I've seen a lot of your posts on this thread and just thought you were wrong and a bit unbending/narrow-minded.
But now I realise you're just labouring under some misapprehensions.
Since you've totally misunderstood the "no such thing as society" phrase. I do wonder whether you've actually ever read the full text.
It is not a call to selfish individualism. It's actually saying there is not a separate, physical thing that is 'society' that we can rely on - when people call on society to solve their problems - there is only you and me.
That nothing gets done by this notional society entity - it only gets done by individuals. That we should look after ourselves and not expect "society" to look after us.
in other words, when we demand something from society, we're actually making demands on other people - and we should be aware of that.
Moreover that speech says that once we've made ourselves into competent, capable, and self-sufficient people thrn we should (per her speech) help our neighbours.
You may be right that more and more people seem to ignore the last part - but it seems to me that there is a significant difference between quietly getting on with life (albeit naked) where people can ignore you if they want, and being shouty in your garden where people cannot ignore you.
I think your responses come from a place where you have decided that your levels of "standards and decency" should be the norm and seeing people who disagree as being mocking. That's a rather individualistic position to take, rather than the more societal "live and let live" attitude.
You are being judgemental - by definition - having established a set of laws/rules in your head, and then judging others by those rules. Sorry :(