I've worked from home since we were sent home in 2020. I speak to people constantly, I would rather have more quiet, uninterrupted working time.
I think it depends on your organisation. We are very present all the time, to the extent that I'm far more cautious about going to the loo or getting a drink than I was in the office, we are in a big group chat, so online starts is always in our eye lines.
We are now in the office 1 day every week. Buildings have been decommissioned, there is not the capacity for everyone to be in the office every day.
Working from home is good for families. I can start as soon as the DC have gone off to school by 8, when I finish at 5/5.30 I get on with walking the dog and cooking.
Having a dog would no longer be feasible for me if I was not WFH. My DC are secondary school age with some additional needs. It would be very difficult for them (and me) without the reassurance of a parent/adult in the house when they get home. I'm not doing any active parenting (before anyone takes issue), but I am there and can take a break (approved and recorded) if something comes up.
When I was in the office when they were younger, I had childcare in place, that provision is not available for teenagers. I feel like it is benefitting my DC enormously to have 2 income household and a parent at home. It is great for stability in families and a safeguard against development of anti-social behaviour. Very different to my own teenage years.
My mum can drop my Dad (with Dementia)round to watch TV in my house if she has an appointment and know that there is someone in the house.
It is really good for my spouse too. I just wish it was the other way round.
I understand WFH does not suit everyone, but demonisation of WFH generally is anti family and anti society.