Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Who's this new celebrity groper ?

322 replies

Daygloboo · 06/06/2026 09:40

Who's this new celebrity groper who's been ' hauled in' for questioning. I'm beginning to think they've got a supply of them at the BBC that they keep in a cupboard and they let one out evwry now and then when there's a bit if a slow news day.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 09/06/2026 11:49

MulberryBrandy · 09/06/2026 09:34

You are right that it was known - David Sullivan was widely known to have a conviction for living off immoral earnings. He was also known for the fact it was him that fast-tracked Karren Brady, I think he was a friend of her father, to start off her career - the reason I have always avoided anything to do with her.

Edited

Karren's daughter has gone into the same kind of line as her good pal DS promotes. Obviously, as an adult, she can make her own choices; but it does make you wonder whether it was her mum's connections that led her down that path originally.

Karren acts all high and mighty on The Apprentice and criticises the young contestants for foolish or rash mistakes and errors of judgement; but I wonder how many of them have a fraction of the murky contacts in their phones as she does?

mumofoneAloneandwell · 09/06/2026 11:51

Do we know who this is yet? 👀

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 09/06/2026 11:56

MulberryBrandy · 09/06/2026 11:24

This is the cynical tactic that Sullivan is using, as usual, to downplay and denigrate:

"after a lifetime spent building businesses in the adult industry in which I have met thousands of women, it is sadly inevitable that a small number of improper conduct claims are being made against me".

Although some of it is quite a while ago, a lot of the victims were very young women - there must be dozens.

He's on record comparing himself favourably in comparison to people involved in the tobacco or arms industries, saying that at least he (supposedly) doesn't kill or harm people.

All the women he has exploited for decades are literally of no importance to him; they're non-persons. None of the harm to them matters in the slightest - they're just things to be used until there's no more money to be made from them.

I can't believe he really believes that, because hundreds of poor, desperate, vulnerable, abused young women haven't found themselves able to stand against him, that means they're all happy and having a whale of a time. It's the same kind of tactic used by dictators, whereby they claim the lack of public dissent as widespread happiness with the situation... when we all know very well what tends to happen to anybody who does dare to dissent.

MulberryBrandy · 09/06/2026 12:11

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 09/06/2026 11:49

Karren's daughter has gone into the same kind of line as her good pal DS promotes. Obviously, as an adult, she can make her own choices; but it does make you wonder whether it was her mum's connections that led her down that path originally.

Karren acts all high and mighty on The Apprentice and criticises the young contestants for foolish or rash mistakes and errors of judgement; but I wonder how many of them have a fraction of the murky contacts in their phones as she does?

I didn't know about her daughter - as I say I have avoided anything to do with Karren Brady. There are/were some horrendous Davids - Sullivan, Gold, Hunt involved in underhand things.

MulberryBrandy · 09/06/2026 12:19

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 09/06/2026 11:56

He's on record comparing himself favourably in comparison to people involved in the tobacco or arms industries, saying that at least he (supposedly) doesn't kill or harm people.

All the women he has exploited for decades are literally of no importance to him; they're non-persons. None of the harm to them matters in the slightest - they're just things to be used until there's no more money to be made from them.

I can't believe he really believes that, because hundreds of poor, desperate, vulnerable, abused young women haven't found themselves able to stand against him, that means they're all happy and having a whale of a time. It's the same kind of tactic used by dictators, whereby they claim the lack of public dissent as widespread happiness with the situation... when we all know very well what tends to happen to anybody who does dare to dissent.

Yes he is full of himself and claims he: "created the image of Mary Millington - I was like the Simon Cowell of the sex industry".

This was a glamour model and Sullivan's girlfriend who took her own life at 33 years old.

Tryagain26 · 09/06/2026 13:13

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 07/06/2026 10:54

Obviously it's too late to ask him anything now!!

But whilst Bruce was alive, he gave me massive vibes of that kind. The way he used to speak to the female models (never to Brian, though) on The Price Is Right was gross. He sometimes even 'fourth-walled' by speaking provocatively (and predator-like imho) to the audience about the models, but not actually to them; and making 'phwooaar!!' gestures about these attractive young women who were sometimes young enough to be his granddaughters. Also how keen he was to get right up close to 'help' pretty young women who were reaching up high to pull the showdown wheel - but never the elderly women or the men.

He even frequently did it to the women of the couples on Play Your Cards Right, with their fiancés standing right there next to them. As well as to the models, of course... what was it he called them - 'dollies'? Bleeuurgh.

Edited

Sadly that was just very common behaviour by men in the 70s. Watch any Carry on film or most 7s sitcoms I grew up in the 70a and looking back I think every male TV presenter behaved like that with young women and extremely patronising with older women

Topsyturveymam · 09/06/2026 13:15

When my friend talked about her run in with him she was upset and felt naive. She was obviously upset about her experience and we talked about it just after it happened in the early 90s.
As soon as I heard the women talking about what he did to them, I knew it was the truth as they described my friends experience exactly. He must use the same formula every time.

Sullivan invited her to look around his house, they got to the bedroom and then he said if she’d want to do modelling he’d have to see her body. When she was in her underwear he went to touch her breasts. She backed away. He then made the statement about how sleeping with him would make them good friends and that would be advantageous for her career. She refused again …then he gave a little monologue about being ugly and older and he knew she didn’t want to have sex with him …but they would both get something out of this. He knew she found him repulsive …but almost wanted her to do it despite this …as if manipulation and a notch on his bedpost …making a woman do this despite her repulsion was the win for him.

khw666 · 09/06/2026 13:22

I worked with a girl who tried to get onto page 3 of the sport. To be honest she wasn't good looking but had big breasts and the sport were less fussy and she said god gave me these I am going to use them. It seemed to be an easy way to get money for women back then - I imagine today she would be on onlyfans.

There was also a documentary about the sport and women were falling over themselves to get onto page 3 or dance at their roadshows. Not my cup of tea at all, but it was different back then and for some (especially working class) girls it was a dream.

InLoveWithAI · 09/06/2026 13:23

mumofoneAloneandwell · 09/06/2026 11:51

Do we know who this is yet? 👀

Wondering the same. Read the whole thread, but dunno if the thread got off track, or they aree discussing who it is supposed to be.

Daygloboo · 09/06/2026 13:25

Tryanalogue · 08/06/2026 23:05

The BBC radio news all day today was an advert for their Panorama programme.

It’s non-news. A pornographer was ungentlemanly toward prospective bare chest models.

"ungentlemanly" ?????

OP posts:
Tryagain26 · 09/06/2026 13:26

Daygloboo · 07/06/2026 12:29

But we pay for them and they are supposed to be impartial and upstanding, so it does matter. It's why people speculate and want to know if they are personally financially contributing towards employing creeps and charlatans and rapists and god knows what else.

But we also pay for Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney plus etc . Every organisation headed by successful men with have scandals like this.
Especially if they are historical scandals from a time when people were much less aware of what is and isn't acceptable and when people in the entertainment industry thought they could get away with anything because of who they were.

Piggywaspushed · 09/06/2026 13:29

I suspect your 'celebrity' is Tony Livesey, employed now by the BBC. Not the big star that the tabloids were trying to suggest.

The stuff about Sullivan is disgusting and not a surprise to anyone because he was the self styled 'king of porn'. I assume Karren Brady stepped down form West Ham a few weeks ago because she knew this would blow up.

Daygloboo · 09/06/2026 13:40

JanisFortescue · 09/06/2026 10:44

This question always comes up in cases like this. I can explain it from personal experience, if it helps, having been involved in goings on involving a different "celebrity" a few years ago.

When something like this happens, it is always a shock, even if the person has previously been kind of flirtatious/inappropriate. But the biggest thing is that it's as if they have suddenly given you some kind of power over them, which you never asked for and didn't want. They realise you might tell someone about it, and you have absolutely no idea who you can tell without it getting out and potentially implicating you in a huge scandal. It's as though someone has handed you a dangerous animal to look after: you can't really offload it to anyone else, because they probably won't want it either. And you feel like you're stuck with this enormous burden you're expected to carry on the person's behalf, and over time that becomes too much to bear. Every time you see them being written about in public, every time your colleagues discuss them, you can feel the anger rising and you're powerless to do anything.

It's not so much a case of wanting them to be punished, or to suffer; for me, it was the sense that I wasn't allowed to say it, you know, just actually say out loud what they had done, even if it wasn't that bad in the scheme of things, because it would cause so much trouble. I don't like attention, but I also don't like being expected to keep secrets, because it feels wrong. So that's why I obsessively looked on social media for other people writing about the guy I had the experience with, and when I saw that someone else had said the same, I got in touch with her and it all cascaded from there.

It was horrific, even though I stayed largely anonymous; I told some people I knew, or half-knew, and lots of them contacted me wanting to know more, or to apologise because they were friends with him. I thought he had some serious psychological issues, that's all. But knowing he had assaulted several other women helped me to decide I had to do something.

I sometimes felt like people didn't really believe me and it made a lot of those former acquaintanceships quite awkward, too awkward to continue in some cases. So I regret it in a sense. But I don't feel that there was much else I could do. It was simply getting too heavy to bear, especially as he would frequently write about how wrong it was for people to get away with sexual assault. The hypocrisy was too galling to watch and the anger I felt was harming my own mental state. So that's just my perspective, as to why wait. Because you don't feel brave enough, and it could cost you a great deal if you say anything.

Edited

O think it"'s very useful.that you have explained it here so that people understand the details. It makes sense, what you are saying.

OP posts:
Daygloboo · 09/06/2026 13:43

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 09/06/2026 11:56

He's on record comparing himself favourably in comparison to people involved in the tobacco or arms industries, saying that at least he (supposedly) doesn't kill or harm people.

All the women he has exploited for decades are literally of no importance to him; they're non-persons. None of the harm to them matters in the slightest - they're just things to be used until there's no more money to be made from them.

I can't believe he really believes that, because hundreds of poor, desperate, vulnerable, abused young women haven't found themselves able to stand against him, that means they're all happy and having a whale of a time. It's the same kind of tactic used by dictators, whereby they claim the lack of public dissent as widespread happiness with the situation... when we all know very well what tends to happen to anybody who does dare to dissent.

Spot on

OP posts:
Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 09/06/2026 13:45

Piggywaspushed · 09/06/2026 13:29

I suspect your 'celebrity' is Tony Livesey, employed now by the BBC. Not the big star that the tabloids were trying to suggest.

The stuff about Sullivan is disgusting and not a surprise to anyone because he was the self styled 'king of porn'. I assume Karren Brady stepped down form West Ham a few weeks ago because she knew this would blow up.

Oh. Never heard of him.

JanisFortescue · 09/06/2026 13:46

Daygloboo · 09/06/2026 13:40

O think it"'s very useful.that you have explained it here so that people understand the details. It makes sense, what you are saying.

Glad if it helps. I was very fortunate in that the woman who did put her head above the parapet was well known and well loved, so I was able to sort of cling to her coat tails on this and that helped massively. I think without having that sort of assurance that you're going to be believed, where do you even turn with something like this? I spoke with the man's employers but they said I'd be locked out of the investigation and wouldn't even be told the outcome, so I backed off. I was terrified he would somehow retaliate. The power imbalance is tremendous when you don't have a high profile or much professional standing yourself. It's only by chance and extreme kindness of the other woman/women involved that I was able to offload that burden to an extent. Many women never get that chance.

Piggywaspushed · 09/06/2026 14:04

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 09/06/2026 13:45

Oh. Never heard of him.

Well, if you read about Sullivan you'll find Livesey's name.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 09/06/2026 14:06

Piggywaspushed · 09/06/2026 14:04

Well, if you read about Sullivan you'll find Livesey's name.

Yes but I don’t even know Sullivan. What I mean more is it’s not the BBC household name that the tabloids were saying and not Gregg Wallace.

MulberryBrandy · 09/06/2026 14:23

Piggywaspushed · 09/06/2026 13:29

I suspect your 'celebrity' is Tony Livesey, employed now by the BBC. Not the big star that the tabloids were trying to suggest.

The stuff about Sullivan is disgusting and not a surprise to anyone because he was the self styled 'king of porn'. I assume Karren Brady stepped down form West Ham a few weeks ago because she knew this would blow up.

Yes and now Livesey has stepped down from his radio show.

Piggywaspushed · 09/06/2026 15:01

This is why he was 'hauled in', I presume and the timing was just before Panorama which they obviously will have had to have told him about as he featured.

It is important to note that he was not an employee at the BBC at the time of the allegations/ events.

Piggywaspushed · 09/06/2026 15:02

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 09/06/2026 14:06

Yes but I don’t even know Sullivan. What I mean more is it’s not the BBC household name that the tabloids were saying and not Gregg Wallace.

I believe the reporting was exceedingly vague on the 'household name ' bit. A lot of households listen to sport coverage on the radio.

This may be your age re Sullivan as he was a notorious sleaze.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 09/06/2026 15:10

Piggywaspushed · 09/06/2026 15:02

I believe the reporting was exceedingly vague on the 'household name ' bit. A lot of households listen to sport coverage on the radio.

This may be your age re Sullivan as he was a notorious sleaze.

Well I’m 54 so perhaps it’s my age. Never heard of these man but have heard of Karren Brady.

MulberryBrandy · 09/06/2026 15:13

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 09/06/2026 15:10

Well I’m 54 so perhaps it’s my age. Never heard of these man but have heard of Karren Brady.

Like, Karren Brady, Tony Livesey grew his career in David Sullivan's empire, In Livesey's book he recollects how they had a countdown to 16, in his newspaper, where they could then legally display girls topless.

Piggywaspushed · 09/06/2026 17:52

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 09/06/2026 15:10

Well I’m 54 so perhaps it’s my age. Never heard of these man but have heard of Karren Brady.

Don't remember the Sunday Sport and Lads' mags?

thenightsky · 09/06/2026 18:11

Piggywaspushed · 09/06/2026 17:52

Don't remember the Sunday Sport and Lads' mags?

I'm 67 and remember SS and lads mags well.