Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Labour's new policies for asylum seekers

994 replies

frommyheadtomyfeet · 17/11/2025 07:51

Are rumoured to follow Denmark's, which include the seizure of valuables from people arriving here to pay their accommodation costs.

Is anyone else disgusted by this?! How will it work, they can take people's jewellery, phones etc., and leave them with nothing? What sort of message does that send?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
HearMeOutt · 17/11/2025 09:03

saveforthat · 17/11/2025 08:58

Do you honestly believe that everyone coming over on the boats is fleeing war torn countries? The pp comparing with her Dad is spot on except her Dad paid into the system all his life and still has to sell assets for his care. How many people do you think we can support for free before this country collapses?

Exactly. Is there a war going on in Eritrea?

poetryandwine · 17/11/2025 09:03

frommyheadtomyfeet · 17/11/2025 08:55

Because we’re stealing the very few things these people have. They’re fleeing war torn countries.

I support asylum seekers. However I believe the vast majority are poverty stricken - I am unaware of statistics - and those who are not would surely prefer to take their chances on the private market rather than live in the hell that is government provided housing for asylum seekers.

It is certainly fair that those seeking asylum should contribute what they can afford to their upkeep. All immigrants do that. I do not see any philosophical grounds for seizing assets on ‘principle’. Employment rights would make this much easier.

Anyone with significant assets would know how to shelter them from HMG. The plan is impractical, aside from anything else.

1apenny2apenny · 17/11/2025 09:03

What I find interesting about this is that we have been told nothing can be done due to the EHCR however just over the water Denmark have put things in place and got more control of the situation. My only concern here is that, yet again, this will be ‘we’re doing this’ when in reality it’ll be a half hearted attempt, blocked by back benchers and civil servants, and won’t get off the ground.

My attitude is that these people have paid £££ to get here, we don’t want them or need them, there are millions in the same (probably worse) situation. Many have views that are incompatible with our culture and way of life. If they are that keen and it’s that bad where they’ve come from they will do anything to meet our rules. The problem currently is that, like thousands already here, they are ‘entitled’ to stuff and that’s the message that needs to change.

EasternStandard · 17/11/2025 09:04

poetryandwine · 17/11/2025 08:55

At present employment for asylum seekers is highly restricted: their claim must have been in process for a year and they can only work in shortage occupations - I don’t know what the official name for the list is.

You might think this would include jobs on the highly skilled visa list (and there might be some overlap) but generally the jobs are different. Eg my asylum seeking friend with excellent STEM qualifications came here urgently because of a political threat; in the usual way he could have got a skilled worker visa. But because his family applied for asylum, when he was able to apply for jobs and he got the list, the jobs were farm labourers, fishing, etc. His application for employment has been in process forever and if it is granted he will apply for anything. But British jobs in his field are unfilled; he had a successful career in his home country; and he cannot apply for them.

In almost all other Western countries people seeking asylum can apply for work after no more than 6 months.

Is this changing so people can work?

I suppose the details haven’t been announced. It’ll be a big change if so.

queenofwandss · 17/11/2025 09:05

I don’t know what the answer is OP. I absolutely detest the rhetoric against asylum seekers. We are already taking far fewer than neighbouring countries. So all this “we are a small country and can’t take more” is nonsense. Of the net migration, only a few are even asylum seekers and the rest are coming for work/study- surely we aren’t going to take their valuables?! People equate the half a million figure with that many people being in hotels which is just simply untrue, so it’s no wonder they are incensed with rage. Usually the same people who complain about the volume of asylum seekers are also oblivious to the effect of climate change and conflict (of the UK’s making!) which is fuelling the need for asylum.

That being said, I worry about a Reform government and think if Labour don’t do something relatively drastic that Reform would be inevitable. I think we do need to push back on the rhetoric as it seems that people are much more brazen in their expressions of views now. The social contract has changed about what’s acceptable to say.

EasternStandard · 17/11/2025 09:06

JassyRadlett · 17/11/2025 08:53

Can you explain the difference between using assets to fund care and using assets to fund accommodation?

Also, why the hyperfixation on jewellery?

Interesting to see where Labour supporters fall on this.

How would you get access to assets?

1apenny2apenny · 17/11/2025 09:07

And all this talk about letting them work is ridiculous, there aren’t enough jobs for our own population! I suspect most of them aren’t very well qualified anyway and their English isn’t good). There are thousands of unemployed youngsters and grads, many of whom can’t/dont claim benefits because they are supported by their parents. We don’t need in/low skilled young men.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 17/11/2025 09:07

HearMeOutt · 17/11/2025 09:01

We’ve had 7 million immigrants since the Millennium and our economy is shite, so your answer to that is ‘far more immigration’ despite the fact we are now the most populated country in Europe bar the Netherlands?

Quite.

We had huge numbers of immigration, both before Brexit and after Brexit, both legal and illegal, yet the only thing we've managed to grow is the welfare budget.

Economy growth seems elusive despite the huge numbers.

As for gran's necklace, Im sure gran would prefer me to sell it, or to give it, if that would make her grandchildren safer, instead of hoarding it.

HearMeOutt · 17/11/2025 09:07

queenofwandss · 17/11/2025 09:05

I don’t know what the answer is OP. I absolutely detest the rhetoric against asylum seekers. We are already taking far fewer than neighbouring countries. So all this “we are a small country and can’t take more” is nonsense. Of the net migration, only a few are even asylum seekers and the rest are coming for work/study- surely we aren’t going to take their valuables?! People equate the half a million figure with that many people being in hotels which is just simply untrue, so it’s no wonder they are incensed with rage. Usually the same people who complain about the volume of asylum seekers are also oblivious to the effect of climate change and conflict (of the UK’s making!) which is fuelling the need for asylum.

That being said, I worry about a Reform government and think if Labour don’t do something relatively drastic that Reform would be inevitable. I think we do need to push back on the rhetoric as it seems that people are much more brazen in their expressions of views now. The social contract has changed about what’s acceptable to say.

We ARE a small country and we ARE extremely overpopulated and that logically means we cannot take any more. How on earth is a country smaller than Michigan able to hold a population of 80 million people? It’s insane. Do you want clean air, locally grown food, wildlife, a low flood risk, nature to enjoy?

JassyRadlett · 17/11/2025 09:08

EasternStandard · 17/11/2025 09:06

Interesting to see where Labour supporters fall on this.

How would you get access to assets?

Sorry - I'm not really clear based on this comment whether you're classifying me as a Labour supporter? If so, why?

Frenchtoastie · 17/11/2025 09:08

frommyheadtomyfeet · 17/11/2025 08:03

I’m sorry but targeting the most vulnerable people as opposed to the vile racists is what’s going to make it worse.

Imagine you’re fleeing a war torn country. You might pick to take things with you, like jewellery. I know if I were to flee, I’d take my nan’s necklace with me as it has a lot of sentimental value. If that got stolen from me by a government I’d be absolutely bereft. It’s reminiscent of Nazi policies.

But the problem is people aren’t fleeing war torn countries, they often past through MULTIPLE SAFE countries to come to the UK

if you were fleeing danger you would stop when you become safe, not where you would get the best benefits

Swiftasthewind · 17/11/2025 09:08

It’s absolutely disgusting and a complete travesty in every sense of the word. I have been a Labour advocate all my life, and to see them become Nazis in less than a year is absolutely heartbreaking, but ultimately not surprising given the way the disgusting way working class have shifted recently.

Now I am seriously considering switching to the Greens, who will remain committed to helping bring the disadvantaged of the world to our shores for succour and safety. They will be the real key to stopping the far right from ever taking hold on these shores.

user90276865197 · 17/11/2025 09:09

I read an article from a soldier who had been in Afghanistan. His Interpreter is now resident here, one of the people who were evacuated by plane. He watched all his family be executed by the Talliban, children, wife, brothers.
The solider had been in contact with him and wanted to set up a fundraising, go-fund me, etc. The interpreter begged him not to as he says the Taliban are here and he’d be dead by the evening if they found out where he was.
It’s a mess…

HearMeOutt · 17/11/2025 09:09

Swiftasthewind · 17/11/2025 09:08

It’s absolutely disgusting and a complete travesty in every sense of the word. I have been a Labour advocate all my life, and to see them become Nazis in less than a year is absolutely heartbreaking, but ultimately not surprising given the way the disgusting way working class have shifted recently.

Now I am seriously considering switching to the Greens, who will remain committed to helping bring the disadvantaged of the world to our shores for succour and safety. They will be the real key to stopping the far right from ever taking hold on these shores.

Can you please explain how they have become Nazis?

DebbiesKitchen · 17/11/2025 09:10

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Swiftasthewind · 17/11/2025 09:11

HearMeOutt · 17/11/2025 09:09

Can you please explain how they have become Nazis?

Have you not witnessed this abhorrent new policy on asylum seekers or are all right wingers completely devoid of a neo cortex?

Oh how silly of me, I already know the answer to that question.

EasternStandard · 17/11/2025 09:11

JassyRadlett · 17/11/2025 09:08

Sorry - I'm not really clear based on this comment whether you're classifying me as a Labour supporter? If so, why?

On your reaction to the policy on this thread.

How do you see the assets being taken?

Teanbiscuits33 · 17/11/2025 09:12

Frenchtoastie · 17/11/2025 09:08

But the problem is people aren’t fleeing war torn countries, they often past through MULTIPLE SAFE countries to come to the UK

if you were fleeing danger you would stop when you become safe, not where you would get the best benefits

So you think that other countries should take all the asylum seekers and the UK have none? People have many reasons for coming to the UK. Risking your life with sometimes over 100 people crammed onto a rubber dinghy is totally worth it for £9 a week and a stay in a shithole Britannia hotel 🤣. Life of luxury that is.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 17/11/2025 09:13

Swiftasthewind · 17/11/2025 09:08

It’s absolutely disgusting and a complete travesty in every sense of the word. I have been a Labour advocate all my life, and to see them become Nazis in less than a year is absolutely heartbreaking, but ultimately not surprising given the way the disgusting way working class have shifted recently.

Now I am seriously considering switching to the Greens, who will remain committed to helping bring the disadvantaged of the world to our shores for succour and safety. They will be the real key to stopping the far right from ever taking hold on these shores.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg7r803m27o

Read and weep.

A brick building. It is sunny. Barbed wire is in front of it.

Wealden council looking to stop asylum seeker plan in Crowborough

The Home Office wants to house 600 people on a military site near Crowborough in East Sussex.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg7r803m27o

HearMeOutt · 17/11/2025 09:14

Teanbiscuits33 · 17/11/2025 09:12

So you think that other countries should take all the asylum seekers and the UK have none? People have many reasons for coming to the UK. Risking your life with sometimes over 100 people crammed onto a rubber dinghy is totally worth it for £9 a week and a stay in a shithole Britannia hotel 🤣. Life of luxury that is.

I don’t care what other countries do. Good luck to them. The British public have decided we are full, which we are, and they don’t want any more mass or low quality immigration. Their wishes should be respected.

HearMeOutt · 17/11/2025 09:16

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 17/11/2025 09:13

Yep. The Greens LOVE ASYLUM SEEKERS just not very local to them. Much better when they’re houses near ‘other people’, they can then advocate for them from afar.

Meadowfinch · 17/11/2025 09:16

frommyheadtomyfeet · 17/11/2025 08:39

But what they will class as sentimental items is different to what actually is a sentimental item. Seizing items of value because you don’t think people deserve to have them is disgusting.

But we all have to do it in hard times. Old people have to sell homes they have lived in for 60 years, all the time, if they need care.

Where is your compassion for them? Or doesn't it extend that far ?

Theunamedcat · 17/11/2025 09:17

frommyheadtomyfeet · 17/11/2025 08:42

Because your dad was wealthy and didn’t face the risk of having everything he owned stolen, just to be returned home with nothing?

Wealthy? Working your entire life to own your own home isn't necessarily wealthy

Frenchtoastie · 17/11/2025 09:17

Teanbiscuits33 · 17/11/2025 09:12

So you think that other countries should take all the asylum seekers and the UK have none? People have many reasons for coming to the UK. Risking your life with sometimes over 100 people crammed onto a rubber dinghy is totally worth it for £9 a week and a stay in a shithole Britannia hotel 🤣. Life of luxury that is.

no we should only take legal immigrants that apply and follow the correct routes.

Teanbiscuits33 · 17/11/2025 09:18

HearMeOutt · 17/11/2025 09:14

I don’t care what other countries do. Good luck to them. The British public have decided we are full, which we are, and they don’t want any more mass or low quality immigration. Their wishes should be respected.

Edited

Ok, but you’re talking out of your arse about them getting the best benefits. This is the problem these days, people read so much rubbish about asylum seekers and all sorts of topics and form their opinions based on it and then claim that those opinions as just as valid as an informed person’s view. It’s a cesspit out there.