Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Autistic child attacking DD

1000 replies

HollandAndCooper · 02/10/2025 16:25

Hi all,

just looking for advice re the above. DD started reception at the beginning of September. She's a confident child and had no issues starting until recently.

3 times in the last 2 weeks an autistic boy has assaulted and attacked DD.
the first occasion was pinching her on her cheek leaving a mark and bruise. She was climbing on the adventure frame in the playground when this happened. Totally unprovoked.
the second occasion, he kicked her on her shin leaving a horrible bruise.
3rd occasion (today) the child in question has hit DD on her head so hard it's left a mark.

I picked her up and she was utterly hysterical.

I am so incredibly angry. I know this child has SEN but as a lot of you will relate, when someone attacks and hurts your child it rages you like nothing else. The first occasion I was angry but as understanding as can be. Now 2 and 3 more times have happened, I'm losing my patience.

it's a very small and Intimate village school, one class per year and is only reception - y2. There is no where else for the boy to go in the school because of this.

all incidents have been noted but I've now demanded a safeguarding investigation take place as he's gunning for my DD. I've been told they're doing their best to 'keep them apart.' My daughter doesn't need to be kept apart from anybody, he needs keeping away from her.

i know who the mum is. At drop off whilst waiting for the gates to be opened this child constantly presses on the intercom, bangs and punches the notice board. The mum just stands there and doesn't say anything. I know conventional discipline won't work with all SEN children, but do I speak to the mum about this? I am so angry that my 4 year old little girl cannot have her right to a safe learning environment due to this child. I have no idea if he's attacked other children.

please don't take this as a thread to hate on SEN. I am neurodiverse myself, and DD most probably is to and is on the correct pathways.

has anyone else been through this, does anyone have any advice? In reality I'd like the boy to be expelled as we're 4 weeks into her schooling life and my daughter has been assaulted 3 times. But who am I to demand that.

im at a loss on what to do. My confident, happy little girl who has loved going to school is now getting upset at drop off and is hysterical at pick up. I'm just heartbroken for her.

I know fights and scraps are normal for young kids, but this is not in the realms of normal.

any advice will be greatly received.

thank you

OP posts:
AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:11

standtallskyfall · 04/10/2025 17:09

Aren't you lovely. Ever think of what it is like to sit in A&E with a terrified 6 year old because a child in their class smashed their face into the wall for nothing.

Kids with SEND aren’t far more likely to be on the receiving end of bullying and violence. It’s well documented .

teaandcupcake · 04/10/2025 17:12

what do you mean by taxis?

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:14

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 17:09

Ever think what it’s like to have your kid battered on a daily basis while posters make nasty little comments like that?

I don’t even care anymore how my comments look. Taunting a parent whose small daughter is being battered on a daily basis at school is lower than a snake’s belly, frankly

There is no taunting just an opposing valid view. The taunting has been from posters like yourself .

standtallskyfall · 04/10/2025 17:14

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:11

Kids with SEND aren’t far more likely to be on the receiving end of bullying and violence. It’s well documented .

Are they allowed stay in school and keep doing it? Or are they expelled, you know if they broke a SEN child's nose for nothing.

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 17:15

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:10

Not sure what your point- you’ve just quoted that the needs of children with SEND aren’t being met.

That’s not the fault of the parents or the children .

The UK doesn’t exist to ‘meet the needs’ of SEN children whatever the cost. They have more than their fair share. That’s that

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:15

standtallskyfall · 04/10/2025 17:14

Are they allowed stay in school and keep doing it? Or are they expelled, you know if they broke a SEN child's nose for nothing.

Oh they stay, explosions are very rare.

Kirbert2 · 04/10/2025 17:16

standtallskyfall · 04/10/2025 17:05

Well hopefully, in that case, more situations like mine will happen and the child is removed before a child is actually killed.

Parents will fight for their children not to be battered, they will fight for their kids to have an education and not be evacuated because a classroom is being trashed, they will fight for their own children's mental health because they are terrified to go to school.

38 other parents will fight. Violent children, SEN or no SERN who actively seriously hurt other pupils should not be in a mainstream setting. It's barbaric to expect children to accept being hurt and terrorised.

A child, even with SEND, can be removed eventually but it isn't immediately due to fact that they can't just turf a child out of school for not having their needs met.

The system is broken and it isn't the fault of SEND parents who are simply trying to fight for their child in an unfit system where 4 year olds with severe SEND who obviously aren't going to cope in mainstream school are sent there by the LA anyway due to 'lack of evidence' that they can't cope in mainstream school as they haven't experienced it yet. The system sets up these SEND children to fail and for other children to be hurt in the process.

Iris2020 · 04/10/2025 17:16

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:11

Kids with SEND aren’t far more likely to be on the receiving end of bullying and violence. It’s well documented .

Nobody is suggesting that children with SEN should be discriminated against.
Just that those who are violent towards peers shouldn't be maintained in a context where they can continue, regardless of whether they happen to have SEN or not.

standtallskyfall · 04/10/2025 17:17

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:15

Oh they stay, explosions are very rare.

You are talking absolute crap now. I presume you mean exclusions and not explosions. Don't be ridiculous. If a NT child was causing huge bodily harm to their classmates on the daily, they would not be allowed back in school.

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:17

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 17:15

The UK doesn’t exist to ‘meet the needs’ of SEN children whatever the cost. They have more than their fair share. That’s that

No they don’t. Many have disabilities and are entitled to those disabilities being catered for. It’s not the fault of children with SEND or SEND staff that there is an inadequate system and funding.

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 17:20

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:17

No they don’t. Many have disabilities and are entitled to those disabilities being catered for. It’s not the fault of children with SEND or SEND staff that there is an inadequate system and funding.

Not at the cost of other children, no.

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:20

standtallskyfall · 04/10/2025 17:17

You are talking absolute crap now. I presume you mean exclusions and not explosions. Don't be ridiculous. If a NT child was causing huge bodily harm to their classmates on the daily, they would not be allowed back in school.

Trust me , after a 2 day exclusion they are.

I have a ND child who was bullied mercilessly verbally day in and day out and also physically assaulted far more seriously than the op’s child by NT children. The main culprit had a 2 day exclusion and then other measures were brought in which did help.

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 17:21

SEN is one of those things like the NHS where we could just keep throwing billions at it and it would never be enough and outcomes wouldn’t change. The issue is at the root, not the branch.

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:21

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 17:20

Not at the cost of other children, no.

They still have a right to have their needs met.

standtallskyfall · 04/10/2025 17:22

Kirbert2 · 04/10/2025 17:16

A child, even with SEND, can be removed eventually but it isn't immediately due to fact that they can't just turf a child out of school for not having their needs met.

The system is broken and it isn't the fault of SEND parents who are simply trying to fight for their child in an unfit system where 4 year olds with severe SEND who obviously aren't going to cope in mainstream school are sent there by the LA anyway due to 'lack of evidence' that they can't cope in mainstream school as they haven't experienced it yet. The system sets up these SEND children to fail and for other children to be hurt in the process.

I understand that but it doesn't mean the parents of the child getting hurt should just lie down and take it. The parents in my daughter's school came together to fight to get this child removed and it worked thankfully. Going by this thread, that doesn't often happen and parents have to continue to send their child in to be hurt..or remove them. It's the violence that does it for me, NO child should have to endure violence just to go to school.

Kirbert2 · 04/10/2025 17:22

Iris2020 · 04/10/2025 17:16

Nobody is suggesting that children with SEN should be discriminated against.
Just that those who are violent towards peers shouldn't be maintained in a context where they can continue, regardless of whether they happen to have SEN or not.

Edited

If a school can't prove that they have put things in place to meet the needs of a SEND children who is violent, it would be deemed an illegal removal and the parents would then have the right to appeal.

If they have tried many things and the behaviour doesn't change then steps can be taken towards removing the child and placing them in a different provision such as special school. This can sometimes take years.

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 17:22

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:21

They still have a right to have their needs met.

Not at any cost they don’t.

I will also point out OP’s daughter has ‘needs’, not that they even register with you.

I’m sorry but there is a culture among some SEN parents of complete disregard for the other children, sheer entitlement and a mentality that the rest of the country only exists as a cash cow for SEN.

teaandcupcake · 04/10/2025 17:23

@Uggbootsforever Regarding spending, i dont know what the answer is.

So in my situation- child age 5. Autistic. Violent. Very delayed and learning difficulties.
Special school not an option. Mainstream has to provide a lot of support to meet his needs and keep him (and everybody else) safe.

Should they be able to say 'No. Sorry. That's too expensive and, since he'd be dangerous without support, you have to keep him at home. He's not entitled to education because he will hurt people now we've decided not to supervise or support him properly.'

In that case, he stays at home with me. 24/7. I do not have the qualifications or experience to know how to educate him. As result he does not develop or progress anywhere near the level he would in a proper educational facility. Support outside of school (like speech or other therapy) is non-existent so it is entirely on me. I now have to leave my job. I now have to claim universal credit. Indefinitely.

Thankfully that didn't happen. He got a full-time 1-to-1 TA with his ehcp (according to some on here, stealing resources from other children), so has a far better education than I could ever provide at home. As a result, his progress has been absolutely brilliant, he can read, his speech and language has come on amazingly, he has some amazing strategies to manage behaviour and emotions. I have been able to continue working rather than relying on benefits.

I just dont understand how anybody could think the former option would have been better?
Is that really the better option?

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:23

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 17:21

SEN is one of those things like the NHS where we could just keep throwing billions at it and it would never be enough and outcomes wouldn’t change. The issue is at the root, not the branch.

Sorry that is completely wrong. The NHS and SEND can absolutely be reformed. Taking away funding is not the answer.

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 17:24

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:23

Sorry that is completely wrong. The NHS and SEND can absolutely be reformed. Taking away funding is not the answer.

I don’t think SEN should get any more funding. If they want to use it differently, fine. But not more. It’s too high as it is.

standtallskyfall · 04/10/2025 17:24

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:20

Trust me , after a 2 day exclusion they are.

I have a ND child who was bullied mercilessly verbally day in and day out and also physically assaulted far more seriously than the op’s child by NT children. The main culprit had a 2 day exclusion and then other measures were brought in which did help.

The same stands in my opinion and the child that did that to your son absolutely should have been removed. I am glad the other measures did work though. Unfortunately measures don't work when dealing with ND children.

SleepySquirrel52 · 04/10/2025 17:24

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:05

You said

” Another parent told their child to use pencil etc to stab at the face of the boy “

That is appalling and wrong. It’s encouraging violence and anarchy. Good luck with the teenager years encouraging that kind of mentality!

Yes that the correct quote now, not sure why you had to exaggerate it previously.

Violence and anarchy was present already and absolutely nothing was being done. Constant injuries to all the smallest kids that he picked on/went for. As I said there were so many meetings and requests for measures. He needed a 121 minimum but nursery staff just minimised/nothing they can do, he's sen and can't help it... Can't talk about another child further. Can you make sure your children have long sleeves on to protect their arms as he likes to bite/scratch. It wasn't acceptable to had to force their hand.

Not teenagers yet but the strategy worked, it went from daily acts of violence and injuries, our children all miserable going in, we were really worried about a future and having to move our child to a school well out of area not in the village out of fear this would just be the way it was going to be.

He didn't finish out the nursery and wasn't on the intake to the primary. I do hope he's somewhere that can properly care and support for his needs - it wasn't his fault

AppleT1zer · 04/10/2025 17:24

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 17:22

Not at any cost they don’t.

I will also point out OP’s daughter has ‘needs’, not that they even register with you.

I’m sorry but there is a culture among some SEN parents of complete disregard for the other children, sheer entitlement and a mentality that the rest of the country only exists as a cash cow for SEN.

So meeting the needs of disability is a cash cow- got it!

You do realise that all the parents of SEND and disabled children want is for their children to have an equal footing and chance at an education.

Kirbert2 · 04/10/2025 17:24

standtallskyfall · 04/10/2025 17:22

I understand that but it doesn't mean the parents of the child getting hurt should just lie down and take it. The parents in my daughter's school came together to fight to get this child removed and it worked thankfully. Going by this thread, that doesn't often happen and parents have to continue to send their child in to be hurt..or remove them. It's the violence that does it for me, NO child should have to endure violence just to go to school.

I understand that too.

Though parents, even groups of them, don't get to decide if a child is removed from a school or not as they have a legal process which must be followed so I bet the child in question was on the way out anyway. I'm assuming we're not talking about a 4 year old like the OP?

SleeplessInWherever · 04/10/2025 17:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread