Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be cheesed off with Universal Credit entry fees?

1000 replies

MaturingCheeseball · 28/06/2026 11:43

I know it’s been done before, but…

I thought I’d like to visit Chatsworth House with (teenage) dd. The cost is £33 each PLUS parking at £7.50. So £73.50.

Then I saw the universal credit/pension credit/pip etc price. THREE POUNDS. And free parking! So £6.00 for two adults (age 17+).

I do not have 12 times as much money as someone on these benefits. I doubt many people do. I’m not begrudging the disadvantaged a day out, but come on! The price differential is ludicrous.

When I saw the £73 price I just decided we couldn’t go, and so be it. But upon seeing the potential for a £6 entry, it made me feel mugged off.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
RubyPowderPuff · 28/06/2026 17:05

I like what I have seen in some EU countries, 25/6 years and under you have free entry to important historical & cultural sites like the the Colosseum in Rome, the Louvre in Paris or the Acropolis in Athens. This is regardless of income or employment status. Maybe National Trust & Co could do similar to encourage people from different walks of life to discover different places.

(I know many museums are free to everyone.)

Sirzy · 28/06/2026 17:07

RSPB already do free entry for under 25s in an effort to encourage more young people in.

DrCoconut · 28/06/2026 17:09

EnvyMakesTheBonesRot · 28/06/2026 16:45

Hiya @MaturingCheeseball. 👋

You are welcome to my discounted ticket (I qualify as I get Carer's Allowance, DH gets PIP).

All you have to do is become a full time carer to your still young, beloved husband and watch him deteriorate day by day in the knowledge that he will eventually end up bed-bound. You will never be able to do anything spontaneously with him ever again without thorough research and meticulous planning that will make your head spin. You will never be able to walk hand in hand down the street with your husband. Ever. Even sitting out in the sun in your own garden with him will involve complicated effort.

These threads are fucking disgusting and people should be ashamed of themselves.

Edited

Absolutely. The demonising of people on benefits is awful. There are some truly disgusting and heartless things being said to and about various vulnerable groups at the moment and it needs to be stopped. Niemoller and all that. I wish you and your DH luck and love in facing what is to come.

Mumwithagreenhouse · 28/06/2026 17:10

@CrosorbledSo you believe that all benefit claimants don’t want to work? So those born with severe disabilities which render them unfit for any kind of work, fall under this category, do they? I had a career & a life altering disability when my husband died suddenly. Leaving DD & I zero choice but to claim. I worked and claimed a top up for years until my disability worsened, now I cannot do any form of work as I cannot stay conscious long enough. But yeah, I just “don’t want to work”…… 😐

Livelovebehappy · 28/06/2026 17:14

Yanbu, but predictably you’ll get the bleeding hearts club accusing you of denying their poor children a day out. That sort of price is beyond a lot of people, but we’re supposed to not complain about that because it hurts the feelings of those who benefit from reduced charges. No doubt the high price is to subsidise those who get in for next to nothing….

CassieCarluccio · 28/06/2026 17:14

RubyPowderPuff · 28/06/2026 17:05

I like what I have seen in some EU countries, 25/6 years and under you have free entry to important historical & cultural sites like the the Colosseum in Rome, the Louvre in Paris or the Acropolis in Athens. This is regardless of income or employment status. Maybe National Trust & Co could do similar to encourage people from different walks of life to discover different places.

(I know many museums are free to everyone.)

Thankfully the UK doesn't do "the EU", so that won't happen here.

FckThisShit · 28/06/2026 17:15

Valpolichella · 28/06/2026 15:09

No, they don’t. Around 40% of UC claimants are in any kind of work. And of those, around 10% work 30 hours or more per week. Those are the governments own statistics.

So then they either have a child under 2, have a severe disability or are a carer to someone with a severe disability. If you have a child between 3 and 12 you have to work 30 hours or you cannot claim. The 10% that work 30 hours is a historical figure as they do not publish that. The rules are not the same now as they once were.

Katypp · 28/06/2026 17:15

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Taxicus · 28/06/2026 17:15

MikeRafone · 28/06/2026 16:37

@Taxicus

Chatsworth is not NT so why would they have a NT strap line?

Not National Trust you say that one. Then my apologies, I've clearly got no point to make.

Machinemasoluem · 28/06/2026 17:16

Mumwithagreenhouse · 28/06/2026 17:02

That’s impossible unless she did have LOTS of kids who have grown up and since moved out. Councils only allocate based on how many of you there are. Single adults get one bedroom flats or studio flats. Also, regardless of whether her kids have grown up and moved out or she miraculously got it some other way, she will be subject to the bedroom tax for 3 of those bedrooms! So she will be paying a SUBSTANTIAL extra amount on top of the <£1,000pm.

Edited

It’s not impossible I know someone paying less than 800 for a four bed council house. In a town where a one bed apartment can go for 900 and a two bed house can be 1300-1400.

I know loads of middle aged empty nesters who were given three bedroom houses years ago and are still rattling around them. It’s very very difficult for a young family to get a council home these days, it makes a lot more sense feeling a bit resentful towards people in council homes than it does UC claimants.
As soon as you stop being eligible for UC you don’t get it but council housed people can live there cheaply for life.

When the cheap days out for UC claimaints was last in the news I had a few pissy comments from boomers about “scrounging” boomers who were given a super cheap life long rental home from the council decades ago. A council house is the ultimate handout.

scoopofmintchocchipicecream · 28/06/2026 17:19

Sugarplumfairy18 · 28/06/2026 17:00

No I am new to this, hence why I’m finding the whole process overwhelming.

i do not blame them. I have said this. But I begrudge the inflated prices which mean we cannot go. Whatever the circumstances/reasons. Just saying it’s my fault because I haven’t claimed is not the point. The truth is at the moment we cannot claim. So again, I am allowed to feel like this.

if my resentment makes me sound horrible then I’m sorry, but life isn’t black and white.

Request alternative provision from the LA.

Having a look IPSEA, SOSSEN and Contact’s websites will help you.

You can claim. People may decide, for a multitude of reasons, not to apply and that is a perfectly valid decision, but that is a choice.

I didn’t say you ‘sounded horrible’.

Your original post certainly sounds like you blame others for you not being able to afford it.

Livelovebehappy · 28/06/2026 17:20

EnvyMakesTheBonesRot · 28/06/2026 16:45

Hiya @MaturingCheeseball. 👋

You are welcome to my discounted ticket (I qualify as I get Carer's Allowance, DH gets PIP).

All you have to do is become a full time carer to your still young, beloved husband and watch him deteriorate day by day in the knowledge that he will eventually end up bed-bound. You will never be able to do anything spontaneously with him ever again without thorough research and meticulous planning that will make your head spin. You will never be able to walk hand in hand down the street with your husband. Ever. Even sitting out in the sun in your own garden with him will involve complicated effort.

These threads are fucking disgusting and people should be ashamed of themselves.

Edited

But can’t you see OP isn’t necessarily saying UC/PIP claimants don’t deserve the discounts, but it shouldn’t be at the expense of denying others the opportunity to give their children the same experience. Clearly the obscene entry fee is to subsidise their offer, so in fact Chatsworth House aren’t subsidising, it’s the rest of the paying public who are. Just because someone isn’t claiming UC, it doesn’t mean they’re rolling about in money fgs.

DrCoconut · 28/06/2026 17:21

thepariscrimefiles · 28/06/2026 15:41

As far as I am aware, once the youngest child is two your friend will need to be actively looking for work in order to be eligible to receive UC. She should have a job coach and should be applying for jobs each week and providing proof of her job searches.

If the earnings are below £7.5k ish (the threshold to get FSM) then maybe. But usually UC will allow SAHM's to claim based on their partner's income. There are no work requirements. But a single mum will be made to work and then called a scrounger for getting possibly less UC than her married counterpart. Tory ideology (the driving force behind UC and the cause of all the hate that's been generated) at its finest.

charliehungerford · 28/06/2026 17:23

Taxicus · 28/06/2026 16:33

Chatsworth House a National Trust Property. The most galling bit of all for me is the National Trust strapline:

"FOREVER, FOR EVERYONE"

Except it's not, is it.

I stopped at a NT property I couldn't afford to visit too OP. I looked at the demographic of aged grey haired seniors with their smart linen trousers and picnic baskets wandering about on the other side of a wall and families with their 4+ children running about on a lawn after I sat with my one on the bit I could afford, a public bench in front of the ticket office where we ate our home made sandwiches after the sheer extravagance of paying the £7 parking.

I confess, not only did I have some ugly thoughts in that moment that I'm not proud of but I gave serious long and hard consideration as to how I could turn to a life of crime and try to break in.

Why dont they scrap the UC scheme completely and instead each individual site have an Open Day once a year where anyone can come for free on a first come first serve basic. With the current social landscape being what it is this would be a much fairer and proportionate solution.

I think that’s rather disingenuous. National Trust membership for a family is very reasonable. It equates to £14 a month for two adults and your children, or for a single parent it’s £9 and if you are a member parking is free. We joined over 30 years ago when the kids were toddlers as it meant cheap days out in London and the surrounding areas when we didn’t have much money.

GillyGillys · 28/06/2026 17:24

BoredZelda · 28/06/2026 16:06

Or, more likely because, they take up the vast majority of the welfare bill and younger people are seeing their wages stagnate, their access to support and healthcare cut, and yet that generation still maintain young people are entitled, and lazy and should just eat fewer takeaways or drink fewer coffees in order to be able to afford their first home.

Whether it is too high or not, it is more protected than any other state benefit, and it is unaffordable.

Interesting to note, I’ve been hearing about all these lazy benefit scroungers since they were known as “dole bludgers” in the 80s. People who never worked a day in their life and lived comfortably off the state. They will be pensioners now, funny how they are considered to have “worked hard all their lives” and are entitled to a triple locked pension.

I thought you needed to have paid in with NI from work?

DrCoconut · 28/06/2026 17:24

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Because disability of self or a family member is a major reason for being entitled to universal credit. they are very much overlapping issues. People whose lives have been devastated resent the implication that they are an undeserving scrounger who is living the high life off the backs of others.

Livelovebehappy · 28/06/2026 17:25

charliehungerford · 28/06/2026 17:23

I think that’s rather disingenuous. National Trust membership for a family is very reasonable. It equates to £14 a month for two adults and your children, or for a single parent it’s £9 and if you are a member parking is free. We joined over 30 years ago when the kids were toddlers as it meant cheap days out in London and the surrounding areas when we didn’t have much money.

Irrelevant anyway as Chatsworth House is not National Trust…

Kirbert2 · 28/06/2026 17:26

DrCoconut · 28/06/2026 17:24

Because disability of self or a family member is a major reason for being entitled to universal credit. they are very much overlapping issues. People whose lives have been devastated resent the implication that they are an undeserving scrounger who is living the high life off the backs of others.

Yep.

The only reason I claim UC is due to the fact that I have a disabled child and can't work.

Pickledonion1999 · 28/06/2026 17:27

FckThisShit · 28/06/2026 17:15

So then they either have a child under 2, have a severe disability or are a carer to someone with a severe disability. If you have a child between 3 and 12 you have to work 30 hours or you cannot claim. The 10% that work 30 hours is a historical figure as they do not publish that. The rules are not the same now as they once were.

Not true at all. The aim is to get people working 30 hours but many do not and they still get paid the benefits as long as they show they are vaguely looking for 30 hours. To say if you don't work 30 hours you cannot claim is ridiculous. They don't just leave people to starve !

EnvyMakesTheBonesRot · 28/06/2026 17:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You are such an empathetic soul, it warms the cockles of the heart!

charliehungerford · 28/06/2026 17:29

Mumwithagreenhouse · 28/06/2026 17:02

That’s impossible unless she did have LOTS of kids who have grown up and since moved out. Councils only allocate based on how many of you there are. Single adults get one bedroom flats or studio flats. Also, regardless of whether her kids have grown up and moved out or she miraculously got it some other way, she will be subject to the bedroom tax for 3 of those bedrooms! So she will be paying a SUBSTANTIAL extra amount on top of the <£1,000pm.

Edited

She has children that have left home, all in their 30’s and 40’s now. She rents a room out to a student which apparently is permitted. She receives a state pension and works part time, and gets a free bus pass so no travel costs. I think her total rent was around £940 last time I discussed it with her.

ElinoristhenewEnid · 28/06/2026 17:30

Pickledonion1999 · 28/06/2026 17:27

Not true at all. The aim is to get people working 30 hours but many do not and they still get paid the benefits as long as they show they are vaguely looking for 30 hours. To say if you don't work 30 hours you cannot claim is ridiculous. They don't just leave people to starve !

Edited

I think you have to earn the equivalent of 30 hours at minimum wage rate. So if you are in higher paid work you can work fewer hours.

Ponoka7 · 28/06/2026 17:30

Crochetandtea · 28/06/2026 14:28

It’s not jealousy. It’s the unfairness of it all. Poor children getting a day out is one thing. I’m all for the welfare state being a safety net. I do not want children to be hungry.
However, two able bodied parents with a huge brood who can’t be arsed to work because( or only work min hours ) they KNOW they honestly will be no better off is another thing. And the entitlement? No you do not have a right to the same standard of living as workers. You do not have a right to a council house, you do not have the right to demand anything if you do not contribute anything.
I think votes should be allocated to tax payers only or at least those with a work history. Too many shirkers voting Labour. Labour is on its way out though so at least that’s something to applaud.

How do asylum seekers, ex prisoners and migrants fit into your plan? What did you think of opening the routes for the Ukrainian people? Do you not believe that we need people to be able to have children? Do you agree with child poverty? Or do you think that we should have better controls so we can dictate wages? I'm genuinely interested.

JustAnotherWhinger · 28/06/2026 17:30

Livelovebehappy · 28/06/2026 17:20

But can’t you see OP isn’t necessarily saying UC/PIP claimants don’t deserve the discounts, but it shouldn’t be at the expense of denying others the opportunity to give their children the same experience. Clearly the obscene entry fee is to subsidise their offer, so in fact Chatsworth House aren’t subsidising, it’s the rest of the paying public who are. Just because someone isn’t claiming UC, it doesn’t mean they’re rolling about in money fgs.

Chatsworth’s entry fee hasn’t changed much since the offer began, according to the bbc article I linked earlier since they brought it in then it’s actually gone down by £2.

The discount scheme is not the reason for the high general entry fee.

NotRightNowPlease · 28/06/2026 17:31

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.