Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Not an ordinary working person if you earn over 45k

1000 replies

TesChique · 02/11/2025 15:50

Disincentivising anyone to strive to earn over 45k a year is a bizarre strategy for growth i feel

Aibu?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Nolletimiere · 02/11/2025 19:00

Legolava · 02/11/2025 18:21

People say bot and don’t understand what it means. You are one of them. Do you understand what a bot is? It’s not someone who has a different opinion to you.

I also asked the PP, but the cat had evidently caught their tongue.

topcat2014 · 02/11/2025 19:00

Basically once you hit higher rate tax you are fair game

ACynicalDad · 02/11/2025 19:00

Try bringing up kids in London without at least one of you bringing that in. Hard enough with both of you doing it.

Hotflushesandchilblains · 02/11/2025 19:02

Bumbles55 · 02/11/2025 18:12

I’m a band 7 AHP and never imagined that I’d be struggling to make ends meet at this point in my career. Cost of living is a disgrace and makes life impossible for single people (even relatively good earners like us!). DD also currently studying for an AHP degree and I’m seriously worried for her future to be honest.

Yes, that is my situation exactly and it is soul destroying. At the same time as saving lives, my debt is increasing as every day problems can push me over what I can cope with. I have been working an extra day a week on top of full time hours for the last 1.5 years but I cant keep it up and its just left me with a massive tax bill.

Nolletimiere · 02/11/2025 19:02

TheNuthatch · 02/11/2025 18:55

Funny, I didn't hear any caveats applied to 'working people' in the election campaign. Apparently it can mean anything Labour want it to mean.

Protecting the bottom two thirds is not at all different from saying that the top third will not be protected. It is you who is being a 'twit'.

Absolutely.

This is all consistent with Reeves and the number of barefaced lies she has told.

She is also delphic - hence Labour tying themselves in knots over what is, is not a ‘working’ person.

moneyadviceplease · 02/11/2025 19:03

Glitchymn1 · 02/11/2025 16:15

Out of touch. Most people in local government earn less than that, those in retail, vets, teachers. They have mortgages, children, go on holiday.

I’m not sure that’s true. I work in local government and you dont need to be particularly senior to earn £45k it’s a PO1 level.

Nolletimiere · 02/11/2025 19:03

Merryoldgoat · 02/11/2025 18:41

How can people get so worked up over made up stuff?

The OP is wilfully misleading and has either deliberately misinterpreted the Sky report or just doesn’t understand it.

It’s fucking tiresome.

The actual take-away from the piece is they want to protect the lower 2/3 of earners so NI and Income Tax are unlikely to see increases. The reporter HIMSELF says that the top thirds starts VERY ROUGHLY at £45k as it depends on age and other things.

I’m so sick of the hyperbole and utter bollocks people spout sometimes.

So, don’t engage.

Simples.

TheNuthatch · 02/11/2025 19:04

Merryoldgoat · 02/11/2025 18:58

It’s not - the OP made the post about one not being considered a normal working person if you earned over that threshold.

The piece didn’t say ‘we are taxing people earning over £45k because they are not ordinary working people’ which is the implication of the post.

The aim is to protect the lowest earners and therefore NI and PAYE increases won’t do this.

An ordinary worker earning over £45k is likely only paying PAYE and NI therefore they will not be taxed more.

The whole piece is about how NI and PAYE aren’t going up. If you earn £80k and have simple tax arrangements then you won’t see an increase either.

If you earn £35k but have significant other wealth or assets then you may not be protected.

That is why it’s misleading.

Edited

I heard this when it was revealed on Sam Coates podcast that he does with Anne McElvoy of Politico.
He specifically said that the treasury are currently working on the definition of a working person. This is exactly what it's about. Right now, their plans are to only apply that meaning to the bottom two thirds of earners, but it could change.
Of course there are differences according to ones tax arrangement, but it doesn't change the fact that the top third starts at around £45K in most cases.

RubySquid · 02/11/2025 19:04

ACynicalDad · 02/11/2025 19:00

Try bringing up kids in London without at least one of you bringing that in. Hard enough with both of you doing it.

People do all the tine

Nolletimiere · 02/11/2025 19:05

twistyizzy · 02/11/2025 18:50

It went to housing. Starmer tweeted it 🤣
State schools are making cuts and redundancies. It's almost like they lied about the true purpose of the policy 🤔

Many of us can empathise with Sunak - we also called it, at the time….

CheeseChamp · 02/11/2025 19:06

It really surprises me how people on 45k+ dont want to contribute more tax. The country is going to the dogs for myriad reasons and we all need to contribute more. Happy to pay a couple of percent more to get a decent functioning country again after it was destroyed by tories. You realise the extra would only be put on any earnings above 45k? I have had enough of all this. I hope they do it. Raise it by 5%, bring it on. Clean the streets, funding for children, mental health, elderly care. Why are we all so happy to be eeking out our lives in this miserable way, clinging on to a few extra pounds? Get a grip.

lalalapland · 02/11/2025 19:07

topcat2014 · 02/11/2025 19:00

Basically once you hit higher rate tax you are fair game

It totally disincentivises people from progressing and working. My husband could work overtime but it's not worth it, he'd only take 40% of it home

Didimum · 02/11/2025 19:08

NoWordForFluffy · 02/11/2025 18:11

You chose to read the thread. If you don't agree with what's being discussed, it's you who needs to 'move on'.

It’s not a source of the proposal. Sky News click bait is irrelevant.

LaserPumpkin · 02/11/2025 19:08

CheeseChamp · 02/11/2025 19:06

It really surprises me how people on 45k+ dont want to contribute more tax. The country is going to the dogs for myriad reasons and we all need to contribute more. Happy to pay a couple of percent more to get a decent functioning country again after it was destroyed by tories. You realise the extra would only be put on any earnings above 45k? I have had enough of all this. I hope they do it. Raise it by 5%, bring it on. Clean the streets, funding for children, mental health, elderly care. Why are we all so happy to be eeking out our lives in this miserable way, clinging on to a few extra pounds? Get a grip.

Do you also support people who get benefits taking them over the net income of someone on a £45k salary paying extra? If not, why not.

Araminta1003 · 02/11/2025 19:08

On 50k, people are not net contributors. Income tax and NI is just under 10k. The Government is wasting so much money now per person that you have to pay over 15k tax for each person in your household. The issue is not people paying enough tax, it is the spending per person is completely unsustainable.

twistyizzy · 02/11/2025 19:08

CheeseChamp · 02/11/2025 19:06

It really surprises me how people on 45k+ dont want to contribute more tax. The country is going to the dogs for myriad reasons and we all need to contribute more. Happy to pay a couple of percent more to get a decent functioning country again after it was destroyed by tories. You realise the extra would only be put on any earnings above 45k? I have had enough of all this. I hope they do it. Raise it by 5%, bring it on. Clean the streets, funding for children, mental health, elderly care. Why are we all so happy to be eeking out our lives in this miserable way, clinging on to a few extra pounds? Get a grip.

Because Labour are refusing to also make cuts!! They are spending other people's money and treating it like it belings to them. No attempt to reduce debt etc.
Don't worry though, after they've bled middle earners dry they will come for you!
Like Thatcher said "eventually socialists run out of other people's money".

10% of the population pay 60% of the tax. That isn't sustainable

Didimum · 02/11/2025 19:09

Nolletimiere · 02/11/2025 18:55

How rude.

I trust you have seen the other posts with a link.

If not, feel free to move on.

That’s not a source. It’s completely irrelevant.

moneyadviceplease · 02/11/2025 19:09

Jamesblonde2 · 02/11/2025 18:31

£7k above minimum wage is not a good professional salary by any measure.

I agree, my eldest has just started his first grad job on £35k with a £2k sign on bonus. I’d be expecting him to hit the £45k within a couple of years. £30k is very entry level for a professional role

MarshaMarshaMarsha · 02/11/2025 19:09

ColourThief · 02/11/2025 16:48

Jesus Christ, try telling that to people like myself who earn less than 45k, have multiple children to support and no hope of even GETTING a mortgage.

Treading water… give me strength.

Did you consider maybe not having multiple children?

Hellohelga · 02/11/2025 19:10

Merryoldgoat · 02/11/2025 18:41

How can people get so worked up over made up stuff?

The OP is wilfully misleading and has either deliberately misinterpreted the Sky report or just doesn’t understand it.

It’s fucking tiresome.

The actual take-away from the piece is they want to protect the lower 2/3 of earners so NI and Income Tax are unlikely to see increases. The reporter HIMSELF says that the top thirds starts VERY ROUGHLY at £45k as it depends on age and other things.

I’m so sick of the hyperbole and utter bollocks people spout sometimes.

Yes my point exactly. I’ve been asking since page 1 where the 45k comes from. It’s just made up by Sky News. Rachel Reeves hasn’t said anything bout targeting earners over 45k.

MyLimeGuide · 02/11/2025 19:10

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Now now no need for the insults just because you are wrong 🙃

Nolletimiere · 02/11/2025 19:10

Didimum · 02/11/2025 19:08

It’s not a source of the proposal. Sky News click bait is irrelevant.

Speaking of sources, are you dismissive of the notion because it would impact you directly?

You appear very keen that the reports prove inaccurate.

Allisnotlost1 · 02/11/2025 19:12

lalalapland · 02/11/2025 19:07

It totally disincentivises people from progressing and working. My husband could work overtime but it's not worth it, he'd only take 40% of it home

People are not all motivated by the same thing. If your husband doesn’t want the overtime then he obviously doesn’t need it - great news for others who need it more and will pick it up. He gets to spend more time doing what he enjoys. It’s ok for people to make different choices.

Hellohelga · 02/11/2025 19:12

Araminta1003 · 02/11/2025 19:08

On 50k, people are not net contributors. Income tax and NI is just under 10k. The Government is wasting so much money now per person that you have to pay over 15k tax for each person in your household. The issue is not people paying enough tax, it is the spending per person is completely unsustainable.

And the Tories didn’t waste any money on unusable PPE or unfinished HS2.

CheeseChamp · 02/11/2025 19:12

twistyizzy · 02/11/2025 19:08

Because Labour are refusing to also make cuts!! They are spending other people's money and treating it like it belings to them. No attempt to reduce debt etc.
Don't worry though, after they've bled middle earners dry they will come for you!
Like Thatcher said "eventually socialists run out of other people's money".

10% of the population pay 60% of the tax. That isn't sustainable

I earn 70k, my husband earns 75k. I find that obscene, frankly, for a basic middle management role. Why should I be on twice the average. Tax me more, ffs. It is 80% luck. I dont work as hard as a nurse.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.