Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Dad thinks he should have the kids if I'm not available.

599 replies

Daniella66 · 12/02/2026 20:03

My ex has the kids dd13, ds14 every second weekend and one evening a week. He has a close loving relationship with them. He's a good father.
I always leave the kids with my mother who lives next door if I'm unavailable. Ex says he should be given that time when opportunities arise. (He lives 5 mins away) I don't agree. It's my time so I'll decide what happens in those instances.

OP posts:
snowmichael · 13/02/2026 12:20

Daniella66 · 12/02/2026 20:06

Don't know. They haven't been asked about it.

They are teens, but you don't think to talk about it with them

Could they stay with their dad, and away from you, for longer?

DotAndCarryOne2 · 13/02/2026 12:21

grumpygrape · 13/02/2026 12:12

Interrogation ?

Where are you going?
Out
Who with?
None of your business (Repeat as necessary)
I need to know
No, you don’t (Repeat as necessary)

Absolutely this. Why would anyone put their need to keep their movements private from the ex above their childrens’ right to a good relationship with their other parent ? And why on earth would they feel obliged to answer intrusive questioning ?

BillieWiper · 13/02/2026 12:21

Of course they can choose but they don't have to tell him. On days they want to go to him, tell him. On days they don't, they go to Nan's. He doesnt need to know what is happening on the other days.

It's up to them. It seems like their dad has very very limited contact with them. I understand that's the court arrangement but as they get older they'll be able to have more freedom of who they see and if they wish to see him more you shouldn't be standing in their way.

ERthree · 13/02/2026 12:23

You are treating your children like they are your possessions. Are you scared they may love their dad more ? Very very soon they won't be children and i think you will be in for a shock.

DotAndCarryOne2 · 13/02/2026 12:26

Howwilliknow122 · 13/02/2026 12:14

That was not the point i was making. The poster said they are at an age where they decide and I said no they arent in the sense of if its easier for gran to have them then that's fine too. I also said I thought the op could be more flexible. I get both sides of it and yes of course what the kids want is relevant but in a safe situation where all adults are safe to be around and mum prefers to drop kids off at her mums then thats what she will do. It doesn't need to go to court. Thats stupid on both parts. Just let the kids go over when they can and other times they can go to their grans too.

But OP appears to be inflexible, hasn’t asked the kids what they want and Gran is the only option. Unless she relents a little and allows him more access he will go to court, the court will ask the kids what they want and base any variation on that, and OP will have to abide by it.

likelysuspect · 13/02/2026 12:32

Daniella66 · 12/02/2026 20:12

We agreed this arrangement in court. He argues that a lot has changed since then (8 years ago) He's the one trying to break the agreement. It's pretty straightforward. Surprised you ladies think this way.

You're definitely a bloke arent you?

'you ladies'

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 12:38

Ilovelurchers · 12/02/2026 20:14

Assuming you are genuine, what's more important to you? Maximising your kids' happiness? Or a court order?

If he thinks it unfair then he needs to take this back to court.

I don’t think you are being infair. I can see the issues
It’s not just the extra 5 minutes they have to travel to their fathers . It’s the extra time you have to wait around for him to arrive to pick them up and making sure they have everything. Then when you pick them up from their fathers it’s 5 more minutes out of your way to get them. 5 more minutes extra to get them back home on top of the extra time to get everyone in the car with everything they need.
it’s just messy and exhausting and eats into your time with them.

These things are never just 5 minutes

redskydelight · 13/02/2026 12:38

Howwilliknow122 · 13/02/2026 12:14

That was not the point i was making. The poster said they are at an age where they decide and I said no they arent in the sense of if its easier for gran to have them then that's fine too. I also said I thought the op could be more flexible. I get both sides of it and yes of course what the kids want is relevant but in a safe situation where all adults are safe to be around and mum prefers to drop kids off at her mums then thats what she will do. It doesn't need to go to court. Thats stupid on both parts. Just let the kids go over when they can and other times they can go to their grans too.

Gran lives next door. Father lives close by. Two teens do not need "dropping off" in either place. What you mean is "Mum prefers the kids go to her mums and won't allow any discussion".

redskydelight · 13/02/2026 12:40

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 12:38

If he thinks it unfair then he needs to take this back to court.

I don’t think you are being infair. I can see the issues
It’s not just the extra 5 minutes they have to travel to their fathers . It’s the extra time you have to wait around for him to arrive to pick them up and making sure they have everything. Then when you pick them up from their fathers it’s 5 more minutes out of your way to get them. 5 more minutes extra to get them back home on top of the extra time to get everyone in the car with everything they need.
it’s just messy and exhausting and eats into your time with them.

These things are never just 5 minutes

5 minutes away means the teens get themselves there (and back).
Teens are quite capable of sorting out their own things.
You are literally making problems where none exist.

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 12:42

redskydelight · 13/02/2026 12:38

Gran lives next door. Father lives close by. Two teens do not need "dropping off" in either place. What you mean is "Mum prefers the kids go to her mums and won't allow any discussion".

Mum is abiding by a court order.

Next time when someone posts that the father has not returned dc to their mother.
Is your reply going to advise the mum to be flexible

grumpygrape · 13/02/2026 12:42

Daniella66 · 12/02/2026 20:03

My ex has the kids dd13, ds14 every second weekend and one evening a week. He has a close loving relationship with them. He's a good father.
I always leave the kids with my mother who lives next door if I'm unavailable. Ex says he should be given that time when opportunities arise. (He lives 5 mins away) I don't agree. It's my time so I'll decide what happens in those instances.

Come on Dad, ‘fess up, it’s you doing a reverse isn’t it ? You must have realised by now most of us aren’t against you.

We keep asking why mother is ‘unavailable’ and you can’t tell us. That’s OK, it’s not your business whether she’s having coffee with a friend, going to gigs, or out with a new partner. Don’t you ask her or the children. As far as you’re concerned she’s out/unavailable, end of.

I would much rather parents resolved issues like this between themselves but if mother is being awkward and you, rightly, don’t want to pressure the children into ‘choosing’ then your only recourse is Court. Pre-Court Mediation should resolve the issues once mother realises she’s in danger of losing time with the children if you ask for more than the current EOW and mid-week. She seems to be a very uptight person but Mediation or a solicitor might give her some insight into reality. If not then the CAFCASS meetings with the children will find out what they think and want without pressure from either parent ding the 'choose me' dance.

Good luck, don’t pressurise the children, just keep a great relationship with them.

TakeALookAtTheseSwatches · 13/02/2026 12:46

Since when do teenagers need a babysitter? Just leave them at home, especially if gran lives literally next door.

grumpygrape · 13/02/2026 12:47

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 12:42

Mum is abiding by a court order.

Next time when someone posts that the father has not returned dc to their mother.
Is your reply going to advise the mum to be flexible

I’ve said it before and I don’t doubt I’ll say it again. An eight year old Court Order is past its sell by date and unless there are serious safeguarding issues the parents should grow their relationship alongside the children‘s growth.

Hiding behind an eight year old Court Order is controlling.

Nanny0gg · 13/02/2026 12:49

dadtoateen · 12/02/2026 20:06

Way to think of your kids first!!

let the dad have them if you can’t spare the time yourself to look after your own kids…

Oh don't be daft!

There are always occasions when even SAHP have to leave their children for some reason or another.

Are you saying that you've never, ever left yours?

Nanny0gg · 13/02/2026 12:51

How long are they being left for?

If it's a couple of hours with Gran next door, surely they can be left at home?

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 12:56

grumpygrape · 13/02/2026 12:47

I’ve said it before and I don’t doubt I’ll say it again. An eight year old Court Order is past its sell by date and unless there are serious safeguarding issues the parents should grow their relationship alongside the children‘s growth.

Hiding behind an eight year old Court Order is controlling.

Then let him take her to court.

Wendywooooo · 13/02/2026 12:58

As long as he sees them when he's meant to, why stop him from seeing them more?

Anyone who weaponises their kids is scum IMO

Tiswa · 13/02/2026 13:02

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 12:56

Then let him take her to court.

Court would basically tell them to sort it out amongst themselves as they should. They would not want to have a hearing about this at best a directions one where it was agreed by the parties

which frankly they should be doing anyway.

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 13:07

redskydelight · 13/02/2026 12:40

5 minutes away means the teens get themselves there (and back).
Teens are quite capable of sorting out their own things.
You are literally making problems where none exist.

So mum returns at 10pm.
Mum calls to say she is home
Teens leave their fathers house at 10.05pm and are back at 10.10pm

Unless 5 minutes is car travel time.

In which case expect dc to walk through the door at gone 11 pm
I certainly wouldn’t want dc roaming the streets at that time

Yes I am seeing problems where there are none. Been told that a few times IRL

Except no one seems to remember that when what I forecast could happen, happens

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 13:08

Tiswa · 13/02/2026 13:02

Court would basically tell them to sort it out amongst themselves as they should. They would not want to have a hearing about this at best a directions one where it was agreed by the parties

which frankly they should be doing anyway.

And until that day the court order stands

MissCooCooMcgoo · 13/02/2026 13:12

Daniella66 · 12/02/2026 20:12

We agreed this arrangement in court. He argues that a lot has changed since then (8 years ago) He's the one trying to break the agreement. It's pretty straightforward. Surprised you ladies think this way.

Eh? I don't get this. Are you bitter about something?

He's their dad, surely he's just saying he'd like to be able to see them more and be default "childcare" why is that a bad thing?

redskydelight · 13/02/2026 13:12

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 13:07

So mum returns at 10pm.
Mum calls to say she is home
Teens leave their fathers house at 10.05pm and are back at 10.10pm

Unless 5 minutes is car travel time.

In which case expect dc to walk through the door at gone 11 pm
I certainly wouldn’t want dc roaming the streets at that time

Yes I am seeing problems where there are none. Been told that a few times IRL

Except no one seems to remember that when what I forecast could happen, happens

Or their Dad drives them home if the area is that bad.
Or Mum picks them up on her way home.

No different from your child being at a friend's house surely?

Thechaseison71 · 13/02/2026 13:20

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 12:38

If he thinks it unfair then he needs to take this back to court.

I don’t think you are being infair. I can see the issues
It’s not just the extra 5 minutes they have to travel to their fathers . It’s the extra time you have to wait around for him to arrive to pick them up and making sure they have everything. Then when you pick them up from their fathers it’s 5 more minutes out of your way to get them. 5 more minutes extra to get them back home on top of the extra time to get everyone in the car with everything they need.
it’s just messy and exhausting and eats into your time with them.

These things are never just 5 minutes

Or they could walk

Thechaseison71 · 13/02/2026 13:22

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 13:07

So mum returns at 10pm.
Mum calls to say she is home
Teens leave their fathers house at 10.05pm and are back at 10.10pm

Unless 5 minutes is car travel time.

In which case expect dc to walk through the door at gone 11 pm
I certainly wouldn’t want dc roaming the streets at that time

Yes I am seeing problems where there are none. Been told that a few times IRL

Except no one seems to remember that when what I forecast could happen, happens

Or if neither parent drives they stay overnight

grumpygrape · 13/02/2026 13:23

FairKoala · 13/02/2026 12:56

Then let him take her to court.

That is what I've advised