To feel bad for Helen Flanagan here?

[mumofoneAloneandwell]

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/helen-flanagan-furiously-hits-out-36599678.amp

she’s being made to sell their home and work, taking jobs she wouldn’t normally, and being away from her kids?

I know some of you are gonna be like ‘poor little rich girl’ 😂😂😂 but honestly, what kind of man is this?? Feel for her a little (from my own, much lower, tax bracket)

She’s living in a 6 bed house that he owns. He’s offered to buy her a 4 bed outright and put it in her name, but she’s refusing. Does that sound a bit stupid to anyone else?

Well, she's got an acting job, so maybe she's planning for the future now.

All of this
I wish some women would understand that a man can buy a house with you , have sex with you , have children with you and still not believe that you are ‘ the one ‘

I remember her in I'm a Celebrity, talking about money.

She said she never has a clue how much is in the bank, she'll just go shopping and 'Kiss the magic card and hope' 😬

And Swansea.

Yes, this was my thoughts too - I feel for her potentially having to leave her home with their kids (what kind of knobhead dad is he wanting to boot the kids out of their home?!)
but I can't get my head round moving in with someone and having kids with someone who you aren't married to, and not on the house /mortgage either!
You're basically just a tenant who's put themselves in an awful situation, sorry.

She's not a SAHM though. Her children are all at school now. She's a SAH. So she thinks her Ex should pay for her to sit on her arse from 9am to 3pm Monday to Friday? She should get a job like everyone else.

Ok, didn't know that bit if so - that changes things slightly - slightly less knobhead 😁 - why doesn't she take that then?
House outright in her own name a lot better situation than in now and more stable!

Yes, and also entitled. I think she thinks of herself as a much bigger star than she actually is.

A 4 bed new build isn’t going to give the children a lower standard of living. Still a room each.
From the pics when she was trying to sell last year it’s just a 6 bed new build and the extra bedrooms are her dressing room/handbag display room.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14710929/amp/Helen-Flanagan-house-ex-Scott-Sinclair-market-broke.html
It was never her ‘forever home’, she never owned it.

3 kids & a 6 bedroom house? With ex paying mortgage and bills? No, obviously she should downsize and accept the 4 bedroom house he has (apparently) offered instead 🎻.

It’s that sort of grasping, entitled attitude that puts men off settling down. Relationships are not meant to be meal tickets, and people are not cash machines. Even men.

I don't feel sorry for her to be honest , because the last few media rants have been her slagging Scott of in public. Ok he might be a dick / shit father- who knows?. But ffs her kids are reading all that shit she posts . Some things should be kept behind closed doors IMO.

🍀🍀🍀

No I think she’s as attention seeking PITA

But the rest of us manage to work and bring up children. What is it about her that exempts her in your view?

The eternal reminder to never rely on a man, especially if you aren't protected by marriage.

Helen? Is that you? 😂

Of course she can't expect to live in a 6-bedroom house forever and never work with school-age children. You think because at one point she was a SAHM it means she can expect her ex to financially support her forever?

She used to do the job of SAHM and now that job isn't available anymore because SAHPs generally only exist when the couple is together. She needs to get another job or have no money.

Can you really imagine if your DH was a SAHD and you split up and he started asking you to pay for him to not work? You'd really say "oh I'd better pay for him to sit on his arse living in a massive house with an extra gaming room and an extra room to store his model aeroplanes while I go to work. Oh and I will continue this arrangement indefinitely as it would be unfair to expect him to get a job"?

She was an utter mug not marrying him.
I don’t really have much sympathy for her - having THREE KIDS without being married.!?!
Who was advising her?

You think c£10 million isn't enough to make work for the rest of your life?

she doesn't come out of this interview very well - I'm sure her children will be thrilled to read in future about what shit a father they have. Even though he undoubtedly is.

When she says she has to take jobs she wouldn't normally, does that include selling your story to the papers? I hate people that slag of an x & then try to make it sound as though they have the moral high ground calling them out. It stinks & isn't clever

we all have to live within our means & being on Coronation Street doesn't exclude anyone from that

Them choosing for her to be a, sahm whilst they're together with young kids doesn't entitle her to be a, sahp for the next decade + after they split. So he should run his own home big enough for the kids to stay, plus pay for her 6 bed house plus all bills and all kids stuff and pay her maintenance on top so she only has to do jobs she fancies? She's hardly taking a shift down the local chicken factory.

Not I'd your paying for your ex to live in a 6 bed house whilst needing at least a 3 bed for yourself and she expects you to pay for everything until the kids leave home so she doesn't have to work

For a sahm she has been all over the press/social media/celeb scene for all that time

she doesn’t really get how lucky she is - not married but she’s getting a house and I’m sure she will get child support - she just wants more!!

and the interview was unwise for two reasons - her kids will see that one day and if she successfully destroyed his reputation she is truly killing the cash cow - commentary is most likely his best bet to make money and he won’t get those gigs with a bad rep

Thank you for this procedural explanation

I agree that she should accept the house but negotiate further re maintenance. He can’t just stop paying for the kids