Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think current concerns over screen time is bordering hysteria

607 replies

Tiredboymum22 · 22/01/2026 13:31

I think it’s over the top.

If my kids didnt have screens, nothing would get done. I’m mostly solo parenting. Family can’t babysit, husband works late 6 days a week. Childcare costs are through the roof.

I have a 6-year-old with ASD and a very hyperactive toddler. Eldest is obsessed with numbers and Minecraft, uninterested in his little brother a lot of the time. Up at 4.30 am most mornings too. I give my toddler the tablet when I’m trying to cook or tidy up (once he’s done playing with his toys).

I am criticised by older members of my family and told I should let him “help me” cook. Sorry but no.

Now I’m seeing countless articles and comments about the harm of too much screen time, but I think people are missing a lot of nuance.

aibu?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
TempestTost · 24/01/2026 01:01

echt · 23/01/2026 23:02

So how do you think people managed in the workplace who never encountered a computer or phone in their lives until, I'm thinking of teaching here, about twenty-two years ago for widespread use, i.e. in every classroom? Even then that did not mean a laptop to work from at home, no email, all phones and pigeonholes.

I do quite a lot of technology assistance in my job, and I have actually found that the younger people and teens are not particularly computer savvy overall. They are quite good at using phones, apps, and navigating social media. But they are poor at really understanding how computers work, they seem less likely than even people my age (50) were to know programming languages or have used them, and most struggle with finding good quality information online.

Todayismyfavouriteday · 24/01/2026 04:05

Sorry, there is no excuse for giving a toddler (or any child, really) an iPad for hours. Perhaps some TV with a kiddy programme on, and then play- draw- Lego -puzzles. Research is right. Placing a screen in front of a child is more difficult than organising other kinds of entertainment, but that's life if you choose to be a mother. My son is fifteen and still gets very little screen time. I have to nudge him frequently, and I often end up playing dice/cards with him, even if I have other things to do. It's called parenting. My choice. I wish more people thought about such issues before falling pregnant.

Kidsgotothatschool · 24/01/2026 06:50

For all the parents of older gamers who are successful adults, gaming HAS become more addictive and problematic. Just a quick google search will tell you that, I personally don’t want an addicted child hooked on dopamine hits. There is a big reason why many parents who work in the gaming industry seriously cut down the time their own children are on screens. They know the dangers and don’t allow their own children unfettered access, while we stick PS5’s/VRs/ipads in our children’s bedrooms and laugh when we haven’t seen our kids all day other than to request food, and I have spent MANY conversations with other parents along these lines.

And then we wonder why our children are struggling in school or becoming school refusers?

It’s bonkers!

Kidsgotothatschool · 24/01/2026 06:55

As for toddlers/preschoolers and screen time there have been increased issues with speech and language that have occurred on the back of increased screen time (along with other factors). It’s a HUGE concern and not just in deprived areas but across the social spectrum. I don’t know a teacher who isn’t concerned about the changes in children in the last ten years or so, we can’t put our fingers in our ears about this.

Uhghg · 24/01/2026 08:19

I am a gamer and so are my DC.
I actively encourage screen time because it has amazing cognitive benefits, builds resilience and develops social skills etc.

Surgeons and pilots are encouraged to play video games because of the benefits it gives them.

I don’t buy into the hysteria that sitting too close to the TV gives you square eyes etc.

However, like anything it’s all about moderation.

Screens can affect sleep.
They can also reduce the amount of exercise and fresh air you get.
They can be addictive resulting in less sleep, fresh air, exercise etc.

I have also seen many ASD kids who’ve developed deformed wrists or spines because they’re sitting in 1 position too long.

I have seen many school refusers who are allowed to just game all day and that really makes me sad because that is purely lazy parenting.

Screens are fine and are actually really beneficial - if used correctly and in moderation.

Luddite26 · 24/01/2026 08:22

Umbilicat · 23/01/2026 23:20

Historically there wasn’t empirical evidence that billiards was actually changing people’s thought patterns and destroying their concentration

Yes true but it was still seen as a disgrace of a no good pastime up until snooker was popularised on TV.

Adult use of screens should be scrutinised too. Funny that only last week I was listening to a podcast which is now going live on YouTube because that platform feels like it's losing out on podcast revenue and has missed a trick. As I've already said I believe adult use of screens in the home is just as damaging if not more so

Jade3450 · 24/01/2026 08:25

Francine84 · 22/01/2026 13:39

All the research suggests that screen time has a detrimental effect on children. If you decide to give your children screens then that’s up to you, but those parents who choose to follow the advice and not give their young children screens are not “hysterical” as you say. Just choosing to parent differently to you.

Exactly this.

Lovetoplan · 24/01/2026 08:28

GloriousGiftBag · 23/01/2026 22:49

I don't buy that argument at all.

Everyone my age and older grew up with zero screen time as they didn't exist until we were adults. We are all in positions of seniority, responsibility and use multiple complex forms of tech multiple times a day. The fact that I spent 20+ years including my whole childhood and adolescence without screens has not in any way prevented me from learning and productively working almost exclusively in a digital environment.

Indeed, it is very much the late teens/early 20s crew who have grown up with screens that are struggling in the workplace - particularly with face to face contact, social skills, other soft skills and executive functioning.

I understand that the old way has worked for you which is great. However our children live in a different world. Just to get a job post uni for many careers means endless online testing before making an interview. I strongly believe that greater familiarity with screens, keyboards and online applications has helped those who have this experience to progress. Of course when they go to work they will learn new skills as you have done but I believe pre-existing online skills can give them early confidence and lead to faster development. From my own experience, I am not convinced that spending time online adversely affects social skills, in fact it can provide a safe space for those with for example ADHD to engage with others. I am sure there are some examples of issues online affecting children badly but there are also issues on the streets. I am concerned that we blame going online for everything and we then take draconian action which will have a negative effect. To be honest that fact that we managed it without computers is not really a fair comparison with the world our children are in now.

Jade3450 · 24/01/2026 08:28

Lmnop22 · 22/01/2026 13:36

I so agree with you. If I didn’t give my 6 and 2 year olds screen time as a single mother, I couldn’t cook dinner at all because there’s zero chance they would play nicely with toys together alone or help me cook.

Obviously there are limits but an hour of screen time so dinner can get cooked is so much better, in my opinion, than an easy oven cooked UPF dinner of pizza/nuggets etc because I am trying to mediate arguments or let my 2 year old “help”

The single parent card is ridiculous. I was a single parent to 3DC ages 9, 6 and 3. One has AuDHD. Worked almost full time.

I cooked, tidied and did everything else without resorting to screens.

You do realise the reason they can’t play nicely and amuse themselves is BECAUSE of the screen time?

Jade3450 · 24/01/2026 08:32

CrazyGoatLady · 23/01/2026 04:02

DS1 is a gamer, but has never really done social media, isn't interested in it and thinks it's stupid. DS2 is more into it and it's his screen time I worry about more and have had to limit because of that. So I do think it depends what the screen time is for.

I used to work in CAMHS and it really was disturbing the number of children we saw who had no capacity to self regulate without a screen, didn't know how to play with toys, no imaginative play, no interest in interacting with other children, boredom would provoke not just the usual crankiness but real distress and tantrums/meltdowns. Parents would come wanting an autism diagnosis or ADHD, and of course a proportion of these children did have SEN. But in most cases, we were able to change behaviour by gradually weaning them off handheld devices such as tablets and phones and radically limiting other screen time, supporting families to learn to play with their children and find other strategies to regulate. And where children were interested in things like Minecraft, getting involved in it with them and integrating their interest into other activities. There are Minecraft board games, Lego, colouring books, craft kits etc, things that can be done as a family. One of our amazing play therapists even produced a Minecraft activity book with things like recipes in. The biggest and hardest behaviour change though was the adults. They needed to get off their phones in order to support the kids to do it, and set an example. A screen addicted child isn't going to change their behaviour if the parents stay on their phones all the time instead of interacting with them. And children want connection with their parents. It's not bloody normal for a child to only want to stare at a screen, that's not innate in any child, even where there are neurodevelopmental differences. It's 100% learned behaviour.

Screen time does not have any benefit for preschool children. Parents who think this are kidding themselves. If you need to use a tablet to get an hour's peace for some housework, cooking, on a car journey or whatever, then we all have to do what we have to do to get by. But don't kid yourself it's in any way good for them. It isn't.

This is very true and very interesting.

DottyLottieLou · 24/01/2026 08:54

You are thinking of yourself and not your kids.

Trytobegood22 · 24/01/2026 08:58

Some screen time clearly isn’t an issue. Reading some of the comments like not being able to cook/clean/calm/do anything unless their child is on a screen can be where the problem starts. Kids can become reliant on it. Then they expect it and often parents are oblivious to the amount of time it’s being used. You look around and some kids need it at restaurants or they can’t finish a meal, clearly it can be helpful particularly if a child has neurodiversity but for many it’s that reduced ability to be with their family and enjoy that social interaction. Once they hit teens they need it for social activities and it we are being honest kids get phones a lot younger because we want to keep them safe. Yet I walk down the street and see so many walking with their eyes glued to a screen. They don’t look for cars or people and their awareness is gone. Then it leads to the apps where people bully, parents often are clueless about what their child is accessing on line and kids think their lives need to be lived through likes and videos on social media, posting their most vulnerable moments for the world to judge, which we do and sometimes unkindly. They watch content where people can say what they want and regardless of the danger that could be there or the brainwashing involved (like toxic masculinity) they believe it wholeheartedly because that’s what they saw on the screen. So yeah screens aren’t a problem generally but that innocent screen time can and does turn into something far more complex.

Lmnop22 · 24/01/2026 09:00

Jade3450 · 24/01/2026 08:28

The single parent card is ridiculous. I was a single parent to 3DC ages 9, 6 and 3. One has AuDHD. Worked almost full time.

I cooked, tidied and did everything else without resorting to screens.

You do realise the reason they can’t play nicely and amuse themselves is BECAUSE of the screen time?

They absolutely can play nice but the witching hour after a full day at school and nursery they struggle to and that’s when I have to cook, plate up and serve the dinner. So that’s when we have our screen time. Then screens go away and dinner is eaten and there aren’t screens before bed. It’s about a balance not making your life harder because you are terrified that an hour of screen time will developmentally destroy your children

Honestly, you’d think I’d said I tie them up in the basement 🙄

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 24/01/2026 09:04

Jade3450 · 24/01/2026 08:28

The single parent card is ridiculous. I was a single parent to 3DC ages 9, 6 and 3. One has AuDHD. Worked almost full time.

I cooked, tidied and did everything else without resorting to screens.

You do realise the reason they can’t play nicely and amuse themselves is BECAUSE of the screen time?

No, it's not.

My MIL tells us stories constantly about how her three boys would regularly have "silent fights" so she couldn't hear them. And the occasions where one of them nearly killed another.

The eldest of them is 50 this year so clearly didn't grow up with screens like they are these days.

My mum and her brother would fight constantly. Also no screens and barely any TV as they grew up very poor.

DD has screen time, not constantly and the type is monitored (because of content on things like YouTube, so she's not allowed that and so on). She's delightful. She can entertain herself beautifully. She helps me cook, we're outside a lot, she reads/is read to. She mostly loves to paint.

The tablet is a really useful tool for her to learn things like her numbers, letters etc and has some games that she loves which will mean if I really need ten minutes (toilet or shower maybe), she's happily settled in the corner of the sofa while I do this.

Screens are not the root of all evil in kids. Like most things, too much can be bad, but some can be good.

Redpeach · 24/01/2026 09:06

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 24/01/2026 09:04

No, it's not.

My MIL tells us stories constantly about how her three boys would regularly have "silent fights" so she couldn't hear them. And the occasions where one of them nearly killed another.

The eldest of them is 50 this year so clearly didn't grow up with screens like they are these days.

My mum and her brother would fight constantly. Also no screens and barely any TV as they grew up very poor.

DD has screen time, not constantly and the type is monitored (because of content on things like YouTube, so she's not allowed that and so on). She's delightful. She can entertain herself beautifully. She helps me cook, we're outside a lot, she reads/is read to. She mostly loves to paint.

The tablet is a really useful tool for her to learn things like her numbers, letters etc and has some games that she loves which will mean if I really need ten minutes (toilet or shower maybe), she's happily settled in the corner of the sofa while I do this.

Screens are not the root of all evil in kids. Like most things, too much can be bad, but some can be good.

So screens are to stop kids nearky killing each other!

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 24/01/2026 09:07

Redpeach · 24/01/2026 09:06

So screens are to stop kids nearky killing each other!

How on earth is that what you took from that!?

This was in response to someone saying that screens were the reason kids behaved badly. I was pointing out kids behaved badly before screens were a thing.

Please learn to read. There's some useful apps on tablets for that 😜

unbelievablybelievable · 24/01/2026 09:28

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 24/01/2026 09:07

How on earth is that what you took from that!?

This was in response to someone saying that screens were the reason kids behaved badly. I was pointing out kids behaved badly before screens were a thing.

Please learn to read. There's some useful apps on tablets for that 😜

90% of the time, screens are the reason for behaviour, particularly angry/aggressive/unregulated behaviour.

That doesn't mean siblings never fought before the iPad was invented. Siblings have fought since the dawn of time.

The two things are not mutually exclusive.

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 24/01/2026 09:31

unbelievablybelievable · 24/01/2026 09:28

90% of the time, screens are the reason for behaviour, particularly angry/aggressive/unregulated behaviour.

That doesn't mean siblings never fought before the iPad was invented. Siblings have fought since the dawn of time.

The two things are not mutually exclusive.

Please can you quote your source for the 90% figure because that seems high.

Kids have always behaved badly. Blaming screens for 90% of it seems like a bit of a cop out.

There's obviously a correlation between too much screen time and some problems in children. I'd be very surprised to see a study that proves that moderate screen time for educational or downtime purposes is causing 90% of behavioural problems in children.

Spacetours · 24/01/2026 09:32

Thinking about this in Aldi last night - there was a boy of about five sat in the trolley, eyes glued to a cartoon all the way round the shop. It is just a snap shot but actually the whole screen thing is so overly indulged . It is so poor compared to the alternative - chatting, reading labels, counting, fetching and learning to be quiet and to behave and to wait a minute. Both were missing out and sure it could have been a random fifteen mins and he went home and helped unpack and put away then helped lay the table or chop some veg but I bet he went and sat alone while his mum did that. I think we tolerate phone and iPads with games and scrolling content way too much. A bit of watching is no bigger than issue but the endless pacification as nd disengagement from live and chat is appalling.

unbelievablybelievable · 24/01/2026 09:46

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 24/01/2026 09:31

Please can you quote your source for the 90% figure because that seems high.

Kids have always behaved badly. Blaming screens for 90% of it seems like a bit of a cop out.

There's obviously a correlation between too much screen time and some problems in children. I'd be very surprised to see a study that proves that moderate screen time for educational or downtime purposes is causing 90% of behavioural problems in children.

Colloquial use of 90%. It means "a lot of" or "most".

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 24/01/2026 09:48

unbelievablybelievable · 24/01/2026 09:46

Colloquial use of 90%. It means "a lot of" or "most".

Still, have you got any evidence to back up that most bad behaviour is caused by moderate use of screens these days, compared to in the past when it was just siblings fighting?

It's a very big claim if there's not actually anything backing it up.

Some bad behaviour, sure. Most? Unlikely to be just screen related.

wasieverreallyhere · 24/01/2026 09:48

Tiredboymum22 · 22/01/2026 13:31

I think it’s over the top.

If my kids didnt have screens, nothing would get done. I’m mostly solo parenting. Family can’t babysit, husband works late 6 days a week. Childcare costs are through the roof.

I have a 6-year-old with ASD and a very hyperactive toddler. Eldest is obsessed with numbers and Minecraft, uninterested in his little brother a lot of the time. Up at 4.30 am most mornings too. I give my toddler the tablet when I’m trying to cook or tidy up (once he’s done playing with his toys).

I am criticised by older members of my family and told I should let him “help me” cook. Sorry but no.

Now I’m seeing countless articles and comments about the harm of too much screen time, but I think people are missing a lot of nuance.

aibu?

It's youre life if its causing issues you can do something i think social media is the problem with kids

CrazyGoatLady · 24/01/2026 10:10

Lovetoplan · 24/01/2026 08:28

I understand that the old way has worked for you which is great. However our children live in a different world. Just to get a job post uni for many careers means endless online testing before making an interview. I strongly believe that greater familiarity with screens, keyboards and online applications has helped those who have this experience to progress. Of course when they go to work they will learn new skills as you have done but I believe pre-existing online skills can give them early confidence and lead to faster development. From my own experience, I am not convinced that spending time online adversely affects social skills, in fact it can provide a safe space for those with for example ADHD to engage with others. I am sure there are some examples of issues online affecting children badly but there are also issues on the streets. I am concerned that we blame going online for everything and we then take draconian action which will have a negative effect. To be honest that fact that we managed it without computers is not really a fair comparison with the world our children are in now.

A lot of online spaces are unsafe for children and ND children are far more at risk of exploitation online. I appreciate what you say about the need for kids to be tech literate, but there is a big difference between kids learning computing skills and social media.

We had to remove DS2's smartphone a couple of years ago because he was talking to strangers online despite multiple attempts by us to educate him about the dangers and his sports club's online safety sessions, he still did it, because ADHD and impulse control. I'm ashamed to say that he also participated in online bullying of a girl in his year, which although we know he did under peer pressure we came down very hard on. He is 16 now and has a smartphone again, but despite his age there are strict conditions on it because his ADHD means he is more prone to dopamine chasing and his autism can make him believe what people say without questioning.

We also sadly had many, many ND kids come through CAMHS who had been groomed online while their parents thought it was all safe and harmless.

Be very careful with ND kiddos and online socialising.

Jade3450 · 24/01/2026 10:15

unbelievablybelievable · 24/01/2026 09:28

90% of the time, screens are the reason for behaviour, particularly angry/aggressive/unregulated behaviour.

That doesn't mean siblings never fought before the iPad was invented. Siblings have fought since the dawn of time.

The two things are not mutually exclusive.

The point is, of course children fight and argue. But if they are put in front of a screen to stop this they never learn vital social skills like compromise, arguing, advocating, making up, discussing etc.

How are you teaching your kids life skills if they’re on a screen to prevent any kind of conflict?

I would regularly have to mediate whilst cooking dinner/trying to get ready etc, but that’s part of being a parent.

Honestly, if you aren’t prepared to do this then don’t have kids. It’s part of raising children, you’re responsible for their wellbeing and for raising them to be good adults.

Jade3450 · 24/01/2026 10:19

clearly it can be helpful particularly if a child has neurodiversity

This is where so many people go wrong. Using screens is the WORST thing you can do for a neurodiverse child.

Swipe left for the next trending thread