Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not consider this “family money”

1000 replies

ImNotSharing · 01/05/2026 21:13

I will shortly be receiving a large sum of money (large to me). It is a compensation payment.

Our finances are joint and DH considers it family money. I do not. AIBU?

Happy to answer questions but I’m mainly here for the vote.

OP posts:
PrizedPickledPopcorn · Yesterday 09:46

You’re seeking comfort, Op.

It’s like people expecting a baby/toddler to share a comfort cloth with someone else.

CarelessWimper · Yesterday 09:47

ImNotSharing · Yesterday 09:40

I will keep saying this because people obviously don’t understand and that’s fine but this is not the same as an inheritance or a lottery win or a salary.

This was something that happened to me through no fault of my own that resulted in life changing injuries. The payment is compensation for that.

Yes, there was an element for expenses and loss wages but the majority was to compensate for the pain, suffering and disfigurement.

I think maybe that’s what people can’t get their heads around on this thread.

I did not get facial injuries but I am in pain every day from a car crash 25 years ago. My compensation went into the family pot. With that sum you can sole use of some of it and use it for family benefit. You do sound like someone that just wants to hoard their gold

Ohgoose · Yesterday 09:47

ImNotSharing · Yesterday 09:32

@ForCosyLion 100% agree.

I have had inheritances over the course of this relationship and they have gone into the pot. It’s not the same at all. Well, not to me.

Of course I don’t begrudge my children money. They have savings in their name.

What I don’t want to happen is that this money just gets swallowed up on bills or mortgage payments and I have nothing to show for it. To me that would feel like it was all for nothing.

Of course you don’t want that and that would be wrong unless you were struggling financially.

I absolutely think you’re right to want to ring fence it and not just let it be swallowed up.

Yes it is your compensation and you should have more of a say about where it goes.

Where I disagree is that you won’t spend anything on your children and you don’t want his opinion on it. If some of it could pay for a lovely holiday or something else then I can’t see why you wouldn’t.

If paying off some of the mortgage eases some financial pressure on the family then ok it might be worth doing. But you’re so resolute this won’t benefit anyone at all except you.

Honestly I would suspect there could be issues in your marriage whether you realise this or not. It’s an unusual attitude for me and I’d want to explore why you feel so strongly.

LorryTaylor · Yesterday 09:47

You keep making comments like this,

70% of the vote say I am being unreasonable and I am taking that on board. I just feel like we wouldn’t even have that money if it wasn’t for me and my efforts to reclaim the funds. All the contracts I signed in getting into this point were on me.

But for me that argument doesn't stand because you and your DH could both say the same about his salary. "If it wasn't for me and my efforts we wouldn't have this money".

I don't have a mortgage to pay off, for me the peace of mind is priceless. How about taking £10k for yourself (roughly the amount you were expecting) and putting the rest in to the family pot (for me, this would be the mortgage)?

ImNotSharing · Yesterday 09:47

BudgetBuster · Yesterday 09:43

He never called her greedy. She made that up for her own narrative.

Crikey chill out! I said in that post I wasn’t sure if greedy was the right word and when questioned further I followed up to say perhaps a better word was unnecessary.

OP posts:
GoodkneeBadKnee · Yesterday 09:48

ImNotSharing · 01/05/2026 23:46

No. I don’t want to spend it on my children.

Genuinely.

As a family, we have some money. We have two incomes. We have a home and we pay our mortgage.

We have enough money to pay our bills and to pay for some days out. We are happy.

Do I want to put aside my compensation payment for their Uni fees? No.

Do I want to earmark it as a potential deposit for their future homes? No.

I want it to be my money. That I get to choose how it is spent.

Is that really so unreasonable?!

I don't think you're being unreasonable at all OP. It's your compensation for your trauma/injuries. I think you should keep it all and spend as you see fit. If that includes spending some on your dc, then great. But it's up to you and your dh should butt out.

LorryTaylor · Yesterday 09:48

(Was the injury due to a cosmetic procedure?).

BudgetBuster · Yesterday 09:48

OP, kindly I think you should do some therapy to understand why you don't like your own family. Begrudging them funds, wanting to not holiday with them just without, calling parenting "drudgery"... (no idea why you had kids), you sound a bit demeaning about how your husband continued to work while you fought this case (despite the fact his work is how you have a roof over your head).

Money and injury aside... you need to do some soul searching because I feel you don't want to be part of a family anymore.

Lmnop22 · Yesterday 09:48

ImNotSharing · Yesterday 09:08

Everyone saying it should be joint because DH supported me to be a SAHM, I find that pretty laughable. It was a financial decision, which benefited both of us. He loves his job and got to to climb the ladder and travel. I stayed with the DC. I did the sick days and the life admin and all the drudgery that comes with that. And then as soon as they were old enough to go to school I returned to full time employment.

I wasn’t swanning around doing coffees or shopping or making the home look nice.

Anyway, I take on board the compromise comments and it doesn’t have to be all or nothing. I am aware that on paper he has an entitlement to the money due to our marriage. I won’t be letting this cause a wedge between us, I just was surprised he seem to think he had an equal say in how it would be spent. I’ve always considered it mine, even before it was won.

It’s really coming across like you want to punish your husband and children by not letting them have any of this money - do you think that’s something you are perhaps subconsciously doing because you didn’t get the support you needed from them during the time you were pursuing the claim or after your accident happened?

dazedandconfused14 · Yesterday 09:48

Charlenedickens · Yesterday 06:45

Op you don’t come across well at all, you come across a deeply selfish. What do you mean you birthed his children and facilitated his career by staying home. Were you artificially inseminated, forced to have children that were not yours, forced to stay home because he couldn’t work and pay for childcare in the 50 percent of the time he was liable. No thought not.

You did it because you were giving birth to your own children, children I assume you want even though you’re not playing it it was all him and his children, and you stayed home as you wanted to.

i can’t imagine having a six figure sum and wanting to spend it solely on myself and not my family or children, although I get it you see them as solely his, or to benefit us as a whole, and wanting them to at the same time keep living off my husbands earnings.

i don’t know how your husband can stand to be in the same room as you, the money as brought out your selfish grabby side.

Completely agree with the last part. If my husband did this I’d reassess everything. And I say this as somebody who was given a similar amount to what op seems to be suggesting

MoFadaCromulent · Yesterday 09:49

I think you're being incredibly selfish.

I've had personal injury settlements before, more than 15-20k but less than 200k, they went in to the pot, I've had an inheritance and same approach with that.

I'd struggle to look at my wife the same way if she had been the one in that position and thought "that's mine right there, think I'll go and do a solo trip without dh/the kids."

travelallthetime · Yesterday 09:49

liloandstitchh · Yesterday 09:33

I’ve read all of your posts and I agree with you that you don’t need to be spending it on the children’s education. It’s not their inheritance. I also don’t see anything wrong with spending a chunk on yourself- as I mentioned in my previous post I did this when I got compensation.

However I really don’t think I would be able to get over it if my DH had 200k sat in the bank to do with what he wanted and didn’t want the family to see any of it, saw it as his own money and I wasn’t allowed to question it ever. It would really make me question him as a man and his opinion on our marriage, which I view us as a team. I genuinely think I would be taking legal advice RE divorce because if I’m being totally honest I wouldn’t be able to move past it.

I aggree 100% with this. I couldnt sit there with £200k in the bank while we still had a mortgage and slogged our guts out to pay it.
Dont get me wrong, I would put some aside just for me but no more than £5k, and really, I would probaly set the same aside for DH and the kids, purely as 'do what you like' money. I'd also pay for an extra special holiday.
If my DH had £200k sat in the bank, no matter how he got it and it was only 'his' money, I couldnt get over that.
Although he wouldnt do that anyway, no matter how he got the money

PrizedPickledPopcorn · Yesterday 09:49

I wonder whether people would feel the same about the awards made to people after the better known casualty events, like terrorist attacks. Would people expect someone who lost a limb in a bombing to share their compensation with family who weren’t there?

PrizedPickledPopcorn · Yesterday 09:50

I’d think you want to be free to choose to treat your family, rather than it be8ng an expectation!

StrictlyCoffee · Yesterday 09:50

ImNotSharing · Yesterday 09:17

I think maybe you need a new family who matter more to you.

😆 thanks for the laugh. It seems to me that any mother on this site who dares to prioritise themselves or stand up for themselves gets demonised. No you are right, I should have just told the other side to make the cheque payable to DH.

No not has said that, but you do sound quite greedy and unpleasant. If you’re comfortable with that and see that just as standing up for yourself, fair dos, but it’s how you come across in your own words.

if you’ve genuinely received the amount you are asserting, for a personal injury element only, and not related to earnings or treatment, it must have been a significant injury. This presumably also had a significant impact on your family and their own mental health and wellbeing? Have you considered that at all?

Viviennemary · Yesterday 09:50

Mt563 · 01/05/2026 22:56

Wow. You really don't see yourself as a team in reality.

I cannot imagine wanting to keep mortgage level money to myself.

I genuinely think you should give a long hard think about whether your heart is truly in this marriage. You seem to have very little regard for your husband.

I agree. You are happy to have your lifestyle heavily subsidised by your DH. But when it comes to sharing your money it's no go. If I was a partner in this situation I think I would leave the relationship. Because I wouldn't be able to accept this level of selfishness.

Gloriia · Yesterday 09:51

PrizedPickledPopcorn · Yesterday 09:49

I wonder whether people would feel the same about the awards made to people after the better known casualty events, like terrorist attacks. Would people expect someone who lost a limb in a bombing to share their compensation with family who weren’t there?

No but we can only presume the dh lives with the op and therefore will have supported her both emotionally and financially? We aren't suggesting she gives it to an auntie who lives 50miles away.

ImNotSharing · Yesterday 09:51

Lmnop22 · Yesterday 09:48

It’s really coming across like you want to punish your husband and children by not letting them have any of this money - do you think that’s something you are perhaps subconsciously doing because you didn’t get the support you needed from them during the time you were pursuing the claim or after your accident happened?

I’m really not trying to punish anyone. I have put ‘extra’ money into the joint funds from things such as inheritance. My children have some savings in their names. Obviously, they would benefit from more. Obviously, life would be easier if we were mortgage free. Obviously. I just don’t want to use this money for that purpose.

OP posts:
Whatado · Yesterday 09:52

ImNotSharing · Yesterday 09:40

I will keep saying this because people obviously don’t understand and that’s fine but this is not the same as an inheritance or a lottery win or a salary.

This was something that happened to me through no fault of my own that resulted in life changing injuries. The payment is compensation for that.

Yes, there was an element for expenses and loss wages but the majority was to compensate for the pain, suffering and disfigurement.

I think maybe that’s what people can’t get their heads around on this thread.

Inheritance is as a result of the death of one spouses family member. So actually it is is similar as the in-law isnt the person who's relationship loss created the Inheritance. Large bonuses in work? One spouses individual performance in their work place.

You do realise that in a healthy functioning family when a traumatic incident happens to one family member it generally impacts on the other members.

How traumatic do you think it has been for your kids and DH dealing with your injury and recovery?

I have suffered horrific traumatic event in the last 5 years that required a fully year of emdr weekly. I couldn't have gotten through that without my DH support and emotionally being there for me.

You sound extremely detached from your marriage and kids in a weird way.

Before you worry about a hobby experience abroad use some of it for really good therapy .

NeatGreyBiscuit · Yesterday 09:52

ImNotSharing · Yesterday 09:40

I will keep saying this because people obviously don’t understand and that’s fine but this is not the same as an inheritance or a lottery win or a salary.

This was something that happened to me through no fault of my own that resulted in life changing injuries. The payment is compensation for that.

Yes, there was an element for expenses and loss wages but the majority was to compensate for the pain, suffering and disfigurement.

I think maybe that’s what people can’t get their heads around on this thread.

I think, maybe, it's because for some of us, money coming in is joint, no matter the source. That's how we handle things anyway.

I did get a payout from trauma and used to to fund therapies and making life a bit easier while struggling, and blew the rest on the trip of a life time for the whole family. My reasoning was that we'd all been through a lot (because an issue with one family member has an impact on everyone) and it was good to do something special that we normally couldn't even think of affording. A way to have a break and heal a bit.

Not saying you have to do it the same, just that it might not be that some people don't 'get it', as you say, just that they view it differently to you.

SharkPants · Yesterday 09:52

I think that you need to think about how you would feel if the shoe were on the other foot. If your husband had been through the trauma that you describe, fought for compensation and then kept the money for himself, how would you react? If you can honestly say you'd be fine with this, then that's your answer.
The amount you have described doesn't sound insignificant. He's going to work every day, as are you, to pay off a mortgage and support your children. Allocating some money to your mortgage would improve your family finances and alleviate the daily pressure.
I completely understand that you have fought for it and that the main impact has been on you, but you have also acknowledged that they have been affected too.
Can you get something drawn up whereby this is ring fenced so that it is under your control, but you still make some of it available for your family or pay of part of your mortgage to reduce the monthly amount? And then keep some for yourself?
That sounds like a compromise to me.
Most people, myself included, would see this money, which, had you lost your claim, would never exist, this making it an unexpected asset that they would hope their family would benefit from in some way.

Blueskycat · Yesterday 09:52

Agree with everyone saying you should have some therapy to help you understand what this money means for you and decide what to do with it.

It seems like you feel restricted and resentful about your life now, and it must feel amazing having the opportunity to change that and just do what you want for yourself. However as many posters have said, keeping the money for yourself risks your marriage and ultimately your relationships with your kids. For most people, being in a family means being a team and facing things together. I’m curious about what the point of being a family is for you?

Halloumiqueen · Yesterday 09:53

And for what it’s worth, I would blow some of that money….. probably quite a lot on so many things that make me happy. Even if they are materialistic. I think about all those things I’d say I’d do if I came into money and do them. But I’d also take my family away (if they wanted) on an amazing trip to in some respect, celebrate the hard work in to getting where you did as it would have undoubtedly impacted everyone (you the most of course). None of it would go into a family pot, it would sit in my account, but some would 100% be spent on my family.

RedRock41 · Yesterday 09:53

LorryTaylor · Yesterday 09:48

(Was the injury due to a cosmetic procedure?).

Good Q. If family money was used on a botched cosmetic surgery procedure, that adds a whole other layer… OP says happy to answer Qs but been radio silent on what actually happened (even in general terms)… = shady.

Regardess, as don’t expect will get a straight answer (‘too outing’ 🙄) I’d like compensation for the pain and suffering from trying to get head round OPs logic and for lost time reading this thread…

dazedandconfused14 · Yesterday 09:54

PrizedPickledPopcorn · Yesterday 09:49

I wonder whether people would feel the same about the awards made to people after the better known casualty events, like terrorist attacks. Would people expect someone who lost a limb in a bombing to share their compensation with family who weren’t there?

I mean, I get you’re trying to give an emotive example. But yes, I would expect the same.

If somebody needed the money for therapy or medical bills, that’s a different scenario. But ultimately if you’re a family, you’re a team. If you’ve made the decision to combine finances, that’s the decision you’ve made. We can think of a million scenarios, lottery wins, compensation for increasingly horrible things etc etc

But the fact is, op would choose to use this money on hobbies and clothes and allow her partner to continue working and supporting her to stay at home. She would also choose not to invest in the financial future of her kids. She may not like it, but that is unfathomable for most, as this thread shows.

She could take a fraction of this money and enjoy herself and still change her family’s life. It doesn’t matter how the money came about.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.