Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Not an ordinary working person if you earn over 45k

1000 replies

TesChique · 02/11/2025 15:50

Disincentivising anyone to strive to earn over 45k a year is a bizarre strategy for growth i feel

Aibu?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
TightOnes · 02/11/2025 19:43

ShortandLongOfIt · 02/11/2025 19:42

Most people I know earn around 30k

Only when early careers right? Like that's an early career salary?

Allisnotlost1 · 02/11/2025 19:44

TightOnes · 02/11/2025 19:38

I mean as long as you're happy with the choices you and your DH have made and aren't claiming benefits that's fine

Why can’t they claim benefits, if entitled?

Plantatreetoday · 02/11/2025 19:44

CheeseChamp · 02/11/2025 19:12

I earn 70k, my husband earns 75k. I find that obscene, frankly, for a basic middle management role. Why should I be on twice the average. Tax me more, ffs. It is 80% luck. I dont work as hard as a nurse.

Yet others on similar salaries may have years of student loans to pay back and years when not paying into ni for pensions ( hence need to work longer)
Many also will be working much harder than nurses with no option for flexible working arrangements and no public sector pension benefits either

Just because you are happy to pay more as you don’t consider your job worth the money means nothing.
No one is stopping you giving loads to charity if you want to offload it

TightOnes · 02/11/2025 19:45

Allisnotlost1 · 02/11/2025 19:44

Why can’t they claim benefits, if entitled?

PIP if disabled then yeah that's fine.

But if they are claiming UC because as they have low income jobs it's up to them to get better paying jobs.

Nolletimiere · 02/11/2025 19:48

Plantatreetoday · 02/11/2025 19:44

Yet others on similar salaries may have years of student loans to pay back and years when not paying into ni for pensions ( hence need to work longer)
Many also will be working much harder than nurses with no option for flexible working arrangements and no public sector pension benefits either

Just because you are happy to pay more as you don’t consider your job worth the money means nothing.
No one is stopping you giving loads to charity if you want to offload it

I think the PP may have rowed back on their previous bout of generosity.

Allisnotlost1 · 02/11/2025 19:48

TightOnes · 02/11/2025 19:45

PIP if disabled then yeah that's fine.

But if they are claiming UC because as they have low income jobs it's up to them to get better paying jobs.

PP said she’s two jobs.

Someone has to do the lower paid ones. If everyone stopped working in retail, or cleaning streets, or driving buses, or caring for elderly people, so they could earn the big bucks, do you think the world would improve?

shuggles · 02/11/2025 19:49

@SoSoLong You're kidding yourself. People on the graduate programme at my work join us with 0 experience, straight out of uni, on about 36k outside London, and we are very much middle of the range on pay.

Those salaries would be highly unusual for recent graduates, obviously. That salary is the national average.

lalalapland · 02/11/2025 19:49

Allisnotlost1 · 02/11/2025 19:48

PP said she’s two jobs.

Someone has to do the lower paid ones. If everyone stopped working in retail, or cleaning streets, or driving buses, or caring for elderly people, so they could earn the big bucks, do you think the world would improve?

There won't be any jobs in retail when everyone's disposable income is swallowed by the government

ArtesianWater · 02/11/2025 19:50

I live in the SE and commute to London for work. Living on £45K would be very hard.

SoSoLong · 02/11/2025 19:50

TightOnes · 02/11/2025 19:45

PIP if disabled then yeah that's fine.

But if they are claiming UC because as they have low income jobs it's up to them to get better paying jobs.

Why? Someone has to do the minimum wage (or slightly higher) jobs. If it's not the PP, it will be someone else. I've got no problem with full time working people claiming UC top ups if they are entitled to it.

Allisnotlost1 · 02/11/2025 19:53

LaserPumpkin · 02/11/2025 19:36

It’s more the middle has stagnated. Minimum wage has gone up a lot, but the salaries above that haven’t. Meanwhile, the top end has been running away from everything else.

And I keep banging on about this, but once you take universal credit into account there isn’t always much difference between someone earning minimum wage and someone earning £45k, depending on circumstances.

But as to whar’s fair, I have no idea. But it’s not constantly hitting the middle earners.

Fair point, though I’d argue lower to middle. And the higher minimum wage has often led to reduced hours for the lowest earners.

And the point re UC is that those costs wouldn’t be necessary if the salaries kept up with costs. Why is it that supermarkets are making record profits while taxpayers are ensuring the security of their workers? That’s crazy.

noworklifebalance · 02/11/2025 19:53

Someone may have posted this link but here it is for those asking for a more reputable link source than Sky and DM:
https://moneyweek.com/personal-finance/income-tax-rise-impact-on-high-earners
Still rumour rather than fact but these things have are always leaked.

MyLimeGuide · 02/11/2025 19:54

SoSoLong · 02/11/2025 19:50

Why? Someone has to do the minimum wage (or slightly higher) jobs. If it's not the PP, it will be someone else. I've got no problem with full time working people claiming UC top ups if they are entitled to it.

Good for you. As far as I can see this kind of socialist model is becoming increasingly unsustainable.

LaserPumpkin · 02/11/2025 19:55

shuggles · 02/11/2025 19:49

@SoSoLong You're kidding yourself. People on the graduate programme at my work join us with 0 experience, straight out of uni, on about 36k outside London, and we are very much middle of the range on pay.

Those salaries would be highly unusual for recent graduates, obviously. That salary is the national average.

Not highly unusual for graduates who get on a formal graduate scheme (which is definitely not all of them). Civil service graduate scheme is £31.5k, I’ve seen other large schemes at £42-45k, not just in London either.

Roopdedoop · 02/11/2025 19:56

This thread has made me feel poor. I earn 35k and thought I was doing alright, now I feel like I’m doing shite and have worked hard for years for a rubbish salary

TightOnes · 02/11/2025 19:57

Allisnotlost1 · 02/11/2025 19:48

PP said she’s two jobs.

Someone has to do the lower paid ones. If everyone stopped working in retail, or cleaning streets, or driving buses, or caring for elderly people, so they could earn the big bucks, do you think the world would improve?

Good on her for doing 2 jobs and (I assume) not claiming from the taxpayer and being the "captain of destiny" (using my own words).

TightOnes · 02/11/2025 19:58

SoSoLong · 02/11/2025 19:50

Why? Someone has to do the minimum wage (or slightly higher) jobs. If it's not the PP, it will be someone else. I've got no problem with full time working people claiming UC top ups if they are entitled to it.

I have a problem on them relying on us for their career choices. If they have health issues and need PIP or need DLA for a kid.

Plantatreetoday · 02/11/2025 19:58

Allisnotlost1 · 02/11/2025 19:32

Part of the reason the top 10% pay such a large share is because, in the last 15 years, earnings at the top end have grown disproportionately, while earnings at the lower end have stagnated.

How would you structure tax bands so they were ‘fairer’, in your view?

Everything should be equal

For example this is a better model

Guernsey income tax is applied at a
flat rate of 20% for all resident individuals on their net income after personal allowances. However, the system is not strictly "equal" for everyone due to a system of allowances, deductions, and tax caps that can result in different effective tax liabilities depending on an individual's income level and residence status.
Key aspects of the Guernsey personal income tax system:

  • Flat Rate: The headline tax rate is a flat 20% on income after allowed deductions. There are no progressive tax bands (like in some other jurisdictions).
  • Personal Allowances: All residents are entitled to a personal allowance (e.g., £14,600 for the 2025 tax year), which means the first portion of their income is tax-free.
  • Allowance Withdrawals: For individuals with income exceeding a certain threshold (e.g., £82,500 for the 2025 tax year), these personal and other allowances are gradually reduced, meaning high-income earners pay the full 20% on a larger portion of their total income.

Of course Guernsey has more high earners attracted because of the 20% tax. So they have a higher income tax income than the U.K. therefore retaining the existing tax thresholds of £12570 until the benefits of a more equal system kick in would be beneficial in the short term

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 02/11/2025 19:58

I'm really tempted to get some t-shirts made with "Working Woman" on them.

Allisnotlost1 · 02/11/2025 19:59

Roopdedoop · 02/11/2025 19:56

This thread has made me feel poor. I earn 35k and thought I was doing alright, now I feel like I’m doing shite and have worked hard for years for a rubbish salary

Don’t let it get to you, there are posters on here in the 1% of earners moaning that it’s not fair to expect them to pay more. Can’t take people that seriously.

You’re doing great. Earnings are not a reflection of your human value.

Bushmillsbabe · 02/11/2025 20:01

godmum56 · 02/11/2025 17:18

top end of Band 6 basic is £46,580 and you will have to be in band 6 for 5 years to get it. Newly qualified Nurse or HCP goes in at band 4 and they will be about 21 at qualification assuming they train straight from school. Staff who work overtime or unsocial hours will get additional payments. Thise figures are before tax. https://www.nhsemployers.org/articles/pay-scales-202526

Nope, newly qualified goes in at band 5. I was a band 7 after 5 years working/graduating. This starts at 47k outside London, plus any antisocial hours and overtime, puts it over 50k easily.

twistyizzy · 02/11/2025 20:01

CheeseChamp · 02/11/2025 19:12

I earn 70k, my husband earns 75k. I find that obscene, frankly, for a basic middle management role. Why should I be on twice the average. Tax me more, ffs. It is 80% luck. I dont work as hard as a nurse.

Then I take it you already pay into the voluntary tax scheme set up by HMRC? otherwise you're just virtue signalling

SoSoLong · 02/11/2025 20:02

shuggles · 02/11/2025 19:49

@SoSoLong You're kidding yourself. People on the graduate programme at my work join us with 0 experience, straight out of uni, on about 36k outside London, and we are very much middle of the range on pay.

Those salaries would be highly unusual for recent graduates, obviously. That salary is the national average.

37k is the national average for full time employees in any kind of job. I don't know what the average would be for professional jobs, but I expect it's quite a fair bit above that. It's not at all an unusual starting salary in the private sector. I googled and found this site saying it's 40k, but it's not an official statistic, so who knows? https://www.savethestudent.org/student-jobs/whats-the-expected-salary-for-your-degree.html]

I appreciate salaries start lower in the public sector, which would bring the average down, and also give the impression that 30k is a good professional salary. It's not.

twistyizzy · 02/11/2025 20:03

CheeseChamp · 02/11/2025 19:15

Sure, I guess? Never met anyone in that position. Happy to tax anyone who earns enough to be on higher rate. Doubt they are destitute.

Ah so you just want to tax everyone who earns more than you until they are destitute?
You realise that's called race to the bottom/levelling down? Which never solves anything, ever?

Morecoombe · 02/11/2025 20:04

TesChique · 02/11/2025 15:57

45k is apparently being used as the internal benchmark in gvmnt to keep to their "no tax increases for working persons" pledge. The directive in the treasury is to find ways to extract more tax from anyone earning above

It’s disgusting, they need to target the proper wealthy and big businesses. Household Income of Less than 100k in London you’re struggling

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.