Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To suspect police are worried about vigilantes - Epsom attack

851 replies

ReadingCrimeFiction · 14/04/2026 16:19

I live relatively close to Epsom and so this appalling assault is all over my news feeds and social media.

BBC News - Town left in shock by appalling rape outside church
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8dl5yevjg9o

The police have asked for witnesses but no descriptions have been given. Cue lots of very disturbing posts and comments from people who very clearly think these men are not white.

I can think of half a dozen scenarios where this is not being disclosed but, based on the comments, I think it all comes down to fears that local communities will take it on themselves to "apprehend" anyone who even vaguely looks like the perpetrators? And while the comments I am seeing are mostly white people being disgusting in their assumptions about brown and black people, i can imagine police would he equally concerned if, for example, the woman was Asian or Black and her attackers were white.

Is this where we are at? Where people make horrible racist assumptions and/or where police have to worry about how they will protect the broader community if they give any details of criminals?

A church built with stone. There is a sign in front of the building.

Epsom left in shock by appalling rape outside church

Helen Maguire says she is "appalled" by the incident outside Epsom Methodist Church on Saturday.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8dl5yevjg9o

OP posts:
Thread gallery
32
ThisIsTheAge · 16/04/2026 18:17

MaturingCheeseball · 16/04/2026 08:48

White men rape, sure, but not really in packs . I think that is what has given rise to the rumours. There was another post-nightclub gang rape in Brighton and one in Bournemouth too.

https://www.gmp.police.uk/news/greater-manchester/news/news/2025/june/three-men-handed-suspended-sentences-for-sexual-offences-against-underage-girl-groomed-over-social-media/

BBC News - Six men from 'depraved' Bolton grooming gang jailed - BBC News
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c89g293zj2ko

Yeah you're talking nonsense. White men commit gang rape too.

A composite image of the mugshots of Corey Barret, Richard Haslam and Jack Poulson.

Six men from 'depraved' Bolton grooming gang jailed

A further six men from a ten-man Bolton gang that abused under-age girls for years are sentenced.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c89g293zj2ko

OtterDoBetter · 16/04/2026 18:21

Love the name @EilonwyWithRedGoldHair

EmeraldShamrock000 · 16/04/2026 18:22

EasternStandard · 16/04/2026 16:15

The Southport enquiry shows how this reaches every level. Girls ended up being the victims. Women and girls usually are.

They always are collateral damage for these human experiments.
Life has changed, it used to be rare that you were followed down the street. No, you dare not to catch a strangers eye.
Mass immigration has definitely had an impact on women’s safety and the lawless drug use among citizens increasing violence isn’t helpful to us either.

QuintadosMalvados · 16/04/2026 18:24

Manxexile · 16/04/2026 17:52

I can't work out if you're posting in good faith or not.

It isn't a question of what "makes Men of a culture not rapey" or the rest you witter on about.

Given that men are the sex that commit rape and crimes of violence against women and girls (and boys it should be added) the real question is why should the UK government allow men - from cultures that specifically denigrate women and condone the abuse of women as acceptable - to be welcomed here as asylum seekers or illegal migrants without adequate background checks as to their history.

Reading what you write I think you would rank a white, British, middle-aged racist (male or female) as being of less value or being less "virtuous" than an asylum seeking non-white non-British rapist

[Edit - if British men go abroad they should conform to the accepted customs and laws of the country they are visiting - or have emigrated to - and if they commit sex or other crimes in that country then they should face whatever the prescribed punishments in those countries are. They should not get special treatment or have special excuses - just as male asylum seekers and illegal immigrants to the UK should not get special treatment or have special excuses in the UK.]

Edited

I think that you are correct and while I'm not saying this specifically about anybody posting here, I very much do think that there really are people who think that middle-aged white male racists are less good than non-white, asylum-seeking, non-British migrant rapists. I truly do. Mind-boggling, isn't it?

What the jeff is going on here? Some rescuer complex? Love is all they need?

(Which is, of course, racist in itself because it implies that these migrants can't help being like this, poor things, if only they had the love of a good woman and we taught them proper values. Good luck with that.)

Is that what it is?

I would rather be in a room with the British male racists.
That is NOT to say I would necessarily agree with their views but hey well obviously they are the much, much lesser of the two evils.
Well to me they are anyway.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/04/2026 18:35

RobinEllacotStrike · 16/04/2026 17:41

If a woman was raped by 3 men in your town wouldn't you want at least a description of what these men look like?

If the police don't release even basic description people will read into that. This is easily avoided by the police making a description of the perpetrators public.

i thought they were doing a press conference sometime today. Maybe I remembered incorrectly.

Manxexile · 16/04/2026 18:36

JHound · 16/04/2026 16:34

Exactly. Population groups exist. Race does not.

The parameters of racial identity are something society created.

Surely population groups are just as much socially constructed as race groups?

What's the difference bewteen a population group and a race?

(You introduced the concept of population group so you can distinguish it from what you meann by race)

Eskarina1 · 16/04/2026 18:36

EmeraldShamrock000 · 16/04/2026 18:22

They always are collateral damage for these human experiments.
Life has changed, it used to be rare that you were followed down the street. No, you dare not to catch a strangers eye.
Mass immigration has definitely had an impact on women’s safety and the lawless drug use among citizens increasing violence isn’t helpful to us either.

How old are you? Because I grew up in the 80s and 90s in a relatively rural and very white part of the UK. I absolutely was always aware of the risk of being followed, it happened more than once. I was scared to get evening buses and would sit next to adult women even if there were double seats available because otherwise a random man would sit next to you. Once I had to climb over seats as he wouldn't let me out at my stop. There are too many incidents in my childhood and early adulthood to mention. I have never felt safe to catch a strange man's eye.

Sarah2891 · 16/04/2026 18:38

Manxexile · 16/04/2026 18:12

Why would you "hope" they are white British people?

Your "hope" sounds racist.

That's not racist. I'm white and almost hope they are white also as it won't start riots!

JHound · 16/04/2026 18:38

Manxexile · 16/04/2026 18:36

Surely population groups are just as much socially constructed as race groups?

What's the difference bewteen a population group and a race?

(You introduced the concept of population group so you can distinguish it from what you meann by race)

In the post I responded to PP mentioned DNA profiles.

They highlight population groups not race. I did not introduce the concept of population groups. The person discussing DNA did.

Manxexile · 16/04/2026 18:41

JHound · 16/04/2026 16:40

Because the perpetrator was not a migrant.

Well that's remarkably obtuse.

His parents were Rwandan. If they hadn't been here and he hadn't been born here the atrocity in Southport would not have happened.

So migration was a direct factor.

FernandoSor · 16/04/2026 18:42

lovealieinortwo · 16/04/2026 05:53

I heard there is a hotel housing asylum seekers which people were already blaming for an uptick in crime. No idea if this is actually true though.

Just an awful story and I hope the perpetrators actually face justice.

Maybe you ‘heard’ but you didn’t bother checking before posting this did you?

Two seconds of googling would have shown you there are no asylum seeker hotels in Epsom.

Pedallleur · 16/04/2026 18:43

Sarah2891 · 16/04/2026 18:38

That's not racist. I'm white and almost hope they are white also as it won't start riots!

Well thank God for that. Its just some white men on a gang rape spree, nothing worth disrupting the traffic for. Basically if they are white they get a pass!!!!

Hereforthecommentz · 16/04/2026 18:43

ThisIsTheAge · 16/04/2026 18:17

I'm really pleased they got justice unlike many of the Rotherham victims because authorities were too scared to do anything about it for fear of being called racist.

Manxexile · 16/04/2026 18:44

JHound · 16/04/2026 16:37

Why blame government for the behaviour of those who cause people like PP to feel threatened? People have a choice for how they react in response to immigration levels and they alone are to blame for that choice.

Actually the government does bear some reponsibility throught its actions - or inactions

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/04/2026 18:45

IamRedCrossnotJesus · 16/04/2026 18:06

Ha. You, a random on the internet, just gave me instructions.

Anyway reason I ask is

a) Google results might vary depending on the country you are googling from

b) you seem to think the capital city of Wales is in England.

You were very keen to help and offered up your helping services. I said what are the first few links on your Google search engine when you ask the question I posed, as apparently my Google was faulty. Now you’re telling me all the reasons why you can’t help 🤦🏻‍♀️

To be fair I asked ChatGPT the question of whether Google can be censored and it did pretty much explain what is probably going on and it’s not directly Google. It suggested the news articles have probably been written in a way where either the parents birth origin is considered sensitive and so has not been mentioned. It also talked about algorithms making the top hits ‘trusted news sources’.

I do find it interesting that The Guardian is often the first news link given when I’ve asked questions about the news. ChatGPT did it recently too when I was asking about a news story a few days ago. Why is The Guardian being offered up so readily when it’s as left bias, as the Mail is right bias?

JHound · 16/04/2026 18:45

Manxexile · 16/04/2026 18:41

Well that's remarkably obtuse.

His parents were Rwandan. If they hadn't been here and he hadn't been born here the atrocity in Southport would not have happened.

So migration was a direct factor.

It’s not obtuse. It’s a statement of fact. He wasn’t a migrant.
What is obtuse is your suggestion that anybody with an immigrant parent becomes an immigrant themself and their actions become down to “immigration”.

It’s a complete red herring to mention migration when discussing AR. He was born, raised and socialised here.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/04/2026 18:48

JHound · 16/04/2026 18:38

In the post I responded to PP mentioned DNA profiles.

They highlight population groups not race. I did not introduce the concept of population groups. The person discussing DNA did.

Edited

I never mentioned ‘population groups’ that was your term.

Manxexile · 16/04/2026 18:49

JHound · 16/04/2026 16:50

I attribute blame to perpetrators of actions.

Not “government”.

By that logic "government" would never be responsible for anything.

So "government" isn't responsible for the NHS or for defence or for the payment of pensions?

by

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/04/2026 18:49

FernandoSor · 16/04/2026 18:42

Maybe you ‘heard’ but you didn’t bother checking before posting this did you?

Two seconds of googling would have shown you there are no asylum seeker hotels in Epsom.

Two seconds of googling would no doubt give you a Guardisn link that would tell you fuck all.

JHound · 16/04/2026 18:49

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/04/2026 18:48

I never mentioned ‘population groups’ that was your term.

I did not say you used the term. But you discussed DNA results. That directly introduces the topic of population groups not race.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/04/2026 18:50

JHound · 16/04/2026 18:49

I did not say you used the term. But you discussed DNA results. That directly introduces the topic of population groups not race.

And the previous poster has asked you to explain that to her.

Dollymylove · 16/04/2026 18:50

ThisIsTheAge · 16/04/2026 18:17

Well done GMP. Imagine if they had put the same diligence into the Pakistani grooming gangs. Imagine!!

IamRedCrossnotJesus · 16/04/2026 18:50

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/04/2026 18:45

You were very keen to help and offered up your helping services. I said what are the first few links on your Google search engine when you ask the question I posed, as apparently my Google was faulty. Now you’re telling me all the reasons why you can’t help 🤦🏻‍♀️

To be fair I asked ChatGPT the question of whether Google can be censored and it did pretty much explain what is probably going on and it’s not directly Google. It suggested the news articles have probably been written in a way where either the parents birth origin is considered sensitive and so has not been mentioned. It also talked about algorithms making the top hits ‘trusted news sources’.

I do find it interesting that The Guardian is often the first news link given when I’ve asked questions about the news. ChatGPT did it recently too when I was asking about a news story a few days ago. Why is The Guardian being offered up so readily when it’s as left bias, as the Mail is right bias?

Edited

Now you’re telling me all the reasons why you can’t help 🤦🏻‍♀️

I haven't done that at all. I just explained why I asked the question I did.🤷‍♀️

JHound · 16/04/2026 18:50

Manxexile · 16/04/2026 18:49

By that logic "government" would never be responsible for anything.

So "government" isn't responsible for the NHS or for defence or for the payment of pensions?

by

That makes zero sense. How can you compare “the NHS” to an individual committing threatening acts? How does that analogy work in your head.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/04/2026 18:52

IamRedCrossnotJesus · 16/04/2026 18:50

Now you’re telling me all the reasons why you can’t help 🤦🏻‍♀️

I haven't done that at all. I just explained why I asked the question I did.🤷‍♀️

Okay. Push all of that to one side. What links does Google give you when you enquire as to the Stockport killer’s parents nationalities? Are you getting The Guardian number one and the BBC number two?