Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Violent children should be stopped regardless of other factors

285 replies

Hamalam · 14/04/2026 11:38

The part that struck me about the Southport findings was the way AR seems to have been given leeway because he had an ASD diagnosis. Oh he’s carrying a knife and a hockey stick but he has ASD, as if that’s ok. It’s an attitude I have met a lot with my child school, where they and other children suffer from violence meted out but other children.

Oh but they have SEND / are in care / have a bad home-life as though that’s excuses my child being a victim. I really hope that one of the lessons learned by schools, police etc is to look at the threat or the violence and the danger to others, regardless of any ‘excuses’ the perpetrator might offer.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 14/04/2026 17:34

gamerchick · 14/04/2026 17:24

Locked away nicely out of sight by the sounds of it.

But where would you want the person who is violent? Around other children?

Janblues28 · 14/04/2026 17:42

@LiviaDrusillaAugusta that's alot of what ifs. What if he grows up and isn't a risk to others. Don't make the assumption that it's a one way track. Actually his behaviour has improved to some extent with age - like I said we have only had 2 incidents in school - one where he kicked a teacher in frustration. 1 where he squeezed a kids face. Kids this age are still learning and they can change and grow. So many assumptions are made about them.
If he gets regulated at school his teacher knows how to redirect him to help him calm down and diffuse. When he's calm then she can reason with him. I'm abroad and I'm lucky that he have access to support but are also able to afford private school. Part of the problem in the UK is that with a growing SEN population, schools are not able to meet their needs and all kids have a right to have their needs met. There is a lack of support for parents. As soon as my son was diagnosed with ASD (we only waited 2 months for diagnosis) we had access to help. A state school in the UK with 25+ kids, 1 teacher, 1 assistant is not the right environment for an ASD kid but there's no funding to do anything about it. My son has been in a setting which saw his behaviour escalate. As soon as we moved him he thrived. Alot of parents don't have that option.

Chocaholick · 14/04/2026 17:44

ghostyslovesheets · 14/04/2026 15:33

Yes - the agency’s involved - Prevent, Lancashire Police, Lancashire Social Services, CAMHS, and FCAMHS. All made fatal mistakes and that’s why we need a more effective multi agency approach

Prevent didn’t have a ‘framework’ he fitted so ‘couldn’t’ act, SS - god knows - they will have a SCR I’m sure but I’m betting it’s down to lack of SW’s and training, CHAMS have no power to force people to engage so if YP say no their involvement ends.

the system is broken, it needs better funding- more specialist staff/support - more legislation behind it. People can only do what they can do in their jobs - as mentioned above there are no secure therapeutic placements around without huge waiting lists, YOS pre offence work is voluntary, youth workers are rare beasts these days.

A broken system will never work - neither will locking kids up.

Im not minimalising this crime - it’s atrocious and those found to have been negligent need to be held to account. Knife carrying and youth crime is an incredibly complex and underfunded area.

No child should ever die this way and no child should feel they need to arm themselves - but they do and that needs addressing

He didn’t ‘feel the need to arm himself’, he was a psychopath who took the knife so he could experience stabbing little girls and watching them bleed to death. He’s an animal and I couldn’t care less about his human rights. He has none as far as I’m concerned. Trying to ‘understand’ him is pointless. He’s evil.

gamerchick · 14/04/2026 17:56

EasternStandard · 14/04/2026 17:34

But where would you want the person who is violent? Around other children?

Not locked away out of sight. Which was what happened fairly recently in history.

Do you want kids in straight jackets tied to radiators?

Ablondiebutagoody · 14/04/2026 18:07

Strictly1 · 14/04/2026 16:03

Society needs a shift. We try to implement consequences and get long complaints from parents as their child didn’t mean it. We try to get support from agencies - they’re drowning. We cannot exclude as it’s due to unmet needs we have told them we can’t meet. We are drowning in schools.

Strike

EasternStandard · 14/04/2026 18:12

gamerchick · 14/04/2026 17:56

Not locked away out of sight. Which was what happened fairly recently in history.

Do you want kids in straight jackets tied to radiators?

That’s a leap. I don’t want violent children to harm other dc. Who does?

Hamalam · 14/04/2026 18:24

Forthesteps · 14/04/2026 16:37

Translation: lock up all those who are different. Worked so well before.

How’s it going not locking them up? AR killed 3, so did VC, and injured 3 more. Great plan!

OP posts:
Hamalam · 14/04/2026 18:28

Whatafustercluck · 14/04/2026 17:10

That child has nowhere else to go. The school must take the child because the local authority cannot find a suitable alternative placement. The school has no choice.

The parent has to send the child in because.... attendance, fines etc. The parent has no choice.

The LA cannot find an alternative but has statutory duties to fulfil.

I understand the frustration, but simply saying 'they need to be removed from class' is not a viable response because, under the current system, with its accompanying policies and available funding, there is nowhere else that child can go.

And let's suppose that child does stay at home, complete with all the violence hitherto seen in school. How long do you think it will be until we're seeing another 'child death that should have been avoided' headline?

We need root and branch overhaul of all existing services and provisions, because there is currently no legal or moral scope for simply 'removing' the child from the classroom. But reform on this scale costs money that nobody is prepared to pay. It's why you'll end up with the government putting even more responsibility onto schools that they have no capacity to meet. The first step being removal of EHCPs and expecting busy teachers to identify need - and parents with no legal backstop when schools inevitably fail.

If you think it's bad now, just wait until the current planned reforms go through.

why the hell would you condone having a child who has split another child’s head open in a mainstream class? What on earth are you thinking?

OP posts:
BreatheAndFocus · 14/04/2026 18:31

gamerchick · 14/04/2026 17:56

Not locked away out of sight. Which was what happened fairly recently in history.

Do you want kids in straight jackets tied to radiators?

Who’s said that?? Where were these children tied to radiators? The only time I remember seeing disabled children tied up like that was in those news reports about Romanian orphanages. They were tied to cots and beds and, presumably, radiators. No-one sat here clapping their hands and thinking that was a great idea. People were absolutely horrified.

OonaStubbs · 14/04/2026 18:32

The onus should be on the rights of law-abiding children not to be assaulted or killed. The rights of violent offenders should not be a priority at all. Fast-track them to a lifetime in prison, to keep people safe.

Hamalam · 14/04/2026 18:35

And it’s not a SEN thing. It’s so not a SEN thing. It’s an ‘any child who is being violent for whatever reason’ thing. I have a SEN child, never violent in their lives but attacked by all and sundry at state school for being different. We moved them to mainstream private. It’s been night and day violence wise because guess what - private school parents don’t just put up with other kids splitting their kids head open! So private school teachers don’t either.! And kids are safe and happy and learning.

There are no excuses for exposing our young children to violence. None whatsoever. There seem to be people on here saying ‘yeh but we have to let kids beat innocent young kids up because otherwise they’d end up in prison/ locked away. Take a listen to yourselves! What a disgusting attitude! Be better!

OP posts:
Owninterpreter · 14/04/2026 18:37

As someone with a lot of experience in special school that this repeated 'in a mainstream class' is annoying.

I am hoping it comes from a place of assuming the violence dissappears in a special school class as the child is now supported but it comes across like its fine for special school children to be exposed to violence as long as mainstream children are ok.

OonaStubbs · 14/04/2026 18:39

No school children should be exposed to violence, or at least not twice from the same offender.

INX · 14/04/2026 18:40

It's a difficult one because if a child was regularly witnessing violence, shouting, swearing, chair throwing etc at home, the police and SS would quite rightly step in to protect them.

Yet at school, many children have to witness this in the classroom and it must be genuinely frightening.

suburburban · 14/04/2026 18:48

BreatheAndFocus · 14/04/2026 18:31

Who’s said that?? Where were these children tied to radiators? The only time I remember seeing disabled children tied up like that was in those news reports about Romanian orphanages. They were tied to cots and beds and, presumably, radiators. No-one sat here clapping their hands and thinking that was a great idea. People were absolutely horrified.

I’m not aware of this happening in the UK recently either

yes the Romanian orphanage scandal

Whatafustercluck · 14/04/2026 19:11

Hamalam · 14/04/2026 18:28

why the hell would you condone having a child who has split another child’s head open in a mainstream class? What on earth are you thinking?

Where have I condoned it? I am stating facts that are well recognised. I haven't said it's in any way an acceptable situation - for anyone.

Hamalam · 14/04/2026 19:20

Owninterpreter · 14/04/2026 18:37

As someone with a lot of experience in special school that this repeated 'in a mainstream class' is annoying.

I am hoping it comes from a place of assuming the violence dissappears in a special school class as the child is now supported but it comes across like its fine for special school children to be exposed to violence as long as mainstream children are ok.

I’d assume special school teachers know restraint techniques and are allowed to use them to help protect the other children?

OP posts:
Strictly1 · 14/04/2026 19:38

Ablondiebutagoody · 14/04/2026 18:07

Strike

And feed the rhetoric that we are lazy. How dare we strike when we fine for term time holidays, we need to go to work etc. All from the parents whose children we are trying to help from such action. I’m old and fed up of being blamed for everything. I know it’s not the attitude but I'm being honest.

Manxexile · 14/04/2026 20:17

Forthesteps · 14/04/2026 16:37

Translation: lock up all those who are different. Worked so well before.

Has anyone suggested locking up "all those who are different"?

No

I think what has been suggested is locking up - or at least dealing differently from how we do at the moment - those who pose a real threat to others and /or seriously disrupt the lives and learning experience of other children.

Earlier today I posted a video about Brendan Depa in the US who seriously beat and injured a teaching assisitant.

He had been violent and dysregulated throughout most of his life and had various ASD and ADHD diagnoses. He was completely out of control and teachers were physically scared of him and warned never to challenge him.

He ended up in a US correctional facility - and guess what - he stopped kicking off because he'd get the shit kicked out of him by people even more scary than he was.

Now I'm not suggesting that sort of solution in the UK, but perhaps a different approach is required for those who refuse to behave in an acceptable manner - whatever their diagnoses...

SeriousFaffing · 14/04/2026 20:24

TheKittenswithMittens · 14/04/2026 12:58

If the Greens get power, it will get worse as they plan to close all the prisons. What will they do with AR then?

@TheKittenswithMittens we’ll be stuffed if Farage and his lot get in too, given that he thinks that gun laws need to be relaxed and the ban on handguns is “ludicrous”.

You know, handguns that were banned after Dunblane.

www.thenational.scot/news/25927271.nigel-farage-said-guns-dunblane/

UnhappyHobbit · 14/04/2026 20:41

I completely agree OP. It’s never an excuse. It’s like we live in a society now where everyone who practices bad behaviour has an excuse. My sister was harrased by years by someone with learning difficulties, yet he was treated like the victim.

My heart goes out to the families of those poor girls in Southport. They should have never experienced this horror.

cobrakaieaglefang · 14/04/2026 20:43

It needs investment in both mental health and SEND provision then kids causing the biggest issues could get help and any excuses removed. No child should be wrecking educational opportunities for a class full of kids. MH/Send does not trump everyone else!
It's all very well saying the issues of a child is non of anyone else's business, but in reality their problems are played out publicly making it everyones problem.
Going back to 2001, my DD was sexually assaulted in yr6 by boy in her class, the school tried the 'we can't discuss ' my reply was he's 10, the police and MP can discuss instead. Guess what, suddenly both school and parents were happy to start discussing! I knew the kid, knew he wasn't being malicious, it was impulsive but the behaviour was both illegal and unacceptable to be tolerated. We worked together to protect both kids!

canuckup · 14/04/2026 20:53

What man exile said

A lot of these kids are basically bullies and need to know where the line is

It may take until adulthood for them to realise this. A lot easier in early childhood!

ChunkyMonkey36 · 14/04/2026 20:56

canuckup · 14/04/2026 20:53

What man exile said

A lot of these kids are basically bullies and need to know where the line is

It may take until adulthood for them to realise this. A lot easier in early childhood!

I’m not sure that your average playground bully does eventually become a child murderer, in all honesty.

user1471497170 · 14/04/2026 20:58

But ARs actions weren't due to autistic meltdowns. It was planned and premeditated murder.

Swipe left for the next trending thread