Thanks for the post.
These posters are on all a lot of the doctor threads especially when prioritisation of British Medical Graduates is mentioned..
I wonder why anyone would waste their energy posting...? Suggestions about motivation have been mentioned on other threads.
They work in teams and seek to discredit anyone that tells the truth. For example saying my DC is in a trust grade job was deliberately spun into me looking down on those in trust grade jobs. This was done to move the conversation away from the fact that the 2025 cohort of UKMGs had to compete with each other along with 20,803 IMGs. 63% of applicants for specialty training were from IMGs.
The points based system is not fair to UKMGs and there have been posts on other threads that it is open to manipulation from outside UK.
Why should thousands of UKMGs be unemployed due to too much competition from IMGs? It is madness having unemployed UKMGs while importing foreign doctors possibly from red list countries.
195 other countries prioritise their own medical graduates and the UK did until January 2020. Streeting could have introduced a new rule for the Oriel application cycle that all applicants should have 2 years NHS experience. That would have protected UKMGs and IMGs already working in the NHS for 2 years.
My DC did two years of surgical training and passed MRCS part A and B first time but now marking time as an SHO when he should be working as a reg in his chosen specialty and building on his skills. A poster on here seemed to think a year of a completely different job was useful to my DC.. The same poster that thought that doctors did not have to have their own indemnity insurance as they could rely on Crown Indemnity and made an unpleasant comment about ND. Vile.
My DC was at medical school when the decision to drop the Resident Market Labour Test was made. The result is it is destroying UKMGs chance of employment and progression.
A message to the more unbalanced posters
I see your name and immediately scroll on without reading.