Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think there will be many more disabled adults in 20 years?

655 replies

Walkyrie · 03/05/2026 22:04

I’m disabled myself, just to put that out there.

It just seems like the number of people with a disability, usually a psychiatric one, is going through the roof.

40% of disability benefit claimants are claiming for mental health related reasons. The number of anxious children and teens on here, and that I know in my own life and family, is really really high. So many schools refusers and kids in need of extra support, special school placements and so on. It seems there are a lot of unemployed young adults living at home who simply don’t have the mental acuity to get a job, live independently, have a life of their own.

3 children in my family are currently school refusing, one we only found out about today but it was not a surprise as she’s always been very anxious and has selective mutism.

My AIBU is, should we be doing something to prepare for what may be a very high number of adults not working in years to come? How will we sustain them all?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
TapestryNeedle · 04/05/2026 13:53

SpryTaupeTurtle · 04/05/2026 13:52

Is this yet another sarcastic post about people with mental health issues getting disability benefits?

No, it is a sigh of relief that we live in a country which gives us money if we need it and when we need it, even to the foreign ones!!!

SpryTaupeTurtle · 04/05/2026 13:54

suburburban · 04/05/2026 13:52

It was a long time ago perhaps late 30s onwards but the medical advances were not there

There is nothing online that suggests that midwives in the UK even in the 1930s helped disabled babies along by ending their life and then calling it a still birth. Disabled people were more likely to end up in an institution.

SpryTaupeTurtle · 04/05/2026 13:56

suburburban · 04/05/2026 13:53

I was responding to another poster who was saying a similar thing

different times

Different times doesn't mean that it's true. People are being expected to believe that a midwife would kill a disabled child just after birth while the mother was in the delivery room and call it a still birth? I don't believe it.

suburburban · 04/05/2026 13:57

SpryTaupeTurtle · 04/05/2026 13:54

There is nothing online that suggests that midwives in the UK even in the 1930s helped disabled babies along by ending their life and then calling it a still birth. Disabled people were more likely to end up in an institution.

I think they didn’t thrive, definitely no foul play, my dgm was a wonderful caring person and good nurse

TapestryNeedle · 04/05/2026 13:57

let me explain: I am foreign, wherever I went in the world, I never found a job which lasted more than 2 years. Made it so far thanks to my husband. When one day cannot find even one job which keeps me up to 2 years, am glad i am in the UK where they give us everything. This is the truth, sounds like bad sarcasm, yet it is not

also am thankful my kids dad is British so they are automatically British and the authorities will provide for them if something happens to the family fortune < how much not specified>

suburburban · 04/05/2026 13:58

SpryTaupeTurtle · 04/05/2026 13:56

Different times doesn't mean that it's true. People are being expected to believe that a midwife would kill a disabled child just after birth while the mother was in the delivery room and call it a still birth? I don't believe it.

No I don’t mean that at all, they just didn’t survive like they do now as there were not the medical advances

Everlore · 04/05/2026 13:59

suburburban · 04/05/2026 13:52

It was a long time ago perhaps late 30s onwards but the medical advances were not there

We are not talking about babies dying of natural causes because medical science was not yet advanced enough to keep them alive. The previous poster was referring to midwives allegedly making the individual decision to deliberately murder a baby who had been born alive, simply because they were visibly disabled. That has nothing to do with medical advances, it is entirely predicated on a mindset which says that disabled babies would be better off dead and that killing them was a morally positive act.

TapestryNeedle · 04/05/2026 13:59

But also, let's pray there always be money in the tax system for all of us, including you guys who are going to be disabled < like really? I never knew you can predict people will be more and more disabled? Such predictions cannot be accurate. > But what you can predict looking at the news, that there will be millions of immigrants which will take money out of this country. Is this still sarcastic or too uncomfy, purely because it is just the facts

suburburban · 04/05/2026 14:00

Everlore · 04/05/2026 13:59

We are not talking about babies dying of natural causes because medical science was not yet advanced enough to keep them alive. The previous poster was referring to midwives allegedly making the individual decision to deliberately murder a baby who had been born alive, simply because they were visibly disabled. That has nothing to do with medical advances, it is entirely predicated on a mindset which says that disabled babies would be better off dead and that killing them was a morally positive act.

yes I see, hopefully that wasn’t the case then

SpryTaupeTurtle · 04/05/2026 14:03

TapestryNeedle · 04/05/2026 13:59

But also, let's pray there always be money in the tax system for all of us, including you guys who are going to be disabled < like really? I never knew you can predict people will be more and more disabled? Such predictions cannot be accurate. > But what you can predict looking at the news, that there will be millions of immigrants which will take money out of this country. Is this still sarcastic or too uncomfy, purely because it is just the facts

So this is an immigrant bashing post and a disabled bashing one as well? Do you realise that everyone is just one accident away from being severely disabled? There are immigrants who give to this country. Plenty of them. The surgeon who saved my mums life when she had cancer was an immigrant and has gone home

The UK has always relied on immigrants

Velumental · 04/05/2026 14:07

SpryTaupeTurtle · 04/05/2026 13:56

Different times doesn't mean that it's true. People are being expected to believe that a midwife would kill a disabled child just after birth while the mother was in the delivery room and call it a still birth? I don't believe it.

No this definitely happened. It happened to my granny. She had 9 children, 2 stillbirths but 1 she swears she heard cry. And when the baby was stillborn (1930s Ireland) the baby would be 'thrown in the bucket under the bed and taken away and that's the last you'd hear about it's poor woman was very traumatised by it. As you can imagine. She also had children with several low level disabilities and the 2 stillbirths were during the thalidomide crisis and my mum always reckoned my granny had taken thalidomide unknowingly and they let or helped the deformed babies pass.

ruethewhirl · 04/05/2026 14:09

SpryTaupeTurtle · 04/05/2026 13:56

Different times doesn't mean that it's true. People are being expected to believe that a midwife would kill a disabled child just after birth while the mother was in the delivery room and call it a still birth? I don't believe it.

Call me a cynic, but it would surprise me if it had never happened.

Velumental · 04/05/2026 14:10

Everlore · 04/05/2026 13:59

We are not talking about babies dying of natural causes because medical science was not yet advanced enough to keep them alive. The previous poster was referring to midwives allegedly making the individual decision to deliberately murder a baby who had been born alive, simply because they were visibly disabled. That has nothing to do with medical advances, it is entirely predicated on a mindset which says that disabled babies would be better off dead and that killing them was a morally positive act.

A baby would be left without covers and food and allowed to pass or smothered quietly. That's what we were told.

Badbadbunny · 04/05/2026 14:14

Newstartplease24 · 04/05/2026 12:31

Someone said something about being forced into work making coffees and fetching and carrying, despite poor mental health and being very disinclined to, and ultimately qualifying as an accountant. This route into work - start at the bottom, no qualifications, benefit from routine and people relying on you to improve health and resilience, increase the demands on yourself as and when you feel ready - has disappeared. I have benefited a lot, despite a lot of qualifications, at times in my life, from friendly and not too demanding office work. Yes it paid the bills but it also pulled me out of a funk more than once. It’s a huge problem that you can’t get jobs like that any more.

Nail on the head. A huge problem indeed.

But a lot of it is the requirement to pay national minimum wage along with employment rights etc. Lots of employers, particularly small ones, are just not able to comply, or worried about the risk of being sued for an "ism", so don't employ anyone. They fear that they won't easily be able to dismiss someone is just isn't capable of doing the job, whether through being disabled, or just failing to follow instructions, poor timekeeping etc. Smaller employers don't have an HR department to help them follow procedures etc.

Everlore · 04/05/2026 14:17

Velumental · 04/05/2026 14:10

A baby would be left without covers and food and allowed to pass or smothered quietly. That's what we were told.

Allowed to pass' or smothered quietly, if this happened it is still deliberate, premeditated murder of a newborn infant. Putting it in soft, kind language as though this was the compassionate thing to do does not change that fact. If this did, in fact, occur with any regularity then I am utterly horrified. I find it hard to believe that anyone could look on such barbaric practices with any amount of understanding or make allowance for the past being a 'different place'. I would have hoped that others would be as upset and disturbed as I am by this suggestion.

Velumental · 04/05/2026 14:23

Everlore · 04/05/2026 14:17

Allowed to pass' or smothered quietly, if this happened it is still deliberate, premeditated murder of a newborn infant. Putting it in soft, kind language as though this was the compassionate thing to do does not change that fact. If this did, in fact, occur with any regularity then I am utterly horrified. I find it hard to believe that anyone could look on such barbaric practices with any amount of understanding or make allowance for the past being a 'different place'. I would have hoped that others would be as upset and disturbed as I am by this suggestion.

There are so many violations of the rights of women, babies and children in Ireland in that timeframe there's only much horror you can continue to hold.

Velumental · 04/05/2026 14:24

Badbadbunny · 04/05/2026 14:14

Nail on the head. A huge problem indeed.

But a lot of it is the requirement to pay national minimum wage along with employment rights etc. Lots of employers, particularly small ones, are just not able to comply, or worried about the risk of being sued for an "ism", so don't employ anyone. They fear that they won't easily be able to dismiss someone is just isn't capable of doing the job, whether through being disabled, or just failing to follow instructions, poor timekeeping etc. Smaller employers don't have an HR department to help them follow procedures etc.

So instead people with learning disabilities should be not paid a living wage is that your point?

SpryTaupeTurtle · 04/05/2026 14:24

Everlore · 04/05/2026 14:17

Allowed to pass' or smothered quietly, if this happened it is still deliberate, premeditated murder of a newborn infant. Putting it in soft, kind language as though this was the compassionate thing to do does not change that fact. If this did, in fact, occur with any regularity then I am utterly horrified. I find it hard to believe that anyone could look on such barbaric practices with any amount of understanding or make allowance for the past being a 'different place'. I would have hoped that others would be as upset and disturbed as I am by this suggestion.

This. It's dreadful. I don't have the words for it.

Everlore · 04/05/2026 14:25

Velumental · 04/05/2026 14:07

No this definitely happened. It happened to my granny. She had 9 children, 2 stillbirths but 1 she swears she heard cry. And when the baby was stillborn (1930s Ireland) the baby would be 'thrown in the bucket under the bed and taken away and that's the last you'd hear about it's poor woman was very traumatised by it. As you can imagine. She also had children with several low level disabilities and the 2 stillbirths were during the thalidomide crisis and my mum always reckoned my granny had taken thalidomide unknowingly and they let or helped the deformed babies pass.

Again, I don't want to nitpick every post on here, but I am uncomfortable with phrases like 'help the deformed babies pass' being used when what is being alleged is the deliberate premeditated murder of a newborn infant.
Having been born 'deformed' myself I am very glad that no healthcare professional decided to 'help me pass'. However, I hope one would not have to have personal experience of being born disabled or having a disabled child to be distraught at accounts of the cold-blooded killing of disabled infants.

plsdontlookatme · 04/05/2026 14:25

Badbadbunny · 04/05/2026 14:14

Nail on the head. A huge problem indeed.

But a lot of it is the requirement to pay national minimum wage along with employment rights etc. Lots of employers, particularly small ones, are just not able to comply, or worried about the risk of being sued for an "ism", so don't employ anyone. They fear that they won't easily be able to dismiss someone is just isn't capable of doing the job, whether through being disabled, or just failing to follow instructions, poor timekeeping etc. Smaller employers don't have an HR department to help them follow procedures etc.

As I say, if someone isn't capable enough that you wouldn't want to employ them then you shouldn't begrudge them being on benefits.

SpryTaupeTurtle · 04/05/2026 14:28

Badbadbunny · 04/05/2026 14:14

Nail on the head. A huge problem indeed.

But a lot of it is the requirement to pay national minimum wage along with employment rights etc. Lots of employers, particularly small ones, are just not able to comply, or worried about the risk of being sued for an "ism", so don't employ anyone. They fear that they won't easily be able to dismiss someone is just isn't capable of doing the job, whether through being disabled, or just failing to follow instructions, poor timekeeping etc. Smaller employers don't have an HR department to help them follow procedures etc.

Then they shouldn't be employers. They shouldn't even think of employing people if they can't pay a decent wage or not upholding workers rights.

There are supports employer can put in place for people with disabilities - any decent employer would. And if they don't have an HR dept. Acas have guidelines

People should have employment rights. They have been eroded enough

Velumental · 04/05/2026 14:29

Everlore · 04/05/2026 14:25

Again, I don't want to nitpick every post on here, but I am uncomfortable with phrases like 'help the deformed babies pass' being used when what is being alleged is the deliberate premeditated murder of a newborn infant.
Having been born 'deformed' myself I am very glad that no healthcare professional decided to 'help me pass'. However, I hope one would not have to have personal experience of being born disabled or having a disabled child to be distraught at accounts of the cold-blooded killing of disabled infants.

As you should be, I'm quoting my grandmother. I have a child with a disability. I am horrified by it but also horrified people don't believe it happened. The way women and babies were treated under the Catholic church especially, it's astounding people DONT believe it but then I guess if you didn't grow up knowing that history just a generation or 2 before maybe you have that luxury

x2boys · 04/05/2026 14:30

Kirbert2 · 04/05/2026 13:19

Yep.

and where would it end? Could medical professionals decide that a child's life isn't worth saving at 1, 5, 7, 12, 16 too because they may be disabled as a result?

My son became disabled at the age of 8 due to surviving from complications of an illness which he wasn't expected to survive and the only reason he did survive is because every medical professional he came across didn't give up on him. I was warned it wasn't likely he'd survive but I was also told that they would try their best and I believed them.

I couldn't imagine living in a world where you hand over your critically ill child to someone who would think 'eh, they'll probably be disabled if they survived anyway, lets not bother'.

Edited

Its horrifiying the way some people think aa you know my son has complex disablliities
But hes in very good health snd enjoys a good quality of life
It reminds me of the pandemic in the early when there waa a worry over a shortage of ventilators
Some people were suggesting ,thst if it came fown to it ,the choice of who should get a ventilator should be based on who could conttibute most to society .

SpryTaupeTurtle · 04/05/2026 14:31

Velumental · 04/05/2026 14:29

As you should be, I'm quoting my grandmother. I have a child with a disability. I am horrified by it but also horrified people don't believe it happened. The way women and babies were treated under the Catholic church especially, it's astounding people DONT believe it but then I guess if you didn't grow up knowing that history just a generation or 2 before maybe you have that luxury

What I actually said was there are no statistics to back up what was said - re the Uk. Then you said you lived in Ireland. I don't live in Ireland. I'm Scottish. With all due respect how would I know what happened in Irish hospitals three generations ago?

suburburban · 04/05/2026 14:33

Ooh before 1946 there was no NHS or welfare like there is now. People were really hard up

probably had no indoor plumbing and little heating. This must have factored in