Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to say my dogs were always part of the package deal of dating me?

1000 replies

Forest28 · 31/05/2026 09:14

I've had my dogs for around 6/7 years. I got them with a previous partner. When that relationship failed, I took on both. They are large breed dogs, and as puppies were a lot of work, but they spend most of their time asleep these days. When dating, it became clear that many men had an issue with the dogs, both from a "you care about something other than me" perspective and a "this is an unwelcome psychological connection with your past relationship" perspective. I was disturbed by how many men expected me to just throw them out.

I'm in a new relationship of nearly two years and it's been going very well. He seemed to accept the dogs, but as soon as we moved in together, he started with the rehome the dogs pressure. I've done everything I can: I pay for all food, vet visits, insurance and kennels. They have a large dog-gated area in the house so they don't come into our lounge or bedroom. I do most of the walks, all feeding and all toilet breaks. I work from home so I keep them active in the day. We pay for a weekly cleaner. I pay for expensive regular shaves and baths. I have a dog sitter on standby.

The latest thing is that we're planning to try for a baby and he's become obsessed with rehoming the dogs in case we can't cope with a newborn and dogs. He wants to rehome them now even though I'm not even pregnant. In any case, I have no intention of rehoming them. It seems like we're at a stalemate and I'm exhausted by it.

AIBU to say I love my pets, I'm responsible for them and he knew when we met that I would never get rid of them? I'm especially not going to entertain this conversation when it's entirely theoretical. We don't know if we can have kids and we don't know what the dynamic will be if we do. I feel it's just because he doesn't like dogs, which he says is unfair and untrue. I think it is true.

OP posts:
Dollysleftnip · 31/05/2026 12:24

Tableforjoan · 31/05/2026 12:12

Well that’s it. Op needs to make her choice.

He is clearly not going to change his mind or I have a feeling if he does he will find or make a reason for them to go while the baby is still a very fresh newborn and ops too burried in baby stuff to fight him.

Is she happy to stay with him and have no trying for a baby? Or even run the risk of the above scenario if he suddenly folds.

Gamble time.

Oh, he won’t stay with the dog and no baby, he’ll go off and find somebody else that he can manipulate.
No baby, no leverage
This isn’t a choice between the dogs and the man
It’s a choice between the man and everything else. It just starts with the dogs being removed. Then it’ll be something else.

happenedtoBeAparrot · 31/05/2026 12:24

Anarchy99 · 31/05/2026 10:22

I’m sorry but that is awful. More fool him for doing it. The animals were there before you and the fact that he was prepared to rehome them because you were pregnant is horrible.

Pets don’t live as long as humans, that is true, but they live longer than many human relationships.

Having a pet is a commitment and to be prepared to get rid because their partner can’t accept a situation that has existed since before they were together isn’t a great character indicator for either person.

I just couldn’t get used to them I couldn’t stay at his house ever as the dogs would snap at me, I was terrified. For 3 years I tried to get used to them and couldn’t. I was also moderately allergic to the cat and rats and although antihistamines worked i didn’t want to take medication every day for years. It wasn’t a decision taken lightly and was his suggestion.

WheretheFishesareFrightening · 31/05/2026 12:24

ChristmasBaby2026 · 31/05/2026 12:04

I don’t think that’s a fair comparison at all. People who aren’t dog people really don’t realise how obsessed dog people are with their dogs. You don’t realise they are going to be wanting to bring them on holiday, arranging the day around them, treating them like a person. We had a cat and then a tortoise growing up. Both animals were just sort of there. You fed them and maybe interacted occasionally but for the most part it was just co existence. A dog is a pet don’t forget, not a child.

Plenty of men have children and realise they’re not children people either and spend less than 50 nights a year with their children…

I doubt it was surprise to the boyfriend that OP centred a lot of a life around her dogs when he moved in.

PP mention realising how much their BILs dog was a big part of their life when they wanted to bring it to Christmas (it might have been you but I can’t see from this page!) - you think he could have missed this in the relationship before they got to the stage of living together?

Forest28 · 31/05/2026 12:25

Seriously12 · 31/05/2026 12:13

Is it your house he has moved into?

If so that is huge and so so sinister.

He knew, he lied, and now he is putting pressure on you.

You are not compatible.
He has lied and will not accept you are sticking to whatvyou said.

Do you want another failed relationship?

Your boundaries are poor if you cannot see this.
He's manipulated you and lied if he has moved into your home.

Be very wary of such a man.

You have been totally played if you think this is what a healthy compatible relationship looks like.

It really isn't.

He has taken over your home.

Kindly meant, but women who are desperate for any relationship will tolerate this, get pregnant, and find they have a controlled abusive man who has fathered their child, snd whom they are now stuck co parenting with.

You have made a huge mistake with him.
You will end up a shell of your former self.

Get him out of your home.

Edited

He hasn't taken over my home. We're renting together in a new place. However, I have relocated hours away from family and friends while his life has remained unchanged. The dogs are the only thing that feels like a connection to who I was and made me feel more at home here. I also feel I've sacrificed a lot already.

OP posts:
Andouillette · 31/05/2026 12:26

ChristmasBaby2026 · 31/05/2026 11:28

But the Op has conveniently omitted the breed of these dogs. This is extremely relevant if you are thinking about their suitability to be in a home with children

She has told us that they are large and mixed breeds. She has also said that the mix doesn't include known dangerous breeds. Good enough description I think.

forgotmyusername1 · 31/05/2026 12:27

Greenwitchart · 31/05/2026 09:20

Dump him and keep the dogs.

No decent guy would ask you to get rid of your beloved pets.

In general I would stay away from people who don't like animals...

I wouldnt have a baby in a house with 2 xl bullies. She hasnt said the breed just large breed dogs

Ihatelittlefriendsusan · 31/05/2026 12:27

He isn't a nice guy @Forest28 he is a controlling arse.

He has baited you with the idea of kids and then dangled the dogs as an issue. Imagine what he would be like if he isn't a fan of the kids.

Something needs rehousing, but it isn't the dogs

Loulou4022 · 31/05/2026 12:27

Forest28 · 31/05/2026 12:25

He hasn't taken over my home. We're renting together in a new place. However, I have relocated hours away from family and friends while his life has remained unchanged. The dogs are the only thing that feels like a connection to who I was and made me feel more at home here. I also feel I've sacrificed a lot already.

This is all beginning to sound rather controlling and coercive!

Squirrelchops1 · 31/05/2026 12:27

He would happily see you heartbroken by you rehoming your dogs. He'd happily rehome 2 dogs who might not end up together or might end up dying in a centre.

He sounds like the type who, you'd get rid of dogs, have a kid then he would buy a totally unsuitable breed but it's HIS. It'll snap at kid but how dare you suggest he rehomes it.

His whole underlying values are clear by his attitude towards your dogs and simply put, I couldn't carry on a relationship.

TheHateUGive · 31/05/2026 12:27

ThatGladTiger · 31/05/2026 12:23

Can you not see how ridiculous this is? I’m surprised you agreed to this in the first place!

The people who would agree to this usually know their dog won't reasonably accept boundaries like no jumping on people or hogging furniture, no stealing or incessant begging. They know their dog is "a lot" so will keep it away from others.

Wheresthebeach · 31/05/2026 12:28

Everytime you update it gets worse. Manipulators rule number one - isolate from friends and family.

Glad your renting - that makes it easier. Go back home asap.

Forest28 · 31/05/2026 12:28

nonumbersinthisname · 31/05/2026 12:16

For me the red flag is that he doesn’t even interact with the dogs. I’m always wary of people who have no affinity for animals.

I’m a cat person and Im not particularly fond of dogs. However, when i visit family and friends with dogs and they come over to say hello, i always make a fuss of them and pet them. I don’t seek them out, but if they come to me then I will interact with them. They know I’m a friend of the household. I’m not sure the dog that ignores him would see him as one of his tribe and worthy of respect and someone to defend.

He loves cats and has previously owned many. I don't really get it.

OP posts:
Bollixtothat · 31/05/2026 12:28

Marriage then babies. Neither of you sound 100% committed to this relationship.

Dollysleftnip · 31/05/2026 12:28

Forest28 · 31/05/2026 12:28

He loves cats and has previously owned many. I don't really get it.

Have you seen any evidence of this?
actually, it doesn’t matter because you don’t have a cat. You have two dogs.

WheretheFishesareFrightening · 31/05/2026 12:29

TheHateUGive · 31/05/2026 11:46

"But whether they were XL bullies or teacup chihuahuas"

These dogs would be equally inappropriate for a young baby. Interesting you chose these 2.

I went for a big, strong breed and small, feeble breed. Substitute St Bernard and cockapoo, or golden retriever and dachshund, or Great Dane and Shih Tzu as you see fit.

But if it were those two breeds, presumably OP knew they were not suitable for children before she got them, or the boyfriend did before he moved in - it’s not a surprise now she a baby might be on the cards.

Andouillette · 31/05/2026 12:29

BashthatTerriesorange · 31/05/2026 11:32

The comparison I was making was that for extreme dog people, whatever the situation is, the dog person is always the good guy and the non-dog person is not. The H in the previous thread was clearly not a good guy yet the extreme dog people thought he was.

I am also taken aback at the idea that non-dog people are expected to take on responsibility for dog people's dogs. It would never occur to me that a boyfriend would expect that. I may share someone's home but would not have imagined they expect me to share the work of their dog. Its not a child. I would not be a step parent. Their pet, their work just like their car or bike or any other of their hobbies are their work and not mine. (Obvs for OP, if they have a child the boyfriend would have to co-'parent' the dog for that to work, but I would not have expected him to do that pre-baby).

I guess this is a fundamental difference between extreme dog people and other people. Extreme dog people see their dogs as at least equivalent (in practice usually superior) to people, whereas other people don't share that view.

Anyway, I really do need to go out now.

I would describe myself as extremely pro dogs. I can say, hand on heart that the H in that equation is an absolute wanker. Not a good guy at all as he has obviously completely failed to train his dog and it is behaving in a way that makes his wife utterly miserable. He should not have that dog. I doubt the dog is happy either.

GingerdeadMan · 31/05/2026 12:30

HedgehogsOnTheWall · 31/05/2026 09:40

I feel it's just because he doesn't like dogs, which he says is unfair and untrue.

He must like dogs on some level if he lives with two! I don't like dogs. So I wouldn't move in with someone who has dogs.

But anyway, I don't understand why anyone would prioritise two animals over the feelings of their partner who they claim to love. Maybe that's his issue.

But anyway, I don't understand why anyone would prioritise two animals over the feelings of their partner who they claim to love.

But this is just blackmail - 'if you loved me you would xyz'
Where does it end?

Its not like they were happy together then she got the dogs knowing he wouldn't like it. She's always had the dogs. He knew this. She told him it was non negotiable at the start.

And now he wants to negotiate harass her into getting rid of them.

Doesn't seem like a healthy dynamic. Doesn't seem like any respect for the OP or taking responsibility for his own feelings/life.

If he thought he could handle living with dogs and it turns out he hates it, there's the door.

TheHateUGive · 31/05/2026 12:31

WheretheFishesareFrightening · 31/05/2026 12:29

I went for a big, strong breed and small, feeble breed. Substitute St Bernard and cockapoo, or golden retriever and dachshund, or Great Dane and Shih Tzu as you see fit.

But if it were those two breeds, presumably OP knew they were not suitable for children before she got them, or the boyfriend did before he moved in - it’s not a surprise now she a baby might be on the cards.

The OP won't answer questions about the breed or behaviour/training of the dogs which as a dog person, I find quite telling.

Seriously12 · 31/05/2026 12:31

ThisBirdOnThatRoof · 31/05/2026 12:15

How is it a great relationship if he is nagging her and isolating her from her pets? Sounds more like he is babytrapping and Master of the House-ing.

Agree, great relationship my arse.

He's just the type to change his mind once the OP is pregnant and really become seriously abusive as he destroys her mental health.

So many threads on MN of women who ignored these huge red flags and the real horror emerges.

Men like this are the very type that weaponise a child with demands of 50/50.

I hope to god OP wakes up fast before she destroys her life.

CelticSilver · 31/05/2026 12:32

He should have moved straight back out again. Don't have a baby with him.

SapphOhNo · 31/05/2026 12:32

Seriously12 · 31/05/2026 12:31

Agree, great relationship my arse.

He's just the type to change his mind once the OP is pregnant and really become seriously abusive as he destroys her mental health.

So many threads on MN of women who ignored these huge red flags and the real horror emerges.

Men like this are the very type that weaponise a child with demands of 50/50.

I hope to god OP wakes up fast before she destroys her life.

Christ, you haven't met the man.

Stop projecting maybe?

Seriously12 · 31/05/2026 12:34

Forest28 · 31/05/2026 12:25

He hasn't taken over my home. We're renting together in a new place. However, I have relocated hours away from family and friends while his life has remained unchanged. The dogs are the only thing that feels like a connection to who I was and made me feel more at home here. I also feel I've sacrificed a lot already.

Move back.
He has you isolated.

What is it with women moving hours away from everything they know for men?

Madness.

Tableforjoan · 31/05/2026 12:35

Dollysleftnip · 31/05/2026 12:24

Oh, he won’t stay with the dog and no baby, he’ll go off and find somebody else that he can manipulate.
No baby, no leverage
This isn’t a choice between the dogs and the man
It’s a choice between the man and everything else. It just starts with the dogs being removed. Then it’ll be something else.

He has longer than her age wise though. He can run down her clock and then just go off and meet someone 10-20 years younger and get his baby.

Arsehole men do that.

StarlingTheConqueror · 31/05/2026 12:35

Its not about the dogs.

The fact he is putting so much pressure on you and is unwilling to reach a compromise tells you what he thinks of you - not someone to be respected as an equal, whose needs Abx wants have equal value to his but as someone who ought to make all the sacrifices, all the effort so that he has the life he wants.

And so far, he got exactly what he wanted (from your own words, you’ve already sacrificed a lot whereas his life hardle changed)
It just happens that the dogs are the hill you will die on so to speak. The area where you’re not going to compromise.

Im sorry @Forest28 , but he isn’t a good partner/father material.
Imagine him doing that relentless pushing in a few years time. Whether you work or not work, how the feed to baby if you have one, who does the parenting, gettimg up at night, going out, all the things hell have to give up when he becomes a father when he hasn’t been ready to give up on anything so far.

andnowwhatdowedo · 31/05/2026 12:35

It's the 'only' point of dispute in your relationshp but it is a huge one, on the scale of wanting to live in different parts of the world, or have/not have children together, or invite/not invite an elderly parent to live with you.
It could be a deal breaker unless you can find a compromise. Have you both tried to find one that would work? I guess it would need to be a compromise where he either succeeds in genuinely loving and caring for your dogs or else you put a lot of money into getting them cared for while you are heavily pregnant and looking after a newborn. Eg, dog walkers 3 times a day, plus someone to sort out the poo and do any extra cleaning.
The thing that would bother me is that he wants you to get rid of the dogs before you are pregnant. That sounds like wheeler dealing to get the result he wants rather than genuinely concern about how you will manage when pregnant or caring for a newborn. There is no guarantee you will get pregnantt; he must know that, and then you will have lost your beloved dogs as well as the chance of being a mum.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.