Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Allow a play date where mum unapologetically supports children’s education tax

1000 replies

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 11:16

Just this really, our local independent prep school closed due to the education tax earlier this year and has caused absolute chaos for lots of families, including my own. My dd (6) has been invited for a play date with a girl she seems very friendly with and who seems very sweet, but I’ve since found out from another parent that the mum is an ‘unapologetic education taxer’. My instinct is to cancel the play date, AIBU?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
CaptainBeefheartspal · 30/05/2026 13:29

🤣 you’ve jumped the shark now.

ClassicHumous · 30/05/2026 13:29

Poor OP is getting a rotten old time on this thread. I personally think we should be more benevolent to the nouveaux pauvres, it must be so hard having to live on government hand outs to access the same education as my children. But DH says it does them no good in the end, and that we shouldn't let our children associate with them at play dates.

Keepoffmyartichokes · 30/05/2026 13:29

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 13:13

Guts? Quite obviously it would suggest a bitter person, net tax recipient, easily misled to blame children for their failings and likely lower than average intelligence. The numbers don’t lie on this.

Myself and my husband full support VAT on these fees, we are both high earners and my husband has an IQ of over 130 putting him in the top 2% of the population on intelligence.

CieloElmers · 30/05/2026 13:30

I agree cancel the playdate, you’ll be doing the other mum a favour.

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 13:30

Arlingtonchase · 30/05/2026 13:22

VAT on private school fees is not an act of cruelty and spite to children. Don’t be so silly.

It most certainly is

OP posts:
GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 13:32

Keepoffmyartichokes · 30/05/2026 13:29

Myself and my husband full support VAT on these fees, we are both high earners and my husband has an IQ of over 130 putting him in the top 2% of the population on intelligence.

Interesting, very rare. Why do you support it?

OP posts:
SmashThePatriarchy · 30/05/2026 13:32

Franpie · 30/05/2026 13:27

It’s not taxing companies. It’s taxing individuals.

Independent schools that have long waiting lists and do not struggle to fill their places even after adding VAT onto their fees have actually done very well out of this VAT change as they now get to reclaim all the VAT on their expenditure and massive capital projects.

It is a service that is not a necessity as we have an education system people can access for free. It is therefore right that is has VAT attached to it.

Preppyprepper · 30/05/2026 13:33

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 13:13

Guts? Quite obviously it would suggest a bitter person, net tax recipient, easily misled to blame children for their failings and likely lower than average intelligence. The numbers don’t lie on this.

Funny, I always thought private school was for those with low intelligence but a bit of money, as they need extra help to do well. Obviously intelligent children will thrive anywhere, private school is just for the dim.

Also if the private school folded because of a 17% tax being added it was clearly shit anyway

OlderGlaswegianLivingInDevon · 30/05/2026 13:34

so where does your child go to school now ?

have you managed to find another ' local ' prep ?

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 30/05/2026 13:34

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 12:43

Sure, you’re right but somebody supporting children’s education tax would suggest a particular personality type. Can we agree on that?

Aye, it suggests they're a sensible person who clearly has their head screwed on right.

Unlike you OP.

Passingthrough123 · 30/05/2026 13:36

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 12:23

Well exactly, also I would imagine that alcohol abuse/smoking would be likely in the home.

This has to be a wind up. Just because they think VAT should be added to private school fees they must drink and smoke?

rainingsnoring · 30/05/2026 13:37

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 13:32

Interesting, very rare. Why do you support it?

What numbers are you referring to specifically here? Plenty of well below average children in private schools incuding plenty with SEN. Private schools are certainly not the preserve of the super intelligent, as is fairly obviously from this thread....

Franpie · 30/05/2026 13:37

SmashThePatriarchy · 30/05/2026 13:32

It is a service that is not a necessity as we have an education system people can access for free. It is therefore right that is has VAT attached to it.

I’m not disputing that.

You said it’s taxing companies. It’s not. Companies are not paying more tax. In fact, they are paying less as they are reclaiming their VAT.

It is taxing individuals.

It is also not raising any money and is therefore completely pointless.

Keepoffmyartichokes · 30/05/2026 13:39

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 13:32

Interesting, very rare. Why do you support it?

Because it's a luxury not a necessity so should be subject to VAT, it's that's simple. If the school wants to pass that on to the parents then that's up to them. I know a few families with children in private education and they are happy to pay the VAT as they also agree. They realise they are fortunate enough to pay for the private education they want and it is their choice.

Balloonhearts · 30/05/2026 13:40

Grow up and don't foist political disagreements on your small child.

CaptainMyCaptain · 30/05/2026 13:40

Passingthrough123 · 30/05/2026 13:36

This has to be a wind up. Just because they think VAT should be added to private school fees they must drink and smoke?

It's totally ridiculous. A quick Google tells me about 6.5% of school age children in the UK are in private education. So the rest of us who use the state system are clearly chavs who drink and smoke all the time and hate the OP's children - 93.5% of the population.

CaptainMyCaptain · 30/05/2026 13:41

Franpie · 30/05/2026 13:37

I’m not disputing that.

You said it’s taxing companies. It’s not. Companies are not paying more tax. In fact, they are paying less as they are reclaiming their VAT.

It is taxing individuals.

It is also not raising any money and is therefore completely pointless.

It's a luxury and should be taxed.

Keepoffmyartichokes · 30/05/2026 13:41

Preppyprepper · 30/05/2026 13:33

Funny, I always thought private school was for those with low intelligence but a bit of money, as they need extra help to do well. Obviously intelligent children will thrive anywhere, private school is just for the dim.

Also if the private school folded because of a 17% tax being added it was clearly shit anyway

It's 20%

JJWT · 30/05/2026 13:41

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 11:16

Just this really, our local independent prep school closed due to the education tax earlier this year and has caused absolute chaos for lots of families, including my own. My dd (6) has been invited for a play date with a girl she seems very friendly with and who seems very sweet, but I’ve since found out from another parent that the mum is an ‘unapologetic education taxer’. My instinct is to cancel the play date, AIBU?

Bloody hell. Wait until you hear about the perfectly civilised European countries where it is illegal to charge for education. They have the best state education in the world because all the stuck up twats like you have to use it.

Hibernatingsloth · 30/05/2026 13:43

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 11:46

Wow 10 minutes in and the comments have convinced me that my first instinct was right ! I will reject the play date, I see protecting children from toxic people who hold immoral views as part of my job as a parent.

Your poor child.
Unable to choose her own friends unless the parents' views and outlook on life align with yours.

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 13:44

Preppyprepper · 30/05/2026 13:33

Funny, I always thought private school was for those with low intelligence but a bit of money, as they need extra help to do well. Obviously intelligent children will thrive anywhere, private school is just for the dim.

Also if the private school folded because of a 17% tax being added it was clearly shit anyway

This is a very good example of what I’m taking about.

OP posts:
Preppyprepper · 30/05/2026 13:44

Keepoffmyartichokes · 30/05/2026 13:41

It's 20%

Showing my age there 😂

Flinderskleepers · 30/05/2026 13:45

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 13:44

This is a very good example of what I’m taking about.

What exactly are you talking about?

Preppyprepper · 30/05/2026 13:45

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 13:44

This is a very good example of what I’m taking about.

This is a very good example of what I'm talking about.

Clever people don't need private school 😉

Cornflakes44 · 30/05/2026 13:47

Franpie · 30/05/2026 13:37

I’m not disputing that.

You said it’s taxing companies. It’s not. Companies are not paying more tax. In fact, they are paying less as they are reclaiming their VAT.

It is taxing individuals.

It is also not raising any money and is therefore completely pointless.

So why isn’t everyone kicking off at the schools for making even more profit from children’s education? They didn’t need to pass the VAT on.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread