Agree.
His comment "There's no policing of it at all, it is purely free will, if you want to queue you can."
Firstly people aren't queuing for the thrill of it - if there wasnt some sort of organised system in place there would just be a desperate mass for the top which would be both dangerous and likely to be "won" by fit younger men like them, leaving older people/children/those with additional needs for whom reaching the top is even harder and more of an achievement to struggle.
Something doesnt have to be "policed" (ridiculous comment in its own right, does he really expect Pc plod to be stationed up the top of a mountain every day!) to be moral.
Secondly by his own logic, in exactly the same way as there is no "policing" of the queue there's no policing that you HAVE to have touched a special magic point to have been considered to climb the mountain. He's climbing for charity - is anyone really going to demand photographic proof or refuse to pay him because he only climbed 1085 metres rather than 1086? They climbed to the top, who actually cares if they "touched the trig" before climbing down?
As a pp said, most people are queuing for a photo AT the trig point rather than because they dont think it "counts" unless they touch it.
Arrogantly pushing past because you're judging everyone else for "queuing like its alton towers" (Im surprised they didn't refer to the other climbers as sheep) is always going to put people's backs up.