Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Modern life doesn’t work

358 replies

DeluluTaylor · 21/01/2026 07:16

I say this reading thread after thread of people trying to work around nigh impossible situations.
I am sitting here with chronic IBS from stress, trying to get the kids out of the door, to a school which can’t meet their need, to go to a job where I’m firefighting as nothing is fit for purpose anymore. Finding care homes for younger and younger people. People who want to work but can’t as they have learning disabilities. Yet in the 20th century an estimated 40-70% of people with LD were employed.
I have 38p in my bank account and all my money goes on paying for a big house that we’re in from 6.30pm 7 the next morning, with a huge garden which none of us have time to do anything in. That I sit in on my own when the kids go to see their father in a bedsit at weekends. Yet there are families down the road with three kids and two parents in one room.

The whole thing is crazy. If you were going to arrive here from another planet and looked at late stage capitalism you would say why do you live like this? Getting in debt to spend two weeks abroad rather than making changes to make the other 50 weeks off the year more bearable.

OP posts:
Peridoteage · 21/01/2026 08:11

The only thing is, social media has simply made us far more aware that a tiny minority benefit far more than others from human labour and exploitation of global resources.

For many millennia, life was basically quite hard for humans but in a different way. Hard work to acquire or produce enough food, build shelter, stay healthy, survive winter/droughts/storms, give birth and raise many children. But most of us are evolved to manage that & find meaning & satisfaction in that sort of labour and we lived in strong, stable communities where people had a lot of social support through harder times & lived near family. A young mum would be surrounded by aunties and grandmas, a man injured in work would be supported by brothers, fathers, uncles, sons while they recovered.

The type of work most of us have to spend our lives on now is far more mentally intense without the physical activity of the past. Office work, staring at screens, paperwork, it messes with our cortisol levels, we spend less time outdoors, eat the wrong food. We have far more material wealth but our lives can lack meaning and we've lost the ability to enjoy simple pleasures.

But we have to be careful not to view the past through rose tinted spectacles

For much of human history:

  • loads of babies never made their first birthday
  • loads of women died in childbirth
  • loads of men died young in battle, or through working injuries
  • lives were short, most people didn't see 50
  • winters were hard and spring was a time of food shortages
  • the disabled were often left to die
Peridoteage · 21/01/2026 08:14

BlackCatDiscoClub · 21/01/2026 07:31

Our brains have not adjusted to the huge changes that have happened over the last 200 years. We work ourselves to stress, but rarely see what that work actually 'did'. 200 years ago we'd have worked 10 hours reaping wheat, and at the end of it we'd be physically tired and have seen huge bundles across the field and known 'I did that'. Now we sit in a chair and have to trust that our admin somehow helps to meet a target that does something important somewhere. And theres no beginning or end to it, theres always multiple things we are just in the middle of. Theres no planting, harvesting, feasting, conserving. There's just a constant flow of equally important things that need to be done now.

This is so so true. The work of the past involved meaningful tasks that were done to completion. Hoe that field, hunt that boar, make the bread, sew that tunic. We lack purposeful task completion and our brains and bodies need it.

BlueJuniper94 · 21/01/2026 08:15

You're not wrong. But we also have greater equality than ever before

Ihateboris · 21/01/2026 08:16

DeluluTaylor · 21/01/2026 08:01

I think ‘we all buy too much stuff’ is a cop out. Most people I know aren’t in debt because they go mad in Next. They are in debt because they put utility bills, kids school shoes, work clothes and petrol on their credit cards.

I agree. Even if I wanted new stuff,I couldn't afford it.EVERY SINGLE PENNY goes on bills.
I think, unless you actually experience it yourself, you really can't imagine how difficult it is for us living on the breadline.

OonaStubbs · 21/01/2026 08:16

Honestly I think the answer is to abolish computers. Worldwide. And go back to basics. It would make things so more simpler and more people would be employed doing tangible work.

itsthetea · 21/01/2026 08:18

BlueJuniper94 · 21/01/2026 08:15

You're not wrong. But we also have greater equality than ever before

I believe that used to be the case but we are going backwards - the gap between the richest and poorest is getting worse not better

Imdunfer · 21/01/2026 08:19

OonaStubbs · 21/01/2026 08:16

Honestly I think the answer is to abolish computers. Worldwide. And go back to basics. It would make things so more simpler and more people would be employed doing tangible work.

I can't ever understand the argument that people would be happier doing utterly meaningless work that a machine could be doing instead.

itsthetea · 21/01/2026 08:20

The answer is to value people and the planet we live on not put profit ahead of everything

the myth we were sold is that profit would lift everyone

ownership of anything probably is a bad idea also

Summerhillsquare · 21/01/2026 08:21

sugarandcyanide · 21/01/2026 07:34

I agree. Life has got so expensive that we live to pay bills and buy food. Disposable income gets lower every year.

Families need two parents working to afford to live and they end up paying the equivalent of a second mortgage to someone else to look after their children. Then everyone is scratching their heads wondering why people aren't having children any more!

People will have to work till they're 70 and give up all of their healthy years. Social care is a disaster in this country and relatives can't help like they used to because they're at work, so those houses families had to give up their lives to buy will eventually end up being sold off to pay £6k a month in care fees.

But it's still the better of two evils to own the house as the alternative is to have no assets and be at the mercy of a state that has no money and even less inclination to look after their elderly.

send this to the Prime Minister. Serioulsy, they need to understand, and too many MPs are remote from this struggle.

frozendaisy · 21/01/2026 08:21

It is about making the most of the time you are in.

GarlicSound · 21/01/2026 08:21

Bargepole45 · 21/01/2026 08:04

The idea that this is the 'norm' though is completely wrong. It has always been very difficult for people earning the lowest wages to even survive, let alone have fun money. I just think our expectations as a country are rooted in a relatively short time period that was never going to be sustainable in the long term.

A good example is food. We have largely got to a point where we expect food to be roughly 10% of our expenditure but there is absolutely no real reason why this should remain the case. Other people in other countries routinely have to spend 50% of their income on food. If food becomes more scarce and our economy continues to falter then we will have less buying power as a country. Food will become more more expensive. There are also ethical questions about whether it should ever be such a low proportion of our spending in the first place anyway.

Agreed. Mind you, I also agree (ish) that we had it very, very good in the last decades of the 20th and the first of this century. It spoiled us - collectively, in the UK - and people's expectations of 'normal' are way higher. Much higher than they were in my youth (born 1955) and unimaginable in my parents'.

We can live comfortably with less, and most of us will probably have to remember how to, starting around now.

I've got another gripe, though - things just not damn well working! Appliances genuinely do break down sooner, and the fix is rarely something you can do yourself with some instructions and a screwdriver. New-type appliances like LED lights are fab, but have to go in the bin when they conk out. New cars are computers, Practical Mechanics can't help you there. Systems & processes are rushed into operation with insufficient troubleshooting, they don't join up with the previous & next process, and there are no humans trained to assist with the failures. Let's ignore the robot assistants that are only able to tell you what's already on the goddamn website.

I shall go & calm down now 😬

Jellycatspyjamas · 21/01/2026 08:23

DeluluTaylor · 21/01/2026 07:56

@Jellycatspyjamaswell some of it is choice, some of it isn’t. I have two children of different genders so they need their own room as they are nearly teens. Most three beds are houses where I am, haven’t seen many three bed flats. Of course I could share with my daughter but society/ media has showed her that she needs her own room. We don’t particularly buy a lot of stuff. I have to work full time to prove affordability to the bank that lent me the money to buy the house that I can no longer afford. And ironically because I’m living paycheque to paycheque I can’t afford to move. I can’t afford to live here and I can’t afford to move.
I can’t work part time and I can’t afford the petrol to work full time.
I follow a lot of ‘I left the rat race’ type accounts on SM, can’t help but feel their lives are propped up by others who can’t leave. If their children get ill, they will be treated by people who can’t live in a gypsy caravan. If they need a loan to buy a new camper, those bank staff are still tied to the capitalist system. We can’t all ‘opt out’

That’s the thing though, I think when parents split there’s an understandable desire to keep things consistent for the kids by either staying in the family home (at crippling cost to the woman) or to buy something as similar as possible. If all you could afford is a 2 bed home then your DD would need to share. It’s not ideal but neither is being down to your last penny.

We’ve been sold this story of what an acceptable life is, from homes to hobbies to clothes even down to how often we do our laundry and we don’t stop to think how sustainable it is until we’re trapped in it. Social media has so much to answer for - the living off grid, lentil weaving life style is no more sustainable (how many of those influencers fund their life style through content creation) than the affluent life styles sold at the other end of the spectrum. It’s all aspirational - but not realistic for most people.

Ionlymakejokestodistractmyself · 21/01/2026 08:24

Thanks for posting this. I've been feeling very despondent about the rat race and not progressing in my career but actually my job is very flexible and allows me to be there after school more days than not. That's something to be valued.

On social care, what happens if you have a joint asset eg house but only one partner needs the care? Do they still force you to sell?

Quine0nline · 21/01/2026 08:26

I find myself humming "rocking the suburbs" from "Over the hedge" as I read these posts.

QuiltyAsCharged · 21/01/2026 08:27

Children are a choice.

Ihateboris · 21/01/2026 08:27

QuiltyAsCharged · 21/01/2026 08:27

Children are a choice.

I don't have children and still struggle.

StandFirm · 21/01/2026 08:28

The reality is that completely deregulated capitalism rigs the game so much that it ends up eating itself as entrepreneurship and competition disappear. That's why anti-trust laws were introduced in the US a century ago. Today's reality though is that transnational big corporations (enabled by globalisation) have killed local businesses, communities and bankrupted states (not enough tax intake to maintain services) without offering viable alternatives. AI disruption is the latest iteration of this and will be the nail in the coffin. We are heading for a post-employment (and terrifyingly) post-human world in which we won't be able to justify our economic value anymore while still being trapped in a system that mercilessly rests on economic value. I'm worried for kids and my old age.

LadyLapsang · 21/01/2026 08:30

In the 20th Century many women were economically inactive or underemployed and divorce was rare for much of the century unless you were very wealthy. Wealth and class, as now, would have been key to your experiences. However, both my DPs lost a elder sibling in the war and most of us in the UK have not experienced that in our lifetime.

MsMcCoo · 21/01/2026 08:32

Bargepole45 · 21/01/2026 08:04

The idea that this is the 'norm' though is completely wrong. It has always been very difficult for people earning the lowest wages to even survive, let alone have fun money. I just think our expectations as a country are rooted in a relatively short time period that was never going to be sustainable in the long term.

A good example is food. We have largely got to a point where we expect food to be roughly 10% of our expenditure but there is absolutely no real reason why this should remain the case. Other people in other countries routinely have to spend 50% of their income on food. If food becomes more scarce and our economy continues to falter then we will have less buying power as a country. Food will become more more expensive. There are also ethical questions about whether it should ever be such a low proportion of our spending in the first place anyway.

Lots of us immigrants started on nmw somewhere in gut of hospitality beast. So we are aware of low wage life. That's what I was describing on personal level. We had good lives😕
Yes, food is cheap in uk but other bills are more than for example where my family lives, let alone DHs.
I remember how often we used eat in nandos 😭

DeftWasp · 21/01/2026 08:32

DeluluTaylor · 21/01/2026 07:16

I say this reading thread after thread of people trying to work around nigh impossible situations.
I am sitting here with chronic IBS from stress, trying to get the kids out of the door, to a school which can’t meet their need, to go to a job where I’m firefighting as nothing is fit for purpose anymore. Finding care homes for younger and younger people. People who want to work but can’t as they have learning disabilities. Yet in the 20th century an estimated 40-70% of people with LD were employed.
I have 38p in my bank account and all my money goes on paying for a big house that we’re in from 6.30pm 7 the next morning, with a huge garden which none of us have time to do anything in. That I sit in on my own when the kids go to see their father in a bedsit at weekends. Yet there are families down the road with three kids and two parents in one room.

The whole thing is crazy. If you were going to arrive here from another planet and looked at late stage capitalism you would say why do you live like this? Getting in debt to spend two weeks abroad rather than making changes to make the other 50 weeks off the year more bearable.

There used to be a big Remploy factory in our town that made electric heaters ,library furniture and school furniture and employed mainly disabled people, it was a fantastic place, all adapted for them.

It was government owned and supplied state schools and libraries.

Sadly gone

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 08:32

Other people in other countries routinely have to spend 50% of their income on food.

But you can’t look at in a vacuum. What are people in other countries spending on housing? childcare? utilities? what are their wages like?

Kimura · 21/01/2026 08:33

OonaStubbs · 21/01/2026 08:16

Honestly I think the answer is to abolish computers. Worldwide. And go back to basics. It would make things so more simpler and more people would be employed doing tangible work.

Which jobs involving computers do you think aren't 'tangible'?

Peridoteage · 21/01/2026 08:34

I think a huge part of it is awareness. There have always been loads of poorer people ekeing out an existence, hand to mouth, but they were surrounded by others like them and it was perceived as the norm. Ordinary folk saw the rich from a distance, understood them to be a tiny proportion of people & didn't really know a great deal about how they lived

Social media bombards us constantly with media focussed on the wealthiest minority and we are given a huge amount of detail about a lifestyle few of us can afford.

Switch it off. Get offline, stop following all this crap. You will be happier.

ThejoyofNC · 21/01/2026 08:35

I'm a gypsy and we get so much criticism from others for our traditional lifestyles. We always say we don't want to do anything differently, we are happy with our lifestyle. Then it's people living like the OP who refuse to believe we could be happy and try to convince us we MUST live the "modern way" and "get out of the 1950s". No thanks. I'll keep my single income, nuclear family 100% of the time.

Sounds like hell OP, you have my sympathies, you were sold a lie.

HeartyBlueRobin · 21/01/2026 08:36

Why not downsize if the home is too big and your children's father is living in a bedsit? The lower outgoings could mean you could work fewer hours allowing some quality time with your children. I'm not suggesting it will be easy but you seem keen for things to change.

As for more people with learning disabilities working in the 20th century than today they were mostly working in servitude and/or exploited toiling for very long hours on a very low wage.