Perhaps instead of people on this thread using it to advance their own agenda, they could focus on the horrible fact a child died in appalling circumstances. But that would probably require a level of emotional intelligence and selflessness that is impossible to find on Mumsnet.
How is a dead child the starting point of a AIBU thread? Disgraceful.
Sorry what? So how is the conversation (if you deign to allow us to have one at all) supposed to go?
'A child has been killed by a dangerous dog';
'Yes it's awful isn't it, but whatever we do we mustn't discuss any possible changes that we might make off the back of this horrific incident to prevent it happening again, we must all just agree it's horrible and leave it at that. We wouldn't want to be seen to be pushing an 'agenda' of...not having more kids mauled to death. That would be insensitive'.
Well bollocks to that. Were you saying we shouldn't be talking about gun law reform after Dunblane? Or police reform after Sarah Everard?