Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Don't like Farage but..

464 replies

TheBlueKoala · 24/04/2026 05:35

I do agree with him that foreign nationals shouldn't be able to claim benefits and to scrap PIP for mild mental health issues. And that the money saved should go into mental health care so that everyone with mild mental health problems can access NHS care rapidly.

OP posts:
Catza · Yesterday 20:54

Have you actually read the link you posted? It literally says "The key with any PIP application is to be honest about your condition affects you. Don’t exaggerate your responses but most importantly you should also not playdown or be afraid to express how you really feel."

Yes, a lot of people need support filling in the forms and a lot of people struggle to fill them in for various health-related reasons. Which is why such support is vital. Don't position it as some kind of a cheat code to claim pip unlawfully.

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · Yesterday 20:54

Pretty sure you know what I and millions of others don’t like about the ECHR including the leaders of two parties with significant support

I genuinely don't know what you don't like about the ECHR - it seems madness to me to want to leave an outside Court of Human Rights that I think would be a bit of protection if things went tits up in Government and they'd pulled us out.
Wasn't it set up just after the 2nd World War as protection for our freedom and rights to try and protect us against the horrors of what had gone on?
Why would it be a good thing to get rid of that outside protection?

BeAmberZebra · Yesterday 21:14

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · Yesterday 20:54

Pretty sure you know what I and millions of others don’t like about the ECHR including the leaders of two parties with significant support

I genuinely don't know what you don't like about the ECHR - it seems madness to me to want to leave an outside Court of Human Rights that I think would be a bit of protection if things went tits up in Government and they'd pulled us out.
Wasn't it set up just after the 2nd World War as protection for our freedom and rights to try and protect us against the horrors of what had gone on?
Why would it be a good thing to get rid of that outside protection?

I must have responded using the word sovereignty numerous times. The loss of which is what I don't like and why I’d like to leave or reform the ECHR which has expanded its powers well beyond its original remit with increasing encroachment to individual countries sovereignty. I also signposted other peoples views and where you might find them but they are generally less important to me than my own views which is why I don’t want to spend time discussing or justifying the validity of them.
I have faith in our government to keep the already existing protections or put in place any necessary new ones to deal with changing situations without input from foreign institutions. After all we live in a mature democracy and can surely protect our own citizens and simply don’t believe any government would strip away our existing rights. Incidentally if we got a government that decided to do that how exactly would our membership of the ECHR stop them?

SkipAd · Yesterday 21:17

BeAmberZebra · Yesterday 20:46

You know what you are trying to do and you are not trying to understand anything.

You don’t know me. Anyone in real life who does know me, would know I am being genuine. If I can’t ask questions on here, about other people’s points of view, this is not the forum I thought it was and I should step away for this evening.
You have probably done me a favour, I have spent far too long on here today 😂

BeAmberZebra · Yesterday 21:19

SkipAd · Yesterday 21:17

You don’t know me. Anyone in real life who does know me, would know I am being genuine. If I can’t ask questions on here, about other people’s points of view, this is not the forum I thought it was and I should step away for this evening.
You have probably done me a favour, I have spent far too long on here today 😂

I have responded see post but have a good evening. I too have probably spent far too long on here today.

BeAmberZebra · Yesterday 21:21

BeAmberZebra · Yesterday 21:19

I have responded see post but have a good evening. I too have probably spent far too long on here today.

Actually I responded to someone else but it explains my views.

pointythings · Yesterday 21:25

BeAmberZebra · Yesterday 21:14

I must have responded using the word sovereignty numerous times. The loss of which is what I don't like and why I’d like to leave or reform the ECHR which has expanded its powers well beyond its original remit with increasing encroachment to individual countries sovereignty. I also signposted other peoples views and where you might find them but they are generally less important to me than my own views which is why I don’t want to spend time discussing or justifying the validity of them.
I have faith in our government to keep the already existing protections or put in place any necessary new ones to deal with changing situations without input from foreign institutions. After all we live in a mature democracy and can surely protect our own citizens and simply don’t believe any government would strip away our existing rights. Incidentally if we got a government that decided to do that how exactly would our membership of the ECHR stop them?

I think your faith is touching, but very naive.

In terms of 'how would the ECHR stop them' in respect of a hypothetical government stripping away key rights - that should be obvious. Someone brings a case, it runs through the courts in the UK. If the UK Supreme Court does not deliver a satisfactory resolution, the ECHR is the next step. For something like stripping away workers' rights (which we know Reform want to do), the ECHR is our backstop. Trust Reform at your peril. And the Conservatives are no better.

BeAmberZebra · Yesterday 21:31

pointythings · Yesterday 21:25

I think your faith is touching, but very naive.

In terms of 'how would the ECHR stop them' in respect of a hypothetical government stripping away key rights - that should be obvious. Someone brings a case, it runs through the courts in the UK. If the UK Supreme Court does not deliver a satisfactory resolution, the ECHR is the next step. For something like stripping away workers' rights (which we know Reform want to do), the ECHR is our backstop. Trust Reform at your peril. And the Conservatives are no better.

Edited

But what practically do they do. Send in an army, bomb us, send our politicians to international jail. Financial sanctions possibly but if a government was minded to strip away rights would they care.

Notonthestairs · Yesterday 21:34

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · Yesterday 20:54

Pretty sure you know what I and millions of others don’t like about the ECHR including the leaders of two parties with significant support

I genuinely don't know what you don't like about the ECHR - it seems madness to me to want to leave an outside Court of Human Rights that I think would be a bit of protection if things went tits up in Government and they'd pulled us out.
Wasn't it set up just after the 2nd World War as protection for our freedom and rights to try and protect us against the horrors of what had gone on?
Why would it be a good thing to get rid of that outside protection?

The point is to deregulate - see Reform's announcements re fracking. Given Farage's personal interests in crapto currencies they'll also want to deregulate there too - just like Trump - money laundering free for all.

Regarding the ECHR - Reform will tell you to rely on common law - but common law didn't give the right to challenge the state if you've been harmed by it or want to challenge the states own investigations (see Hillsborough or Worboys).
See also challenging corporal punishment in schools and discrimination against gay people.

The idea that these rights will be automatically replaced is nonsense. They wont want to replicate the system that would get in their way.

Brexit was supposed to make the country richer - instead its damaged GDP significantly.
Sovereignty is all important - until they want to prorogue Parliament.
Sovereignty is all important - until they dont care about peace in NI.

Leaving the ECHR isnt some kind of golden ticket to make the countries services run better - its just creating another opportunity for a free for all. The average person will be no better off but someone that wants to challenge the state will be left with more limited avenues.

The justice system will be the next thing they blame - political appointments for judges. What could go wrong? (hint - see James Orr's views on abortion)

Newnamethisway · Yesterday 21:41

SpryTaupeTurtle · Yesterday 20:03

I made a claim for adult disability payment - for both physical and mental health issues - I was seeing a psychiatrist but they weren't involved in my application. I didn't get the highest rate and I didn't expect to. But I just answered the questions and also gave them evidence of my medication and any fit notes plus the letter that said I was seeing a psychiatrist - I don't know if it's different in Scotland with adult disability payment but I don't think that my GPs were contacted. The evidence I submitted was enough - I don't know if it's different under the Pip system. Certainly when I tried to claim lcwra my doctors were contacted and refused to fill the form. They know I have mental health issues but they just aren't supportive

I'm not sure if that helps but the mild thing seems to be coming from Reform - they aren't in power yet. I would suggest that if you want to claim that you do so and maybe get help from welfare rights or CAB to fill the form in

You have the right to say that your mental health serious even if professionals don't agree

Thank you but I genuinely don’t need PIP. My point was that restricting not allowing PIP to people with “mild” mental illness makes no sense because it’s used by doctors in relation to severity of illness and treatment needs, not ability to do daily tasks associated with PIP or ADP.

The assessment should be based on the descriptors not the name of the illness or whether it is “mild”.

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · Yesterday 21:48

pointythings · Yesterday 21:25

I think your faith is touching, but very naive.

In terms of 'how would the ECHR stop them' in respect of a hypothetical government stripping away key rights - that should be obvious. Someone brings a case, it runs through the courts in the UK. If the UK Supreme Court does not deliver a satisfactory resolution, the ECHR is the next step. For something like stripping away workers' rights (which we know Reform want to do), the ECHR is our backstop. Trust Reform at your peril. And the Conservatives are no better.

Edited

Exactly

cantgardenintherain · Yesterday 21:56

I think people like Farage love everyone desperately debating these sorts of issues, because then we aren’t focusing on issues like their well established linked with the ultra rich-who they really represent.

Crikeyalmighty · Yesterday 23:30

@pointythings you would think people would realise that having very few checks and balances in the system would put us in a similar situation to the US at the moment -all down to the whims of someone off their nut on power , but no , because our right wing dominated press have been playing , look here, don’t look there because it suits their agenda and an awful lot of voters still get their news from those same sources - they aren’t seeing Trumps night time up all night ranting - the gross narcissism, the falling asleep on the job etc etc , they aren’t reading about the mafia style money building, insider trading -

Crikeyalmighty · Yesterday 23:33

Notonthestairs · Yesterday 21:34

The point is to deregulate - see Reform's announcements re fracking. Given Farage's personal interests in crapto currencies they'll also want to deregulate there too - just like Trump - money laundering free for all.

Regarding the ECHR - Reform will tell you to rely on common law - but common law didn't give the right to challenge the state if you've been harmed by it or want to challenge the states own investigations (see Hillsborough or Worboys).
See also challenging corporal punishment in schools and discrimination against gay people.

The idea that these rights will be automatically replaced is nonsense. They wont want to replicate the system that would get in their way.

Brexit was supposed to make the country richer - instead its damaged GDP significantly.
Sovereignty is all important - until they want to prorogue Parliament.
Sovereignty is all important - until they dont care about peace in NI.

Leaving the ECHR isnt some kind of golden ticket to make the countries services run better - its just creating another opportunity for a free for all. The average person will be no better off but someone that wants to challenge the state will be left with more limited avenues.

The justice system will be the next thing they blame - political appointments for judges. What could go wrong? (hint - see James Orr's views on abortion)

Exactly -

New posts on this thread. Refresh page