Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

So upset about ICE killings in Minnesota

903 replies

Allotmentblackfly · 24/01/2026 23:55

So upset about the killings. No investigation and victim blaming from the Trump administration. I see no hope for America. Trump will cancel the midterms possibly elections or will rig them. The most powerful western country - one we thought was our friend is dying
im so sad for the bereaved and do sad for the country

OP posts:
Thread gallery
48
1dayatatime · 28/01/2026 13:18

DdraigGoch · 28/01/2026 13:04

How do you know that they're law enforcement officers?

They wear masks, have no proper uniforms bar a flak jacket that may or may not have a "police" patch on it (any embroiderer could produce that). They don't present badges or court warrants and they have no collar numbers.

They could be anyone. How are people to know that it is law enforcement who are trying to abduct them and not cartels?

Well a stronger argument could be made against armed plain clothes UK police arresting people, where the only proof that they are police is them shouting "armed police ".

As a general rule when confronted by people armed with assault rifles shouting "police - get down on the ground " - it's probably a good idea to do as they say. Failure to comply doesn't make you a civil rights hero it just makes you a dead twat.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/zuHV2uOXBGE?si=fKxK0DrjW_v2TF0o

1dayatatime · 28/01/2026 13:23

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 28/01/2026 13:06

@Gloriia has completely ignored my question. I can't imagine why.

Well if a group of people in tactical gear armed with assault rifles turn up at my door step shouting "armed police get down on the ground " then I would certainly comply.

If a lone individual in a hoodie turns up at my door step pointing a pistol at me then I would also probably comply.
However if he wasnt armed then I would either try to close the door or run away.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 28/01/2026 13:26

1dayatatime · 28/01/2026 13:23

Well if a group of people in tactical gear armed with assault rifles turn up at my door step shouting "armed police get down on the ground " then I would certainly comply.

If a lone individual in a hoodie turns up at my door step pointing a pistol at me then I would also probably comply.
However if he wasnt armed then I would either try to close the door or run away.

I think this is a response to a question posed by a different poster.

nicepotoftea · 28/01/2026 13:28

1dayatatime · 28/01/2026 13:23

Well if a group of people in tactical gear armed with assault rifles turn up at my door step shouting "armed police get down on the ground " then I would certainly comply.

If a lone individual in a hoodie turns up at my door step pointing a pistol at me then I would also probably comply.
However if he wasnt armed then I would either try to close the door or run away.

And what do you do next?

nicepotoftea · 28/01/2026 13:32

1dayatatime · 28/01/2026 13:18

Well a stronger argument could be made against armed plain clothes UK police arresting people, where the only proof that they are police is them shouting "armed police ".

As a general rule when confronted by people armed with assault rifles shouting "police - get down on the ground " - it's probably a good idea to do as they say. Failure to comply doesn't make you a civil rights hero it just makes you a dead twat.

There is certainly no lack of scandals involving the UK police, but imagine that the government has told them that they have immunity from prosecution.

How do you think this affects their behaviour?

DdraigGoch · 28/01/2026 13:55

1dayatatime · 28/01/2026 13:18

Well a stronger argument could be made against armed plain clothes UK police arresting people, where the only proof that they are police is them shouting "armed police ".

As a general rule when confronted by people armed with assault rifles shouting "police - get down on the ground " - it's probably a good idea to do as they say. Failure to comply doesn't make you a civil rights hero it just makes you a dead twat.

Plainclothes police in the UK identify themselves at the first opportunity.

I don't recall hearing "police, get on the ground" in the videos from Minneapolis. They just shot him in the back.

If any British officer did what they did, they'd be facing a murder trial.

BlueJuniper94 · 28/01/2026 13:57

DdraigGoch · 28/01/2026 13:10

There's nothing stopping them from visibly displaying a number that would allow for misconduct allegations to be investigated properly.

They wear masks so that they can't be identified and sued when they breach people's civil liberties.

Yes that's true.

If ICE were disbanded, re-recruited, properly trained, which would be of benefit to the right who are not looking good with these optics and redeployed, with the mission of humanely removing undocumented migrants - would all those who come out to resist just go home?

The fact the blow whistles to alert people to the presence of ICE suggests to me it's not how they go about it, which is just the cherry on the cake, but that they disagree in principle with their task.

DdraigGoch · 28/01/2026 14:16

BlueJuniper94 · 28/01/2026 13:57

Yes that's true.

If ICE were disbanded, re-recruited, properly trained, which would be of benefit to the right who are not looking good with these optics and redeployed, with the mission of humanely removing undocumented migrants - would all those who come out to resist just go home?

The fact the blow whistles to alert people to the presence of ICE suggests to me it's not how they go about it, which is just the cherry on the cake, but that they disagree in principle with their task.

If ICE did just seek out actual illegal immigrants, used proper warrants to search premises, used only reasonable & proportionate force, allowed people to make a phone call, ensured that people had access to legal representation and maintained detention facilities that are fit for humans to use, there wouldn't have been mass protests. After all, before 2024 there wasn't much of an issue.

Instead they have been targetting anyone who is not white, they drag them off regardless of whether they can prove right to remain in the US, they don't bother with court warrants, they use excessive and unnecessary force, they refuse to allow people to contact their families or lawyers and their detention facilities are overcrowded and unsanitary.

The well is poisoned now. It will take a lot of work to rebuild trust.

The fact the blow whistles to alert people to the presence of ICE suggests to me it's not how they go about it, which is just the cherry on the cake, but that they disagree in principle with their task.

ICE aren't targetting illegal immigrants. They're targetting the law-abiding Somali family next door to you who are in the country perfectly legally and whose kids go to school with yours. Of course you're going to want to warn them.

nicepotoftea · 28/01/2026 14:27

BlueJuniper94 · 28/01/2026 13:57

Yes that's true.

If ICE were disbanded, re-recruited, properly trained, which would be of benefit to the right who are not looking good with these optics and redeployed, with the mission of humanely removing undocumented migrants - would all those who come out to resist just go home?

The fact the blow whistles to alert people to the presence of ICE suggests to me it's not how they go about it, which is just the cherry on the cake, but that they disagree in principle with their task.

You haven't explained what you would do after you have been carted off in the van.

Do you agree that in principle people theoretically working for the government, but with no apparent oversight, should be able to pick you up off the street and throw you in a van and take you to a detention centre 1,000 miles away?

DeepBlueDeer · 28/01/2026 15:50

BlueJuniper94 · 28/01/2026 09:17

Whose consent? Trump won the election

Rule of law is another pillar of liberal democracy but you're perfectly happy with interference in that

Edited

Did someone really just cite the Rule of Law in defence of ICE, and against the protesters?

My days, the ignorance is astounding.

TooBigForMyBoots · 28/01/2026 16:16

DeepBlueDeer · 28/01/2026 15:50

Did someone really just cite the Rule of Law in defence of ICE, and against the protesters?

My days, the ignorance is astounding.

Its not ignorance it's belief.🙏

Belief in Donald Trump. Whatever he says or does is right. Despite evidence and facts. It doesn't matter what he does, his believers will defend and justify it because they believe in Trump.🤷‍♀️

Gloriia · 28/01/2026 17:57

'Belief in Donald Trump. Whatever he says or does is right. Despite evidence and facts. It doesn't matter what he does, his believers will defend and justify it because they believe in Trump'

Who has even said that?! It sounds like something a cnn reporter would make up.

What many have said is ICE have a job to do and local leaders and local plods should support that not incite unrest. They should try to protect the residents not encourage them to obstruct law enforcement.

nicepotoftea · 28/01/2026 18:14

Gloriia · 28/01/2026 17:57

'Belief in Donald Trump. Whatever he says or does is right. Despite evidence and facts. It doesn't matter what he does, his believers will defend and justify it because they believe in Trump'

Who has even said that?! It sounds like something a cnn reporter would make up.

What many have said is ICE have a job to do and local leaders and local plods should support that not incite unrest. They should try to protect the residents not encourage them to obstruct law enforcement.

I would imagine that people in Minnesota would like the 'plods' to spend their time on actual police work instead of helping ICE to round up people because they sound or look foreign. Even Trump seems to be understanding that this is all back firing.

Again, a man in a mask tells you to get into his van. What do you do?

Usernamenotfound1 · 28/01/2026 18:18

Gloriia · 28/01/2026 17:57

'Belief in Donald Trump. Whatever he says or does is right. Despite evidence and facts. It doesn't matter what he does, his believers will defend and justify it because they believe in Trump'

Who has even said that?! It sounds like something a cnn reporter would make up.

What many have said is ICE have a job to do and local leaders and local plods should support that not incite unrest. They should try to protect the residents not encourage them to obstruct law enforcement.

Issue is they are not doing their jobs. They have gone way beyond that and are working way beyond their remit, and are not following the law or the constitution. They are picking up people they should not be, and holding them illegally. Kidnapping under the guise of law enforcement.

law enforcement should be acting guided by intel and have cause. If they pick someone up it should be because they are known or at least believed to illegal or a criminal. They should not be acting based on people looking a bit brown, having an accent or filming their actions.

so when law enforcement goes rogue, who stops them? Isn’t that the whole point of the second amendment?

Wheresrebeccabunch · 28/01/2026 18:31

knitnerd90 · 25/01/2026 03:29

Trump doesn't run elections. The states run them.

they should do but many of the states, like Texas for example, are giving him their electoral voter information - at his request. He is clearly planning to interfere with the mid terms.

DeepBlueDeer · 28/01/2026 18:43

Wheresrebeccabunch · 28/01/2026 18:31

they should do but many of the states, like Texas for example, are giving him their electoral voter information - at his request. He is clearly planning to interfere with the mid terms.

Over several threads, I'm still waiting for one of the administration's defenders to explain how its demand for Minesotta's production of voter rolls - expressed as a precondition to any withdrawal of ICE from the state - serves to advance immigration enforcement.

EverythingGolden · 28/01/2026 19:21

I heard an interview of an ex boss of ICE. He said previously ICE would usually be picking up people who were already in custody of other agencies for criminal offences. So they aren’t trained or experienced in this kind of frontline action. The training itself was reduced from 13 weeks to 8. Recruitment procedure was significantly loosened regarding background checks. Internal systems for checking standards and investigating things have been dismantled.

He said a lot of the longer serving ICE agents are unhappy about the changes and having to serve alongside all of these under trained newbs.

Even Trump seems to now have an inkling of what a disastrous clusterfuck this has been.

TooBigForMyBoots · 28/01/2026 20:30

Who has even said that?! It sounds like something a cnn reporter would make up.

A CNN reporter?
😂😂😂

CJsGoldfish · 28/01/2026 21:56

Gloriia · 28/01/2026 08:25

Blowing whistles does not constituent a crime obviously but it causes an annoying distraction that is why they do it. Why would you when there are armed officers trying carry out complex operations?

Loads of comments online from experts in the US saying you do not go into a law enforcement operation area with a loaded weapon. First thing you do is declare it.

He should not have been shot but we can all see how a situation escalates.

Which 'experts' would that be?

https://www.thepoke.com/2026/01/26/fox-news-said-alex-pretti-was-asking-for-it-and-the-hypocrisy-was-so-rank-even-their-own-contributor-was-moved-to-point-it-out/

Fox News said Alex Pretti was ‘asking for it’ and the hypocrisy was so rank even their own contributor was moved to point it out

Fox News said Alex Pretti was 'asking for it' and the hypocrisy was so rank even their own contributor was moved to point it out

Absolutely shocking scenes in America, where a second US citizen has been killed by ICE agents in less than a month. This time it was 37-year-old nurse Alex Pretti in Minnesota, with truly disturbing videos of the incident all over social media. A tota...

https://www.thepoke.com/2026/01/26/fox-news-said-alex-pretti-was-asking-for-it-and-the-hypocrisy-was-so-rank-even-their-own-contributor-was-moved-to-point-it-out/

DdraigGoch · 28/01/2026 22:08

https://www.newsweek.com/ice-minneapolis-alex-pretti-trump-darius-reeves-1600-11431514
Here's an expert, a former ICE Field Officer. He doesn't seem to be blaming protestors for the actions of ICE/CBP.

Asked why similar enforcement actions during earlier administrations avoided widespread backlash, Reeves said ICE once prioritized discretion and planning.

“We took great pride in being known as the silent service,” he said of the enforcement work he and his colleagues did during the Obama years. “You had targets. You did your homework. You planned every possible scenario.”

The Minneapolis operation, he said, abandoned that model.

“You don’t flood neighborhoods,” Reeves said. “You don’t antagonize people. This is not how things are supposed to go.”

Reeves pointed to agents operating in masks and tactical gear without visible identification, saying the practice has undermined public trust and increased risk.

Ex-ICE Official Predicts Agency’s Collapse: ‘No Coming Back From This’ - Newsweek featured image

Ex-ICE official predicts agency’s collapse: ‘no coming back from this’

Former ICE field office director Darius Reeves told Newsweek’s 1600 podcast the agency may not survive in its current form.

https://www.newsweek.com/ice-minneapolis-alex-pretti-trump-darius-reeves-1600-11431514

NoKidsSendDogs · 28/01/2026 22:17

Gloriia · 28/01/2026 17:57

'Belief in Donald Trump. Whatever he says or does is right. Despite evidence and facts. It doesn't matter what he does, his believers will defend and justify it because they believe in Trump'

Who has even said that?! It sounds like something a cnn reporter would make up.

What many have said is ICE have a job to do and local leaders and local plods should support that not incite unrest. They should try to protect the residents not encourage them to obstruct law enforcement.

Is it the job of immigration enforcement to kill US citizens, exercising their second ammendment rights and right to protest? NO. This administration's ICE are the worst of the worst, ex Jan 6 morons, untrained and highly incompetent. People should protest them, every chance they get.

CJsGoldfish · 28/01/2026 22:42

Gloriia · 28/01/2026 17:57

'Belief in Donald Trump. Whatever he says or does is right. Despite evidence and facts. It doesn't matter what he does, his believers will defend and justify it because they believe in Trump'

Who has even said that?! It sounds like something a cnn reporter would make up.

What many have said is ICE have a job to do and local leaders and local plods should support that not incite unrest. They should try to protect the residents not encourage them to obstruct law enforcement.

@Gloriia Just so we are absolutely clear, can you just clarify this for anyone reading?

Under the once sacred constitution, all immigrants and asylum seekers are guaranteed due process. Other amendments further protect those being 'rounded up' by ICEstapo. Considering that the constitutional rights of both citizens AND immigrants are being disregarded, are you saying that local leaders and local plods should go along with this anyway?

Keep in mind that there is no doubt that ICEstapo are not upholding constitutional rights. Judicial orders are being disregarded. States strong armed into compliance.

Are you saying that this doesn't matter and local leaders and local plods should go along with it anyway?

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/26/minnesota-immigration-cases-ice-00746275

If you cannot rely on the laws being upheld, is that really not a concern? What do YOU believe are the consequences of removing constitutional rights in addition to the fundamental human rights of all if 'local leaders and local plods' are complicit?

Fascist dictatorship: "a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political system led by a dictator, emphasizing centralized autocratic power, intense nationalism, and the violent suppression of opposition"

Far right authoritarian ✅
Led by dictator ✅
Central autocratic power ✅
Intense nationalism ✅
Violent suppression of opposition ✅

DeepBlueDeer · 28/01/2026 23:17

Those defending ICE's actions and the administration directing them, don't give a fuck about the law, sadly.

It's a term I tend to shy away from, given how overused it is, but yeah - "fascist" is appropriate.

GaIadriel · 28/01/2026 23:31

Usernamenotfound1 · 28/01/2026 03:41

Which is all well and good but the result of keeping well away means these dangerous men are free to grab anyone they please off the street.

these are unidentifiable, masked, armed men who with the support of the government are disappearing people off the street. Doesn’t matter if you’re legal, they can still take you to a detention centre for a few days, remove your phone and Id, no contact, before kicking you back out on the street if you’re lucky, or if not, whoops you’re on a plane to Ecuador.

they’ve grabbed citizens, native Americans, asylum seekers, people on legal visas, people at green card appointments. They’ve revoked visas without informing the holder, who is then illegal.

someone needs to do something. We’ve seen what happens when people do nothing. These people are protecting their neighbours. There’s people hiding children under beds ffs while ice break down doors. Sound familiar?

what do you think will solve the issue?

Edited

But heated interactions in the street whilst they're going about their business have a high chance of tragic consequences as we've seen. Short of a proper coup/enforcement of the 2nd amendment they won't be stopped by ordinary people.

An unarmed citizen isn't going to stop these men. At a certain point they'll warn you and after that they'll shoot you. You may not even get a proper warning. The best route is likely through the media and raising public awareness etc.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 28/01/2026 23:59

CJsGoldfish · 28/01/2026 22:42

@Gloriia Just so we are absolutely clear, can you just clarify this for anyone reading?

Under the once sacred constitution, all immigrants and asylum seekers are guaranteed due process. Other amendments further protect those being 'rounded up' by ICEstapo. Considering that the constitutional rights of both citizens AND immigrants are being disregarded, are you saying that local leaders and local plods should go along with this anyway?

Keep in mind that there is no doubt that ICEstapo are not upholding constitutional rights. Judicial orders are being disregarded. States strong armed into compliance.

Are you saying that this doesn't matter and local leaders and local plods should go along with it anyway?

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/26/minnesota-immigration-cases-ice-00746275

If you cannot rely on the laws being upheld, is that really not a concern? What do YOU believe are the consequences of removing constitutional rights in addition to the fundamental human rights of all if 'local leaders and local plods' are complicit?

Fascist dictatorship: "a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political system led by a dictator, emphasizing centralized autocratic power, intense nationalism, and the violent suppression of opposition"

Far right authoritarian ✅
Led by dictator ✅
Central autocratic power ✅
Intense nationalism ✅
Violent suppression of opposition ✅

She does not care because she does not imagine that she or her loved ones could ever be affected by any of these issues.

Trump can do whatever he likes because she doesn't believe that the collapse of constitutional rights will not touch her own life in any way.

First they came for the Jews...

Swipe left for the next trending thread