Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be verbally abused by this dog owner

316 replies

moana1234 · Yesterday 23:13

This is an extremely honest account of what happened to me this evening and I am still shook up over now. Out walking my dog with my 2 sons age 2 and 6 dog is very friendly & likes to play, we pass a dog with his male owner and 3 sons near some outdoor fitness equipment both his and my dog are off lead so my dog goes over to say hello both dogs are excited and run in a circle around the fitness equipment. I turned my head and in that moment it is alleged my dog ran and knocked over the man’s son who is obviously upset. I ask if that was my dog and if so I’m sorry and hope the boy is okay. To which I am given a torrent of abuse, the man shouts at me to get my dog under control and on lead. I said sorry she is very friendly and wouldn’t have meant to it was an accident and his dog was playing too. He continued screaming and shouting at me telling me to train my dog and if I didn’t he would train it for me... I was so took aback I asked if he was joking then when he continued shouting I asked if he would just stop so I could firstly put my dog on a lead (I really didn’t need to as she had come back & has good recall but I didn’t want to provoke anything) and secondly not shout round the children (my 6 yr
old was visibly distressed) I got the dog on the lead and as I was walking away he shouted arsehole. I am ashamed to say I was so stressed and upset I actually soiled myself and can’t stop shaking and crying about this. Was I in the wrong here??

OP posts:
PrettyBeachHuts · Today 14:02

ThreadGuardDog · Today 13:51

So you think he would be OK with his child being knocked over if the dog's owner was a man?

No. But I very much doubt the response would have been the same. Especially the name calling. He was angry - perfectly reasonable. He shouted at OP - again perfectly reasonable. OP then apologised and asked if the boy was OK. At that point any further shouting is unnecessary because an apology has been given. But he carried on and then added name calling as OP walked away. That kind of bullying behaviour is saved for women because there’s little chance of a woman turning round and putting him on his arse in response. That’s the point.

You have no idea what this man would have done in another situation. He saw his child was in danger and acted accordingly.

OP's apology should have ended with "I am sorry this has happened, is your child OK?". Trying to minimise the seriousness of what her dog had done, instead of acknowledging the father's right to be angry, was inevitably going to fuel the father's anger.

MandingoAteMyBaby · Today 14:08

ThreadGuardDog · Today 14:01

OP didn’t dismiss his concerns. She apologised and asked if the boy was OK. He carried on shouting.

Well it must have been a shock. You’re there having a nice walk and the kids are playing with the exercise equipment, and suddenly some drooling idiot dog comes screaming in out of nowhere and causes absolute mayhem, the feckless owner tries to make the usual bullshit “friendly” excuse. No surprises the guy gave her an earful.

Really not his fault the OP is such a snowflake that having caused chaos with her idiot dog, she got a dressing down and promptly powersharted her pants.

If it’s not dogs shitting everywhere, it’s dog owners. Sick of it.

A858 · Today 14:09

Interesting view. My first post proposed EQUAL rights for dogs and children, I think this is as dog friendly as it can be. My son loves dogs and would run towards them and grab them, but I don’t let him because he can be a bit rough at this age and I think that dogs have a right to be in the park without getting hurt by toddler hands, even involuntarily. Yet somehow it doesn’t work the other way round and it’s ok for dogs to hurt toddlers involuntarily (and much more seriously). God make this make sense.

Edit sorry this was in response to @ThreadGuardDog

BurtsBeefCrisps · Today 14:14

Firstly, I am really sorry it got so nasty, I have no doubt he would have reacted differently to a man.
I do think there is a tendency from owners who have friendly dogs that its ok to let them off in any circumstances and I wish owners would be more reserved and cautious about this.
In this situation I would have kept my dog back and assessed the situation a bit more but I think he was unnecessary vile. The chances are with 3 kids and a dog he didn’t want his dog running round but he should have had it on the lead really.

Miyagi99 · Today 14:15

You should have put your dog on a lead when you saw them or at least stopped it running over to say hello.

Corgiowner · Today 14:18

Charlize43 · Today 13:30

Dogs are such a nuisance, especially those that the owners have off their leads. I'd really like to see a law passed that dogs must be kept on a lead and muzzled in all public places and at all times.

This would never have happened with a cat. Whoever heard of a cat knocking a boy over... just saying.

Asking again is this workable? How do you define a “public places”? Urban parks obviously comes under the term “public places” and possibly enforceable but remote fields in rural areas not enforceable and arguably unnecessary.
Do we really need to put all dogs leads and muzzle them? I suspect it’s only a small but significant minority that are causing problems. What about responsible dog owners?

Charlize43 · Today 14:21

I'd like to see a law passed that makes all parks dog free... somewhere where kids can run around free without being knocked down.

You don't see cat owners taking their cats to the park and letting them crap in the flower beds... just saying.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 14:25

A858 · Today 14:09

Interesting view. My first post proposed EQUAL rights for dogs and children, I think this is as dog friendly as it can be. My son loves dogs and would run towards them and grab them, but I don’t let him because he can be a bit rough at this age and I think that dogs have a right to be in the park without getting hurt by toddler hands, even involuntarily. Yet somehow it doesn’t work the other way round and it’s ok for dogs to hurt toddlers involuntarily (and much more seriously). God make this make sense.

Edit sorry this was in response to @ThreadGuardDog

Edited

I think it’s about personal responsibility. There are areas in our park where it’s signposted that dogs can be let off the lead, but I think it’s down to all parties in that area to take appropriate precautions if there are kids involved.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 14:26

Charlize43 · Today 14:21

I'd like to see a law passed that makes all parks dog free... somewhere where kids can run around free without being knocked down.

You don't see cat owners taking their cats to the park and letting them crap in the flower beds... just saying.

So where do dogs go that they can run around free then ? As I’ve said a couple of times, there is clear signposting in our local park in an area specifically where dogs can be let off the lead. Whatever happened to personal responsibility ? If you don’t like dogs, then don’t go into that area.

FourSevenThree · Today 14:27

ThreadGuardDog · Today 13:39

Read the OP again. She apologised and asked if the boy was OK and was met with a torrent of abuse. The conversation about her dog just being friendly came after. The mans’ own dog was off the lead too so likely contributing to the situation.

Yes. Ok, let's reorder.

She let her off lead dog approach the other dog near three other children without communication whether it is ok.
She didn't even see her dog knocking the child away.
She didn’t mention immediately calling it back and saw no reason to put it on the lead (even just to reassure the child the dog won't approach it again).

When he asked her to (yes, in a shouty way), she said : I said sorry she is very friendly and wouldn’t have meant to it was an accident and his dog was playing too.
That's not an apology. That's a set of lame excuses. I wouldn't be surprised if someone started shouting hearing that.

People are sick of dog owners not controlling their dogs and babbling about "friendly" as if it meant anything.

Charlize43 · Today 14:29

Corgiowner · Today 14:18

Asking again is this workable? How do you define a “public places”? Urban parks obviously comes under the term “public places” and possibly enforceable but remote fields in rural areas not enforceable and arguably unnecessary.
Do we really need to put all dogs leads and muzzle them? I suspect it’s only a small but significant minority that are causing problems. What about responsible dog owners?

I'm not totally unreasonable.

I wouldn't expect a responsible dog owner to have to wear a muzzle... although it might stop them from saying the annoying 'Fido's just being friendly' after the mutt's put its muddy paws and drool over you.

Gloriia · Today 14:35

pikkumyy77 · Today 13:57

Not true at all. Its a built in part of an animals flight reflex. Voiding occurs naturally as the body gets ready to run.

It doesn't.

Charlize43 · Today 14:40

ThreadGuardDog · Today 14:26

So where do dogs go that they can run around free then ? As I’ve said a couple of times, there is clear signposting in our local park in an area specifically where dogs can be let off the lead. Whatever happened to personal responsibility ? If you don’t like dogs, then don’t go into that area.

So where do dogs go that they can run around free then ?

Nowhere.

Think of the pavements... No more having to scrape dog shit from your shoes.

Gloriia · Today 14:40

flumpmonster · Today 13:22

You might be aware of it but this reply quite clearly shows that you don’t understand it. You don’t get to decide what a stranger perceives as a threat in a situation you didn’t even witness. But sure keep on dishing out the ridiculous medical advice if it makes you feel superior.

I 'understand it'. Everyone would be soiling themselves every day the amount of wound up people you see having altercations.

If someone 'soils' over a run in with someone over their nuisance dog they need some help to develop strategies to cope and also maybe inco pads until they've been checked out by a hcp.

Ilovethecaptain · Today 14:40

Corgiowner · Today 12:31

Im sorry IMO both were at fault unless the shouting man had clearly said I don’t want your dog chasing mine.
My friends dog loves to chase other dogs in circles we were in a field and he was busy chasing another dog he knew, same breed, the owner was smiling saying “it’s lovely to see them having a run” if the owner had a child and had either dog had knocked the child over both owners would have been at fault (if you gave to blame anyone for an accident) for allowing their dogs to chase each other when a child is close by.

I understand that's your opinion but it's objectively inaccurate. The fault lies with the owner of the dog who caused harm. You're fine to be outraged by it but it's fact.

Gloriia · Today 14:43

ThreadGuardDog · Today 14:26

So where do dogs go that they can run around free then ? As I’ve said a couple of times, there is clear signposting in our local park in an area specifically where dogs can be let off the lead. Whatever happened to personal responsibility ? If you don’t like dogs, then don’t go into that area.

We have a dog. Its never off lead around kids and she is very calm and good natured.

Dogs should be on lead where other members of the public are around, only off on a beach/fields where you can clearly if there are kids approaching.

Corgiowner · Today 14:46

So just parks. How is this going to be enforced? I think muzzles are unnecessary if on leads.
A few years ago I went a NT place a very large fenced dog free area around the house, heaving in dogs on leads and off leads no one enforcing it. No one is even able to enforce dog fowling.
I completely understand that out of control dogs are at best a bloody nuisance at worst can be dangerous but surely there has to be a middle path between all dogs on leads and wearing muzzles and allowing dogs galloping around the local park on a sunny Sunday afternoon eating everyone’s picnic and knocking people over. I also personally don’t think dogs should be allowed in shops like JL ans don’t think dogs want to go in JL. But cafes etc well behaved dogs what’s the problem.
I don’t think we should underestimate the pleasure dogs give to people (not just their owners) and the health benefits often derived from them. I regularly walk mine and being a rare breed I get lots of comments and questions about them I live alone I enjoy the interactions but it’s also very obvious that those who talk too me many don’t own dogs also enjoy the interaction
I know it’s popular on here to take the extreme view on everything but in my experience taking the middle road is often the best way forward.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 14:49

FourSevenThree · Today 14:27

Yes. Ok, let's reorder.

She let her off lead dog approach the other dog near three other children without communication whether it is ok.
She didn't even see her dog knocking the child away.
She didn’t mention immediately calling it back and saw no reason to put it on the lead (even just to reassure the child the dog won't approach it again).

When he asked her to (yes, in a shouty way), she said : I said sorry she is very friendly and wouldn’t have meant to it was an accident and his dog was playing too.
That's not an apology. That's a set of lame excuses. I wouldn't be surprised if someone started shouting hearing that.

People are sick of dog owners not controlling their dogs and babbling about "friendly" as if it meant anything.

You and a few other posters are suggesting that OP offered up the fact that the dog was only being friendly as an actual apology. If you read the OP that’s not what happened. She apologised immediately and asked if the child was OK. The conversation about the dog being friendly came after that, and she was still being yelled at while she was trying to put the lead back on.

OP approached with her own children and this man had his own dog off the lead. So why does the necessity to put it back on the lead not apply just as much to him ?

ThreadGuardDog · Today 14:54

Gloriia · Today 14:40

I 'understand it'. Everyone would be soiling themselves every day the amount of wound up people you see having altercations.

If someone 'soils' over a run in with someone over their nuisance dog they need some help to develop strategies to cope and also maybe inco pads until they've been checked out by a hcp.

OP says it’s only ever happened once. And clearly everyone is different so that’s why you don’t see it happening every day. Doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen, and it doesn’t signify illness. Your insinuation that OP has some sort of a mental health problem and needs to wear incontinence pads would be hilarious if it wasn’t so insulting.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 14:55

Charlize43 · Today 14:40

So where do dogs go that they can run around free then ?

Nowhere.

Think of the pavements... No more having to scrape dog shit from your shoes.

Christ, I don’t know where you live, but around here we take doggy bags and use them.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 14:56

Miyagi99 · Today 14:15

You should have put your dog on a lead when you saw them or at least stopped it running over to say hello.

And likewise the man should have put his own dog on a lead when he saw OP approaching,

JohnofWessex · Today 14:57

Dog, or really Dog Owner licensing cant come soon enough.

In particular owners or potential owners need to have it imprinted on their minds what is and is not acceptable behaviour for their dog.

Charlize43 · Today 14:58

Corgiowner · Today 14:46

So just parks. How is this going to be enforced? I think muzzles are unnecessary if on leads.
A few years ago I went a NT place a very large fenced dog free area around the house, heaving in dogs on leads and off leads no one enforcing it. No one is even able to enforce dog fowling.
I completely understand that out of control dogs are at best a bloody nuisance at worst can be dangerous but surely there has to be a middle path between all dogs on leads and wearing muzzles and allowing dogs galloping around the local park on a sunny Sunday afternoon eating everyone’s picnic and knocking people over. I also personally don’t think dogs should be allowed in shops like JL ans don’t think dogs want to go in JL. But cafes etc well behaved dogs what’s the problem.
I don’t think we should underestimate the pleasure dogs give to people (not just their owners) and the health benefits often derived from them. I regularly walk mine and being a rare breed I get lots of comments and questions about them I live alone I enjoy the interactions but it’s also very obvious that those who talk too me many don’t own dogs also enjoy the interaction
I know it’s popular on here to take the extreme view on everything but in my experience taking the middle road is often the best way forward.

Trust me, there is no pleasure in dogs. Yes, most dog owners are alone because of the doggy smell...

Quite simply this could enforced with the use of rifles. This is MN. It's extreme.

Wait til the poop trolls discover and descend on this thread.

Corgiowner · Today 14:59

Charlize43 · Today 14:29

I'm not totally unreasonable.

I wouldn't expect a responsible dog owner to have to wear a muzzle... although it might stop them from saying the annoying 'Fido's just being friendly' after the mutt's put its muddy paws and drool over you.

I could say I’m tired of people calling my dog over crouching down waggling their hands in his face making squeaky noises touching his enormous ears (which he doesn’t really like) and then complaining he’s jumped up at them complaining he’s muddy or licks them. Ignore him and he ignores you talk to him try and attract his attention then don’t moan if he comes over jumps up etc.
Or my other very human uninterested dog who people insist on trying to touch because she’s “soooo pretty” even though she very obviously doesn’t like it and are asked too leave her alone.
But do you know what I accept that it’s not a perfect world many people don’t understand dogs and there are dog owners who don’t train their properly.

Corgiowner · Today 15:04

Charlize43 · Today 14:58

Trust me, there is no pleasure in dogs. Yes, most dog owners are alone because of the doggy smell...

Quite simply this could enforced with the use of rifles. This is MN. It's extreme.

Wait til the poop trolls discover and descend on this thread.

Trust me I’m not alone because of the “doggy smell”! 🤣
There is research that dog owners are less likely to develop dementia. Apparently it’s because 1. They exercise more and 2. They interact/socialise with people when walking the dog one of proven way to reduce your risk of dementia and slow down its progression.