Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Ice agent shoots a woman in the face part 3

1000 replies

Moontan · 09/01/2026 15:35

Donald Trump has now said its okay to murder a woman. Because they are doing it for people's 'safety'

It is interesting how far humans will let themselves be abused by bad people.

I was watching a documentary about jonestown the cult.

Some people left the cult

They said that the leader beat people, raped people, starved people. He made them do physical labour for many hours a day. He demanded that they give him all of their money.

And yet still hundreds of people followed him.

People seem to keep supporting a person and staying there. Rather than saying "maybe i was wrong and this guy is actually a bad person"

OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
Gloriia · 10/01/2026 10:23

LakieLady · 10/01/2026 10:21

Agree with all of this, especially "If you cannot act rationally in the face of provocation, you shouldn’t be an officer, full stop.".

Some people just don't have the right temperament to be in any sort of enforcement role imo, jobs like that need people who are calm, measured and rational.

Or, some people are well trained and react quickly to an escalating situation.

W0tnow · 10/01/2026 10:24

@1dayatatime It’s right there in the recording. He shot her, then said “fucking bitch”. They’re not the words of someone in control.

He lost control. Male rage. It’s pretty common. I think the poster just a couple back saying he treated her as a suspected insurgent is being too charitable. He lost his temper.

People keep coming back to this “she did a stupid thing”. They make a good point. Armed officers should be able to control themselves when someone bruises their ego.

W0tnow · 10/01/2026 10:26

Gloriia · 10/01/2026 10:23

Or, some people are well trained and react quickly to an escalating situation.

Some people. Yes. Not him.

TheQuirkyMaker · 10/01/2026 10:28

1dayatatime · 10/01/2026 09:46

OK - let's expand here.

She was shot because she decided to ignore a clear instruction to get out of her vehicle by armed officers. And instead drove her vehicle at an armed officer who will claim that in his opinion his life or his colleagues lives were in danger which is why he shot her.

If you disagree with that statement then please explain what do you think was the motive of the officer for shooting her?

She had turned her car around and was driving away. She was executed for being on the street while ICE were carrying out their usual illegal activities.
The take-away is: draw your curtains and don't watch the ICE/Trump activities. Same as in Germany in the 1930s.

Walkaround · 10/01/2026 10:30

OtterlyAstounding · 10/01/2026 10:06

Now you're just being ridiculous. If you can't understand basic proportionality and risk assessment, I'm afraid I really can't help you. As I've said, there is always an inherent risk, but we can minimise it. So, if we need nurseries, then they should be staffed by the safest demographic.

Here's an example: Let's pretend we need dogs for some reason. In this world where we need dogs, Golden Retrievers and XL Bullies are the only dog breeds that exist.

XL Bullies commit 60% of fatal attacks on humans despite the breed only making up 5% of the dogs in the UK. Golden Retrievers only commit 40% of fatal attacks, despite being 95% of the dog population.

Which breed is much more dangerous? And if we have to have dogs, which breed would you think is safer to have around your children?

Not being ridiculous. Your “common sense,” is another person’s not taking things far enough and, before you know it, women are for reproduction and childcare and men for everything else. As for your dog example, there is something badly wrong with the view that all men are like a particularly violent breed of dog. Funny how there are multiple dog breeds, but human males are all uniformly dangerous, like XL Bullies.

PevenseygirlQQ · 10/01/2026 10:31

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

OtterlyAstounding · 10/01/2026 10:31

Just to clarify on this in case no one else has, having been reading up on it:

'I am reading that the ICE officer has a conviction for sexually abusing his stepchild so…you know…as usual with violent gun nuts, he was an abuser of women.'

The ICE agent does not have a conviction for abusing anyone. Apparently in June, he was dragged 50 yards or so by a car, causing injuries requiring 33 stitches, in the apprehension of a man who was being deported after sexually abusing his stepdaughter.

Walkaround · 10/01/2026 10:32

OtterlyAstounding · 10/01/2026 10:31

Just to clarify on this in case no one else has, having been reading up on it:

'I am reading that the ICE officer has a conviction for sexually abusing his stepchild so…you know…as usual with violent gun nuts, he was an abuser of women.'

The ICE agent does not have a conviction for abusing anyone. Apparently in June, he was dragged 50 yards or so by a car, causing injuries requiring 33 stitches, in the apprehension of a man who was being deported after sexually abusing his stepdaughter.

So he shouldn’t have been back at work and using a firearm.

LakieLady · 10/01/2026 10:33

WhatHoJeeves · 10/01/2026 00:45

Booted, masked, armed thugs travelling en masse with seeming impunity from the law and a complete mandate to carry out any violent act including murder. And the majority of Republicans apparently supporting and applauding this.

What has America become.

I wouldn't go to the US now if someone offered me a 5-star, all expenses paid holiday with a chauffer-driven limo at my disposal. It'd feel as wrong as holidaying in South Africa under apartheid.

I wonder how feasible it would be to boycott US companies and products?

user4532789 · 10/01/2026 10:34

RingoJuice · 10/01/2026 08:41

Someone asked why they are in Minneapolis and I answer that question.

There is little to investigate. She looked straight at him and hit him with her car. Those consequences are on her. It’s tragic, but she should have just left her car.

I read responses like this and wonder what proportion of MAGA is made up of people with sociopathy or other personality disorders.

ICE, by the way, is not the correct body to investigate fraud.

W0tnow · 10/01/2026 10:35

Well, Ringo has staying power. I’ll give him that.

RingoJuice · 10/01/2026 10:40

StandFirm · 10/01/2026 10:22

Now we know she was trying to engage ICE and made her grievance against them clear.
... As was her right as an American citizen.
I am very uncomfortable with the implication that the act of protesting in itself is incriminating. The hallmark of a true democracy is that protesting is a right. They already had her license plate. They could have come to find her later and arrest her if they really wanted to make the case against her that she was obstructing.

You don’t get to block law enforcement just because you disapprove of what the rest of us voted for. If she had waved signs at a federal building then fine, whatever. This is very different, meant to subvert democratic processes tbh

Frequency · 10/01/2026 10:41

I suppose your opinion on his training hinges on your opinion of his intentions. I personally believe he intended to inflame the situation, at the very least, and fairly quickly decided to kill her, not shoot her, not stop the threat or protect himself, but kill her.

With that in mind, his training served him well; he achieved his goal with relative ease and a complete lack of conscience.

His suitability as an armed law enforcement agent is a different matter, and both sides appear to believe he was not suitable. Someone with PTSD, who is "stressed" by confrontation and vehicles, which seems to be the defense people are putting forward the most to defend his attitude before and after the killing, is not suitable to serve as armed law enforcement. I would hope that is something we could all agree on.

I usually lean away from conspiracy theories, but I can't help wondering whether this was planned, not planned as in they discussed killing her, and all agreed beforehand to take that action, but planned as in they've previously practiced intimidating suspects and aggressively maneuvering themselves in front of vehicles in order to explain away any violence on their part. It is not the first time ICE has fired at moving vehicles counter to what their training should be and what the law definitely is, and sadly, I doubt it will be the last time.

OtterlyAstounding · 10/01/2026 10:41

Walkaround · 10/01/2026 10:30

Not being ridiculous. Your “common sense,” is another person’s not taking things far enough and, before you know it, women are for reproduction and childcare and men for everything else. As for your dog example, there is something badly wrong with the view that all men are like a particularly violent breed of dog. Funny how there are multiple dog breeds, but human males are all uniformly dangerous, like XL Bullies.

Except studies show that not only are men more likely to abuse children, but women are just as good as, if not better than men at many jobs. For example, female surgeons are superior to male surgeons, and women are more effective in leadership roles than men.

So based on the common sense evidence, while men shouldn't be involved in the care of young children, women should be employed across practically all spheres of the workforce, because they're as good as men, or better. Sorry, but women are both lower risk, and just as skilled!

And again, you're showing your inability to reason: just because XL Bullies are 5% of the population but make up 60% of fatal attacks in my example, doesn't mean that all XL Bullies are dangerous on an individual level. What it does mean is that on a demographic level, XL Bullies, much like men, pose a higher statistical risk.

Ultimately, you cannot deny the facts: men carry, across every metric, a proportionately far higher risk of violence and abuse than women do. And you know what? Decent men will understand that their fellows have ruined it for them, and not insist on inserting themselves into areas where their demographic introduces a much higher risk.

OtterlyAstounding · 10/01/2026 10:43

Walkaround · 10/01/2026 10:32

So he shouldn’t have been back at work and using a firearm.

Definitely not, if he was still suffering trauma that triggered his behaviour. Of course, maybe he was just a trigger-happy arsehole, who knows.

I wasn't defending him or his behaviour, just clarifying that he has not been convicted of sexual abuse.

Gloriia · 10/01/2026 10:43

'while ICE were carrying out their usual illegal activities'

What are you suggesting is 'illegal' about immigration and customs enforcement?!

RingoJuice · 10/01/2026 10:44

W0tnow · 10/01/2026 10:05

Well, that’s easy. He was incensed that she was attempting to drive away. Incensed that she wasn’t doing what she was told. Was clearly not even close to being intimidated. Was mocking him even. He lost control of his emotions. He let his anger take over, and, well, shot the “fucking bitch”.

Having seen the footage from the shooters point of view, I’m not even convinced she heard the instruction to get out of the car. Not that it matters.

Edited

He honestly was quite calm and professional when doing the walkaround despite her wife getting in his face and trying to provoke.

RingoJuice · 10/01/2026 10:46

She hit him with a car. That’s when he got angry. He was calm when her wife got in his face trying to start shit

user4532789 · 10/01/2026 10:48

Gloriia · 10/01/2026 10:20

We've seen the footage! It happened in a split second. Now you may have the luxury of analysing it, viewing slo mo re runs and examining where the 'wheels were pointing'. He didn't have all that info he had to act on what was infront of him, someone refusing to get out as instructed and then the sound of acceleration in his direction.

He carried on shooting until the threat was neutralised as they are trained to do.

They are, allegedly anyway, trained to not shoot at moving cars. In large part because it's more likely to create a threat than 'neutralise' it.

RingoJuice · 10/01/2026 10:48

Walkaround · 10/01/2026 10:30

Not being ridiculous. Your “common sense,” is another person’s not taking things far enough and, before you know it, women are for reproduction and childcare and men for everything else. As for your dog example, there is something badly wrong with the view that all men are like a particularly violent breed of dog. Funny how there are multiple dog breeds, but human males are all uniformly dangerous, like XL Bullies.

Men are more dangerous than women. Everywhere on this planet. And it’s not close. Like it’s not even a debate

Livelovebehappy · 10/01/2026 10:49

TheQuirkyMaker · 10/01/2026 10:28

She had turned her car around and was driving away. She was executed for being on the street while ICE were carrying out their usual illegal activities.
The take-away is: draw your curtains and don't watch the ICE/Trump activities. Same as in Germany in the 1930s.

'Usual illegal activities'?? ICE are employed by the government to remove illegal immigrants. Nothing illegal in that.

W0tnow · 10/01/2026 10:50

RingoJuice · 10/01/2026 10:44

He honestly was quite calm and professional when doing the walkaround despite her wife getting in his face and trying to provoke.

So calm he switched his phone to his non dominant hand so he could take out his gun when the car was backing away.

You think he lost his temper after he shot her?

RingoJuice · 10/01/2026 10:51

Gloriia · 10/01/2026 10:43

'while ICE were carrying out their usual illegal activities'

What are you suggesting is 'illegal' about immigration and customs enforcement?!

yeah I want to hear their ‘reasoning’ here

user4532789 · 10/01/2026 10:51

1dayatatime · 10/01/2026 10:20

OK so in your interpretation the officer did not believe that he was in any danger from being run over.

He simply lost his temper and shot her for driving off.

But he seemed quite calm both before and after the shooting. As for the "stupid bitch" comment, I disagree with the "bitch" part but being surrounded by armed officers shouting at you to get out of the vehicle and then refusing to comply, is a pretty stupid thing to do which resulted in being dead.

He, or the other ICE agent - it's not completely clear who's speaking - didn't call her a 'stupid' bitch. They called her a 'fucking' bitch. Immediately after she was murdered, with her brains splattered all over the car. So it had nothing to do with her judgment or lack thereof.

How do you defend that?

Frequency · 10/01/2026 10:51

RingoJuice · 10/01/2026 10:46

She hit him with a car. That’s when he got angry. He was calm when her wife got in his face trying to start shit

Even if that was true, you do not get to act out of anger as a law enforcement official. You are, rightly, held to a higher standard than that. Shooting a civilian because you were angry is, at the very least, manslaughter, if not murder. The reason for your anger is irrelevant.

But yes, I agree he was very calm when walking around the car, chillingly so given what happened a few seconds later. Professional? No. A professional would have ignored the protestors, driven past as the first car did, and carried on with their planned duties.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread