Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Labour's new policies for asylum seekers

994 replies

frommyheadtomyfeet · 17/11/2025 07:51

Are rumoured to follow Denmark's, which include the seizure of valuables from people arriving here to pay their accommodation costs.

Is anyone else disgusted by this?! How will it work, they can take people's jewellery, phones etc., and leave them with nothing? What sort of message does that send?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
EasternStandard · 20/11/2025 11:32

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 11:07

At minimum the arrangement with France isn’t looking very practical or implementable, is it?

Brexit seems to me an own goal simply in terms of having some control over immigration. Farage pulled a blinder

That’s not what I’m referring to, I mean the language. Do you agree with the term illegal migrant in Starmer’s comms? In the 7.17 post

But no Brexit isn’t much of a factor, if you look at Germany and ROI. Similar issues including high profile crimes.

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 11:56

EasternStandard · 20/11/2025 11:32

That’s not what I’m referring to, I mean the language. Do you agree with the term illegal migrant in Starmer’s comms? In the 7.17 post

But no Brexit isn’t much of a factor, if you look at Germany and ROI. Similar issues including high profile crimes.

Well, what exactly does the phrase ‘if you come here illegally’ mean?

The two ways to claim asylum in the UK are to come on a visa either under false pretences or to overstay that visa, and to claim on UK soil.

I suppose people could be required to claim at recognised frontiers. If the system were scaled up to cope with the numbers - and that is quite a caveat - then sending others back to the extent practicable once the word got out wouldn’t bother me. It isn’t perfect but it would have the advantage of reducing trafficking.

I don’t think we have a particularly sound legal basis for sending them back to France, however. We rely on the French. I continue to think we would be better off participating in the DA.

Another option would be to allow people to apply for asylum from outside the country. But this relies on both technical expertise and timely processing; incompetence risks lives. I don’t know that this is viable.

EasternStandard · 20/11/2025 14:29

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 11:56

Well, what exactly does the phrase ‘if you come here illegally’ mean?

The two ways to claim asylum in the UK are to come on a visa either under false pretences or to overstay that visa, and to claim on UK soil.

I suppose people could be required to claim at recognised frontiers. If the system were scaled up to cope with the numbers - and that is quite a caveat - then sending others back to the extent practicable once the word got out wouldn’t bother me. It isn’t perfect but it would have the advantage of reducing trafficking.

I don’t think we have a particularly sound legal basis for sending them back to France, however. We rely on the French. I continue to think we would be better off participating in the DA.

Another option would be to allow people to apply for asylum from outside the country. But this relies on both technical expertise and timely processing; incompetence risks lives. I don’t know that this is viable.

I was just looking at the language, from what you know of the one in one out agreement is Starmer correct to use illegally in that line or not

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 14:59

EasternStandard · 20/11/2025 14:29

I was just looking at the language, from what you know of the one in one out agreement is Starmer correct to use illegally in that line or not

Got it.

Starmer’s statement about turning back those who enter illegally violates the 1951 UN Convention on Human Rights, which the UK signed. Manner of entry should be irrelevant to an asylum claim as stated there. I think that’s terrible and in the long run bad for national security as it promotes anti-Western radicalisation. But the UK isn’t the first country taking this stance and it won’t be the last.

I can’t get past the impracticality of ‘one in, one out’. Just so stupid.

EasternStandard · 20/11/2025 15:46

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 14:59

Got it.

Starmer’s statement about turning back those who enter illegally violates the 1951 UN Convention on Human Rights, which the UK signed. Manner of entry should be irrelevant to an asylum claim as stated there. I think that’s terrible and in the long run bad for national security as it promotes anti-Western radicalisation. But the UK isn’t the first country taking this stance and it won’t be the last.

I can’t get past the impracticality of ‘one in, one out’. Just so stupid.

You’d think he’d know better given his old career. Someone should ask directly why he uses that line. The Guardian could do that.

caringcarer · 20/11/2025 15:56

If I was genuinely fleeing persecution I'd use all of my jewellery, phone and money to save my life and that of my kids. How would that be racist? People come up with everything being racist.

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 16:25

EasternStandard · 20/11/2025 15:46

You’d think he’d know better given his old career. Someone should ask directly why he uses that line. The Guardian could do that.

He is running scared of Reform, very cowardly.

I wish someone would hold him to account but I suppose they may also be afraid of Reform, also. I think that’s also stupid because Reform can’t govern anything and that will become clear before the election.

Dollymylove · 20/11/2025 19:29

caringcarer · 20/11/2025 15:56

If I was genuinely fleeing persecution I'd use all of my jewellery, phone and money to save my life and that of my kids. How would that be racist? People come up with everything being racist.

Most of these MEN are not fleeing persecution, if that was the case they would bring their families and seek asylum in the first safe country.
They are economic migrants who want an easy life courtesy of the mugs of this country

Leavesfalling · 20/11/2025 21:54

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 16:25

He is running scared of Reform, very cowardly.

I wish someone would hold him to account but I suppose they may also be afraid of Reform, also. I think that’s also stupid because Reform can’t govern anything and that will become clear before the election.

Tbf Reform arent the Government. So we dont know if they can't govern. Labour on the other hand are in government. So we do know they definitely can't govern.

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 22:09

Leavesfalling · 20/11/2025 21:54

Tbf Reform arent the Government. So we dont know if they can't govern. Labour on the other hand are in government. So we do know they definitely can't govern.

Reform are in charge of Kent council (amongst others) where they have cocked up remarkably in just 6 months. The list of problems there since the local elections is very long and readily searchable.

Kent is the second largest council by population so yes, this counts as governing

InTheMoodToHuff · 20/11/2025 22:15

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 22:09

Reform are in charge of Kent council (amongst others) where they have cocked up remarkably in just 6 months. The list of problems there since the local elections is very long and readily searchable.

Kent is the second largest council by population so yes, this counts as governing

I don't think reform actually WANT to govern, when they can disrupt and force change from the sidelines just as easily. If they get in, whatever your personal politics, we are truly fucked.

Leavesfalling · 20/11/2025 22:51

Councils are subject to national policy unfortunately. So no. Reform aren't the government.

GaIadriel · 20/11/2025 23:16

frommyheadtomyfeet · 17/11/2025 08:03

I’m sorry but targeting the most vulnerable people as opposed to the vile racists is what’s going to make it worse.

Imagine you’re fleeing a war torn country. You might pick to take things with you, like jewellery. I know if I were to flee, I’d take my nan’s necklace with me as it has a lot of sentimental value. If that got stolen from me by a government I’d be absolutely bereft. It’s reminiscent of Nazi policies.

War torn Albania. 😂

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 23:17

Leavesfalling · 20/11/2025 22:51

Councils are subject to national policy unfortunately. So no. Reform aren't the government.

Reform in Kent have already lost 9 of their councillors elected in May, from 57. They are about to break their promise of no council tax rises and request the maximum increase of 5%. The list of their incompetencies, conflicts of interest and attempts to stymie the press is long and searchable.

Local government counts.

I agree with @InTheMoodToHuff that they don’t really want to govern. That’s too boring and grown up. Much more fun just to stir things up

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 23:20

GaIadriel · 20/11/2025 23:16

War torn Albania. 😂

The Albanian pipeline quite rightly dried up.
We were able to send the Albanians back

Leavesfalling · 20/11/2025 23:21

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 23:17

Reform in Kent have already lost 9 of their councillors elected in May, from 57. They are about to break their promise of no council tax rises and request the maximum increase of 5%. The list of their incompetencies, conflicts of interest and attempts to stymie the press is long and searchable.

Local government counts.

I agree with @InTheMoodToHuff that they don’t really want to govern. That’s too boring and grown up. Much more fun just to stir things up

Reform have only just been running Kent for 6 months. If Labour can use the excuse of Tory mismanagement in actual government surely Reform can in local government.

Or are we being a bit 2 Tier again..

GaIadriel · 20/11/2025 23:23

Maybe OP could let a few stay with her?

poetryandwine · 21/11/2025 07:24

Leavesfalling · 20/11/2025 23:21

Reform have only just been running Kent for 6 months. If Labour can use the excuse of Tory mismanagement in actual government surely Reform can in local government.

Or are we being a bit 2 Tier again..

Having 9 of your councillors forced out for bad conduct in 6 months is rather shocking.

If you want to excuse Reform for being new in Kent, following a Tory council there, then the same applies to Labour. I am not Starmer’s biggest fan but you cannot clean up 14 years of Tory greed etc in 16 months.

Leavesfalling · 21/11/2025 07:27

poetryandwine · 21/11/2025 07:24

Having 9 of your councillors forced out for bad conduct in 6 months is rather shocking.

If you want to excuse Reform for being new in Kent, following a Tory council there, then the same applies to Labour. I am not Starmer’s biggest fan but you cannot clean up 14 years of Tory greed etc in 16 months.

Reform are a new party and learning. Labour don't have that excuse.

We need an alternative to the two main parties as they have both failed. So hopefully Reform will have learned from Kent by 2029. They have time.

suburburban · 21/11/2025 07:40

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 23:20

The Albanian pipeline quite rightly dried up.
We were able to send the Albanians back

Now we need to send some of the other nations back too.

EasternStandard · 21/11/2025 07:42

poetryandwine · 20/11/2025 23:20

The Albanian pipeline quite rightly dried up.
We were able to send the Albanians back

That’s pretty much what stops selling to people for Channel crossing.

The only thing really.

Southernecho · 21/11/2025 07:43

Leavesfalling · 21/11/2025 07:27

Reform are a new party and learning. Labour don't have that excuse.

We need an alternative to the two main parties as they have both failed. So hopefully Reform will have learned from Kent by 2029. They have time.

Its not just Kent and what damage will they do whilst they are "learning" ?

As we've seen, in some aspects, with Labour, learning on the job isn't an option and just 16months in doesn't equal "failing", which as a "fair person" i'm sure you'll agree on.

After all, we gave the Tories 14 years.

Still several 100 Albanian families living here which Mahmood wants to send back, why was it never done earlier?

suburburban · 21/11/2025 07:48

Southernecho · 21/11/2025 07:43

Its not just Kent and what damage will they do whilst they are "learning" ?

As we've seen, in some aspects, with Labour, learning on the job isn't an option and just 16months in doesn't equal "failing", which as a "fair person" i'm sure you'll agree on.

After all, we gave the Tories 14 years.

Still several 100 Albanian families living here which Mahmood wants to send back, why was it never done earlier?

Edited

I think some of the other people from Eastern Europe (I’m not going to name group) who don’t work and live in social housing and don’t seem to abide by the rules should also be asked to go. Why are we paying for them.

Leavesfalling · 21/11/2025 08:00

Southernecho · 21/11/2025 07:43

Its not just Kent and what damage will they do whilst they are "learning" ?

As we've seen, in some aspects, with Labour, learning on the job isn't an option and just 16months in doesn't equal "failing", which as a "fair person" i'm sure you'll agree on.

After all, we gave the Tories 14 years.

Still several 100 Albanian families living here which Mahmood wants to send back, why was it never done earlier?

Edited

I think the Albanian issue was fixed under the Conservatives. Presumably they are the stragglers.

You're assuming Kent was in great shape before Reform took over. As everyone said when Labour got in, just give them a chance. As I said, we need a viable alternative to the two main parties. Im hoping it is a centre right one and so Reform is looking like the main option. Fingers crossed for the good of the country that they are in good shape in 2029.

poetryandwine · 21/11/2025 13:19

Leavesfalling · 21/11/2025 07:27

Reform are a new party and learning. Labour don't have that excuse.

We need an alternative to the two main parties as they have both failed. So hopefully Reform will have learned from Kent by 2029. They have time.

It is a matter of public record that Reform has already lost over 5% of the councillors elected to local government just 6 months ago.

The former leader of Reform in Wales has just now been sentenced to 10.5 years in jail for accepting bribes from a Russian asset for making pro Russian speeches.

These are not growing pains.