Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Nicola Sturgeon STILL didn't know her husband stole £400,000

486 replies

Imdunfer · 01/06/2026 07:32

Follow on from previous thread.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Swiftie1878 · 01/06/2026 09:50

AnonymityAnonymity · 01/06/2026 07:51

All these threads laced with vitriol directed at Nicola are just proving the point that women in politics are subjected to a degree of hatred never directed at male politicians.

It's truly embarrassing the number of posters on a site which is supposed to be primarily for women and supportive of women are so obviously enjoying putting the boot into another woman.

No. She’s getting shit because she deserves it. Having a vagina does not exempt her from proper scrutiny. She was the leader of the party and the leader of Scotland. If you can’t stand the heat…

INeedAPensieve · 01/06/2026 09:51

LaliqueSaltGrinder · 01/06/2026 09:29

I think it's also important to remember that the SNP doesn't tolerate dissent. Their MPs and MSPs are whipped to within an inch of their arses. They MUST vote in a block for whatever the SNP leadership says is the party stance. If they break ranks and rebel, they are suspended from the party. This is what happened to Fergus Ewing, who has been in the SNP for yonks.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-66941281

So you have this atmosphere that you have to keep your head down and do what you're told, or you're out on your ear. So people do just that because they know that without the "SNP" branding on a ballot paper nobody is going to vote for them. It's really not the way to run any organisation.

I was really disappointed that Fergus Ewing was unable to get in as an independent in the recent elections. I miss the sensible politicians but of course all of them were either pushed out or left the SNP once they saw what was going on.

TorroFerney · 01/06/2026 09:54

AnonymityAnonymity · 01/06/2026 08:00

I think your post here says it all about the people who are revelling in seeing a woman being put on public trial when the police and Scottish Justice system found no evidence of wrong doing.

Why not bring back public lynching while you are at it?

Edited

Yes that’s a good idea. Well suggested.

dottiedodah · 01/06/2026 10:04

I feel torn tbh.Not Scottish ,but I feel NS has always come over as an honest warm person .However I cannot see how she can have missed the Campervan and other large purchases TBH. Maybe she was busy as first Minister who knows? She has questions to answer at the very least I would say

ArabellaScott · 01/06/2026 10:10

ByGraptharsHammer · 01/06/2026 09:29

What I noticed was her bridling about being made to compensate or hand over assets regarding what her ex husband did.

Over time, what he did was an overall financial benefit to her household. The pens and the toilet rolls are headlines. But ultimately it mean that they spent (as a couple) on more assets like property. Sturgeon did get divorced of course, but I do not know if that ring fences her assets from the marriage.

The investigation cost 2 million pounds.

They are not divorced.

Igneococcus · 01/06/2026 10:13

dottiedodah · 01/06/2026 10:04

I feel torn tbh.Not Scottish ,but I feel NS has always come over as an honest warm person .However I cannot see how she can have missed the Campervan and other large purchases TBH. Maybe she was busy as first Minister who knows? She has questions to answer at the very least I would say

Ah yes, the "honest and warm" person who claimed women were akin to Nazis and racists for wanting single sex spaces maintained.

ArabellaScott · 01/06/2026 10:15

As noted by some, Sturgeon's act has gone down well in England, where the public have not been subject to the rule of a government run by her and her party.

Those of us in Scotland who have been called 'probably racist' by her for defending women's rights have a somewhat different view.

ArabellaScott · 01/06/2026 10:16

Sorry, *possibly racist. But obviously bigots.

https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/obviously-the-case-some-gender-reform-critics-are-bigots-says-nicola-sturgeon-4006954

AnonymityAnonymity · 01/06/2026 10:20

TorroFerney · 01/06/2026 09:54

Yes that’s a good idea. Well suggested.

You really should be ashamed of yourself. But I doubt anyone who could make a comment like this one has enough decency to know what shame is.

ArabellaScott · 01/06/2026 10:32

AnonymityAnonymity · 01/06/2026 10:20

You really should be ashamed of yourself. But I doubt anyone who could make a comment like this one has enough decency to know what shame is.

I expect that poster was being sarcastic.

ByGraptharsHammer · 01/06/2026 10:38

ArabellaScott · 01/06/2026 10:15

As noted by some, Sturgeon's act has gone down well in England, where the public have not been subject to the rule of a government run by her and her party.

Those of us in Scotland who have been called 'probably racist' by her for defending women's rights have a somewhat different view.

I don’t think so. She is a source of amusement.

Btw I am staggered. Not divorced? Wow

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 01/06/2026 10:41

NS has not gone down well in England. Why does anyone think this? She’s come across as unquestioning and clearly didn’t look at finance very deeply. This is either lack of ability or, as most of us think, she knew and is now wriggling on the end of a fishing line. She’s not admired here!

AnonymityAnonymity · 01/06/2026 10:44

ArabellaScott · 01/06/2026 10:32

I expect that poster was being sarcastic.

Do you think so? They sounded pretty serious to me, especially given the amount of venom being expressed on these threads.

Lovesacake · 01/06/2026 10:50

I believe her. A couple who both are high earners with no children and a modest house are exactly the sort of people I would expect to be able to afford a Jag or motor home - who else do you think is buying them. They must’ve had an extremely high level of disposable income and savings and as they didn’t share a bank account I believe her when she says she assumed the gifts were bought with his actual money. It’s not unusual for high earners with no kids to spend a lot on handbags/jewlery etc - you don’t need to be a millionaire to afford those things you just need high incomes and low outgoings which it seemed they had.

Imdunfer · 01/06/2026 10:53

Lovesacake · 01/06/2026 10:50

I believe her. A couple who both are high earners with no children and a modest house are exactly the sort of people I would expect to be able to afford a Jag or motor home - who else do you think is buying them. They must’ve had an extremely high level of disposable income and savings and as they didn’t share a bank account I believe her when she says she assumed the gifts were bought with his actual money. It’s not unusual for high earners with no kids to spend a lot on handbags/jewlery etc - you don’t need to be a millionaire to afford those things you just need high incomes and low outgoings which it seemed they had.

And the SNP auditing?

OP posts:
JSMill · 01/06/2026 10:56

Lovesacake · 01/06/2026 10:50

I believe her. A couple who both are high earners with no children and a modest house are exactly the sort of people I would expect to be able to afford a Jag or motor home - who else do you think is buying them. They must’ve had an extremely high level of disposable income and savings and as they didn’t share a bank account I believe her when she says she assumed the gifts were bought with his actual money. It’s not unusual for high earners with no kids to spend a lot on handbags/jewlery etc - you don’t need to be a millionaire to afford those things you just need high incomes and low outgoings which it seemed they had.

There’s a lot of truth in what you are saying about their disposable income but NS is denying any knowledge of the motor home. No reasonable can accept her explanation that she didn’t notice it on her in laws property.

ByGraptharsHammer · 01/06/2026 10:57

They had to get auditors from Barnsley. A place not exactly known for its expertise compared to say, Edinburgh.

Lovesacake · 01/06/2026 10:58

@Imdunfer I wouldn’t expect someone at her level of the organisation to be looking at itemised credit card bills to monitor who was spending what. I would expect a robust system of checks to be in place further down the chain, clearly that failed and as leader she does have to take some accountability for that. But the idea that she knowingly participated or allowed embezzlement and was fine with that is just bananas to me. I just cannot see any evidence to suggest she knowingly took part in her husbands crimes.

guinnessguzzler · 01/06/2026 10:59

Brilliant, thanks for the share, well worth a read.

ACynicalDad · 01/06/2026 11:03

Her brass neck to do the media round and promote her book this weekend, she should at very least withdraw from public life completely.

I guess a lot of Scots would have voted differently if this had come out a month earlier.

Lovesacake · 01/06/2026 11:03

@JSMill she has described the set up at her in laws and explained how she didn’t register the vehicle when she visited. I’m sure journalists have fact checked the layout she described. My in laws also have a drive down the side of their house. They could have a rocket ship parked there for all I know, I don’t go down the side when we visit.
has there been any evidence to suggest she knew of the motor home and that it was owned by him/them? If her signature is on the paperwork or people have evidence to suggest she absolutely knew of it and knew it was bought with their money then fair enough but if it’s a vehicle she had no involvement with and couldn’t easily see then I believe her.

ArabellaScott · 01/06/2026 11:04

AnonymityAnonymity · 01/06/2026 10:44

Do you think so? They sounded pretty serious to me, especially given the amount of venom being expressed on these threads.

I do think so, yes.

And fwiw, I don't see huge amounts of 'venom'. We are discussing the leader of a political party who had responsibilty for signing off on accounts that we now know were being embezzled from. She also attacked anyone asking questions or raising concerns.

Those of us who have spent years being slurred and dismissed and sneered at by this woman and those in her circle also are often angry. I would say often understandably so. We've been called every name under the sun, attacked, smeared, vilified, sacked, shunned and threatened. For many years we were treated as though we were beyond the pale. Why? Because we didn't want men in women's rape centres, prisons, hostels, changing rooms, etc.

And the woman who styled herself as a gracious and stunning progressive turns out to have been covering for an absurd and tawdry programme of theft. Her hubris and arrogance are ridiculous. People get angry at hypocrisy.

Personally, I'm just finding it depressing that the whole history of Scottish politics over the past decade or so comes down to grubby venality. It ought to have been obvious, really - anyone making the vicious attacks that Sturgeon and her cronies made generally is doing so as a defensive measure, and most of the time the reasons are not very special, but common or garden grubbing for power, money, and fame.

Still. It's unedifying, depressing, and grim that our lovely country has been so badly served by these people.

ByGraptharsHammer · 01/06/2026 11:06

What she is asking everyone to be believe is she never saw a motorhome, never saw it at her MIL’s house, never discussed it, nor that her husband ever mentioned it to her.

I appreciate she can literally assert this as a legal defence, but she is actually asking people to believe that.

Swipe left for the next trending thread