Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Political badges should be banned from NHS uniforms

787 replies

Ihatetomatoes · 04/06/2026 08:28

New report says political badges such as Pro Palestine shouldn't be worn on NHS uniforms. It's led to increased antisemitism and fear amongst Jewish patients.

Also NHS uniforms not to be worn on protests.

This report makes a number of suggestions and in my opinion must be implemented. All political badges off NHS uniforms. No NHS uniforms on protests such as pro Palestine. It contributes to racism and fear.

The NHS should treat all patients equally and individuals political opinions shouldn't be pinned on their uniforms.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Fancythatfancyhat · 11/06/2026 17:33

Twiglets1 · 11/06/2026 17:25

It was me who said antivaxxers might feel judged.

You are talking to different people and we are not one homogenous group, we all have different opinions on things.

You also don't need to lecture the person reminding you to not assume someone's intentions and lump everyone in together on the concept of people not being a homogenous group!

PurpleThistle7 · 11/06/2026 17:33

DomPom47 · 11/06/2026 17:27

I think this is where we genuinely differ.
I don’t accept that wearing a Palestine pin means I am prioritising Palestinians over the person in front of me any more than wearing a white poppy means I am prioritising victims of past wars over the patient I am treating that day.
For me, the symbol reflects a moral conviction. It does not alter my duty to the person in front of me, nor does it diminish it.
I agree that symbols have meaning and impact. Where we disagree is that I don’t think the existence of different interpretations automatically means a symbol should be excluded from every professional setting.
You see the presence of the symbol as evidence that I have prioritised a cause over a patient. I see it as entirely possible to hold a moral conviction about suffering elsewhere while still giving my full attention, compassion and professionalism to the person in front of me.
I don’t doubt that your feelings about the symbol are real. I just don’t think that those feelings tell us how I would actually treat a patient. For me, that remains the crucial question.

Well I wouldn’t know that until later. Or never if my son runs out of the room. Harm would have been done instantaneously. I appreciate you might treat me kindly eventually but I’d have no way of knowing that while running after my son.

It’s fine. I don’t think you’re a terrible person. Your views are popular and you’ll have plenty of company. Am sure most people don’t notice, don’t care or agree with you. But I really, really hope to never ever come across you when I need help.

TheKeatingFive · 11/06/2026 17:37

DomPom47 · 11/06/2026 17:20

By that logic, very few symbols achieve anything and yet people wear them all the time. Most of them don’t directly change the world. They express solidarity, values, remembrance or conscience.
My Palestine pin and white poppy is no different. It reflects my opposition to the suffering of Palestinian civilians and what I believe to be a profound humanitarian catastrophe.
Not every expression of a moral conviction has to produce a measurable outcome to have meaning. Sometimes it is simply a way of saying, “I have not chosen to look away.”
The more important question for me is not what the badge achieves, but whether it prevents me from providing compassionate and impartial care. I have seen no evidence that it does.

You can maintain all of that in your own head without involving your patients in it.

Thing is, it shouldn't be about you. It's their needs, their care. None of which has any relevance to your political views.

TheKeatingFive · 11/06/2026 17:39

Fancythatfancyhat · 11/06/2026 17:20

But apparently this isolates antivaxers from accessing care as they feel judged.

You keep bringing someone else's views into this conversation with me. I didn't say that, I don't agree with that, so 🤷‍♀️

DomPom47 · 11/06/2026 17:41

PurpleThistle7 · 11/06/2026 17:33

Well I wouldn’t know that until later. Or never if my son runs out of the room. Harm would have been done instantaneously. I appreciate you might treat me kindly eventually but I’d have no way of knowing that while running after my son.

It’s fine. I don’t think you’re a terrible person. Your views are popular and you’ll have plenty of company. Am sure most people don’t notice, don’t care or agree with you. But I really, really hope to never ever come across you when I need help.

While I understand why a parent would be protective of their child and cautious about anything that makes them uncomfortable, I don’t think it’s fair to assume that wearing a Palestine pin means someone would provide worse care or hold hostility toward Jewish patients.
I also think parents have a responsibility to teach children not to make assumptions about people based solely on a symbol, badge or expression of concern for others. A Palestine pin does not automatically tell you how someone will treat you, what their values are in every respect, or whether they can be trusted to care for a patient professionally and compassionately.
For me, a Palestine pin is not a statement against Jewish people. It is a statement of concern for Palestinian civilians, including children who have been killed, injured, displaced, orphaned, traumatised or denied medical care. All of which are there for all who care and want to see.
Caring about Palestinian children does not diminish concern for Jewish children, or for any other child who needs help. Those concerns are not mutually exclusive.
You say you hope never to come across me when you need help. That’s your choice. But I would still treat you and your child with the same care, dignity and compassion as anyone else, regardless of your views about my badge.

Fancythatfancyhat · 11/06/2026 17:43

TheKeatingFive · 11/06/2026 17:39

You keep bringing someone else's views into this conversation with me. I didn't say that, I don't agree with that, so 🤷‍♀️

But you did agree it's more strange that forward for things to be neutral and that the patients needs and care take precedent? Just not when it comes to a couple of views you happen to also agree with..

ErroltheSwampDragon · 11/06/2026 17:44

DomPom47 · 11/06/2026 17:32

I think you’re conflating two different things: a patient’s reaction to a symbol and the actual conduct of the healthcare professional.
Impartiality is about how I treat people, not whether everyone agrees with or feels comfortable about every belief I hold.
By your reasoning, any symbol that causes distress, disagreement or anxiety to some patients would render the wearer incapable of acting impartially. I don’t think that’s true. People can and do make assumptions about healthcare professionals for all sorts of reasons, but assumptions are not evidence of discrimination.
You say it hinders my ability to treat others, but that is precisely the point under debate. I have yet to see evidence that wearing a Palestine pin or a white poppy prevents a healthcare professional from providing safe, compassionate and impartial care.
For me, discrimination would be treating patients differently because of their identity, beliefs or background. Wearing a symbol that expresses opposition to something as horrific as genocide or solidarity with civilians is not the same thing.
The test should be whether the professional’s conduct is impartial, not whether every patient approves of a symbol they happen to wear.

Not intentionally. As @PurpleThistle7 has said, the reaction of the patient is a key element of your ability to deliver care.

The test should be whether the symbol impacts the ability for the patient to receive the care they need and in this case it does.

There may be lots of symbols that cause this, but while the debate has been partly triggered by the impact on Jewish patients, the discussion is not only limited to Palestinian flags but any symbol that might impact the ability to treat patients.

TimeFlysWhenYoureHavingRum · 11/06/2026 17:45

Start by banning Poppies.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 11/06/2026 17:47

TimeFlysWhenYoureHavingRum · 11/06/2026 17:45

Start by banning Poppies.

Why?

TheKeatingFive · 11/06/2026 17:49

Fancythatfancyhat · 11/06/2026 17:43

But you did agree it's more strange that forward for things to be neutral and that the patients needs and care take precedent? Just not when it comes to a couple of views you happen to also agree with..

No. You just made that up.

My position (which incidently I laid out much earlier in this thread) is that I feel the only pins that it would be appropriate to wear in a clinical setting are those connected with the nhs remit.

Fancythatfancyhat · 11/06/2026 17:49

ErroltheSwampDragon · 11/06/2026 17:44

Not intentionally. As @PurpleThistle7 has said, the reaction of the patient is a key element of your ability to deliver care.

The test should be whether the symbol impacts the ability for the patient to receive the care they need and in this case it does.

There may be lots of symbols that cause this, but while the debate has been partly triggered by the impact on Jewish patients, the discussion is not only limited to Palestinian flags but any symbol that might impact the ability to treat patients.

By that logic the nurse who insisted on calling a patient he could impact the ability for a patient to receive the care they need too? Provided it's documented accurately in notes what the patients biologically sex is as well, then a HCP is affecting the patients ability to deal with the HCP if they insist on not following their preference of addressing them by preferred name or pronoun.

Fancythatfancyhat · 11/06/2026 17:51

TheKeatingFive · 11/06/2026 17:49

No. You just made that up.

My position (which incidently I laid out much earlier in this thread) is that I feel the only pins that it would be appropriate to wear in a clinical setting are those connected with the nhs remit.

So wearing a sex matters pin would be fine because it's medically accurate then? It doesn't matter if it would make patients upset or uncomfortable, in which case why does the feeling a flag creates matter if it's not about the patients feelings?

PurpleThistle7 · 11/06/2026 17:58

DomPom47 · 11/06/2026 17:41

While I understand why a parent would be protective of their child and cautious about anything that makes them uncomfortable, I don’t think it’s fair to assume that wearing a Palestine pin means someone would provide worse care or hold hostility toward Jewish patients.
I also think parents have a responsibility to teach children not to make assumptions about people based solely on a symbol, badge or expression of concern for others. A Palestine pin does not automatically tell you how someone will treat you, what their values are in every respect, or whether they can be trusted to care for a patient professionally and compassionately.
For me, a Palestine pin is not a statement against Jewish people. It is a statement of concern for Palestinian civilians, including children who have been killed, injured, displaced, orphaned, traumatised or denied medical care. All of which are there for all who care and want to see.
Caring about Palestinian children does not diminish concern for Jewish children, or for any other child who needs help. Those concerns are not mutually exclusive.
You say you hope never to come across me when you need help. That’s your choice. But I would still treat you and your child with the same care, dignity and compassion as anyone else, regardless of your views about my badge.

If I found you at a hospital I wouldn’t have a choice. I cannot escape it. I have to lie there, in pain, and fearful. It bewilders me that you’d choose to make me more upset for absolutely no reason.

I support your right to march and protest and boycott. I support your right to donate your time and money as you like in your free time. I cannot see why when you have a position of power and I have no power whatsoever, you’d want me to feel worse. That is your choice but I really hope the NHS follows the example of the police and other tax funded organisations of community support and enforce a uniform policy that supports everyone equally.

ErroltheSwampDragon · 11/06/2026 18:03

Fancythatfancyhat · 11/06/2026 17:49

By that logic the nurse who insisted on calling a patient he could impact the ability for a patient to receive the care they need too? Provided it's documented accurately in notes what the patients biologically sex is as well, then a HCP is affecting the patients ability to deal with the HCP if they insist on not following their preference of addressing them by preferred name or pronoun.

Yes, I agree. I don't know the details of the case well enough to know exactly what happened but I'd say the nurse should avoid using any pronouns if they felt unable to use the patient's preferred ones.

I don't believe in compelled speech (e.g. forcing the nurse to use preferred pronouns) but as you say, noting it on the form and medically treating the patient as per the sex seems the most sensible way of respecting the nurse's beliefs and treating the patient.

Noodledog · 11/06/2026 18:07

TheKeatingFive · 11/06/2026 17:03

You're only looking at it from your point of view though.

How you see it may not be the same as how your patients see it. And as it's irrelevant to you delivering their care, there is no need to display it on work time.

I think this is the nub of the problem and why these posters will never change their point of view. People have tried so hard to get them to empathise, to put themselves in the shoes of potential patients who might find them upsetting, but it has got nowhere, and never will.

Because, for them, it literally is "all about them". Other people are simply there to either appreciate their opinions or to shut up.

They have no interest in anyone who may be upset by them. This is why a debate is pointless and a blanket ban is the only option.

Fancythatfancyhat · 11/06/2026 18:31

Noodledog · 11/06/2026 18:07

I think this is the nub of the problem and why these posters will never change their point of view. People have tried so hard to get them to empathise, to put themselves in the shoes of potential patients who might find them upsetting, but it has got nowhere, and never will.

Because, for them, it literally is "all about them". Other people are simply there to either appreciate their opinions or to shut up.

They have no interest in anyone who may be upset by them. This is why a debate is pointless and a blanket ban is the only option.

I disagree, I think the nub of the issue is the assertion that a pin is for the wearer alone and not FOR other patients, and the assumption that it's somehow inherently anti any patients it's not aimed at.

Fancythatfancyhat · 11/06/2026 18:32

ErroltheSwampDragon · 11/06/2026 18:03

Yes, I agree. I don't know the details of the case well enough to know exactly what happened but I'd say the nurse should avoid using any pronouns if they felt unable to use the patient's preferred ones.

I don't believe in compelled speech (e.g. forcing the nurse to use preferred pronouns) but as you say, noting it on the form and medically treating the patient as per the sex seems the most sensible way of respecting the nurse's beliefs and treating the patient.

Agreed, I think the most important aspect is whether a HCP treats all patients with the same respect and care, which includes being understanding if they wish to be cared for by someone else. HCPs are people too, so I don't think we need to restrict their expression or solidarities as long as they provide great care.

ErroltheSwampDragon · 11/06/2026 18:39

Fancythatfancyhat · 11/06/2026 18:32

Agreed, I think the most important aspect is whether a HCP treats all patients with the same respect and care, which includes being understanding if they wish to be cared for by someone else. HCPs are people too, so I don't think we need to restrict their expression or solidarities as long as they provide great care.

But the difference here is between a neutral action (not using any pronouns or wearing any badge) and negative action (calling the patient a pronoun that will distress them, wearing a badge that will distress them).

Healthcare workers are not being asked to deny their beliefs or act in a way that counter to their beliefs, they are being asked not to actively behave in a way that may distress patients.

Ihatetomatoes · 11/06/2026 18:56

DomPom47 · 11/06/2026 17:41

While I understand why a parent would be protective of their child and cautious about anything that makes them uncomfortable, I don’t think it’s fair to assume that wearing a Palestine pin means someone would provide worse care or hold hostility toward Jewish patients.
I also think parents have a responsibility to teach children not to make assumptions about people based solely on a symbol, badge or expression of concern for others. A Palestine pin does not automatically tell you how someone will treat you, what their values are in every respect, or whether they can be trusted to care for a patient professionally and compassionately.
For me, a Palestine pin is not a statement against Jewish people. It is a statement of concern for Palestinian civilians, including children who have been killed, injured, displaced, orphaned, traumatised or denied medical care. All of which are there for all who care and want to see.
Caring about Palestinian children does not diminish concern for Jewish children, or for any other child who needs help. Those concerns are not mutually exclusive.
You say you hope never to come across me when you need help. That’s your choice. But I would still treat you and your child with the same care, dignity and compassion as anyone else, regardless of your views about my badge.

The thing is you are at work.

Stop bringing your opinions, political views etc into work.

Just work. Is that really so difficult, without having pins showing various positions you hold on your uniform? Be professional. I really don't care for your posturing on various issues, it's irrelevant.

OP posts:
Anarchy99 · 11/06/2026 18:57

Fancythatfancyhat · 11/06/2026 18:31

I disagree, I think the nub of the issue is the assertion that a pin is for the wearer alone and not FOR other patients, and the assumption that it's somehow inherently anti any patients it's not aimed at.

But it is for the wearer. You all claim it’s to help people. Who is going to be affected positively by someone wearing a Palestine pin? It’s not going to help the people you say you support. The Palestinians being killed are on the other side of the world but the Jews in this country are suffering for it.

It is hard enough finding a decent HCP who knows what’s going on in your file. So if you walked in with any flag or badge I am going to be wondering about your professionalism tbh. I’m certainly not going to trust someone who thinks their political opinion has any place in a medical consultation.

Ihatetomatoes · 11/06/2026 18:58

ErroltheSwampDragon · 11/06/2026 18:39

But the difference here is between a neutral action (not using any pronouns or wearing any badge) and negative action (calling the patient a pronoun that will distress them, wearing a badge that will distress them).

Healthcare workers are not being asked to deny their beliefs or act in a way that counter to their beliefs, they are being asked not to actively behave in a way that may distress patients.

Indeed. You would assume 'professionals ' might understand that. No need to wear your opinions on a pin on your work uniform. Just be professional.

OP posts:
Ihatetomatoes · 11/06/2026 19:00

ErroltheSwampDragon · 11/06/2026 18:39

But the difference here is between a neutral action (not using any pronouns or wearing any badge) and negative action (calling the patient a pronoun that will distress them, wearing a badge that will distress them).

Healthcare workers are not being asked to deny their beliefs or act in a way that counter to their beliefs, they are being asked not to actively behave in a way that may distress patients.

This.

They can go bang whatever drum they want to bang, in their free time, not at work, in an NHS uniform.

OP posts:
EmeraldShamrock000 · 11/06/2026 19:03

I agree. It is inappropriate to be showing your political views on your uniform. It would make me feel uncomfortable.

Anarchy99 · 11/06/2026 19:05

Ihatetomatoes · 11/06/2026 19:00

This.

They can go bang whatever drum they want to bang, in their free time, not at work, in an NHS uniform.

Yeah but they wont listen because they would rather risk upsetting some people just to try to signal to others how
supportive they are.

Of course wearing a badge is a way of showing support without having to get your hands dirty

KeeperOfTheSevenKeys · 11/06/2026 20:48

DomPom47 · 11/06/2026 17:41

While I understand why a parent would be protective of their child and cautious about anything that makes them uncomfortable, I don’t think it’s fair to assume that wearing a Palestine pin means someone would provide worse care or hold hostility toward Jewish patients.
I also think parents have a responsibility to teach children not to make assumptions about people based solely on a symbol, badge or expression of concern for others. A Palestine pin does not automatically tell you how someone will treat you, what their values are in every respect, or whether they can be trusted to care for a patient professionally and compassionately.
For me, a Palestine pin is not a statement against Jewish people. It is a statement of concern for Palestinian civilians, including children who have been killed, injured, displaced, orphaned, traumatised or denied medical care. All of which are there for all who care and want to see.
Caring about Palestinian children does not diminish concern for Jewish children, or for any other child who needs help. Those concerns are not mutually exclusive.
You say you hope never to come across me when you need help. That’s your choice. But I would still treat you and your child with the same care, dignity and compassion as anyone else, regardless of your views about my badge.

The recommendation for staff to stop wearing political symbols comes off the back of a report into antisemitism. It found that some Jewish people are not seeking treatment because of fear of antisemitism in the NHS after hearing stories of Jewish people who were treated badly. The fact that you as a healthcare professional think that this is less important than your "right" to wear a pin that does nothing and helps no one is disturbing.