Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To expect Sunday Dinner as the agreement?

1000 replies

TipJarTroubadours · 01/11/2025 15:56

Small details changed but the short of it is:

  1. We allow people to stay in self contained accommodation for 'free'
  2. The only 'cost' is attendance to Sunday dinner
  3. Aibu to refuse to let someone stay (or charge them market rent) if they don't attend dinner

The long of it is

DH and I own a residential static caravan site. It has been in DH family a long time. It has great transport links to a major city.

We allow close family/friends to stay rent free whilst they attend uni in the city/start a new job. We have had 15 different people over the years, some for six months, the longest five years.

Currently house DS and nephew who are both at uni and DHs best friends daughter and her partner who has just started an apprenticeship. All four attend Sunday dinner, as have the 15 beforehand.

(For those that are interested, I cook the meal and then they take turns to make/buy a pudding and wash up (most goes in the dishwasher) I have had one with severe allergies who used to bring their own food, and one that was fussy so I used to make them beans on toast every Sunday. )

My sister's son has been living with us since September, I was very clear on the rules- it might seem odd but for a 10k saving a year I expect attendance at one meal a week.- they both knew about this.
Since starting he has attended one, preferring to go to the pub/gym/game on a Sunday. It has been raised with him and we have said if he doesn't attend then we will charge him rent (we have other uni students renting although they are all mature)

I have gone to my parents for half term and have just met my sister and told her the same. My parents and her think I am completely unreasonable to ask him to attend Sunday dinner, I think they are completely unreasonable to expect me to house him for free after agreeing to my rules ( there are costs involved for me, utilities etc plus not being able to rent it out)

I've said he has to attend tomorrow or I will bill them from now until Christmas and if it isn't paid will evict at Christmas.

Am I being unreasonable to expect my nephew to do what he agreed to in return for accommodation? (I don't think I am, even if expecting to attend dinner is unreasonable, he has agreed to the terms, he could have just rented halls)

OP posts:
Cosyblackcatonbed · 01/11/2025 20:33

TheSwarm · 01/11/2025 20:30

Who would actually believe that anyone who isn't obviously batshit crazy would follow through on a threat to evict them because of a refusal to attend sunday lunch?

I mean, the signs would already be there years beforehand, and you'd know never to take up such a poisoned chalice of a gift in the first place if you really believed that OP was serious.

Edited

He doesn't have to accept the gift. He can find somewhere else to stay or pay her rent. What he can't have is free accommodation and not follow through on the deal he made in order to get it. Good life lesson for him, don't make deals you are willing to stand by.

FagotsAndPeas · 01/11/2025 20:34

It's an odd arrangement, but if he agreed to attend the meal in exchange for rent free accommodation, then he needs to leave or stick to it.

Consideringparttime · 01/11/2025 20:34

I think there's loads of weird projection on here.
I can think of lots of quid pro quo arrangements
My neighbour has his niece living with him, he charges minimal rent but the deal is that she takes him to all his appointments (he can't drive anymore due to a medical.issue)
Not coercive , but a clear part of the deal
I think it's really normal
My.mum made it clear when I was 18 that she wouldn't charge me rent but I needed to share the cooking and cleaning , otherwise she would charge me

TheSwarm · 01/11/2025 20:35

Cosyblackcatonbed · 01/11/2025 20:33

He doesn't have to accept the gift. He can find somewhere else to stay or pay her rent. What he can't have is free accommodation and not follow through on the deal he made in order to get it. Good life lesson for him, don't make deals you are willing to stand by.

I'll refer you to my point that nobody would actually think it's a serious condition of offering a family member accommodation, because it's a mental demand to make of anyone.

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 20:35

TheSwarm · 01/11/2025 20:32

I'm not "threatened" by anything.

I just recognise abusive behaviour when I see it.

In what way that any normal, sane, well-adjusted person would understand is this "abusive" ?

She's invited him to be part of her family. He's declined. She's not obliged to offer rent-free accommodation to anyone, let alone someone who disdains her company.

How many indifferent strangers do you have living in your properties?

arcticpandas · 01/11/2025 20:35

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 20:31

Yes, if I thought it was for the greater long-term good of the family.

Nephew is free to pay rent instead, if he finds the OP and her husband's company so distasteful. I wouldn't be offering free rent to someone who didn't think I was worth 2 hours a week chat around the dinner table.

But it's not for the greater good of the family. It's just a power play. OP had it done to her so now she thinks it's her turn to "be in charge". She has fallen out with her sister and mother because of it. And her nephew must think she's batshit crazy. Is that your definition of the "greater long-term good of the family"?

snackatack · 01/11/2025 20:36

I understand why people think it is odd- but it is a good benchmark. If they don't want to spend one meal a week with you they are not 'close enough' to get free rent.

I'd not make him come to dinner (he's made it clear he would only be coming for the free rent - not for you .. or your company).. but I would kick him out.

Purplevioletblu · 01/11/2025 20:36

Oh my god you remind me of my mil so bloody needy. I personally can't stand having to go round to someone's house for Sunday lunch like in laws and have to make small talk all afternoon. You sound lonely, is there a hobby you could take up or go out for the day a couple of Sundays every month, that would fill me with dread feeling forced to do something I didn't really want to each week, cut him some slack.

Cerezo · 01/11/2025 20:37

“So I used to live on the family caravan park with compulsory Sunday lunch with my unbearable aunt. I didn’t want to go, by Sunday night studying all week and work and stress I just needed to rest but they said I could pay them hundreds of pounds a month or leave if I didn’t go and make pudding and wash up and play nice.”

Mate, that’s creepy af, do you still see them?

“God no. I think on reflection they were a cult.”

TheSwarm · 01/11/2025 20:37

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 20:35

In what way that any normal, sane, well-adjusted person would understand is this "abusive" ?

She's invited him to be part of her family. He's declined. She's not obliged to offer rent-free accommodation to anyone, let alone someone who disdains her company.

How many indifferent strangers do you have living in your properties?

He is already part of her family, by virtue of being related to her.

Healthy families doesn't make demands on people and offer "gifts" that come with controlling, abusive conditions on how people spend their time, in order to lord over them like some weird oligarch.

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 01/11/2025 20:37

@No5ChalksRoad- but it’s not a long standing family tradition for the nephew - @TipJarTroubadourssays in her OP that it’s her sister’s son. The tradition of “Sunday dinner blackmail” is her husband’s family’s fucked up tradition, that oddly the OP has decided to continue and can’t say why she feels it’s a good thing for all involved.

Shudacudawuda · 01/11/2025 20:37

hihelenhi · 01/11/2025 19:05

You're missing that the key to people's reactions to this is the "compelled" part.

An OFFER of a family meal (with stipulations if they attend, like pudding) is lovely and what most people would do. Likewise, a transaction that includes work in kind (for example, doing the gardening, a task) is completely fair and reasonable and most people would see it as such.

Compelling other adults, especially family members to socialise in exactly the way you demand is not reasonable. It's weird and controlling and smacks of "I think people should behave THIS way". Ugh. As someone who left an abusive relationship with a partner, this smacks of coercion and control.

It's "compelled" in the same way as I am compelled to pay my mortgage!
He agreed to the terms, he didn't have to, he was not compelled to. This is not difficult.

Consideringparttime · 01/11/2025 20:37

It's mental to.me that anyone would accept free rent without expecting there to be any commitment or responsibilty necessary

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 20:38

Consideringparttime · 01/11/2025 20:34

I think there's loads of weird projection on here.
I can think of lots of quid pro quo arrangements
My neighbour has his niece living with him, he charges minimal rent but the deal is that she takes him to all his appointments (he can't drive anymore due to a medical.issue)
Not coercive , but a clear part of the deal
I think it's really normal
My.mum made it clear when I was 18 that she wouldn't charge me rent but I needed to share the cooking and cleaning , otherwise she would charge me

There's lots of mumsnetters with low standards who are providing blow jobs, childcare and domestic labour to arsehole men who are footing the financial bill, too. but suddenly they read the OP's scenario and they see a controlling abuser behind every shrub. The mind truly reels.

Cosyblackcatonbed · 01/11/2025 20:38

TheSwarm · 01/11/2025 20:35

I'll refer you to my point that nobody would actually think it's a serious condition of offering a family member accommodation, because it's a mental demand to make of anyone.

Edited

Life lesson, don't expect people to give you £10k in free accommodation without strings when they specifically say the strings are a Sunday meal. He made a deal, he's not sticking to it so he loses the deal. It's very simple.

AstonScrapingsNameChange · 01/11/2025 20:38

Mapletree1985 · 01/11/2025 18:45

You are not being unreasonable. You laid out the terms of the informal contract and he agreed to it. He can't renege just because it suits him. Teach him a lesson about this now, and he won't fall foul of the same issue when he's older and it might matter more.

When is he ever going to encounter a situation this bonkers again? 🤣

Doesn't strike me as a transferable life lesson!

OP why oh why do you want to force people to eat with you on pain of eviction? I get that it's a nice suggestion, but you're not suggesting, you're mandating. Have you considered why he doesn't want to? Have you asked him? Do you even care, or do you just want to steamroller your will upon the situation?

We get that you have saved him money, but you seem to feel that gives you a weird entitlement to his time. Why? What has the one thing got to do with the other (apart from you've attempted to link them in a dodgy sounding contract)?

BackToLurk · 01/11/2025 20:38

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 20:35

In what way that any normal, sane, well-adjusted person would understand is this "abusive" ?

She's invited him to be part of her family. He's declined. She's not obliged to offer rent-free accommodation to anyone, let alone someone who disdains her company.

How many indifferent strangers do you have living in your properties?

He’s her nephew. He’s already ‘part of her family’. Mind you her own son is also apparently subject to this conditional family membership, so who knows what kind of weird family dynamic she’s got going on.

TheSwarm · 01/11/2025 20:39

Cosyblackcatonbed · 01/11/2025 20:38

Life lesson, don't expect people to give you £10k in free accommodation without strings when they specifically say the strings are a Sunday meal. He made a deal, he's not sticking to it so he loses the deal. It's very simple.

The life lesson being run the fuck away from the OP and don't look back.

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 20:39

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 01/11/2025 20:37

@No5ChalksRoad- but it’s not a long standing family tradition for the nephew - @TipJarTroubadourssays in her OP that it’s her sister’s son. The tradition of “Sunday dinner blackmail” is her husband’s family’s fucked up tradition, that oddly the OP has decided to continue and can’t say why she feels it’s a good thing for all involved.

Why do you consider it fucked up?

Why would anyone offer free rent to someone who is not close enough to dine with for two hours once a week? He doesn't feel close or connected to the OP, so he can pay his rent like any other unconnected stranger would.

TheSwarm · 01/11/2025 20:39

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 20:38

There's lots of mumsnetters with low standards who are providing blow jobs, childcare and domestic labour to arsehole men who are footing the financial bill, too. but suddenly they read the OP's scenario and they see a controlling abuser behind every shrub. The mind truly reels.

Are you ok? I mean, really?

Because that is some grade A nonsense right there.

arcticpandas · 01/11/2025 20:40

Consideringparttime · 01/11/2025 20:34

I think there's loads of weird projection on here.
I can think of lots of quid pro quo arrangements
My neighbour has his niece living with him, he charges minimal rent but the deal is that she takes him to all his appointments (he can't drive anymore due to a medical.issue)
Not coercive , but a clear part of the deal
I think it's really normal
My.mum made it clear when I was 18 that she wouldn't charge me rent but I needed to share the cooking and cleaning , otherwise she would charge me

Not at all the same things. I would happily take uncle to his medical appts because there is a need for them. Also very reasonable to share cooking and cleaning tasks with your mum. If the OP asked for them to do some cleaning job in lieu of rent I would find that very reasonable. But to attend her Sunday dinners is just a power move- she likes the idea of having a family gathering so much that she doesn't realise that making them into an obligation takes away all joy from such gatherings and just makes everyone miserable.

BackToLurk · 01/11/2025 20:40

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 20:38

There's lots of mumsnetters with low standards who are providing blow jobs, childcare and domestic labour to arsehole men who are footing the financial bill, too. but suddenly they read the OP's scenario and they see a controlling abuser behind every shrub. The mind truly reels.

Wow

Bubobubo · 01/11/2025 20:40

@TipJarTroubadours See this would be lovely. If you fancy housing me and my teenager we'll come every Sunday, bring flowers, make dessert each week and cook the roast if you wanted a weekend off cooking!

It's not a big ask at all.

I bet you have a lovely dining table.

Whaleandsnail6 · 01/11/2025 20:42

Consideringparttime · 01/11/2025 20:34

I think there's loads of weird projection on here.
I can think of lots of quid pro quo arrangements
My neighbour has his niece living with him, he charges minimal rent but the deal is that she takes him to all his appointments (he can't drive anymore due to a medical.issue)
Not coercive , but a clear part of the deal
I think it's really normal
My.mum made it clear when I was 18 that she wouldn't charge me rent but I needed to share the cooking and cleaning , otherwise she would charge me

Thats more understandable...thats actually doing things that have a clear benefit to others/the household that they live in.

An enforced social dinner every single week? That doesn't have a benefit if the individual doesn't want to be there. I can't even see how it benefits op, as I'd hate to think someone was only having dinner with me was because they felt they had to (or to avoid moving out or paying rent)

I want people to spend time with me because they actually want to

thepariscrimefiles · 01/11/2025 20:42

BunnyLake · 01/11/2025 20:21

Can you give a bit of background as to who attends your dinners? Their ages, relationship to nephew etc?

OP has said:

'Currently house DS and nephew who are both at uni and DHs best friends daughter and her partner who has just started an apprenticeship. All four attend Sunday dinner'

They all sound around the same age.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread