Netanyahu didn’t put Hamas in power in Gaza. The Palestinians in Gaza did. They did not vote for peace as the other half of the electorate voted for Fatah.
Was Israel supposed to go into Gaza and get rid of Hamas in 2007? Can you imagine the international outcry if they had tried to remove the first elected government from Gaza, with all the collateral damage that would have caused, that Palestinians had chosen in their first free and fair elections?
Doesn’t everyone go on about their right to self determination?
There were good reasons to have Hamas as a counterweight to the PA (Fatah/PLO). The PA is hated by Palestinians, Pay for Slay, refused peace deals and to accept Israel, and incited terrorism including in their schools. It also hasn’t got a good track record of controlling terrorism in the West Bank.
www.gov.il/en/pages/wave-of-terror-october-2015
Arafat used to speak out of one side of his mouth pretending to want peace in front of Western leaders and speak out of the other side to Arab leaders and the Palestinians. Much like Abbas. I’m sure Israel knows what he really says, How many years has he been President of the PA now?
I read Netanyahu thought the money from Qatar would keep Hamas fat and lazy so to speak and they would be controllable. Netanyahu also facilitated more work permits for Gazans, who could get a much higher wage in Israel, to bring more money into the Gazan economy to increase living standards.
Being brutally honest Israel’s security depends on there not being a Palestinian State as there is no popular party who wants peace with Israel and there never has been. Netanyahu is not naive enough to believe the opposite.
Palestinians are radicalised to hate Israel and for terrorism from young childhood. Who’s fault is that?
The warnings were ignored but not by Netanyahu. He has maintained he was not informed until the attack was happening.
I have read comments ages ago by some Israelis (translated so may not be entirely accurate) that warnings may have ignored as a way to oust Netanyahu (perhaps linked to the corruption charges as well), and only hostages from the military base were expected to be taken. Netanyahu would have to step down and take the blame for the secularity failures.
I wonder if it’s true and Netanyahu knows this which is why he’s not backing down.
If he has friends in high places who’d stop him from going to The Hague, why would he be bothered about relatively minor local corruption charges? It’s to do with champagne, cigars and good media coverage isn’t it? Not embezzlement of millions of shekels or buying votes.