Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Harry Windsor getting upset about Peter Phillips

115 replies

WhenTheDustSettles · 06/06/2026 10:31

Am I missing something? There is a story in the press today about Harry refusing to go to Peter Phillips's wedding, allegedly because he sold his first wedding to Hello (or OK) magazine. What am I missing here - these magazines have featured Kate and William's wedding, Sophie and Edward, Eugenie and Jack, loads of them. Including his own wedding to Meghan. I thought that's just what they do, so what's Harry's issue? Is it that Peter Phillips got paid and the rest didn't?

The excuse given by Harry is something to do with upsetting him about his girlfriend Chelsy Davy. He's supposedly so happy with Meghan, so why does anything to do with Chelsy bother him now?

For info, this is not a "royal bashing" "Meghan bashing" post. It's to get understanding of how these things work.

OP posts:
Mcdhotchoc · 07/06/2026 11:01

I'm sure there must be a thread somewhere" AIBU not to invite my husbands first cousin and wife to my wedding? They an 11 hour flight away and have 2 young children. I have never met them. They might also steal the limelight on my special day."
Equally "my fiancé's uncle has excepted but it leaving straight after the ceremony to go to the races."

WhatTheHellsGoingOn · 07/06/2026 11:08

Tshirtking · 06/06/2026 10:35

He isn't going because he wasn't invited.

This

Arjan · 07/06/2026 11:29

Talltreesbythelake · 07/06/2026 10:46

That doesn't apply to H though. They are very wealthy and have nannies and staff. They fly to many destinations each year for photo-ops. This would have been the money shot. H with Royal adjacency. Kerching!

This.

I absolutely think H would have rocked up solo if he had been invited (unless of course the elite tax payer funded security was not afforded to him). I think M would not have been seen dead attending it.

JacknDiane · 07/06/2026 11:32

As if anyone on mn know op, I mean c'mon

Clearinguptheclutter · 07/06/2026 11:35

i wouldn’t indulge the mail with their ridiculous stories

but it’s true that Peter Phillips was paid for the whole exclusive thing with Hello and interview etc

for other royal weddings Hello would have paid for “pool” official photos, none were their own

Della19 · 07/06/2026 12:24

WhenTheDustSettles · 06/06/2026 10:31

Am I missing something? There is a story in the press today about Harry refusing to go to Peter Phillips's wedding, allegedly because he sold his first wedding to Hello (or OK) magazine. What am I missing here - these magazines have featured Kate and William's wedding, Sophie and Edward, Eugenie and Jack, loads of them. Including his own wedding to Meghan. I thought that's just what they do, so what's Harry's issue? Is it that Peter Phillips got paid and the rest didn't?

The excuse given by Harry is something to do with upsetting him about his girlfriend Chelsy Davy. He's supposedly so happy with Meghan, so why does anything to do with Chelsy bother him now?

For info, this is not a "royal bashing" "Meghan bashing" post. It's to get understanding of how these things work.

Why do you care?

LoudTealHare · 07/06/2026 15:54

WhenTheDustSettles · 06/06/2026 10:31

Am I missing something? There is a story in the press today about Harry refusing to go to Peter Phillips's wedding, allegedly because he sold his first wedding to Hello (or OK) magazine. What am I missing here - these magazines have featured Kate and William's wedding, Sophie and Edward, Eugenie and Jack, loads of them. Including his own wedding to Meghan. I thought that's just what they do, so what's Harry's issue? Is it that Peter Phillips got paid and the rest didn't?

The excuse given by Harry is something to do with upsetting him about his girlfriend Chelsy Davy. He's supposedly so happy with Meghan, so why does anything to do with Chelsy bother him now?

For info, this is not a "royal bashing" "Meghan bashing" post. It's to get understanding of how these things work.

So because it’s in the press, it has to be true 🤦‍♀️ I think you will find they were not invited as although once close like the rest of his family he’s estranged from Peter!

AmazingGreatAunt · 07/06/2026 16:12

Harry was not invited.
Probably for all the reasons posted above, possibly because the cousins are not that close and perhaps because he actually lives too far away (and would have found it difficult to cadge a lift in a private jet).
The gutter press loves to invent stories. Look for the words likely, could and might!

Boomer55 · 07/06/2026 16:29

It’s probably best to stop reading made up journalism. 🤷‍♀️

WhenTheDustSettles · 07/06/2026 23:02

Della19 · 07/06/2026 12:24

Why do you care?

I don't "care" but you don't have to really care about something to be able to talk about it do you. The main point of my question was what was the difference between Peter's first wedding appearing in a celeb mag and him getting grief about it and Harry, William, Eugenie and others not. That's been answered.

I'm now also enlightened that the rest of the stuff and spurious reasons put forward on the press about Harry not going are 🐂💩.

It also doesn't mean that because I wanted to discuss what's been printed that I believe what's been printed. It was obvious that bringing Chelsey into it was a big reach.

OP posts:
Teached · 07/06/2026 23:12

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 06/06/2026 13:34

Lol, they've turned up.
Watch the thread descend into the usual batshittery 😂

Yes, what a complete surprise🙄 Literally no one missed the mad glut of '...I don't want this to turn into a H&M bashing thread BUT...'

The little knot of MNers who post inane crap at the mere mention of Harry and Meghan names never sleeps.

LewKirtonHeavenInTheAfternoonNSOul · 07/06/2026 23:22

dnadiscoveryquery · 06/06/2026 10:33

I wouldn’t believe a word the Mail printed. They have a very clear vendetta against Harry and Meghan.

The Mail has a vendetta against most of humanity.

LBFseBrom · 07/06/2026 23:30

WhenTheDustSettles · 06/06/2026 10:31

Am I missing something? There is a story in the press today about Harry refusing to go to Peter Phillips's wedding, allegedly because he sold his first wedding to Hello (or OK) magazine. What am I missing here - these magazines have featured Kate and William's wedding, Sophie and Edward, Eugenie and Jack, loads of them. Including his own wedding to Meghan. I thought that's just what they do, so what's Harry's issue? Is it that Peter Phillips got paid and the rest didn't?

The excuse given by Harry is something to do with upsetting him about his girlfriend Chelsy Davy. He's supposedly so happy with Meghan, so why does anything to do with Chelsy bother him now?

For info, this is not a "royal bashing" "Meghan bashing" post. It's to get understanding of how these things work.

That is nonsense, probably came from 'a source close to'. Harry would not have refused an invitation for that reason and, at the time, nobody thought much of it. There were a few sniffs but that's all, soon forgotten.

Zara and Mike did the same for their wedding. I remember seeing the photos in the magazine. Again, no big fuss.

The cousins have always been close. By royal standards this was a fairly simple, small affair, there were probably several people who couldn't go. It looked lovely.

LBFseBrom · 07/06/2026 23:31

LewKirtonHeavenInTheAfternoonNSOul · 07/06/2026 23:22

The Mail has a vendetta against most of humanity.

It really is a scurrilous rag.

TheBerry · Yesterday 08:53

I wouldn't be happy if somebody I knew sold a story of mine to the papers for personal financial gain. Would you?

I also wouldn't be happy if they were unpleasant to my ex, my friend, my partner, my parents, or anyone really. Would you?

Renamedefault · Yesterday 08:57

Let me guess, was the story from a “source close to [insert]” - if so, total bollocks.

Arjan · Yesterday 09:18

Renamedefault · Yesterday 08:57

Let me guess, was the story from a “source close to [insert]” - if so, total bollocks.

We know they ALL have their favourite royal reporters to leak to.

We know, when Harry was single, he was shagging a Daily Mail reporter and giving her info about his activities and whereabouts, we know he was inadvertently revealed as the ‘source’ for a People magazine article, when some junior copywriter revealed the ‘source’ was a personal email from Harry,. We know Meghan uses her friends as sources to get her message out nd we know she and Harry were the source for Omid Scobie book. We know Camilla’s son is a journalist and Camilla, Eugenie, Beatrice are buddies with Jeremy Clarkson.

Harry and Meghan invite journalists into their home, allow friends to speak to reporters on their behalf, have curated a long list of media friends to push whatever agenda is of the moment.

H&M and the RF have PR teams working full time for them, Claiming ‘a source’ disclosed some information is not the utter bollocks people like to think it is.

TorroFerney · Yesterday 09:19

WhenTheDustSettles · 06/06/2026 10:46

You what? What a very weird reply. Why do I need a hug from you? How odd.

Edited

They are being sarcastic/taking the mickey!

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · Yesterday 09:27

Arjan · Yesterday 09:18

We know they ALL have their favourite royal reporters to leak to.

We know, when Harry was single, he was shagging a Daily Mail reporter and giving her info about his activities and whereabouts, we know he was inadvertently revealed as the ‘source’ for a People magazine article, when some junior copywriter revealed the ‘source’ was a personal email from Harry,. We know Meghan uses her friends as sources to get her message out nd we know she and Harry were the source for Omid Scobie book. We know Camilla’s son is a journalist and Camilla, Eugenie, Beatrice are buddies with Jeremy Clarkson.

Harry and Meghan invite journalists into their home, allow friends to speak to reporters on their behalf, have curated a long list of media friends to push whatever agenda is of the moment.

H&M and the RF have PR teams working full time for them, Claiming ‘a source’ disclosed some information is not the utter bollocks people like to think it is.

But they also brief against each other. There are always ' rival' stories where they are trying to get one over on someone in their family by claiming something or another. The AMW stories and the house stories for a start. One person said Charles was soft of Andrew and William put his foot down, next mi ute William is calling him to sympathise because he's worried about his mental health. One minute ute Charles is paying the York girls rent then suddenly a story pips up that William is going to have a review of Royal properties when he's King. It's almost as if they have too many staff and not enough to do...

Arjan · Yesterday 09:33

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · Yesterday 09:27

But they also brief against each other. There are always ' rival' stories where they are trying to get one over on someone in their family by claiming something or another. The AMW stories and the house stories for a start. One person said Charles was soft of Andrew and William put his foot down, next mi ute William is calling him to sympathise because he's worried about his mental health. One minute ute Charles is paying the York girls rent then suddenly a story pips up that William is going to have a review of Royal properties when he's King. It's almost as if they have too many staff and not enough to do...

I absolutely agree.

The RF don’t have fulltime PR and communications departments for nothing, in the same way H&M have in house PR teams, based in not only the US, but also in the UK, as well as external PR companies working on their behalf. We know from Harry in Spare and his ex PR employees, their PR people are pretty much worked to the bone by H&M.

LaliqueSaltGrinder · Yesterday 09:36

If your cousin had spent the last 5 or 6 years badmouthing your family all over social media, telly and in podcasts, then had moved to the other side of the world saying he wanted nothing more to do with the lot of you, would you invite that cousin to your wedding? Especially when you knew that attention would be on the cousin and his wife, rather than the you as the groom and your new bride?

Course you wouldn't.

SleepingStandingUp · Yesterday 09:42

WhenTheDustSettles · 06/06/2026 11:06

Of course I didn't think that, seriously or otherwise, and that's not what I asked. Some quite weird replies here this morning, aren't there? I asked about what the problem was about Peter Phillips getting paid for his wedding in the magazine in 2008. I'm not a print journalist, so I don't know those things. However someone has given an answer without sarcasm or smart alec-ness.

the point is there Isn't a problem. it seems near improbable that Harry has said to anyone "oh we're not going cos of what he did last time". If he's felt the need to justify not going and not wanted to admit he isn't invited, I'm sure he'd just cite a lack of personal security

Arjan · Yesterday 09:56

He can’t cite lack of personal security as the reason, because with the King, Queen and the Kings heir at the event the level of security will be the highest level any RF event demands.

I wouldn’t be surprised if he did use the privacy thing as an excuse, it also makes the point and reminds others he is not the only one who breached his family’s privacy.

I do think he wasn’t invited though.

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · Yesterday 11:01

LaliqueSaltGrinder · Yesterday 09:36

If your cousin had spent the last 5 or 6 years badmouthing your family all over social media, telly and in podcasts, then had moved to the other side of the world saying he wanted nothing more to do with the lot of you, would you invite that cousin to your wedding? Especially when you knew that attention would be on the cousin and his wife, rather than the you as the groom and your new bride?

Course you wouldn't.

Is this the Peter Phillips who sold his first wedding to Hello Magazine, allowed pictures to be published of Kate demonstrating that William had let her go alone to meet his family for the first time while he flew to his ex girlfriends wedding, then years later broke COVID restrictions by having an affair and travelling to meet his lover, subsequently breaking up his marriage? Although like the rest of them he probably thinks no crime is worse than leaving and inviting scrutiny on them.

HoppingPavlova · Yesterday 11:24

LaliqueSaltGrinder · Yesterday 09:36

If your cousin had spent the last 5 or 6 years badmouthing your family all over social media, telly and in podcasts, then had moved to the other side of the world saying he wanted nothing more to do with the lot of you, would you invite that cousin to your wedding? Especially when you knew that attention would be on the cousin and his wife, rather than the you as the groom and your new bride?

Course you wouldn't.

This. How is this not common sense OP?
The whole wedding would have been everyone side eyeing Harry, not one eye would have been on bride/groom, so why on earth would he have been invited?