Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think the Weasleys were not actually poor?

152 replies

Jane379 · 21/06/2026 16:40

With the HBO show coming up I've been rereading the books and on several forums discussing them I've noted people describing the Weasleys as poor, saying they're a good portrayal of a poor family etc
I'd seen this before and assumed I must have missed those details but rereading (although not fully finished the series yet), they don't strike me as particularly poor. They have 7 kids which means money is tighter, Ron has hand me downs etc but overall they seem comfortable. Arthur has a steady job, Molly is a SAHM - presumably if they were really in financial trouble she would get a paid job too. A lot of families might find 7 kids financially tricky, rely on hand me downs etc, not holiday abroad much but is that necessarily poor?

I will say my own experience growing up with a single mother in fairly low-paid work was that we did scrimp on various things including holidays (which we never did when I was a child), but we could always afford good enough food, necessary clothes, had a warm house & books etc that I wanted (living in a place with good libraries and various cheaper services helped). A bit like Ron, I went to a school where a lot of people were much more well-off, but I'd never have considered myself poor. That would have felt insulting given far too many people (even more now) lack money for essentials or have enough for basics but not much else.

AIBU?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
sashh · Today 06:33

I don't think Hogwarts is a free school, 7 lots of school fees is probably a significant amount.

Oh and if you want to feel old, watch 'The fortune' - I was watching thinking, he looks familiar, and finally some switch went on and I realised it was Neville Longbottom AKA Matthew Lewis.

SmallTreeDeepRoots · Today 08:25

Minesril · Today 06:17

I like to think that Neville’s father’s wand might have switched allegiances to Neville. One of the biggest themes is the power of love. Perhaps the wand knew what had happened to Frank and wanted to be owned by his son? It certainly never held him back in the fifth book in the DA.

There used to be an excellent set of essays by someone called Red Hen who theorised that Neville didn’t do well his first few years because he didn’t want magic at all, having seen what it had done to his parents. But when Voldemort returned (and Bellatrix escaped Azkaban) he realised he had to get over that if he was to be of any help in the coming war.

Neville is a proto-squib until he gets his own wand. He has to work really hard. Probably character-forming, but a bit cruel really.

The adults are so oblivious to stuff, so much of the time. Largely incapable of dressing for the muggle world. Poor magic outside their specialism. I don’t know if it’s a child-centred view of adults not being interested in important (to a child) things. Or magic makes life so easy that their brains turn to mush.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread