I'm sorry, but you there is a reason handovers are in a public space.
I read this post thinking it was my life, but I don't have a partner and work full time.
Handover has to be in front of CCTV in a public space for my protection, our phones are set up for fast response should we need help, and my house is covered in CCTV.
You could do Clare's Law and my exes record is clean, however, I have been physically threatened, told he won't do it, but will hire someone to get rid of me etc.
Without physical proof in a letter or text, the police can't do anything and my ex has a clean record. I am also too scared to pursue it, the abuse is against me (not my child) and it is something to live with and endure to ensure my child's protection. I am not drip feeding, but I am also not going to display my reality on here.
In Court, the court weren't interested in the abuse against me. However, my DASU worker was instrumental in having it agreed that handover was in a public space. Three times we had to return to court as we couldn't agree, until the Judge noted that my ex and his legal team were unhealthily pursuing the need for our home address which was a red flag and highlighted it was not in the best interest of the child for the mother to live in such fear.
So, yes on paper there is no safeguarding issue BUT always read behind the lines. My ex now has a new partner, and I can guarantee that I am the abuser and won't know any of this. It is entirely my fault that she won't find anything on Clare's Law about him, but it isn't worth the risk and my child needs a Mum that is alive.