Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Update to AIBU to refuse Aunt's fwb claim on her estate.

454 replies

Sleepneededprettyplease · 07/04/2026 17:52

Posting here because it is where I put the first thread.

A brief summery is that my Aunt died and her FWB is trying to say that he is entitled to part of her estate because she had asked me to allow him to stay in a house she had invested in for me. Anyway if you want the full story feel free to read what I put on the first thread.

Anyway the main thing is that he is now sueing in the courts. I need a bit of a hand hold please. My lawyers have suggested getting a barristers opinion so I am just waiting for that. I wouldn't even mind if it was possible to just go to mediation but he wants the house for the rest of his life and won't consider anything else.

www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5505433-aibu-to-refuse-aunts-fwb-claim-on-her-estate?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

OP posts:
SheilaFentiman · 28/05/2026 18:26

If the claim of dependency against the estate is successful (doubtful but that is the issue at court) then the CF might be able to claim his living/rental costs since the death of the aunt. These would be claimed from the estate and so OP is trying to minimise such a claim by CF continuing to live rent free.

I can also imagine she is horrified by the idea of bailiffs etc, particularly as there is now a court date for the estate dependency hearing which is a “bearable” amount of time away.

YourOliveBalonz · 28/05/2026 18:32

I think OP has every right and intention of enforcing the existing court order, but seeing as she has an ongoing legal case with the same person she has been advised not to take steps to enforce until this aspect has been resolved. It is frustrating but it makes sense to me. Although the house is unrelated to the current legal case of contesting the will, the OP is a beneficiary of the will being contested on the grounds that the person can’t support themselves. Seeing as the (unlikely) outcome is that they need to award him money to support himself from the Estate, it may not look great for him to be made homeless by the person who is getting the money he claims to need, until that aspect is settled by the judge.

SheilaFentiman · 28/05/2026 18:35

Well put @YourOliveBalonz

WallaceinAnderland · 28/05/2026 18:36

Sleepneededprettyplease · 28/05/2026 18:23

Oh it is unlikely. Absolutely.

That said when assessing risk the is a gains loss calculation. If I evict the gain is I can get the house on the market sooner although realistically the gain is I can start the process for bayliffs/high court enforcement officers sooner. The loss is the risk that I could put myself thousands of pounds out of pocket.

If I don't evict the gain is that I can look good to the court (respecting the process), there is no chance of really nasty bills, and I may be able to avoid paying for bailiffs if he accepts the courts decision. The loss is that I can't put the house on the market and realise the money. However even if I did sell the house the money will have to sit in an account until this is finished. So the loss is actually just annoyance to me.

This decision is pretty easy. I get people saying to evict him. I want him gone. I want the house gone. I want to remember a genuine, kind, loving woman who was closer and more supportive of me than my own mother without stressing about this situation. I so want this done.

I will not let emotions drive me though. I have to be sensible and level headed to play the long game. There is no place for emotions in legal cases.

That makes sense OP. It's just a matter of being patient.

Sleepneededprettyplease · 28/05/2026 18:43

PinotPony · 28/05/2026 18:24

OP, you seem confused about the legal advice you’ve received from your solicitor. Are they not confirming their advice to you in writing?

If you have a possession order you’ll be able enforce that if he fails to vacate the property by the date ordered. You simply instruct High Court enforcement officers to physically evict him.

As far as the claim on the estate goes, he is entitled to bring a claim under the Inheritance Act if he is either (1) an unmarried partner who lived with your aunt for at least 2 years prior to her death or (2) he was being financially maintained by your aunt (partially or fully) prior to her death. If she had provided rent free accommodation to him, then it is arguable that she was financially maintaining him.

It sounds like he’s issued a claim form. Has he served Particulars of Claim yet? You’ll need to file a Defence to the claim setting out why you say he is not entitled to any part of the estate. If he has no resources of his own to house himself, and your aunt was effectively supporting him, why do you say he is not entitled to reasonable provision from her estate?

Has your solicitor suggested making a Part 36 offer? In your shoes, unless I was absolutely certain that I’d win the case, I’d formally offer him a lump sum settlement of money. There are cost consequences for him if he fails to beat your offer at trial and so it will put him under pressure to agree a settlement. A negotiated settlement also removes the uncertainty of litigation and the ongoing legal fees.

My Aunt was not supporting him. I thought I had a proper tenancy agreement to make him a tenant in my house. My Aunt paid occasional money into his account when she split a joint expense.

I am waiting for his response to the defence paperwork.

As for offering money as I have said he isn't interested.

OP posts:
RandomMess · 28/05/2026 18:44

I can see why your solicitors say to wait until the hearing, it does make sense.

Hopefully you may be able to claim the legal costs from your aunt’s estate?

Sleepneededprettyplease · 28/05/2026 18:44

YourOliveBalonz · 28/05/2026 18:32

I think OP has every right and intention of enforcing the existing court order, but seeing as she has an ongoing legal case with the same person she has been advised not to take steps to enforce until this aspect has been resolved. It is frustrating but it makes sense to me. Although the house is unrelated to the current legal case of contesting the will, the OP is a beneficiary of the will being contested on the grounds that the person can’t support themselves. Seeing as the (unlikely) outcome is that they need to award him money to support himself from the Estate, it may not look great for him to be made homeless by the person who is getting the money he claims to need, until that aspect is settled by the judge.

This

OP posts:
Sleepneededprettyplease · 28/05/2026 18:45

RandomMess · 28/05/2026 18:44

I can see why your solicitors say to wait until the hearing, it does make sense.

Hopefully you may be able to claim the legal costs from your aunt’s estate?

I can fortunately. Although trying not to do so yet.

OP posts:
Sleepneededprettyplease · 28/05/2026 18:49

WallaceinAnderland · 28/05/2026 18:36

That makes sense OP. It's just a matter of being patient.

Yes. I don't want to put everything at risk for the sake of a bit more time.

OP posts:
PyongyangKipperbang · 28/05/2026 18:57

(2) he was being financially maintained by your aunt (partially or fully) prior to her death. If she had provided rent free accommodation to him, then it is arguable that she was financially maintaining him.

But it wasnt her house so she wasnt providing the free accommodation, the OP was. The aunt arranged it with OP but it was never her house, so she wasnt financially maintaining him. As I said waaaaay up thread, its possible that he would have a claim against OP if she passed away, because she was the one housing him, but he hasnt a hope of proving that he was in any way financially dependent on the Aunt.

I would also say that the fact that he has turned down money will not look good in court because as far as this case is concerned, that is all that they can award given that the house was never part of the estate.

Sleepneededprettyplease · 28/05/2026 19:00

PyongyangKipperbang · 28/05/2026 18:57

(2) he was being financially maintained by your aunt (partially or fully) prior to her death. If she had provided rent free accommodation to him, then it is arguable that she was financially maintaining him.

But it wasnt her house so she wasnt providing the free accommodation, the OP was. The aunt arranged it with OP but it was never her house, so she wasnt financially maintaining him. As I said waaaaay up thread, its possible that he would have a claim against OP if she passed away, because she was the one housing him, but he hasnt a hope of proving that he was in any way financially dependent on the Aunt.

I would also say that the fact that he has turned down money will not look good in court because as far as this case is concerned, that is all that they can award given that the house was never part of the estate.

This. You put it more clearly than I manage

OP posts:
andweallsingalong · 28/05/2026 19:05

To speed things up a little bit would your counsel be happy with you getting all the eviction ducks in a row and bailiffs scheduled for the 18th August (day after the court case).

That way you could theoretically cancel them so would be leaving things up to the court?

Sleepneededprettyplease · 28/05/2026 19:16

andweallsingalong · 28/05/2026 19:05

To speed things up a little bit would your counsel be happy with you getting all the eviction ducks in a row and bailiffs scheduled for the 18th August (day after the court case).

That way you could theoretically cancel them so would be leaving things up to the court?

It doesn't work like that. We can give notice that he needs to leave then but to use bailiffs he must have failed to leave on the stated date then I have to fill in a form and apply to court for a warrant. Then there were a few more steps which I don't immediately recall.

OP posts:
andweallsingalong · 28/05/2026 20:52

Sleepneededprettyplease · 28/05/2026 19:16

It doesn't work like that. We can give notice that he needs to leave then but to use bailiffs he must have failed to leave on the stated date then I have to fill in a form and apply to court for a warrant. Then there were a few more steps which I don't immediately recall.

Ah, sorry, I thought he had already had an eviction date in May and overstayed so bailiffs was the next stage.

Mustn't have read it properly 🤣

Good luck in August 🍀

PyongyangKipperbang · 28/05/2026 20:55

Adding to what I posted above......it also was not supposed to be free. He was supposed to pay rent but never did. That the OP chose not to evict him isnt relevant as it was due to his friendship with her Aunt. Her actions since her Aunt's death show that her actions prior were based purely on not wanting to upset her Aunt and that she always intended to take full possession of the property. Everything that the OP has done has shown that it was never intended to be his "forever" home, but done as a favour to her Aunt.

WallaceinAnderland · 28/05/2026 22:05

The only thing I'm still not sure about is the court case in August.

It is about if he can claim from the estate while the case is being decided.

How can the judge decide this. If the judge allows an interim order, what happens if he loses, does he have to pay it back to the estate?

PyongyangKipperbang · 28/05/2026 22:23

WallaceinAnderland · 28/05/2026 22:05

The only thing I'm still not sure about is the court case in August.

It is about if he can claim from the estate while the case is being decided.

How can the judge decide this. If the judge allows an interim order, what happens if he loses, does he have to pay it back to the estate?

Knowing a fair few chaps of his age who have this bombastic attitude, he is probably thinking "well I will be dead by then!" so he wont care. Also they never back down as they are so sure that they are right. (I encountered the husband of my mother's friend who is like this, he ended up getting barred from our local because he wouldnt accept that he was wrong in a pub quiz about who was born as a result of the immaculate conception).

I suspect that he is confusing the house with the will, thinking that if he wins the case (he wont) that he will be able to stay in the house.

Sleepneededprettyplease · 29/05/2026 03:41

andweallsingalong · 28/05/2026 20:52

Ah, sorry, I thought he had already had an eviction date in May and overstayed so bailiffs was the next stage.

Mustn't have read it properly 🤣

Good luck in August 🍀

I mean he kinda has but as I am accepting this because of court dates I have to give him a new one.

OP posts:
Sleepneededprettyplease · 29/05/2026 03:43

WallaceinAnderland · 28/05/2026 22:05

The only thing I'm still not sure about is the court case in August.

It is about if he can claim from the estate while the case is being decided.

How can the judge decide this. If the judge allows an interim order, what happens if he loses, does he have to pay it back to the estate?

I think technically yes although as he has no money it would never happen. I have a meeting with my solicitor to get more info in a couple of weeks.

OP posts:
Sleepneededprettyplease · 29/05/2026 03:44

PyongyangKipperbang · 28/05/2026 22:23

Knowing a fair few chaps of his age who have this bombastic attitude, he is probably thinking "well I will be dead by then!" so he wont care. Also they never back down as they are so sure that they are right. (I encountered the husband of my mother's friend who is like this, he ended up getting barred from our local because he wouldnt accept that he was wrong in a pub quiz about who was born as a result of the immaculate conception).

I suspect that he is confusing the house with the will, thinking that if he wins the case (he wont) that he will be able to stay in the house.

I think so. I do think that he isn't getting very good legal advice. Or maybe he just isn't listening.

OP posts:
Sleepneededprettyplease · 29/05/2026 03:44

PyongyangKipperbang · 28/05/2026 20:55

Adding to what I posted above......it also was not supposed to be free. He was supposed to pay rent but never did. That the OP chose not to evict him isnt relevant as it was due to his friendship with her Aunt. Her actions since her Aunt's death show that her actions prior were based purely on not wanting to upset her Aunt and that she always intended to take full possession of the property. Everything that the OP has done has shown that it was never intended to be his "forever" home, but done as a favour to her Aunt.

Thank you.

OP posts:
Owl55 · 29/05/2026 04:52

Is he paying his gas/electric /council tax / water rates or you?
Will you be left to pay these bills if he has stopped paying them?

Sleepneededprettyplease · 29/05/2026 05:59

Owl55 · 29/05/2026 04:52

Is he paying his gas/electric /council tax / water rates or you?
Will you be left to pay these bills if he has stopped paying them?

He is and yes when he leaves I will have to. It annoys me that the best chance of selling is during the summer but I will probably be saddled with the bills all winter because he is doing this.

OP posts:
MachineBee · 29/05/2026 09:55

Sleepneededprettyplease · 29/05/2026 05:59

He is and yes when he leaves I will have to. It annoys me that the best chance of selling is during the summer but I will probably be saddled with the bills all winter because he is doing this.

Edited

Hopefully you won’t have a long wait to sell. The current housing market is difficult but mainly because there are very few properties coming on to the market. We found a buyer for my late DF’s house in January - 9 days after it went on sale. Completed by Easter.

Sleepneededprettyplease · 29/05/2026 10:08

MachineBee · 29/05/2026 09:55

Hopefully you won’t have a long wait to sell. The current housing market is difficult but mainly because there are very few properties coming on to the market. We found a buyer for my late DF’s house in January - 9 days after it went on sale. Completed by Easter.

Thank you. I hope it will be fairly quick. It is a nice property as long as he hasn't trashed it.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread