Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

So who is going to be brave enough to ask whether Shabana Mahmood's proposed reforms are right/sensible/racist?

538 replies

Papyrophile · 16/11/2025 17:26

Is Shabana Mahmood right or wrong to restrict asylum seeker's rights? In general?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
BeefFriedChips · 16/11/2025 19:47

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Papyrophile · 16/11/2025 19:49

We are very densely populated already and I, for one, would vote against building over the green belt to build accommodation for asylum seekers.

OP posts:
Seymour5 · 16/11/2025 19:49

Thatstheheatingon · 16/11/2025 18:22

I don't think someone who has been granted asylum should have to live with the uncertainty of being sent back in a few years. To what exactly?
They can't settle into a community and children will be uprooted to a different education system if they have to return.

Not many children coming via the boats. Refugees used to be the vulnerable, elderly, children, women. Most young to middle aged men were the most likely, as in Ukraine, to remain in their home countries.

EasternStandard · 16/11/2025 19:50

Seymour5 · 16/11/2025 19:49

Not many children coming via the boats. Refugees used to be the vulnerable, elderly, children, women. Most young to middle aged men were the most likely, as in Ukraine, to remain in their home countries.

If there’s no family reunification it’ll likely be younger men coming anyway.

GeneralPeter · 16/11/2025 19:51

The problem with this issue (and so many that divide people) is incentives.

If all asylum-seekers are genuine and worthy should we restrict their rights/privileges? Probably no.

If we want to ensure that asylum seekers are all genuine and worthy should we restrict their rights/privileges? Probably yes.

Zanatdy · 16/11/2025 19:51

Dollymylove · 16/11/2025 19:40

That's correct. Some of the "terrified" afghan interpreters have been going back for holidays.

Not until they get citizenship as their travel documents excludes the country they’ve claimed asylum from. Not from the UK anyway.

BelatrixLestrange · 16/11/2025 19:52

Very sensible proposal for those who come here illegally.

Now to loosen the strings for those who want to come here with valuable skills and/or the will to work and contribute to the economy.

I have lost two excellent staff members in the last two years because they don't meet the strict "skilled workers" criteria the tories brought in. We need to fix that.

Papyrophile · 16/11/2025 19:53

IMO if a person is happy to return "home" on holiday, they no longer require refuge.

OP posts:
Whistonia · 16/11/2025 19:56

HearMeOutt · 16/11/2025 19:46

We are not rich and we have no space.

Oh we are rich, well lots of people and companies are but others not so much - and the birth rate is decreasing

RowOfRunners · 16/11/2025 19:56

ExitPursuedByABare · 16/11/2025 17:36

I think it’s great. And so relieved it’s the Labour Party introducing it. The Tories would have had their arse handed to them on a plate.

It has to be Labour. Like it has to be Labour to get to get to grips with the NHS. There would have been civil war if the tories had dared.

HearMeOutt · 16/11/2025 19:57

Whistonia · 16/11/2025 19:56

Oh we are rich, well lots of people and companies are but others not so much - and the birth rate is decreasing

The birth rate is decreasing but immigration is so high our net population has been increasing by half a million to a million a year. It’s madness. And we are not rich. We are in managed downward spiral with few options.

Supersimkin7 · 16/11/2025 19:59

None of the proposed changes is racist, so there’s no argument,

Larryfell · 16/11/2025 19:59

She's entirely correct

EasternStandard · 16/11/2025 20:01

Supersimkin7 · 16/11/2025 19:59

None of the proposed changes is racist, so there’s no argument,

Labour have relied on this rhetoric a lot.

Mumblechum0 · 16/11/2025 20:05

I agree with the proposals too, but doubt they’ll get through parliament without a lot of watering down.

Flibbertyfloo · 16/11/2025 20:07

Whilst sending people home once it's safe sounds good in practice, what happens when ten years from now they've married and had three kids here? Are they really saying they'll be sent back? Without their kids?

Whistonia · 16/11/2025 20:07

HearMeOutt · 16/11/2025 19:57

The birth rate is decreasing but immigration is so high our net population has been increasing by half a million to a million a year. It’s madness. And we are not rich. We are in managed downward spiral with few options.

Most of that is legal immigration which is needed. What we need to do is deal with the issues that cause migration. And the issues that cause poverty. Why do we give millions of pounds to companies based in other countries who own our water? Why do we always have enough money to support counties kill people.

Supersimkin7 · 16/11/2025 20:10

Parts of London now have 0 social housing for locals, whatever colour we are.

Illegal immigrants taking over a country’s social housing is insane, but it’s happened.

Playing the race card is particularly daft given most of the people who’ve been denied housing in London aren’t white. It’s a bit more than daft, it’s offensive.

Whistonia · 16/11/2025 20:11

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

We could do far more to sort out our problems and not blame them on migrants. And we have caused a lot of the issues leading to migration in the first place.

Glitchymn1 · 16/11/2025 20:13

38,000 individuals came over over this year - so far…..

BeefFriedChips · 16/11/2025 20:18

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SpaceRaccoon · 16/11/2025 20:18

Flibbertyfloo · 16/11/2025 20:07

Whilst sending people home once it's safe sounds good in practice, what happens when ten years from now they've married and had three kids here? Are they really saying they'll be sent back? Without their kids?

The children would go with them. I don't think being just born in the UK confers any specific residency rights.

5MinuteArgument · 16/11/2025 20:20

We are in a similar situation as Denmark. The liberal-left are terrified of the rise of the far right, because they can't deal with illegal immigration.

I just hope Labour's plans are genuine and not just an attempt to shut people up. If they don't get a grip they'll will be cast into the dustbin of history. And they know it.

Whistonia · 16/11/2025 20:20

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Who is ‘them’. Many migrants make the country a better place. Why not blame the issues that cause difficulties in the first place like excessive profits and excessive wealth rather than a few thousand migrants.

PropertyD · 16/11/2025 20:22

We shouldn’t allow appeal after appeal and give them a chance to get a women pregnant and then claim right to family life.

Where are we going to send these people back to though especially if they are lying about where they have come from, their age etc. we always seem to give people the benefit of the doubt.