Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Limiting MH support to certain cultural areas?

1000 replies

Mindcultural · 17/02/2026 18:48

I have today received this message below from a mental health support service for young people.

AIBU to think it’s completely wrong to offer support based on cultural diversity and would like to know how they decide who fits this criteria?

Hi,

I’m getting touch as you have recently made a referral to our Youth In Mind services on behalf of a child or young person.

Unfortunately, we are having to reduce the size of the team for funding reasons, so we now only have funding to support young people from culturally diverse communities, if this is relevant for the individual you referred to us, please can I ask that you complete this form forms.office.com and we will be back in touch accordingly.

If we are now no longer able to offer support to the individual you have made a referral for, please accept our apologies for this. Please feel free to keep an eye on our website for updated information regarding available services as we are always looking for new funding opportunities to allow us to reach more children and young people.

Limiting MH support to certain cultural areas?
OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Anyahyacinth · 17/02/2026 22:00

Cucumberino · 17/02/2026 21:56

It is. You’re not looking at the information provided by the patient, but looking at the statistical chances of x, y, z instead. As I’ve said before, if Mind had any ethics they’d tell the funder that their funding conditions were immoral.

Immoral to help the groups that are most disadvantaged? No need to reply we operate with different ethics

Preachmuch · 17/02/2026 22:00

ExtraOnions · 17/02/2026 21:48

I donate to the Autistic Girls Network, they support Autistic Girls. The research they do, the groups the set up, the placements they organise are for Autistic Girls …. I don’t see any “equality warriors” frothing about that. People only have an issue when it’s about Race - specifically Black & Brown people.
I would expect Farage and his Cronies to jump on stuff like this, as they love nothing more that stiring up some racial tension.
There are groups more specifically focussed on working class groups, we had the Dalligio Foundation in recently, keeping boys out of gangs .. anyone want to complain or that they didn’t also go to our local Private School?

So if you were refused support from the Autistic girls network because your daughter did not meet the culturally diverse criteria you’d would by happy with that?

Of course there are uni condition groups that people can support but surely they should be universal even if it’s a non governmental body.

nomas · 17/02/2026 22:01

Ablondiebutagoody · 17/02/2026 22:00

I am aware of it. Bullshit semantics to justify discrimination. I'm not buying it.

Because your self-interest is paramount.

Str0ganoff · 17/02/2026 22:01

nomas · 17/02/2026 22:00

Wow that is some of the worst deliberate misquoting I’ve seen on MN. Here is the actual situation:

Black children are 10 times more likely to be referred to CAMHS via social services and youth justice teams rather than through the GP compared with White British children

The “stark” discrimination and inequalities Black and minority ethnic adults face in mental health service are reproduced in children’s services, the review of race inequalities in healthcare concluded.

The Rapid Race Review called for critical action from NHS England and NHS Digital to address the discrimination.

Evidence reviewed by the team showed Black people and other minority ethnic groups face harsher treatment, including being more likely restrained in a prone position or put in seclusion when detained on psychiatric wards.

People from Black and other ethnic groups were also less likely to seek help from mental health services for fear of discriminatory treatment. And their GP is less likely to refer them for psychological therapies.

Discrimination is mirrored in children’s mental health services.

Ditto for children with autism- who are now excluded from help if they’re white.

MrsChristmasHasResigned · 17/02/2026 22:01

Ablondiebutagoody · 17/02/2026 22:00

I am aware of it. Bullshit semantics to justify discrimination. I'm not buying it.

No I suspect you would not accept anything that does not fit your narrative that white children are being discriminated against here. But maybe some people without such narrow minds will read this thread and learn some things.

Str0ganoff · 17/02/2026 22:02

nomas · 17/02/2026 22:01

Because your self-interest is paramount.

Self- interest- in what way?

Preachmuch · 17/02/2026 22:03

Itsmetheflamingo · 17/02/2026 21:51

Suspect you donate next to nothing anyway. They won’t care

The compassionate left 👏

Cucumberino · 17/02/2026 22:03

Anyahyacinth · 17/02/2026 22:00

Immoral to help the groups that are most disadvantaged? No need to reply we operate with different ethics

It’s not disadvantaged people that need mental health help, it’s mentally ill people. A charity should prioritise purely by need of that individual person weighed up against other people seeking help. Nothing else.

Waiting up find other scandalous discrimination. Do other charities only help certain ethnic minorities too? Would be good to know who the racist charities are so we can donate according to our own morals, not theirs!

nearlylovemyusername · 17/02/2026 22:03

nomas · 17/02/2026 21:37

Because there are other charitirs for that white child that are less accessible to the brown child with similar needs.

Can you please name at least one? that non-white kids /adults can ask for help but be rejected because they aren't white?

Facts please?

Elise10 · 17/02/2026 22:03

Even if you think what they are doing is justified, this kind of stuff ends up causing more resentment towards ethnic minorities in the long run. If they actually wanted to make sure the help was going to those most in need of it, each individual applying could be asked to supply basic details of their mental health issues and what other support services they were accessing. Then help could be offered first to those with the most significant issues and/or the least access to other care.

Ablondiebutagoody · 17/02/2026 22:04

nomas · 17/02/2026 22:01

Because your self-interest is paramount.

No. Its just complete nonsense that needs calling out.

wrongthinker · 17/02/2026 22:05

MrsChristmasHasResigned · 17/02/2026 21:52

And yet that is the experience of a sizable portion of the population. It is just done by stealth.

Give me some concrete examples of how this discrimination is done by stealth? I'm not sure what you mean by that.

Cucumberino · 17/02/2026 22:05

Elise10 · 17/02/2026 22:03

Even if you think what they are doing is justified, this kind of stuff ends up causing more resentment towards ethnic minorities in the long run. If they actually wanted to make sure the help was going to those most in need of it, each individual applying could be asked to supply basic details of their mental health issues and what other support services they were accessing. Then help could be offered first to those with the most significant issues and/or the least access to other care.

Edited

Firm agree. It’s not hard to treat everyone equally is it?

Ablondiebutagoody · 17/02/2026 22:05

MrsChristmasHasResigned · 17/02/2026 22:01

No I suspect you would not accept anything that does not fit your narrative that white children are being discriminated against here. But maybe some people without such narrow minds will read this thread and learn some things.

It's definitely been eye opening. I predict Daily Mail article in 48 hours, followed by a swift Mind reverse ferret as donations fall through the floor.

Barnsleybonuz · 17/02/2026 22:06

attichoarder · 17/02/2026 21:41

I understand resources are limited and that therefore charities need to make decisions. However, I feel that if the charity is making these decisions they need to be transparent to those who donate either items from shops or money. I do feel very strongly about this as when you donate to a charity you need to know what they are spending money on and what their priorities are.

And you can see that by looking at their annual reports and accounts it’s all transparent

Str0ganoff · 17/02/2026 22:06

Some posters have zero experience of supporting seriously ill young people within a broken system and battling for support that isn’t there. They have no experience of how much of a life line charities are . If they did they wouldn’t think that the slamming of doors based on skin colour in such a dire situation is ok .

Str0ganoff · 17/02/2026 22:07

Barnsleybonuz · 17/02/2026 22:06

And you can see that by looking at their annual reports and accounts it’s all transparent

No it’s better when it’s made clear more publicly. Hiding discrimination behind reports and accounts is a cop out.

MrsChristmasHasResigned · 17/02/2026 22:08

Elise10 · 17/02/2026 22:03

Even if you think what they are doing is justified, this kind of stuff ends up causing more resentment towards ethnic minorities in the long run. If they actually wanted to make sure the help was going to those most in need of it, each individual applying could be asked to supply basic details of their mental health issues and what other support services they were accessing. Then help could be offered first to those with the most significant issues and/or the least access to other care.

Edited

Except that several poster have pointed out that it is for children from diverse areas, not children from particular ethnicities. What causes resentment is the kind of deliberate twisting of the facts demonstrated by the right wing, especially the ones further out there. And people who are only concerned about equality when their own privilege is threatened and who dont give a shit at other times.

Allisnotlost1 · 17/02/2026 22:08

plsdontlookatme · 17/02/2026 20:17

If I were a Reform campaigner I'd be rubbing my hands with glee at this revelation

Because Reform famously have committed to the funding and systemic change needed to ensure all people with mental health needs are provided for?

Oh, no probably not that.

Str0ganoff · 17/02/2026 22:08

Cucumberino · 17/02/2026 22:05

Firm agree. It’s not hard to treat everyone equally is it?

I suspect the money they lose will be bigger than that they received in the grant.

Cucumberino · 17/02/2026 22:09

Str0ganoff · 17/02/2026 22:07

No it’s better when it’s made clear more publicly. Hiding discrimination behind reports and accounts is a cop out.

i really hope this ends up in the Daily Mail. I’ve never read the thing in my life but they’d give this suitable publicity at least, and hopefully charities will think again before taking such unethical funding. And hopefully funders might in turn have a think about their morals too!

Rhubarbandcustardd · 17/02/2026 22:09

Str0ganoff · 17/02/2026 19:05

That’s appalling.

It should be based on need.

It probably is - those children are the ones in need becuase they are probably 2-3 times more likely to suffer

it will be something like that

attichoarder · 17/02/2026 22:11

Barnsleybonuz · 17/02/2026 22:06

And you can see that by looking at their annual reports and accounts it’s all transparent

I believe that charities need to be more explicit, People simply don’t have the time to trawler through lots of documents in order to find out how the money was spent. It should be clearly stated their mission what their priorities are and which groups of people they are supporting. People can make their own judgements about whether they wish to give to that charity after all it is a matter of choice when donating.

Elise10 · 17/02/2026 22:11

MrsChristmasHasResigned · 17/02/2026 22:08

Except that several poster have pointed out that it is for children from diverse areas, not children from particular ethnicities. What causes resentment is the kind of deliberate twisting of the facts demonstrated by the right wing, especially the ones further out there. And people who are only concerned about equality when their own privilege is threatened and who dont give a shit at other times.

I don't think you or any of us know that, it wasn't clear.
Even if it did mean people from culturally diverse areas, I still think the same applies. Actually if they did mean children from culturally diverse areas rather than children who are themselves from an ethnic minority, that would be very odd. I can't see how being from a culturally diverse area would make someone disadvantaged and more in need of mental health care.

Str0ganoff · 17/02/2026 22:11

MrsChristmasHasResigned · 17/02/2026 22:08

Except that several poster have pointed out that it is for children from diverse areas, not children from particular ethnicities. What causes resentment is the kind of deliberate twisting of the facts demonstrated by the right wing, especially the ones further out there. And people who are only concerned about equality when their own privilege is threatened and who dont give a shit at other times.

Having seriously unwell children with zero provision and years of discrimination isn’t a privilege.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread