Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Keir starmer is dead in the water

1000 replies

Bertiebiscuit · 04/02/2026 22:21

The UK cannot have a prime minister who gave a plum job to a man when all the time he knew that Mandelson was still close friends with an ex-con who was convicted for trafficking children for sexual abuse. Starmer is destroying the reputation of the UK, he is an embarrassment and shoukd resign, if not the Labour party should demand his resignation.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Pineneedlesincarpet · 05/02/2026 11:23

nomas · 05/02/2026 11:17

Why not? Why is something that happened in 2009 more of a priority than something that happened in 2020?

I think maybe you need to just read up a bit on whats happening now and why. Then you will understand.

Gungeandroses · 05/02/2026 11:25

Im watching his speech. I've never seen KS do a speech before

godmum56 · 05/02/2026 11:27

he's on TV now.....talk about a whitewash......Mandelson lied to security and they went "oh ok then"

EasternStandard · 05/02/2026 11:28

godmum56 · 05/02/2026 11:27

he's on TV now.....talk about a whitewash......Mandelson lied to security and they went "oh ok then"

It’s such a juvenile defence. He lied. Starmer’s not 8

Notsosweetcaroline · 05/02/2026 11:34

I think it’s just a matter of time now before Starmer goes, I suspect we will have a new prime minister by the summer, the question is who, and there are no good alternatives, likely who comes next will be worse, which is a very low bar indeed. And it will deteriorate further. Labour are usually out of power for at least a decade when they fuck it badly, but this is the worst I’ve witnessed, so likely longer,

the whole thing is a disaster, from the winter fuel payments to the oil and gas industry to the budgets, child benefit caps, the freebies, it’s a never ending list of constant mess,

I felt at first it was like having a bunch of work experience people run the country, now it’s not even that good.

PropertyD · 05/02/2026 11:35

I am listening to it now. I know Birmingham well and he is wrong that its intergrated. Big woke thing to say whilst he lives in his bubble.

He needs to go - this is not a leader talking. He is lecturing us and speaking AT us.

Twat.

nomas · 05/02/2026 11:37

EasternStandard · 05/02/2026 11:21

You do know Starmer, Mandelson and Epstein are in the press rn?

🙄

The point is corruption needs to be tackled whenever and wherever it happens.

NautilusLionfish · 05/02/2026 11:37

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 05/02/2026 10:31

If they were going to kick him out on that basis alone, then they would have done it ages ago. The fact that PM maintained a friendship with JE after his conviction has been in the public domain for ages. It isn't news, and we have known for a while that this fact was known to KS at the time the appointment was made.

Rightly or wrongly, KS remained in post despite all of that, having argued that he had not realised the depth or extent of PM's friendship with JE.

What will hopefully emerge from the documentation when it's published is a much greater degree of clarity about what exactly KS did actually know and what he didn't know; the extent to which any warnings may or may not have been given and whether or not these were acted upon or ignored; and indeed the extent to which it might be deemed that any "due diligence" that was done was sufficient and appropriate for the seniority and risk profile associated with the Ambassador role.

I think Starmer's survival as PM, at least in the short term, is probably dependent on the detail that emerges from those documents. If it turns out that he ignored clear warnings and/or that he knew much more than he has previously indicated, then he will have to go. If the evidence largely backs up his account to date and PM was given clearance after the vetting process, then he might cling on at least until the May elections or perhaps even longer.

Regardless of how things pan out for KS, I think this whole sorry saga highlights serious issues with how our systems are operating. If KS didn't know more about PM's previous behaviour, then it sounds like the vetting process is sorely inadequate - surely our intelligence services should have been able to find out enough to have been able to warn KS that PM was a significant risk? And if KS did know more details, was warned against appointing PM and then chose to appoint him anyway, why on earth are we allowing one individual to exercise so much power without having any proper checks and balances in place? Either way, the systems and processes don't appear to be serving us well.

I totally agree.

What I dont understand about Starmer sometimes, he isnt stupid obviously but is he naive? Or rather does he think we are all stupid? After first tranche of PM with JE post conviction, PM said there was more to come and it would be embarrassing. That was September 2025. At that point why didn't he think lets go to the Americans and access these files or lets use other means to see just how much more embarrassing it will get? Is there no advisor to help him? Even when news breaks out with evidence that PM was passing government info and emails on to JE (we dont know yet how serious/useful/dangerous that info was) he still dillydallies on any sort of action. Especially given PM's past! Gosh, why cant this country produce good leaders.

nomas · 05/02/2026 11:37

Pineneedlesincarpet · 05/02/2026 11:23

I think maybe you need to just read up a bit on whats happening now and why. Then you will understand.

I think maybe you need to go read up on what happened in 2020 as well. Then you will understand.

PeggingFan · 05/02/2026 11:38

gogogogogoog · 05/02/2026 00:11

what about Farage, wasn't he in there multiple times?

and repeatedly buddying up with Trump, who was in the Epstein Files apparently 38,000 times according to this article:
https://newrepublic.com/post/206023/how-often-donald-trump-mentioned-epstein-files
Not to mention Steve Bannon and all the other dodgy people that feature in there that Farage cosies up to on a regular basis. Gross POS.

Seems to be a misleading stat re: Farage https://pa.media/blogs/fact-check/fact-check-the-epstein-files-include-limited-mentions-of-uk-party-leaders/

Fact check: The Epstein files include limited mentions of UK party leaders

A widely shared social media post listed UK political party leaders by how many times they were “mentioned in the Epstein files”.The post said

https://pa.media/blogs/fact-check/fact-check-the-epstein-files-include-limited-mentions-of-uk-party-leaders/

scalt · 05/02/2026 11:41

Meadowfinch · 04/02/2026 22:58

It would be a start to have a PM (of either party) who didn't lie with every breath.

Then perhaps they could stay for an entire term.

Do such prime ministers exist? Indeed, do any such politicians exist?

Dragonscaledaisy · 05/02/2026 11:44

NautilusLionfish · 05/02/2026 11:37

I totally agree.

What I dont understand about Starmer sometimes, he isnt stupid obviously but is he naive? Or rather does he think we are all stupid? After first tranche of PM with JE post conviction, PM said there was more to come and it would be embarrassing. That was September 2025. At that point why didn't he think lets go to the Americans and access these files or lets use other means to see just how much more embarrassing it will get? Is there no advisor to help him? Even when news breaks out with evidence that PM was passing government info and emails on to JE (we dont know yet how serious/useful/dangerous that info was) he still dillydallies on any sort of action. Especially given PM's past! Gosh, why cant this country produce good leaders.

It's arrogance combined with average intelligence and a very poor team behind him. He's vastly underestimated the British public and the power they hold. He's learning but it's far, far too late.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 05/02/2026 11:46

nomas · 05/02/2026 11:37

I think maybe you need to go read up on what happened in 2020 as well. Then you will understand.

Id prefer to read up on the fact that someone central in government has been passing on state secrets. Why dont you start another thread about Michelle?

godmum56 · 05/02/2026 11:47

Notsosweetcaroline · 05/02/2026 11:34

I think it’s just a matter of time now before Starmer goes, I suspect we will have a new prime minister by the summer, the question is who, and there are no good alternatives, likely who comes next will be worse, which is a very low bar indeed. And it will deteriorate further. Labour are usually out of power for at least a decade when they fuck it badly, but this is the worst I’ve witnessed, so likely longer,

the whole thing is a disaster, from the winter fuel payments to the oil and gas industry to the budgets, child benefit caps, the freebies, it’s a never ending list of constant mess,

I felt at first it was like having a bunch of work experience people run the country, now it’s not even that good.

looks like Shabana Mahmood is a prophetess...... Shabana talking up the government to Laura Kuensberg "Well Labour governments don't come along very often"

Bertiebiscuit · 05/02/2026 11:50

Since when did the Labour party treat women fairly, they have always had a chronic woman problem, they will promote the worst sleazy males rather than treat women fairly

OP posts:
nomas · 05/02/2026 11:50

Pineneedlesincarpet · 05/02/2026 11:46

Id prefer to read up on the fact that someone central in government has been passing on state secrets. Why dont you start another thread about Michelle?

Why dont you start another thread about Michelle?

I did, yesterday.

But many people are rightly pointing out that now that Mandelson has resigned from the HoL, Mone needs to be next.

Dragonflytamer · 05/02/2026 11:50

Peter told me he was a good'un and I believed him. That seems to be the whole vetting process.

Bertiebiscuit · 05/02/2026 11:52

The Labour party doesn't vet men, silly, it's only women who get scrutinised in the misogynist party. They can't tolerate women having any power or rights.

OP posts:
Pineneedlesincarpet · 05/02/2026 11:52

nomas · 05/02/2026 11:50

Why dont you start another thread about Michelle?

I did, yesterday.

But many people are rightly pointing out that now that Mandelson has resigned from the HoL, Mone needs to be next.

Ok

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 05/02/2026 11:53

Pineneedlesincarpet · 05/02/2026 11:13

No I dont think that. I think otherwise that would mean the whole of government are corrupt which I dont think is true. I tbink KS was just desperate to get a past "successful" politician on board. Same as Jonathan Powell.

I agree with this. KS lacks political skills and he probably knows it. PM was known for being a skilled political operator, and that's why he was appointed. It was a bad judgement, undoubtedly, but I don't think it was because PM had any "dirt" on Starmer.

Dragonflytamer · 05/02/2026 11:53

nomas · 05/02/2026 11:50

Why dont you start another thread about Michelle?

I did, yesterday.

But many people are rightly pointing out that now that Mandelson has resigned from the HoL, Mone needs to be next.

Of course she should de-lorded, as should Starmer resign. Two things can to be true at the same time.

SeriousFaffing · 05/02/2026 11:54

Bertiebiscuit · 05/02/2026 11:52

The Labour party doesn't vet men, silly, it's only women who get scrutinised in the misogynist party. They can't tolerate women having any power or rights.

@Bertiebiscuit I’m unsure of your political stance so can I ask what your thoughts on Reform are in this regard?

EasternStandard · 05/02/2026 11:55

Dragonflytamer · 05/02/2026 11:50

Peter told me he was a good'un and I believed him. That seems to be the whole vetting process.

I can’t listen long as it’s excruciating but the Guardian journo just read out Labour MPs saying he should go and he did the I get they’re angry with Mandelson and the last Labour lot. How is he so blind to anger at him?

godmum56 · 05/02/2026 11:56

Dragonflytamer · 05/02/2026 11:50

Peter told me he was a good'un and I believed him. That seems to be the whole vetting process.

I DO NOT believe that there weren't more security checks that turned this stiuff up and I DO NOT BELIEVE that KS wasn't told the outcomes. I suppose its vaguely possible that KS was told that Mandelson could be useful because of his contacts and the circles he moved in but that KS himself should maintain "plausible deniability" On from this I reckon that the plausible deniability thing was a strategy to make him the fall guy if (when) it all went to rat shit. He could then be portrayed as a fool but not a villain.

JazzyAmbs · 05/02/2026 12:00

Mandelson on has always been a wrongun. I can remember my Dad ranting about him years ago. I always had the impression he came across pervy and untrustworthy. I have never met him and have no political or legal training. However the fact our PM who has allegedly been one of the UKs top lawyers cannot sniff out a complete charlatan when the rest of the country can doesn't really say a fat lot about his judgement does it? Or it suggests he knew it all and just didn't care which is worse.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread