Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The impossible has happened - Trump has made me a Keir Starmer supporter!

1000 replies

mumofoneAloneandwell · 03/03/2026 17:33

'This is not the age of churchill'

Thank God. Fucking orange twat.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
41
PerkingFaintly · 03/03/2026 23:47

Also for anyone confused by some posters wittering about dry dock...

No, HMS Dragon is not in dry dock. It's just in dock.

Doubtless the basin it is in could be made dry, ie drained of all water and the vessel supported by a cradle while works are carried out on the hull, which is what we mean by a vessel being "in dry dock".

But that's not how Dragon is. It's just moored in a dock being loaded.

1dayatatime · 03/03/2026 23:48

Ihavelostthegame · 03/03/2026 23:45

@1dayatatime this seems to contradict you. It seems our jets are capable of shooting down drones

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g74npdwnyo

Certainly possible but less effective and more expensive than an anti missile/ anti drone integrated air defence system.

PerkingFaintly · 03/03/2026 23:50

I only bother saying this because there seem to be a lot of people boldly making statements on stuff they appear to know nothing about. Not even what the words mean.

rainingsnoring · 03/03/2026 23:50

I'm not a fan of Starmer but pleased with his stance on this at present.

Hyacinthbucketsgarden · 03/03/2026 23:58

rainingsnoring · 03/03/2026 23:50

I'm not a fan of Starmer but pleased with his stance on this at present.

What "stance"?

He's hardly been in one position long enough for it to qualify as a "stance". 🙄

1dayatatime · 04/03/2026 00:00

PerkingFaintly · 03/03/2026 23:47

Also for anyone confused by some posters wittering about dry dock...

No, HMS Dragon is not in dry dock. It's just in dock.

Doubtless the basin it is in could be made dry, ie drained of all water and the vessel supported by a cradle while works are carried out on the hull, which is what we mean by a vessel being "in dry dock".

But that's not how Dragon is. It's just moored in a dock being loaded.

HMS Dragon as of this afternoon, afloat but in a dock getting replenished. Even traveling at full speed it will take 5 to 7 days to get to Cyprus from Portsmouth.

Interestingly senior commanders in the Royal Navy did recommend to the Government that recommend that HMS Dragon be deployed in the area ahead of the attacks:

"The Navy had offered the government the option to preposition a Type 45 ahead of the attack that Trump had telegraphed for several weeks in advance, but planned NATO deployments were deemed the priority. Events in the region are moving fast, and the ship’s arrival could be too late to prevent more damaging attacks on RAF Akrotiri."

Source: https://www.navylookout.com/type-45-destroyer-to-be-sent-to-the-eastern-mediterranean/

The impossible has happened - Trump has made me a Keir Starmer supporter!
tobee · 04/03/2026 00:00

Have you looked in the mirror lately @Marmalademorning?

PerkingFaintly · 04/03/2026 00:00

PerkingFaintly · 03/03/2026 23:47

Also for anyone confused by some posters wittering about dry dock...

No, HMS Dragon is not in dry dock. It's just in dock.

Doubtless the basin it is in could be made dry, ie drained of all water and the vessel supported by a cradle while works are carried out on the hull, which is what we mean by a vessel being "in dry dock".

But that's not how Dragon is. It's just moored in a dock being loaded.

Meh. She is not in dry dock...

Knew something was wrong as I was typing, but takes a while for brain to creak round at this time of night...

PerkingFaintly · 04/03/2026 00:05

Thanks for that article @1dayatatime .

It summarises the situation neatly, though depressingly:

The Royal Navy simply does not have enough ships to sustain vessels on deployment overseas, ready to respond to emergencies as it used to. Instead, it is reduced to prioritising its handful of available ships to assign to the most urgent mission at the expense of other tasks. This situation is not of the RN’s making and is the clear result of successive governments underfunding defence. The crippling in-year budget rounds and small spending increases that barely cover the cost of inflation have all contributed to the precipitous decline.
[...]
The UK needs to recover its hard power and quickly; this cannot be done on the cheap or without a significant increase in funding.

Hyacinthbucketsgarden · 04/03/2026 00:10

PerkingFaintly · 04/03/2026 00:05

Thanks for that article @1dayatatime .

It summarises the situation neatly, though depressingly:

The Royal Navy simply does not have enough ships to sustain vessels on deployment overseas, ready to respond to emergencies as it used to. Instead, it is reduced to prioritising its handful of available ships to assign to the most urgent mission at the expense of other tasks. This situation is not of the RN’s making and is the clear result of successive governments underfunding defence. The crippling in-year budget rounds and small spending increases that barely cover the cost of inflation have all contributed to the precipitous decline.
[...]
The UK needs to recover its hard power and quickly; this cannot be done on the cheap or without a significant increase in funding.

Maintaining a functioning military is a bit like buying insurance, it tends to be skimped on by some.

HeddaGarbled · 04/03/2026 00:16

We’ve allowed ourselves to be lulled into a false sense of security. Putin and Trump have jolted us out of that alright.

rainingsnoring · 04/03/2026 00:40

Hyacinthbucketsgarden · 03/03/2026 23:58

What "stance"?

He's hardly been in one position long enough for it to qualify as a "stance". 🙄

I think it's pretty clear what I meant and what this thread is about.

rainingsnoring · 04/03/2026 00:42

PerkingFaintly · 04/03/2026 00:05

Thanks for that article @1dayatatime .

It summarises the situation neatly, though depressingly:

The Royal Navy simply does not have enough ships to sustain vessels on deployment overseas, ready to respond to emergencies as it used to. Instead, it is reduced to prioritising its handful of available ships to assign to the most urgent mission at the expense of other tasks. This situation is not of the RN’s making and is the clear result of successive governments underfunding defence. The crippling in-year budget rounds and small spending increases that barely cover the cost of inflation have all contributed to the precipitous decline.
[...]
The UK needs to recover its hard power and quickly; this cannot be done on the cheap or without a significant increase in funding.

A very significant increase in funding. What are the UK population willing to cut to ensure that this happens, if indeed they do want to increase defense spending?

Muffinmam · 04/03/2026 00:46

The US is completely broken. Congress did absolutely nothing when Biden was showing signs of dementia. Now Trump is showing signs of early dementia and added to this he is a raging narcissist. Congress could vote to have him removed as he is clearly not fit for the office of the President. They also need to change the constitution to put an age limit on who can serve as President. It is very very scary right now.

Muffinmam · 04/03/2026 00:49

HeddaGarbled · 04/03/2026 00:16

We’ve allowed ourselves to be lulled into a false sense of security. Putin and Trump have jolted us out of that alright.

You do realise Putin isn’t involved in what is happening right now? The US military has joined Israel in a war with Iran.

persephonia · 04/03/2026 00:59

JustCabbaggeLooking · 03/03/2026 23:43

Just moving troops threatens the financial markets.

And sends signals that the UK is preparing to assist America. Which then invites attacks. There were attacks anyway (probably first from Hezbollah) so now they need to defend. It might have been better to have sent the ship earlier after all but I think that's the only misstep.

persephonia · 04/03/2026 01:01

1dayatatime · 03/03/2026 23:48

Certainly possible but less effective and more expensive than an anti missile/ anti drone integrated air defence system.

Yes but cheaper than the cost of not shooting the drones down I suspect

DdraigGoch · 04/03/2026 01:06

ChattyCatty25 · 03/03/2026 21:19

Is this the Dispensionalism nightmare - that the US military is full of a “Christian” death cult that worships Israel and is deliberately trying to induce world war 3 (starting in Iran) to fulfill the Revelations chapter of the Bible?

Well, make of this report what you will:
https://jonathanlarsen.substack.com/p/us-troops-were-told-iran-war-is-for

A combat-unit commander told non-commissioned officers at a briefing Monday that the Iran war is part of God’s plan and that Pres. Donald Trump was “anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth,” according to a complaint by a non-commissioned officer.

U.S. Troops Were Told Iran War Is for “Armageddon,” Return of Jesus

Advocacy group reports commanders giving similar messages at more than 30 installations in every branch of the military

https://jonathanlarsen.substack.com/p/us-troops-were-told-iran-war-is-for

DdraigGoch · 04/03/2026 01:15

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 03/03/2026 21:23

Last month Iran killed 30,000 of their own people

the October 7th massacre was entirely down to Iran

Iran funds hezzbollah directly

iran directly funds the houthi rebels.

Iran is directly responsible for the killing of several million people in the last couple of years.

fuck Iran. The UK should have been in the first wave of attacks.

more to the point - that turnip Starmer should have KNOWN because it’s his job we would immediately be attacked. And we were. So now we are still hated by Iran and the USA justifiable thinks we are weak idiots. Which we are. It’s an embarrassment of historic proportions.

Edited

Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi did a lot of evil shit too. Are Iraq and Libya liberal democracies now that we've helped to overthrow them?

DdraigGoch · 04/03/2026 01:26

1dayatatime · 03/03/2026 21:34

Is the UK that vulnerable to energy price shocks when 60% of our electricity generation capacity is renewables?

The price of electricity in the UK is set by the last generator to be brought online. Which is invariably gas.

DdraigGoch · 04/03/2026 01:29

BIossomtoes · 03/03/2026 21:34

Let's be honest here - after decades of defence budget cuts by both the Tories and Labour,

Yes, let’s be honest - Labour haven’t been in power for decades. The eviceration of the defence budget and armed forces was all the Tories’ own work.

The decision to reduce the Type 45 order from twelve to six was taken by a Labour government. Decommissioning several Type 23s early was down to both parties. The fact that there aren't even enough personnel to crew our remaining surface fleet is doen to the Tories though.

DdraigGoch · 04/03/2026 01:45

TakeALookAtTheseSwatches · 03/03/2026 21:54

I genuinely cannot understand the venom people spit towards Starmer. I think he's handled this (and a lot of other things) really well.

It's incredible. He's a fence-sitting ditherer for sure (the sucking-up to Trump last year was embarrassing), but I can't understand why he attracts the hatred he does.

DdraigGoch · 04/03/2026 01:53

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 03/03/2026 22:03

Well the type 45 was built to do that as are the Wildcat helicopters on them. But we only have 6 and three are in multi year fixes meaning they aren’t available and of the three that are, one was in any way ready.

A Sea Viper missile costs £1m. A Shahed drone costs less than $50k. Using a Type 45 to intercept a handful of drones coming out of Lebanon is not sustainable. Besides, it would be better employed keeping shipping lanes through the Strait of Hormuz open. A third of the world's oil passes through there.

PigletJohn · 04/03/2026 02:12

mumofoneAloneandwell · 03/03/2026 18:07

I reckon Angela raynor would've been excellent here as well

I'm prepared to believe that she might have been more blunt.

PigletJohn · 04/03/2026 02:14

DdraigGoch · 04/03/2026 01:53

A Sea Viper missile costs £1m. A Shahed drone costs less than $50k. Using a Type 45 to intercept a handful of drones coming out of Lebanon is not sustainable. Besides, it would be better employed keeping shipping lanes through the Strait of Hormuz open. A third of the world's oil passes through there.

Our two new carriers should be safe as they rarely get past the Isle of Wight without breaking down and needing to be towed home.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.