Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think some older women having tax payers funded ivf are hypocrites?

814 replies

Spiderbug · 19/05/2026 10:39

There seems to be a substantial group of people who are ok with calling teen mums a waste of their tax money but then leave child bearing too late and expect the tax payers to foot the bill for their multiple ivf cycles which costs the tax payer up to 100 million a year.

Hypocrites!!!

OP posts:
BorisBigBalls · 19/05/2026 11:58

Hopefully when Reform take over this nonsense will stop.

Spiderbug · 19/05/2026 11:58

ChasingRainbow5 · 19/05/2026 11:55

OP what are you classing as 'older'?

As several people have pointed out, the cut off for IVF on the NHS in most areas is 40, and those people will have to have tried for years, gone through diagnosis and then faced lengthy waiting lists. It is absolutely NOT an easy process.

As several other people have pointed out, the majority of IVF is funded privately so is not costing the taxpayer a penny.

Anyone who simply 'left it too late' will be one of those self funding (and will have paid into the system for years, too).

I'm sorry you faced stigma as a teen mum but honestly, this thread is complete bullshit.

Honestly 30. Yeah I know it’s average these days but fertility peaks in your mid twenties. And again I’m only judging those who judge young mums if you don’t then this isn’t about you

OP posts:
IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 19/05/2026 11:59

Spiderbug · 19/05/2026 11:55

Again google is your friend we even have ai now :

Yes, there is substantial evidence from UK studies, reports, charities, and personal accounts showing that teenage mothers ("teen mums") face significant stigma, judgment, hostility, and discrimination.This persists despite teenage pregnancy rates in England and Wales falling sharply (to historic lows, with under-18 conception rates dropping over 60% in recent decades). Public perceptions often exaggerate the issue, contributing to negative attitudes. Academic and Qualitative StudiesMultiple UK-focused studies document young mothers' experiences:
Young parents report everyday judgment, hostility, and stigmatisation, including disparaging looks from strangers, being shouted at or sworn at, ignored by professionals, and name-calling. This leads to feelings of worthlessness, shame, and higher risks of postpartum depression.
Stigma is linked to stereotypes of teen mums as irresponsible, unfit parents, welfare-dependent, or morally lax. This "inferiorisation" affects interactions with the public, schools, and services.
A Brighton-based study (Ellis-Sloan) found young mothers keenly aware of the stigmatising identity. Examples include public sneering, bus passengers calling teen mums a "disgrace," and assumptions they only get pregnant for benefits/housing.
Barnardo's report Not the End of the Story highlighted bullying, stigma, and unofficial school exclusions for pregnant girls, reinforcing isolation and reluctance to access support.
Media, Charities, and Public Discourse
BBC Newsbeat (2014) reported young mums facing stigma and abuse, with charities noting discrimination often stems from misconceptions about how common teen pregnancy is.
The "pramface" label and media portrayals reinforce views of teen mums as a social problem or burden.
Public polls (e.g., Ipsos MORI) show Britons overestimate teen birth rates (guessing ~16% of girls aged 15-19 give birth yearly, vs. actual ~3% at the time), fueling exaggerated negative views.
Impacts on Mental Health and Daily Life
Young mums experience shame, judgment from professionals, and barriers to support, increasing mental health risks. Many feel not taken seriously as parents.
Stigma continues into later life, e.g., at their child's school, where former teen mums report judgment from other parents and staff.
This can lead to social isolation, lower self-esteem, and reluctance to seek help.
Context and NuanceTeenage pregnancy in the UK is strongly linked to deprivation, with higher rates in poorer areas. While many teen mums face real challenges (e.g., lower educational/economic outcomes on average), research shows outcomes vary, some young parents do well with support, and stigma itself worsens isolation and mental health without helping prevention. Government strategies (e.g., the Teenage Pregnancy Strategy) and prevention frameworks acknowledge stigma as a factor but also aim to reduce rates through education and support. In short, peer-reviewed studies, charity reports (Barnardo's, etc.), and first-hand accounts consistently prove widespread judgment exists in the UK, manifesting in public hostility, professional bias, and social exclusion. Rates have declined partly because of this stigma, per some analyses, but it harms those affected.

That's evidence that teen mum's face stigma. Not being disputed on this thread.

You've given evidence of how many births are from IVF. Not being disputed on this thread.

Where is the evidence that women who give teen mum's a hard time go on to have tax payer funded IVF at an older age?

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 19/05/2026 11:59

Spiderbug · 19/05/2026 10:50

im Not sure what part of this you’re struggling to believe but google is your friend

But Goggle didn’t make the post you did.

Lomonald · 19/05/2026 11:59

StacieBenson · 19/05/2026 11:44

There are any number of reasons why couples might struggle with infertility, such as cancer treatment, which don't mean they are unworthy or incapable of having children via IVF.

I agree, infertility is a health condition that needs investigated, and if IVF or any other infertility treatment is prescribed then I don't think anything is wrong with that,

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 19/05/2026 11:59

Spiderbug · 19/05/2026 10:43

It’s not about nice older women who have ivf just the ones who judge teen mums and call them a waste of tax money and then go and have multiple nhs ivf cycles. Just seems hypocritical to me

Have you encountered many of those?

SapphireSeptember · 19/05/2026 12:00

Monty36 · 19/05/2026 11:01

Can honestly say I haven’t heard the phrase ‘teen mums’. Or anyone using it.

I have, it was used a lot in certain newspapers in the 2000s and 2010s.

My mum had me when she was 18, by the time she was my age (37) she had an adult child and three nearly adult children. (All with the same dad.) I didn't have DS till I was 35. Interesting how that worked out!

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 19/05/2026 12:01

Spiderbug · 19/05/2026 11:58

Honestly 30. Yeah I know it’s average these days but fertility peaks in your mid twenties. And again I’m only judging those who judge young mums if you don’t then this isn’t about you

30 is not an "older mum". Just to be completely clear here. The NHS considers that average age and 35+ is considered to be advanced maternal age. However, in recent years, because of medical and health advancements, the "geriatric" age range has been upped to 40.

Having IVF at 30 is not because they've left it too late.

babyproblems · 19/05/2026 12:02

its controversial I agree. I can’t even work out where I stand because I’m not 100% sure I agree with IVF; I’m not sure I believe children are a universal right.. i definitely do not agree with surrogacy in any circumstance for example. I think that’s a bit of a dangerous idea to come up with other ways of having children even when nature says no tbh. How on earth you police playing god with children / new life I really don’t know, who qualifies, who doesn’t? From my limited understanding I think there are many reasons why someone would require IVF- I think it’s a slippery slope because are some of those possibly self inflicted? I think that’s what you are saying. Maybe some people who can’t have children would be wonderful parents, and some who have children easily are terrible parents. Are you also ok to say if you’ve smoked, you don’t get free treatment for cancer? I don’t know where you draw the line so maybe it’s better to not draw any lines.. complex..

Shithotlawyer · 19/05/2026 12:02

OK.

Teen births are about 2% of all live births (though you don't mean people age 18 and 19 do you, you mean the 15 year olds who need loads more help, but let's stick with this). There are about 650,000 births per year in the UK. Obviously there are more teen mums walking around than there are births per year because everyone who was a teen mum last year is a "teen mum" for life. So taking people whose children are still under 18, there may be 234,000 teen mums around with youngish children, taking care of their children, at any given time.

There are about 18 million women in the UK between 15 and 50 at any given time. Take off the 234,000 of that cohort who are themselves teen mums and that's about 17.7 million women in the UK.

How many women out of those 17.7 do we think really do disapprove of teen mums and think they are selfishly costing the state? Well, Charities say that teen mums are often abused, and I take lived expertise as really strong evidence when the themes are identified and brought together by civil society voices. So I believe there is stigma. Let's say, again to be super generous to OP and to the lived experience of stigma, that 1/3 of all women, of this childbearing age group also disapprove of teen mums.

That's an assumed 5.9 million women age 15-50, who have not themselves been teen mums, and who could think teen mums are selfish spongers, and say so.

Per year there are 15-17,000 NHS funded IVF treatments. Let's generously say the figure for individual women having an ivf cycle each year is 15,000 because some will have 2 or 3 cycles allowed so some of them are the same women.

We can't see how those groups overlap- "choosing to have ivf" and "hating teen mums".

But... - EVEN IF ...

Out of all the 15,000 women who have ivf for free, on the NHS, every single one of those women happens to also be in the group of 5.9 million who hate teen mums...

That's only 2.5% of the women, max, who already hate teen mums, choosing to have IVF.

That seems a very high figure - all the IVFers wouldn't hate teen mums, surely. Let's say the opinions of women having IVF are the same as the opinion we have assuumed for the general population. Maybe 5,000 of them (one third) disapprove of teen mums.

So the hypocritical group you are slagging off amounts to 5,000 women per year, or 0.03% of women you might meet in the UK who are of childbearing age. And that's the absolute max I reckon.

I don't think anyone should hate teen mums by the way, and I'm not sure those who do are basing it on the cost to taxpayer.

However if you know 20 of those 5,000 women personally (unlikely!) I'm sure it seems very annoying. Or even if you know one, which seems more likely from your OP.

But there are hardly any of these people with these attitudes in the grand scheme of things. Ignore them.

Be compassionate to both teen mums and infertile people.

Allisnotlost1 · 19/05/2026 12:02

Spiderbug · 19/05/2026 10:44

I personally know some like this

Maybe tell them what you think then.

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 19/05/2026 12:02

Spiderbug · 19/05/2026 10:55

Loads of people hate teen mums, anyone that was one will know this me personally was pregnant at 15 and have been disrespected by a vast array of people for it.
Some of these people leave child bearing too late and then expect the tax payer to pay for their ivf which seems incredibly hypocritical

Well they will have paid plenty of tax before the issue of having a child occurred.
You on the other hand paid no tax.

ChasingRainbow5 · 19/05/2026 12:03

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 19/05/2026 12:01

30 is not an "older mum". Just to be completely clear here. The NHS considers that average age and 35+ is considered to be advanced maternal age. However, in recent years, because of medical and health advancements, the "geriatric" age range has been upped to 40.

Having IVF at 30 is not because they've left it too late.

Yeah I had my first at 38/39 and my age was literally never mentioned.

I'm now 41 and trying for a second and I may well have left it too late but wouldn't expect the NHS to fund IVF for me (and FWIW, wouldn't judge teenage mums unless they start stupid threads).

Zov · 19/05/2026 12:03

coulditbeme2323 · 19/05/2026 11:56

I think this thread is probably best left.

OP is clearly carrying some hurts, and isn't able to debate clearly.

Yes I agree with this. Also leaving the thread now. I think it's a pretty unsavoury thread.

All I will say is @Spiderbug try and have some compassion and empathy. This thread is very unkind.

SapphireSeptember · 19/05/2026 12:05

BorisBigBalls · 19/05/2026 11:58

Hopefully when Reform take over this nonsense will stop.

What nonsense? Teenage girls getting pregnant (unlikely, and that also includes 18 and 19 year olds who are adults) or IVF on the NHS? (As reform want to get rid of the NHS that's more likely.)

Getting rid of the NHS might well mean less women have kids because the cost is ridiculous. The c section and the week in hospital I had when DS was born would have been ridiculously expensive in somewhere like the USA even with medical insurance.

Interdit · 19/05/2026 12:06

Controversial but I don’t think any IVF should be state-funded.

Spiderbug · 19/05/2026 12:06

Zov · 19/05/2026 12:03

Yes I agree with this. Also leaving the thread now. I think it's a pretty unsavoury thread.

All I will say is @Spiderbug try and have some compassion and empathy. This thread is very unkind.

As I said I’m not talking about everyone who goes through ivf I am only talking about the hypocrites.
And I’m not going to have empathy and be kind to them when they never would have done the same to me

OP posts:
SapphireSeptember · 19/05/2026 12:06

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 19/05/2026 12:02

Well they will have paid plenty of tax before the issue of having a child occurred.
You on the other hand paid no tax.

Untrue. Everyone pays VAT.

pigsDOfly · 19/05/2026 12:07

How many women who have reached menopause have IVF

Must admit when I read the title of the op, my first thought was, who are all these 'older' women who had 'left it too late' and were trying to get pregnant in their old age?

Speediegonzales · 19/05/2026 12:07

Havesomefaith · 19/05/2026 11:43

I agree.

I also don’t think the NHS should be funding IVF at all. I know that’s unpopular, but I think the NHS should be there primarily to treat illness and keep people healthy, not to fund every deeply wanted life outcome.

Infertility is obviously distressing, and I do have sympathy for couples going through it, but wanting a child and having a medical need aren’t the same thing. The NHS is already struggling to provide timely cancer treatment, mental health support, GP appointments, dentistry, and basic operations. When resources are finite, I think priorities matter.

I also think people underplay the risks and costs involved with IVF itself. IVF pregnancies statistically have higher rates of complications. That has knock-on costs not just for fertility treatment, but for maternity services, neonatal care and long-term healthcare support as well, so when people say we are only spending £X on fertility treatments, they aren’t taking into account the later strain on the NHS.

Plenty of treatments aren’t funded because they’re considered low priority or not cost-effective enough. Fertility treatment seems to get treated differently because emotionally it’s such a sensitive topic.

I’m not saying IVF should be banned, people who want it should absolutely be free to pursue it privately if they choose. I just don’t think it should be funded by the taxpayer.

Well said.

BudgetBuster · 19/05/2026 12:07

Spiderbug · 19/05/2026 12:06

As I said I’m not talking about everyone who goes through ivf I am only talking about the hypocrites.
And I’m not going to have empathy and be kind to them when they never would have done the same to me

Why don't you delete this thread and make a new one about Jan and Mary or whoever the very very specific people you are trying to berate are?

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 19/05/2026 12:08

DefiantRabbit9 · 19/05/2026 11:05

Point to me a teenage mum who has been paying into the system for 20+ years, has a stable relationship and has their own place that they pay for.

Yup this.

tealandteal · 19/05/2026 12:09

I am sure that there are people who have judged teen mothers who have gone on to have IVF on the NHS. However I just don’t think the link is clear.

If your thread was about how can we better support teen mums as a society and how can we reduce that judgement then you would probably get a lot of support. However to suggest that a lot of women who have IVF have previously judged younger mums seems to be a bit of a reach.

Most people don’t have IVF because they have left it too late but because they have a fertility issue that has always existed. The only older person I know who had IVF, did so because they were using a sperm donor and doing it alone.

IVFbabyanyday · 19/05/2026 12:09

I wonder what exactly is meant by "judging teen mums" too.

Of course I judge people who are careless, irresponsible, and make poor decisions. Especially where this impacts on other's lives. But how people react to making a mistake is a big thing too.

I know a teen mum (well she was a teen mum). Wild and irresponsible, that's how she ended up pregnant and didn't even realise for ages. But she massively stepped up and was/is a brilliant mum, so I have so much admiration for her.

So I guess I judged the circumstances but now admire the way she faced up to them.

Spiderbug · 19/05/2026 12:09

BudgetBuster · 19/05/2026 12:07

Why don't you delete this thread and make a new one about Jan and Mary or whoever the very very specific people you are trying to berate are?

It’s not that specific more people hate teen mums then you think or at least think they’re a waste of tax money who only get pregnant for the benefits but then these people have no problem taking from the tax payer themselves

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread