Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel bad for Helen Flanagan here?

350 replies

mumofoneAloneandwell · 23/01/2026 19:57

Cardi B Look GIF by Taimi

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/helen-flanagan-furiously-hits-out-36599678.amp

she’s being made to sell their home and work, taking jobs she wouldn’t normally, and being away from her kids?

I know some of you are gonna be like ‘poor little rich girl’ 😂😂😂 but honestly, what kind of man is this?? Feel for her a little (from my own, much lower, tax bracket)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
McSpoot · 24/01/2026 04:54

mumofoneAloneandwell · 24/01/2026 00:20

Hard agree

Why can’t she work at M&S?

Fancyachangefromitall · 24/01/2026 04:59

Hopingforaholiday · 23/01/2026 22:58

A 4 bed new build isn’t going to give the children a lower standard of living. Still a room each.
From the pics when she was trying to sell last year it’s just a 6 bed new build and the extra bedrooms are her dressing room/handbag display room.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14710929/amp/Helen-Flanagan-house-ex-Scott-Sinclair-market-broke.html
It was never her ‘forever home’, she never owned it.

This article states it’s an 8 bedroom house, that she earned over 75k last year & she states she likes moving & being in one place too long.

ticklyfeet · 24/01/2026 05:54

mumofoneAloneandwell · 23/01/2026 20:58

She’s saying she has to work, so he can’t be providing properly - he put her in that house, he should be keeping her there imo

I am aware it’s not a popular opinion but I’d like to change that 🤭

I am aware it’s not a popular opinion but I’d like to change that 🤭

What! You would like to change 75yrs progress of women’s rights to be “put in a house and kept there.”

Give me strength! 🤬

ticklyfeet · 24/01/2026 06:01

19lottie82 · 23/01/2026 22:36

She’s living in a 6 bed house that he owns. He’s offered to buy her a 4 bed outright and put it in her name, but she’s refusing. Does that sound a bit stupid to anyone else?

Nope! It sound perfectly reasonable to me. 🤷‍♀️

NameChangeElaine · 24/01/2026 06:04

ProfessionalPirate · 24/01/2026 04:49

It’s a 6 bed house but must be a cheap area because it was on the market for under £1M. This is a guy who was on 1.7M/year earlier in his career, and is currently still a v high earner. It wouldn’t kill him to just let them stay where they are settled. It’s not like he’s gifting it to them, he can reclaim and sell when the children are grown up. I realise he has no legal obligation, but it would be a kind thing to do. If they’d been married, he’d be far worse off.

This is a guy who was on 1.7M/year earlier in his career, and is currently still a v high earner.

Right and when you take into account taxes (football players are PAYE) and agent fees you can more than HALF that amount for a start.

Scott and Helen broke up four years ago so were together while he was earning the bigger bucks, now deduct all the money spent on the fancy cars, designer clothes / shoes / handbags and luxury holidays from that total; it’s not inconceivable to think they spent the majority of which he earned.

Since the split he’s being paying for the house she’s in, all the bills, private school fees and maintenance PLUS whatever his living expenses are. Now that the youngest is in school, he’s proposing to buy her a four bedroom house which is one bedroom each for the children plus carry on paying private school fees which for 3 children is a significant amount all through secondary school.

He’s also 36 now and his career is coming to an end, even if they were still together they’d have to look into tightening their belts / her going back to work / getting other streams of income because with their spending (all captured on instagram for prosperity) I don’t imagine they saved up enough to see them through retirement; my guess is he’ll be using the money he’s freeing up to make some investments / build passive income.

To feel bad for Helen Flanagan here?
Simonjt · 24/01/2026 06:24

Zov · 23/01/2026 21:33

I agree @mumofoneAloneandwell being a SAHM is a job, in fact it's multiple jobs. Re, the women who go to paid employment as well, many of these will outsource to childminders, nannies, cleaners, laundry services, etc. The SAHM will do all the work these people do herself.

Working mums - especially full time ones - do NOT do a full time job- and 'everything else as well' (that a SAHM does.) They just don't.

And I say this as someone who has been a SAHM, a part time working mum, and a full time working mum.

SAHM is a little bit of a privilege but it's not an easy life for everyone, and it IS a job. (Indeed, multiple jobs as I said.) Frankly it's demeaning and insulting to say 'it's not a job.'

As a parent who is temporarily unemployed, being a stay at home parent is not a job in the slightest.

Sartre · 24/01/2026 06:30

Meh, I don’t. She has 3 kids so doesn’t need a 6 bedroom house and he’s offered to sort her out with a 4 bedroom one. It’s his house legally, he wants to sell it so has the right to. She should have married him if she wanted more rights like this.

Also really won’t harm her to work. It’s good for the mental health. I’m sure the jobs she’s taking on aren’t minimum wage cleaning jobs or anything. She just means she’s doing OF or going on programmes she deems beneath her. She always struck me as quite snobbish, a lot like her character on corrie was years ago.

loislovesstewie · 24/01/2026 06:46

mumofoneAloneandwell · 24/01/2026 00:23

So legally, what can she do

isn’t there a cohabitation law that recognises her as his wife

We don't have common law marriage in the UK, people are either married or not, just to be clear I mean civil partnerships too when I say married. He has obligations to his children and to support them, but she can't expect to have the same standard of living now they have parted ways. Not unless she provides it.

CommonlyKnownAs · 24/01/2026 07:50

DreamTheMoors · 24/01/2026 01:30

Just like every other couple under the sun it should be 50% mum & 50% dad.

Fair is fair.

Well, practically speaking he can't currently do 50% of the work involved with raising them. Someone said upthread they have a 50/50 split, but there's no way he's pulling that off when they live and go to school around Bolton but his in-person work requires him to be in Bristol. So as he needs her to be the primary parent in order to allow him to continue working in his chosen job, it's right that he pay more than 50% as things stand, in order to facilitate an equal overall split.

Obviously once his football career ends he can move to where the kids are, or he could even move to a north western football club before then. One of them would have him, even if it's a lower ranked and paying team than Bristol. If he steps it up to do 50/50 of the day to day work, at that point reducing his financial contribution to 50% of the costs of raising them would be reasonable.

I agree with the PP who said it might be in Helen's best interests to shut up and bolster his reputation. He'll be coming to the end of his playing career soon, and at that point it would be helpful for him to be able to access media work.

feistyoneyouare · 24/01/2026 07:53

OP why is that gif in your opening post?

Nushi21 · 24/01/2026 08:02

Isn’t it crazy how she showed how loved up she was a few years back when she was cooking for him in lingerie and now he’s a dkhead. I think she knew he was a dhead all along and just milking him for a lavish paid for lifestyle like Rooney and that other dude Kyle walker and Lauren Goodman. She ade so many demands after having kids with him as a side woman.

We all have to work so she needs to get up and get out there. She’s kind of a good actress right? I’ve never seen her apart from on I’m a celeb. She can get a good job. Her ego is hurt after all the bragging that’s all.

StepAwayFromGoogling · 24/01/2026 08:16

Simonjt · 24/01/2026 06:24

As a parent who is temporarily unemployed, being a stay at home parent is not a job in the slightest.

This. And her kids are at school now. How does that make her a SAHM please? She's presumably, what, doing a food shop, a bit of cleaning and some laundry? Not going to take up 9am-3pm 5 days a week, is it? Hardly the equivalent of a job.

hollytheheroic · 24/01/2026 08:36

I like you OP. But this thread is ridiculous 😆 A job is something you get paid for. Are you seriously suggesting her ex boyfriend pays all her bills forever so she can stay in the lap of luxury and never work? It's crazy talk 😄

purpleme12 · 24/01/2026 08:38

avalanchecoverssoul · 24/01/2026 02:23

Is the OP actually Helen Flanagan? I've skim read, but it seems possible.

I doubt it

She's a known poster on here

I believe she's got one child

slashlover · 24/01/2026 08:40

Zov · 23/01/2026 21:33

I agree @mumofoneAloneandwell being a SAHM is a job, in fact it's multiple jobs. Re, the women who go to paid employment as well, many of these will outsource to childminders, nannies, cleaners, laundry services, etc. The SAHM will do all the work these people do herself.

Working mums - especially full time ones - do NOT do a full time job- and 'everything else as well' (that a SAHM does.) They just don't.

And I say this as someone who has been a SAHM, a part time working mum, and a full time working mum.

SAHM is a little bit of a privilege but it's not an easy life for everyone, and it IS a job. (Indeed, multiple jobs as I said.) Frankly it's demeaning and insulting to say 'it's not a job.'

MN really is a different place sometimes.

I do not know one person who has a nanny, cleaner, uses a laundry service etc. Maybe a childminder for a few hours after school until they finish work, but that's it.

MindaBelinda · 24/01/2026 08:50

mumofoneAloneandwell · 23/01/2026 20:39

She’s a sahm though, that’s her job 🥺

I completely get that SAHM is a job to an extent but not when all the kids are school age! If you’ve got three under three all at home fair enough.

There are plenty of actors who split from their partners and continue to act. Or she can just do boring work like the rest of us. Her ex does sound like a dick but she kind of lost my sympathy when it said she posted on social media to say something about him being a dick missing the nativity. No need to put that online just send him a text to tell him he’s a twat.

CommonlyKnownAs · 24/01/2026 08:51

Not sure why this has turned into a SAHM discussion, as she's quite clearly working. Google tells me she was in panto before Christmas and is in play rehearsals now.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-helen-flanagan-feels-lucky-052100961.html

As well as the play, she's got a heavily curated Instagram account with over a million followers and hawking loads of stuff. So her job is basically selling things and taking acting roles locally as they come up.

If anything she's probably coming out with all this to get more publicity, so more people will go on her social media and notice what she's advertising. And hell, it got me to do it!

Why Helen Flanagan feels lucky as she prepares to take to the stage in Bolton

Helen Flanagan opens up about balancing motherhood with rehearsals in Bolton for The Memory of Water at Octagon Theatre, ahead of its 30th anniversary run.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-helen-flanagan-feels-lucky-052100961.html

ACIGC · 24/01/2026 09:17

I don't feel bad for her at all reading this. He pays for her to live in the massive house for now, has offered to buy her a 4 bed house outright and plenty women have to work jobs they'd rather not do that involve time away from their kids. She's not in a bad situation overall.

SuziQuinto · 24/01/2026 09:22

Exactly, @CommonlyKnownAs !
She's not a SAHM, she's a working actress with a lucrative social media presence.

ProfessionalPirate · 24/01/2026 09:24

NameChangeElaine · 24/01/2026 06:04

This is a guy who was on 1.7M/year earlier in his career, and is currently still a v high earner.

Right and when you take into account taxes (football players are PAYE) and agent fees you can more than HALF that amount for a start.

Scott and Helen broke up four years ago so were together while he was earning the bigger bucks, now deduct all the money spent on the fancy cars, designer clothes / shoes / handbags and luxury holidays from that total; it’s not inconceivable to think they spent the majority of which he earned.

Since the split he’s being paying for the house she’s in, all the bills, private school fees and maintenance PLUS whatever his living expenses are. Now that the youngest is in school, he’s proposing to buy her a four bedroom house which is one bedroom each for the children plus carry on paying private school fees which for 3 children is a significant amount all through secondary school.

He’s also 36 now and his career is coming to an end, even if they were still together they’d have to look into tightening their belts / her going back to work / getting other streams of income because with their spending (all captured on instagram for prosperity) I don’t imagine they saved up enough to see them through retirement; my guess is he’ll be using the money he’s freeing up to make some investments / build passive income.

Edited

Yes it wouldn’t surprise me to learn that a footballer and an ‘influencer’(?) have not planned well for the future. But don’t forget she has had 3 children with him - 3 pregnancies, 3 maternity leaves. Holding the fort at home while he pursued his football career. Who can tell what affect this has had on her career and earning potential. If they had been married she would have been entitled to a portion of the marital assets. As it is, she has no rights of that kind. The house is his. She is only permitted to live in it. The school fees are an expected minimum. He mad a lifetime commitment to that as soon as he decided to put the eldest into private school. I know nothing in detail about their financial arrangement - if he is indeed paying her bills on top of regular CM payments then that is generous. Selling the house just seemed petty to me, and possibly a flex. I wouldn’t have thought buying a decent 4 bed would have freed up much cash, what with stamp duty etc. the 6 bed in question isn’t that impressive, typical new build with too many rooms crammed into the space.

Blondeshavemorefun · 24/01/2026 09:35

She doesn’t need a 6 bed house.

he is willing to buy her a 4 bed house.

We all have to work and do jobs they take us away from our children

NameChangeElaine · 24/01/2026 10:20

ProfessionalPirate · 24/01/2026 09:24

Yes it wouldn’t surprise me to learn that a footballer and an ‘influencer’(?) have not planned well for the future. But don’t forget she has had 3 children with him - 3 pregnancies, 3 maternity leaves. Holding the fort at home while he pursued his football career. Who can tell what affect this has had on her career and earning potential. If they had been married she would have been entitled to a portion of the marital assets. As it is, she has no rights of that kind. The house is his. She is only permitted to live in it. The school fees are an expected minimum. He mad a lifetime commitment to that as soon as he decided to put the eldest into private school. I know nothing in detail about their financial arrangement - if he is indeed paying her bills on top of regular CM payments then that is generous. Selling the house just seemed petty to me, and possibly a flex. I wouldn’t have thought buying a decent 4 bed would have freed up much cash, what with stamp duty etc. the 6 bed in question isn’t that impressive, typical new build with too many rooms crammed into the space.

The house is NOW 6 bedrooms because they converted the top floor into her walk in wardrobe / dressing room / beauty space, it was originally 8 bedrooms though and also has 6 bathrooms, 5 reception rooms and altogether is 5000 square feet, an average 3 bedroom house in the UK 800 - 1000 square feet as a comparison. Yes he’s been paying all the bills as well as maintenance and I can only imagine the heating bills are on a house that size! I imagine the 4 bedroom he’d be wanting to buy her would probably be half the square footage which is still ample space but would definitely free up money; not only in capital but also ongoing utilities and house maintenance costs.

No one is saying he doesn’t have to support her or the kids but he was never a top earning player and he’s now coming to the end of his career with I imagine not a shit tonne of savings due to their spending (at one point they were paying 6.5k in rent alone). Yes he’s made the commitment to paying school fees but the youngest is 4, if he doesn’t start saving and investing now then where is the money going to come from until he’s 18? Scott will literally stop playing in a few years and doesn’t have anywhere near the profile to be a pundit etc. Also maybe he’s thinking long term as well, uni for the kids, buying them a house each etc.

mumofoneAloneandwell · 24/01/2026 10:28

ticklyfeet · 24/01/2026 05:54

I am aware it’s not a popular opinion but I’d like to change that 🤭

What! You would like to change 75yrs progress of women’s rights to be “put in a house and kept there.”

Give me strength! 🤬

How is forcing a mother back to work, away from her kids, progress?

progress is recognising how hard motherhood is and ensuring the woman is supported

OP posts:
mumofoneAloneandwell · 24/01/2026 10:33

purpleme12 · 24/01/2026 08:38

I doubt it

She's a known poster on here

I believe she's got one child

Jennifer Lopez Reaction GIF

I could be Helen Flanagan, you don’t know!

OP posts:
Bruisername · 24/01/2026 10:34

I do t know why there is a sudden push to try and make motherhood this holy grail of jobs tbh - it seems like an insidious step to say to young women ‘your place is in the home looking after your kids and your man because it’s so hard only a mother can do it’

if her being a sahm was her job then her employer, the person who paid her wage, has made her unemployed. Yes it’s sad but unfortunately once a relationship breaks down the structure of the family inevitably changes

she works - an unconventional job but she works. Her kids are at school. She just wants her ex to bankroll a lifestyle she can’t afford. It’s not that hard.