Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Lucy letby

1000 replies

bloomingbonkerz · 08/02/2026 15:58

Do you think she did it ? Watched the documentary and I’m not sure she should have been convicted

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 19:58

kkloo · 09/02/2026 19:51

Yes but let's say there was in fact a serial killer (I don't think there was but let's say there was for the sake of argument) and let's say they killed 4 babies, but someone else was present for the deaths of 7, the presence at more of the deaths doesn't mean that the one who was at more deaths is the serial killer.

You’re really stretching it…2 killers

10 deaths is highly suspicious

I’m never going to agree with you - the world is made of lots of people with differing opinions

move on!

2021x · 09/02/2026 19:58

Oftenaddled · 09/02/2026 08:44

Here is a copy of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Children's Health review, 2016.

https://pdf4pro.com/cdn/www-coch-nhs-uk-7537c.pdf

The two consultant rounds a week is confirmed on pages 10 and 11

Thank you I have read this report it is very interesting.

Two things stand out.

  1. The staffing of the doctors was insufficient, by a significant standard. This is the main factor that the reports contributes to the deaths
  2. There was also insufficient nursing and a high usage of agency nursing. Even though the agency nurses seemed pretty consistent this is also an increased risk.

The report doesn’t seem too concerned about the deaths of the patients but does note that the investigation by the “enthusiastic” medical team did not follow the proper protocol.

This report was published in 2016- dies anyone know when the police were called in?

kkloo · 09/02/2026 20:00

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 19:58

You’re really stretching it…2 killers

10 deaths is highly suspicious

I’m never going to agree with you - the world is made of lots of people with differing opinions

move on!

Edited

I never suggested there was 2 killers, I don't even think there was one killer. I'm saying that if they focused on someone else they could have just as easily found as much circumstantial evidence against that person.

I was just engaging in debate about the topic, I certainly wasn't trying to aggressively try to make you agree, and I am fully accepting that the world is made up of people with differing opinions so not sure why you have chosen to respond this way.

Oftenaddled · 09/02/2026 20:02

2021x · 09/02/2026 19:58

Thank you I have read this report it is very interesting.

Two things stand out.

  1. The staffing of the doctors was insufficient, by a significant standard. This is the main factor that the reports contributes to the deaths
  2. There was also insufficient nursing and a high usage of agency nursing. Even though the agency nurses seemed pretty consistent this is also an increased risk.

The report doesn’t seem too concerned about the deaths of the patients but does note that the investigation by the “enthusiastic” medical team did not follow the proper protocol.

This report was published in 2016- dies anyone know when the police were called in?

Yes, police were brought in through a series of meetings April - May 2017.

Meanwhile there were reviews of the individual deaths but we don't have the full reports for them. We just know that they concluded there were significant failings in care around the majority of deaths.

Firefly1987 · 09/02/2026 20:02

2021x · 09/02/2026 06:07

This is where I stand. I have been a allied health professional in hospital and none of the behaviour they reported was unusual to the point of targeted malice.

I find it interesting that there is- in general- a difference of understanding between people who have extensive experience working in hospital, especially in units of high risk patients and the expectations of the general public. Diary entries, keeping of handover sheets even the close observation of patients are within the range of normal behavoiur for a person working on a ward with very sick babies.

Behaviour that I have witnessed when members of staff have behaved suspicously in the past would be:

  • Isolating target patients (this was Dr. Shipmans MO)
  • Harrassment and bullying of members of staff that worked with her targeted patients
  • Coming into work on days when not on shift to "socialise" on the ward
  • Being on hospital premesis when not scheduled to visit the patients
  • Taking home items that belonged to the patients (in fairness I think she did this)
  • Hiding of notes .
  • Harassement of family post death of the baby i.e. keeping in contact after the funeral.
  • Refusal to attend training or upskilling

I have wondered if they had a jury of neo-natal nurses whether they would have found her guilty of murder, or manslaughter through negligence or incompetence.

That's interesting because she actually displayed many of these behaviours as well.

  • Isolating target patients (this was Dr. Shipmans MO)
  • Harrassment and bullying of members of staff that worked with her targeted patients
  • Coming into work on days when not on shift to "socialise" on the ward
  • Being on hospital premesis when not scheduled to visit the patients
  • Harassement of family post death of the baby i.e. keeping in contact after the funeral.

She did all of these.

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:03

kkloo · 09/02/2026 20:00

I never suggested there was 2 killers, I don't even think there was one killer. I'm saying that if they focused on someone else they could have just as easily found as much circumstantial evidence against that person.

I was just engaging in debate about the topic, I certainly wasn't trying to aggressively try to make you agree, and I am fully accepting that the world is made up of people with differing opinions so not sure why you have chosen to respond this way.

Edited

Because you keep coming back with arguments already aired that I don’t agree with so it feels like going over old ground

maybe debate with someone else

Oftenaddled · 09/02/2026 20:09

Firefly1987 · 09/02/2026 20:02

That's interesting because she actually displayed many of these behaviours as well.

  • Isolating target patients (this was Dr. Shipmans MO)
  • Harrassment and bullying of members of staff that worked with her targeted patients
  • Coming into work on days when not on shift to "socialise" on the ward
  • Being on hospital premesis when not scheduled to visit the patients
  • Harassement of family post death of the baby i.e. keeping in contact after the funeral.

She did all of these.

I wouldn't say so. She is said to have come in sometimes on days off (which isn't too odd when she lived at hospital accommodation) but none of the rest apply that I can see.

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:11

Ooo coming in on days off - you would think she needed a rest!

paranoidnamechanger · 09/02/2026 20:13

Weekends as well…who knows, maybe she wanted the extra money because she was struggling a little paying a mortgage and other bills by herself.

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:15

No I think they mean she came to the unit not to work

Oftenaddled · 09/02/2026 20:21

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:15

No I think they mean she came to the unit not to work

I have to say, I don't have a source for her coming in on days off - I've just seen it claimed online

MistressoftheDarkSide · 09/02/2026 20:24

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:15

No I think they mean she came to the unit not to work

In that case that will no doubt have been documented somewhere, and it would be useful to know thw source, the frequency and any established purpose - for example a birthday gathering or leaving do, which I have seen happen on wards myself. Vastly different to the insinuation that she was just hanging around creepily and didn't have a life.

Oftenaddled · 09/02/2026 20:24

paranoidnamechanger · 09/02/2026 20:22

At least in 2015, she did the overtime for financial reasons:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-64419757.amp

Yes, she was getting her deposit together for her house

Her manager said she could always call on Lucy when the unit was over capacity. That happened often at night if there were intensive care babies in. So she was there when a baby was more likely to die

PinkTonic · 09/02/2026 20:25

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:03

Because you keep coming back with arguments already aired that I don’t agree with so it feels like going over old ground

maybe debate with someone else

But you keep coming back with arguments already aired as well. Everyone isn’t here to debate with you, but if you keep repeating the same old same old, it’s likely you’ll get the same responses.

Firefly1987 · 09/02/2026 20:29

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:11

Ooo coming in on days off - you would think she needed a rest!

Yes according to some you'd think the super nurse never even had any days off! She was always working, and that's why all the suspicious events followed her...
If you believe them that she worked far more than the others, only makes it all the more suspicious about why she always wanted to be there. She even wanted updates about work when she was on holiday.

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:32

PinkTonic · 09/02/2026 20:25

But you keep coming back with arguments already aired as well. Everyone isn’t here to debate with you, but if you keep repeating the same old same old, it’s likely you’ll get the same responses.

Yea and then we talk about it for a while and move on

same arguments as they still stand

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:32

Firefly1987 · 09/02/2026 20:29

Yes according to some you'd think the super nurse never even had any days off! She was always working, and that's why all the suspicious events followed her...
If you believe them that she worked far more than the others, only makes it all the more suspicious about why she always wanted to be there. She even wanted updates about work when she was on holiday.

ah I thought it meant coming in on days off

MistressoftheDarkSide · 09/02/2026 20:41

Firefly1987 · 09/02/2026 20:29

Yes according to some you'd think the super nurse never even had any days off! She was always working, and that's why all the suspicious events followed her...
If you believe them that she worked far more than the others, only makes it all the more suspicious about why she always wanted to be there. She even wanted updates about work when she was on holiday.

Christ on a bike, I've heard it all now. Anyone who works hard, is passionate about their job, and wants to bolster their financial position should be viewed with suspicion apparently 🙄

Doing "bank" shifts is surprisingly lucrative, according to HCPs I know. If you don't have family commitments and actually enjoy the job, and want to get ahead on a fresh mortgage, how the hell can it be regarded as sinister. Also, while I'm on this roll, people regularly get lambasted on work / financial threads for not working all the hours God sends and securing their financial position and pension. Double standards at their finest, and hefting a whole bale of straw!!

Firefly1987 · 09/02/2026 20:42

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:32

ah I thought it meant coming in on days off

Yes that's exactly it-coming in on her days off. I was just saying well it's amazing she had any days off if you listen to the people who say she worked so much more than all the rest of the team put together. But she was just saving for a house deposit of course! Weren't most of the rest of the staff literally the same age as her anyway. Yet it's only Lucy people are convinced worked so much overtime (and if that's true then why did she always want to be there-even on her days off?) Hmm

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:42

MistressoftheDarkSide · 09/02/2026 20:41

Christ on a bike, I've heard it all now. Anyone who works hard, is passionate about their job, and wants to bolster their financial position should be viewed with suspicion apparently 🙄

Doing "bank" shifts is surprisingly lucrative, according to HCPs I know. If you don't have family commitments and actually enjoy the job, and want to get ahead on a fresh mortgage, how the hell can it be regarded as sinister. Also, while I'm on this roll, people regularly get lambasted on work / financial threads for not working all the hours God sends and securing their financial position and pension. Double standards at their finest, and hefting a whole bale of straw!!

She isn’t anyone who works hard though is she

whatawalley · 09/02/2026 20:47

Catpuss66 · 09/02/2026 01:23

Considering you said there is no proof, on what do you think she did it. Leaving out notes, no crying, weirdness none of which are prerequisites to being a serial killer.

I didn't say that there is no proof. I said that I don't believe that they proved it legally. I believe she will get off on appeal. I am not allowed to say why I am sure she is guilty.

MistressoftheDarkSide · 09/02/2026 20:48

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:42

She isn’t anyone who works hard though is she

She is someone who is regarded as working hard. What's your point? Or are you fixated on some bizarre notion that she ninja-ed her way into the ward at every opportunity and carried out "attacks" mission impossible style at every opportunity?

kkloo · 09/02/2026 20:52

HattieJ2 · 09/02/2026 20:32

Yea and then we talk about it for a while and move on

same arguments as they still stand

And you can move on without being so rude about it.
You can simply stop replying to the topic in question instead like most other people do when they don't want to discuss a point further.

TheGrimSmile · 09/02/2026 20:52

Tollington · 08/02/2026 16:27

Unsure, she is the only person that knows

She is a lier though. She had over two hundred confidential case files in her parent’s house. She said she brought them home by mistake and wasn’t sure how to dispose of them, she didn’t have a shredder

Clearly she did have a shredder as one was photo’d in the house

People under pressure panic and say things. That doesn't mean she did it. I imagine she was terrified.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.