It would be nice, and there are many organisations trying for that, but they are condemned by people on both sides who are very emotionally involved in being 'right' so are a lot of institutions and powerful people outside of the area who think there is an ideal outcome and will only accept and give resources to that outcome. A lot of that ideal outcome have to do with using a particular religious lens. though there is heavy overlap with that and just wanting control and bring 'right'.
The inhabitants of Canaan were known for their polytheistic religious practices, which included the worship of deities such as Baal, Asherah, and Molech. These practices often involved rituals that were abhorrent to the Israelites, including child sacrifice and temple prostitution. The Jews/Israelites were more civilised and monodeistic.
This rhetoric is popularly used to try to explain why a particular ideal outcome is how things should be, but it's based on very outdated understanding of Biblical scholarship.
There is no evidence of Moloch being a deity and it hasn't been considered one by most scholars since the 1930s. Most likely, it's a specific type of sacrifice, and there is evidence that the ancient Israelites did this practice. Pretty much anything specifically condemned in the Biblical texts is linked to the Israelites doing it. The Bible is fairly open that the Israelites did a lot of horrible things, including things more horrible than their neighbours and vassals.
Ba'al means lord and is used to refer to multiple gods, including the god of Israel. Ba'al the storm deity isn't involved in those practices from what we have left.
Asherah is the wife of El who sometimes is the same as YWHW and sometimes in YWHW's father. In Israeli archaeology there is evidence of her worship by ancient Israelites (YWHW and his Asherah) though there is still debate on if it means her as a goddess or particular cultic objects/place. She's only condemned in Biblical texts that were written or edited after King Josiah, who pushed for Israel to move from monolatry/Divine Council style common in the area to monotheism. King Josiah associated goddess worship with 'whoredom', but the language used around Asherah doesn't really confirm that - while some older translation use temple prostitutes for their own reasons to discuss her priestesses, there is nothing in the Hebrew to mean that and it is no longer what most scholars take the writings on it to mean. She is associated with fertility, but also motherhood and trees and different animals depending on place and time.
There is the god Chemosh, the god of the Moabs, who the Bible specifically says brought down divine wrath onto Israel (specifically divine wrath, the Bible has no issue discussing Chemosh is both divine and more powerful in his own territory), which is why they were defeated. We have the Mesha Stele potentially discussing that or a similar conflict that meant the Moabites were no longer vassalage of Israel, who is written to have oppresed them. They did do human sacrifices, though the evidence we have was it was slaughtering of defeated people to Chemosh rather than child sacrifices, not that different to what Israelites did where their conquering involved mass slaughter, only allowing virgin females to survive, and, by some writings and traditions, they were allowed one month to mourn before given away and if they still mourned after that, they were to be killed.
Many people groups have lived in the various locations we call Canaan - the borders aren't really agreed to - and ancient Israel was pretty much like the rest of them, no more or less civilised. Even if they were the most civilised, that is a very low bar and basing any desired outcomes on the groups back then is neither fair nor stable ground - as shown, many understandings of the peoples and their behaviour have changed as more evidence is found and discussed in wider groups. We can recognised there were many groups that have been in conflict in the area for centuries, but trying to claim one was better 3000 years ago isn't going to build any useful outcomes for the people today.