Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

If you have a SEN child, would you be comfortable with this?

348 replies

Beetrootisthesecretingredient · 26/10/2025 08:43

Context: DS7 is autistic. Verbal but with lots of sensory issues and is very rigid.
Yesterday we went cycling along the canal tow path, one of our usual Saturday activities. Its usually quiet and we have a nice time cycling to a certain bridge and back. DS is very noise sensitive. Yesterday there was a series of unfortunate events (in our world): someone using a chain saw, a baby cried and then a loud car backfired, all within 2 mins of each other. DS leaps off bike screams and cries and lies on the tow path. Meltdown.
This happened on a very narrow bit of towpath. At this exact same time 4 older male cyclists in all the lycra wanted to overtake us. DP went to DS to sooth/move out of way. Cyclists have now stopped and said loudly 'FFS just move him out of the way'.
I replied 'it won't take a second he's upset'.
More grumbling and general unkindness from cyclists. DP then loudly called cyclist 'inconsiderate twat'.
DP now wants to get DS a high vis vest that says 'I am autistic please be patient ' but I feel uncomfortable about it.
Fwiw we have a sunflower lanyard but these cyclists either didn't know what it represents of didn't care and DP just doesn't want to get in that situation again.... which ended with all stressed and called people twats.

OP posts:
Italiandreams · 26/10/2025 16:22

Hiptothisjive · 26/10/2025 16:13

This was my immediate thought.

I know your son can’t help where he melts down but it potentially was in a dangerous spot and he was at high risk of being hit.

The other riders were rude but your DP should have moved for safety. Your DO was rude for saying that and using that language in front of a child. No glory anywhere for anyone all around.

Whether your son is ND or not the danger to him was as a child and while it is super pertinent to you it isn’t to others (whether you agree or not).

They did move him. The cyclists had to wait a whole 20 seconds . Someone could have fallen of their bike, or tripped when walking, or had an asthma attack. People should cycle considerately.

RubySquid · 26/10/2025 16:24

EatSleepDreamRepeat · 26/10/2025 09:41

A canal tow path isn't a cycle path. It's a shared space and pedestrians have right of way on them over cyclists. No problem of course with cyclists using them but it's not reasonable for a cyclist to think they won't need to stop and give way. I don't think a hi vi's vest will make a difference if this is how they behave.

Pedestrian would be walking. Not laid on the floor

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 26/10/2025 16:33

Jellybunny56 · 26/10/2025 09:36

Surely the solution here is you just quickly move a 7 year old out of the way, clearing the path to let others pass and also then means you don’t have an audience for an already stressful situation?

DS is autistic, he's had shut downs in public, and even when he was 7 or 8, it was hard to move him as he was a dead weight and unable to help. Add in that he'd become hypersensitive so any attempt to move him caused him pain. Sometimes we'd just have to drag him out of the way - ok on a smooth shopping centre floor, less doable on a rougher outside path.

Safahh · 26/10/2025 16:37

222days · 26/10/2025 14:39

The only people who created any danger in this situation were any cyclists who were cycling much too fast on a shared pathway - that was not a cycle lane so they had no reason whatsoever to presume would be clear of obstructions - in order for them to be able to stop in good time if there were obstructions ahead.

Such obstructions could take the form of small children, elderly people walking/ almost at a standstill, or any number of other things.

The only people to blame here for creating any danger are the cyclists themselves for not riding safely. There needs to be a system where bicycles are issued with number plates so that when repeated dangerous or antisocial behaviour is reported they can be banned from cycling and issued with large fines if they continue to do so illegally after a ban. I think this may be the only way to crush the entitled and often dangerous behaviour on roads and pathways. All decent cyclists who observe the rules and basic decency would welcome such a system.

You have no evidence they were going too fast for conditions or were dangerous. They didn't hit him. They were annoyed he was being allowed to lie on the path.

Safahh · 26/10/2025 16:42

222days · 26/10/2025 15:06

They were moving their child out of the way as quickly as was reasonably feasible to do so.

Do you think parents enjoy their child being in immense distress and worried whether they’ll be hurt by irresponsible cyclists going much too fast or verbally abused by them and having to listen to swearing from these strangers? I highly doubt they were needlessly prolonging the situation.

I don't think parents enjoy it, but I do think in this case tried to exaggerate their belief that they were perfectly and reasonably entitled to 'soothe' the child until such time he was willing to move out of others' way BECAUSE AUTISM.

A bit like when cyclists stay right in the middle of the lane when there is no reason not to move over because the highway code ALLOWS IT.

Italiandreams · 26/10/2025 16:44

Safahh · 26/10/2025 16:37

You have no evidence they were going too fast for conditions or were dangerous. They didn't hit him. They were annoyed he was being allowed to lie on the path.

Except he wasn’t being allowed , they were moving him. The cyclist had to wait 20 seconds.

Safahh · 26/10/2025 16:45

Italiandreams · 26/10/2025 16:44

Except he wasn’t being allowed , they were moving him. The cyclist had to wait 20 seconds.

Either it was difficult and a dead weight of a seven year old in meltdown is too much for one adult to manage, or it was done swiftly and no big deal, hardly noticed by onlookers. Can't have it both ways.

Italiandreams · 26/10/2025 16:48

Safahh · 26/10/2025 16:45

Either it was difficult and a dead weight of a seven year old in meltdown is too much for one adult to manage, or it was done swiftly and no big deal, hardly noticed by onlookers. Can't have it both ways.

The OP l said it took 20sconds. The other comments did not come from the OP. ( but trust me, moving a four year old in melt down is hard enough- so it is difficult just not what the OP said in this situation)

gamerchick · 26/10/2025 16:52

I would get the vest and I also would have moved him out of the way.

I like the sound of a vest actually for mine.

AstonScrapingsNameChange · 26/10/2025 16:55

caringcarer · 26/10/2025 08:54

I think it would increase the chances of strangers being more patient with your DS. The cyclist may have just thought he was a naughty DC and they were probably timing their cycle so your DC affected their times.

Then they should have found a route that wasn't narrow and likely to be blocked by other users. You can't expect everyone else to get out of the way just because you're timing yourself. Ive met people like this in swimming pools, it is not nice.

Kittlewittle · 26/10/2025 16:58

I have a child with additional needs and the first thing I would have done in this situation is pick them up and move them out of the way: both for their safety and to not obstruct the cycle path. I'm not sure why you didn't do this?

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 26/10/2025 16:59

Safahh · 26/10/2025 16:45

Either it was difficult and a dead weight of a seven year old in meltdown is too much for one adult to manage, or it was done swiftly and no big deal, hardly noticed by onlookers. Can't have it both ways.

Or, you know, they know their child and know how to handle this situation?

Being delayed for 20 seconds as stated by OP, or even a full minute or two is not generally catastrophic to someone's day.

RoostingHens · 26/10/2025 17:01

vivainsomnia · 26/10/2025 09:34

You know this is risky path because of how narrow it is but still choose to cycle at "a decent speed"? And you shouted at a family for being on the path when it was you who was creating the risk by going at the speed you were when you knew it wasn't safe?
Yes, just like on a road, would you believe it! When it becomes narrower, you slow down but you don't stop and block the whole path. If you need to stop, you then step in the side.

These posts are proving my point how clueless some cyclists are. Would you step out your car and stay in the middle of a road to comfort a child? Why do you think it's ok because it's 'only' a cycle path?

It wasn’t a cycle path, it was a tow path - designed for slow walking horses and pedestrians. The fact that cyclists are allowed on tow path’s doesn’t give them priority over pedestrians.

Ponderingwindow · 26/10/2025 17:01

Please don’t put a sign on your child like that.

there was a child in distress. These men didn’t react with sympathy. They don’t care why the child was in distress.

Italiandreams · 26/10/2025 17:04

Kittlewittle · 26/10/2025 16:58

I have a child with additional needs and the first thing I would have done in this situation is pick them up and move them out of the way: both for their safety and to not obstruct the cycle path. I'm not sure why you didn't do this?

They did

Arran2024 · 26/10/2025 17:06

Lycra clad cyclists hate waiting even a nanno second so I would just ignore them tbh.

222days · 26/10/2025 17:06

Safahh · 26/10/2025 16:37

You have no evidence they were going too fast for conditions or were dangerous. They didn't hit him. They were annoyed he was being allowed to lie on the path.

Then they were completely unreasonable. There are myriad reasons why on a shared pathway like a towpath their precious cycling might have to slow down or cease temporarily for a few seconds: an elderly person walking slowly, somebody injured or collapsed, a fisherman setting up for the day, someone having fallen off a bike, a runner having sprained an ankle, a mother pushing a pram along, etc.

Other people have a right to exist. If cyclists want to cycle with no obstructions they need to either buy a garden large enough for them to do it in space that they own, or keep to dedicated cycle paths (but even then, they could do with learning the highway code and that when these go over pedestrian crossings etc, they don’t always have the right of way).

222days · 26/10/2025 17:10

Safahh · 26/10/2025 16:42

I don't think parents enjoy it, but I do think in this case tried to exaggerate their belief that they were perfectly and reasonably entitled to 'soothe' the child until such time he was willing to move out of others' way BECAUSE AUTISM.

A bit like when cyclists stay right in the middle of the lane when there is no reason not to move over because the highway code ALLOWS IT.

Nobody said that though, did they? You’ve invented it. Try reading the OP again. And tuck your prejudice in.

MrsWhites · 26/10/2025 17:12

coxesorangepippin · 26/10/2025 15:45

Don't take autistic kids on the canal tow path in general, really

The cyclists were right

Just checking - is there anywhere else autistic children shouldn’t be taken in case they inconvenience others?

Bumble2016 · 26/10/2025 17:13

Cyclist would have been lucky I didn't shove him into the canal tbh.

Blogswife · 26/10/2025 17:29

Some cyclists are just ignorant twats . I don’t think it would have mattered if your DP was lying in the path with his leg hanging off , they would have still wanted him to move as it was inconvenient
The lanyard should be enough , I think most people understand what they represent but some still choose to disrespect

nicelongbath · 26/10/2025 17:36

AstonScrapingsNameChange · 26/10/2025 16:55

Then they should have found a route that wasn't narrow and likely to be blocked by other users. You can't expect everyone else to get out of the way just because you're timing yourself. Ive met people like this in swimming pools, it is not nice.

It would be a completely inappropriate place for a timed ride, and even if they were you have to accept that shit happens.

i was doing a time trial run in the park the other day, was going really well and was on course for a PB, when a woman in front of me had got into a pickle between her dog/toddler/buggy, partially blocking my route. I could have just broken my stride and skirted round her and muttered to myself about losing valuable seconds, but I stopped to see if she needed an extra pair of hands for a minute, the PB can wait for another day.

Just baffles me that there are people so self-centred that their reaction to seeing people struggling is to complain!

Kirbert2 · 26/10/2025 17:41

222days · 26/10/2025 17:06

Then they were completely unreasonable. There are myriad reasons why on a shared pathway like a towpath their precious cycling might have to slow down or cease temporarily for a few seconds: an elderly person walking slowly, somebody injured or collapsed, a fisherman setting up for the day, someone having fallen off a bike, a runner having sprained an ankle, a mother pushing a pram along, etc.

Other people have a right to exist. If cyclists want to cycle with no obstructions they need to either buy a garden large enough for them to do it in space that they own, or keep to dedicated cycle paths (but even then, they could do with learning the highway code and that when these go over pedestrian crossings etc, they don’t always have the right of way).

Yep.

My child is in a wheelchair and we'll walk in places like that with shared pathways and in that case, if it was especially narrow, cyclists just have to slow down and wait until there's enough room to go past us. Oh well, the pathway doesn't just belong to cyclists wanting to beat their personal best.

nicelongbath · 26/10/2025 17:42

Safahh · 26/10/2025 16:42

I don't think parents enjoy it, but I do think in this case tried to exaggerate their belief that they were perfectly and reasonably entitled to 'soothe' the child until such time he was willing to move out of others' way BECAUSE AUTISM.

A bit like when cyclists stay right in the middle of the lane when there is no reason not to move over because the highway code ALLOWS IT.

I have one NT child and one ND and if either were in significant distress I’m going to prioritise them over causing someone else a minor inconvenience of having to wait 20 seconds every time, autism or no autism.

Safahh · 26/10/2025 17:53

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 26/10/2025 16:59

Or, you know, they know their child and know how to handle this situation?

Being delayed for 20 seconds as stated by OP, or even a full minute or two is not generally catastrophic to someone's day.

You can't assert you know how to handle the situation if you become involved in an altercation with another member of the public when it happens and then argue with your partner about how visible to make a child's issue in the hope of guilting others into being more accommodating of your entitled behaviour.