I looked up the meaning of the word disgruntled. This is what I found:
‘If you are disgruntled, you are cross and dissatisfied because things have not happened the way that you wanted them to happen.’
’angry or dissatisfied’
‘annoyed or disappointed because something has happened to upset you’
‘Disgruntled sounds like what it is — dissatisfied, grunting and grumbling’
‘displeased and discontented; sulky; peevish’
‘To put into sulky dissatisfaction or ill-humour; to chagrin, disgust’
That’s a lot of definitions that basically say the same thing - and in your post, you seem to be saying that there will be a rise in men displaying this behaviour if women don’t respond to men trying to talk to them thanks to these wankers with their stupid glasses.
Women are not obligated to engage with random men. When random men approach them and try to strike up a conversation, women often feel the need to make polite conversation back to avoid the man becoming aggressive or threatening. Being told you are a stuck-up bitch or being asked if you think you are too good for them is fairly common. It would be particularly uncomfortable to be alone in a lift with a random man trying to talk to you. What a lot of women would prefer is for random men to let them go about their day in peace and not to have to deal with this kind of shit.
Men need to look at their own behaviour, and their friends’ behaviour, and the behaviour of all these entitled fucks on the internet, and say ENOUGH ALREADY - WE NEED TO CHANGE. Then actually make some change and not just bleat about how unfair it all is because NAMALT. Then women might be interested in talking to them and they’ll be less disgruntled. Although hopefully along the way, they will have learned that acting like a sulky peevish twat when you are disappointed or don’t get what you want isn’t a good look anyway.