Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Autistic child attacking DD

1000 replies

HollandAndCooper · 02/10/2025 16:25

Hi all,

just looking for advice re the above. DD started reception at the beginning of September. She's a confident child and had no issues starting until recently.

3 times in the last 2 weeks an autistic boy has assaulted and attacked DD.
the first occasion was pinching her on her cheek leaving a mark and bruise. She was climbing on the adventure frame in the playground when this happened. Totally unprovoked.
the second occasion, he kicked her on her shin leaving a horrible bruise.
3rd occasion (today) the child in question has hit DD on her head so hard it's left a mark.

I picked her up and she was utterly hysterical.

I am so incredibly angry. I know this child has SEN but as a lot of you will relate, when someone attacks and hurts your child it rages you like nothing else. The first occasion I was angry but as understanding as can be. Now 2 and 3 more times have happened, I'm losing my patience.

it's a very small and Intimate village school, one class per year and is only reception - y2. There is no where else for the boy to go in the school because of this.

all incidents have been noted but I've now demanded a safeguarding investigation take place as he's gunning for my DD. I've been told they're doing their best to 'keep them apart.' My daughter doesn't need to be kept apart from anybody, he needs keeping away from her.

i know who the mum is. At drop off whilst waiting for the gates to be opened this child constantly presses on the intercom, bangs and punches the notice board. The mum just stands there and doesn't say anything. I know conventional discipline won't work with all SEN children, but do I speak to the mum about this? I am so angry that my 4 year old little girl cannot have her right to a safe learning environment due to this child. I have no idea if he's attacked other children.

please don't take this as a thread to hate on SEN. I am neurodiverse myself, and DD most probably is to and is on the correct pathways.

has anyone else been through this, does anyone have any advice? In reality I'd like the boy to be expelled as we're 4 weeks into her schooling life and my daughter has been assaulted 3 times. But who am I to demand that.

im at a loss on what to do. My confident, happy little girl who has loved going to school is now getting upset at drop off and is hysterical at pick up. I'm just heartbroken for her.

I know fights and scraps are normal for young kids, but this is not in the realms of normal.

any advice will be greatly received.

thank you

OP posts:
DoubtfulCat · 02/10/2025 19:17

I started teaching around the time that specialist provision settings were being closed in the name of inclusion. I now work in a specialist provision. Our learners are nearly all autistic and suffering the effects of trauma, burnout, and anxiety.

The thing is, inclusion can work and should be the first choice for children who are deaf, blind, have physical differences and disabilities- as well as some children who are neurodivergent.

But for other neurodivergent children, mainstream school can inflict real and lasting harm by not meeting their needs.

furthermore, as we see in this case, and as I have seen in previous workplaces, some children’s behaviours have led to other children within the setting being assaulted and in some cases quite badly injured. Now, while we can explain the behaviour we cannot excuse it and it does nobody any favours if we pretend that such violent behaviour, away from an educational setting, would be treated with anything other than aggression and retaliatory violence. Those kids who lash out at their peers in school may lash out at someone in a pub or a shop and they’re either going to get a kicking from a member of the public, or be restrained and arrested by the police. Both outcomes would be horrific for that young person.

Children who use violence as a means of communication have to learn as soon as they start that they just can’t respond like that. Even if they’re four, they have to be withdrawn and separated from the peer group, because as they grow the injuries they inflict can get worse and worse. I saw a girl punched in the face and another girl attacked full-body, scratched and kicked, by a boy the same age and in both cases the violence came from nowhere, no warning signs that they could have seen. The same boy also threw electronic equipment around with force enough to break it (these were all separate incidents)- staff were right there in every incident but because it was so sudden and so violent could do nothing until the assault had happened. This boy was 13 at the time and I don’t know what happened to him because I stopped working there soon after. All I know is that the lack of adequate response and consequence by the setting meant that he escalated from breaking equipment to breaking a girl’s nose because someone had done something he didn’t like.

OP I would be the same as you in your situation. Don’t speak to the mum, but do go all out to the school. Your daughter is entitled to be safe at school and it can be an Ofsted fail if children don’t feel, or are not, safe at school.

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 02/10/2025 19:18

wizzywig · 02/10/2025 18:44

So the op herself has said she is neurodiverse has additional needs'. Is her type of difference ok?

Don’t know, who is she assaulting on a near daily basis.

SleeplessInWherever · 02/10/2025 19:18

Gruffporcupine · 02/10/2025 19:15

That is not OP's problem. Home I guess, if the right setting can't be found

Like I said, that child needs feeding and many of us work.

And I’ll go back to my right to education point.

My son bit a teacher in EYFS, while he was still in mainstream. He’d been telling them
all day he was hungry, using the sign he’d been taught. Nobody had noticed.

He didn’t eat his lunch because nobody cut it up for him.

He was 5, and didn’t have the words to ask for those things. He bit her because he felt ignored, unheard, not bothered with, and didn’t have the language to do anything about it so he used the only thing he knew would get attention.

These are children you’re talking about. And for some of us, they’re our children.

Baital · 02/10/2025 19:18

Gruffporcupine · 02/10/2025 19:15

That is not OP's problem. Home I guess, if the right setting can't be found

Why? He has a right to education. As does the OP's daughter.

There is no reason why one of his parents should stay at home with him. Nor that the OP should keep her DD at home to protect her.

The school needs to care and protect (and educate) both children.

The parents of children with SEN don't choose that, so they shouldn't be punished.

Astrabees · 02/10/2025 19:18

Diarygirlqueen · 02/10/2025 18:57

As a parent of two children with autism, this thread and most of the comments have made me so sad.
The ableism is quite shocking.

So you think this child should be allowed to assault the little girl three times with impunity? This is totally shocking, and could easily lead to the girl becoming a school refuser if it is not resolved. The school clearly cannot cater for his needs and he needs to be excluded. I would be contacting my MP, making a direct safeguarding referral to Child Services, contacting the police and the press if my child was the subject of escalating violence which had culminated in a blow to the head, and no action was being taken. I would talk to the mother too, and make my child aware that whilst hitting back is not a good idea she can act in self defence if she needs to.

smilingfanatic · 02/10/2025 19:19

@NCJD - I don't follow your point. Because it's hard for the parents.....other children have to put up with violence?

The theme of this thread seems to be simultaneously that the school should be doing this that and other, while acknowledging that it takes months/years to get there.

glittereyelash · 02/10/2025 19:19

I've been on both sides of this scenario and it's equally horrible whether your child is hurting someone or being hurt themselves. My son has autism and had very poor impulse control for his first year in school. He would lash out sporadically either slapping or throwing objects. We had a zero tolerance and every behaviour was met with a consequence. We had daily communication with his teacher and a plan to support him but it was a slow process. He had an sna who generally was able to block his behaviours but he still had a consequence for attempts. He hasn't been aggressive in two years. Last year another boy in his class was biting and headbutting and made contact with my son on 8 occasions and had 15 other attempts. We had a new plan to support my son after any attacks and he eventually had to move classes. You need to make contact with the school and see what support plan is available for your daughter.

Blessthismess2 · 02/10/2025 19:19

DoubtfulCat · 02/10/2025 19:17

I started teaching around the time that specialist provision settings were being closed in the name of inclusion. I now work in a specialist provision. Our learners are nearly all autistic and suffering the effects of trauma, burnout, and anxiety.

The thing is, inclusion can work and should be the first choice for children who are deaf, blind, have physical differences and disabilities- as well as some children who are neurodivergent.

But for other neurodivergent children, mainstream school can inflict real and lasting harm by not meeting their needs.

furthermore, as we see in this case, and as I have seen in previous workplaces, some children’s behaviours have led to other children within the setting being assaulted and in some cases quite badly injured. Now, while we can explain the behaviour we cannot excuse it and it does nobody any favours if we pretend that such violent behaviour, away from an educational setting, would be treated with anything other than aggression and retaliatory violence. Those kids who lash out at their peers in school may lash out at someone in a pub or a shop and they’re either going to get a kicking from a member of the public, or be restrained and arrested by the police. Both outcomes would be horrific for that young person.

Children who use violence as a means of communication have to learn as soon as they start that they just can’t respond like that. Even if they’re four, they have to be withdrawn and separated from the peer group, because as they grow the injuries they inflict can get worse and worse. I saw a girl punched in the face and another girl attacked full-body, scratched and kicked, by a boy the same age and in both cases the violence came from nowhere, no warning signs that they could have seen. The same boy also threw electronic equipment around with force enough to break it (these were all separate incidents)- staff were right there in every incident but because it was so sudden and so violent could do nothing until the assault had happened. This boy was 13 at the time and I don’t know what happened to him because I stopped working there soon after. All I know is that the lack of adequate response and consequence by the setting meant that he escalated from breaking equipment to breaking a girl’s nose because someone had done something he didn’t like.

OP I would be the same as you in your situation. Don’t speak to the mum, but do go all out to the school. Your daughter is entitled to be safe at school and it can be an Ofsted fail if children don’t feel, or are not, safe at school.

Those kids who lash out at their peers in school may lash out at someone in a pub or a shop and they’re either going to get a kicking from a member of the public, or be restrained and arrested by the police.

This child is FOUR. Four. Four. Four.
four. Four.

NotEnoughKnittingTime · 02/10/2025 19:20

Silvertulips · 02/10/2025 18:34

Oh yeah let's avoid the disabled kids.

Would you repeatedly play with someone who is known to hurt you?

Inclusion isn’t about being a battering ram for another child!!

Most kids are inclusive - they just don’t like being hit! Isn’t that actually illegal now? If OP was injuring her DD in temper she’d be removed!

That isn't what I meant.

Soukmyfalafel · 02/10/2025 19:21

I was sympathetic up to this point:

In reality I'd like the boy to be expelled as we're 4 weeks into her schooling life and my daughter has been assaulted 3 times. But who am I to demand that.

You're right, you can't. Legally the boy has a right to an education and your child also has a right to being safe at school. The school has to provide both and it is upto them to ensure this. Expelling the boy is just getting rid of the problem for you but creating more issues for him.

The child may well be waiting forever to be placed in a specialist school because the SEN system is rubbish. My son did one year in a mainstream and should have been put in a special school prior to this but we had to wait twice as long for an EHCP, and THEN another 6 months to appeal to get him a specialist place (and that was with asking the courts to bring the tribunal date forward - the council didn't even inform us we could ask for this).

The mother is probably doing nothing because a) her son will likely react by doing more than pressing intercom buttons, and b) she is probably bloody worn down and unsupported by it all.

I understand you are angry, but it is an issue for the school. You can get some sort of SEN funding without an EHCP in the interim, but they probably aren't using this on the boy if they are and your child is getting hurt as a result of this. He needs a 1 to 1, so maybe ask if this is in place.

Bumdrops · 02/10/2025 19:21

Blessthismess2 · 02/10/2025 19:16

Is it your belief that the only way to prevent this violence is to remove the child from school?

What is your basis for this absolute belief?

I think an immediate safeguarding action should be remove the perpetrator of violence from the classroom / playground and any situation where other children are likely to be harmed

if that can’t be addressed then the perpetrator should be removed from school for immediate risk management

then educators / parents / child require assessment of needs / plan in order for child to access education

it is not appropriate to allow children to be harmed because he is entitled to an education

for example - a person is legally entitled to travel by bus, but if they are assaulting people on the bus, they have forfeited their rights and that requires addressing.

with a child entitled to an education, that does not trump the rights of others - all rights are clearly needed to be seen in the round -

beautyqueeen · 02/10/2025 19:21

MissIonX · 02/10/2025 19:12

I'm amazed at some of these comments.

Of course he shouldn't be excluded. Would you exclude a child with down syndrome; with cancer; with a physical disability that other children found upsetting??

Your focus is on the wrong thing. It's not the little boys fault, the school should be doing better to manage his meltdowns and his inability to communicate in a "normal" way. Actions are communication. He is not gunning for your little girl or focusing on her. You make it sound like it's a deliberate choice the child is making.

School need to do better at managing the situation and rightly raised that.

Stay away from the mother with your judgement she has enough to deal with. I know, I have a son just like that little boy. I am crushed when I get a call to say he's bitten someone, or pinched someone, but my question is always why isn't his support worker there; why did the school not intervene sooner. He has tells for when he's getting overwhelmed, they're just not intervening soon enough.

That’s an absolutely stupid comparison, feeling afraid and being physically attacked are two completely different things. But for the purpose of your example if the attacking child had cancer or downs then yes I would still want them removing! Why should any child have to suffer at the hands of another?

I couldn’t care less if the kid has SEN all I care about is my child being safe and happy at school at the age of 4! It’s disgusting, inclusivity doesn’t mean one size fits all, some places just aren’t appropriate to everyone and that includes mainstream school.

Bumblebee72 · 02/10/2025 19:22

Gruffporcupine · 02/10/2025 19:10

Then the law is immoral

The school need to spend the money to manage the disability. In a well managed environment they may well have meltdowns Would you consider it immoral if the school had to spend thousands to enable a child in a wheelchair to access learning? Or spend thousands installing hearing loops for a deaf child? Or is just supporting children with invisible disabilities you consider immoral. This child is violent because hasn't given the right support.

If OPs daughter starts develops sensory needs where she needs TA support in quiet space - would that be an immoral use of funds?

TickingKey46 · 02/10/2025 19:22

So when the child is throwing sticks at other children what do the other parents do? I would ask the mother to ask her child to stop!
Your child has every right to be safe in school. The right to safety trumps any right to inclusativity!
I would insist a member of staff stay near your child at all times, ensuring her safety. If they carnt guarantee that then I would remove my child until the school have come up with a solution ( that wont look good on them) they will want to resolve this as soon as possible.! I would also contact ofsted and the school safeguard lead and inform them of what is happening. Make sure you back any meetings up with an email, clearly outlining your complaint so there is a trail.

Bumblebee72 · 02/10/2025 19:23

beautyqueeen · 02/10/2025 19:21

That’s an absolutely stupid comparison, feeling afraid and being physically attacked are two completely different things. But for the purpose of your example if the attacking child had cancer or downs then yes I would still want them removing! Why should any child have to suffer at the hands of another?

I couldn’t care less if the kid has SEN all I care about is my child being safe and happy at school at the age of 4! It’s disgusting, inclusivity doesn’t mean one size fits all, some places just aren’t appropriate to everyone and that includes mainstream school.

And if your child develops SEN you want them kicked to home educate too?

jellyfish2121 · 02/10/2025 19:23

Sorry your daughter is going through this OP, it isn't fair at all on the other kids. I see it happening regularly, these children should have 1 to 1 support adult with them at all times or be taken to the SEN building if your school has one. It's the other children like your dd who need safeguarding from such children. Parents know from before school age when their ND child has such problems and should get things sorted in place or have them in a SEN school BEFORE reception, not years later when they've already hurt numerous kids & school staff!

Kirbert2 · 02/10/2025 19:23

Soukmyfalafel · 02/10/2025 19:21

I was sympathetic up to this point:

In reality I'd like the boy to be expelled as we're 4 weeks into her schooling life and my daughter has been assaulted 3 times. But who am I to demand that.

You're right, you can't. Legally the boy has a right to an education and your child also has a right to being safe at school. The school has to provide both and it is upto them to ensure this. Expelling the boy is just getting rid of the problem for you but creating more issues for him.

The child may well be waiting forever to be placed in a specialist school because the SEN system is rubbish. My son did one year in a mainstream and should have been put in a special school prior to this but we had to wait twice as long for an EHCP, and THEN another 6 months to appeal to get him a specialist place (and that was with asking the courts to bring the tribunal date forward - the council didn't even inform us we could ask for this).

The mother is probably doing nothing because a) her son will likely react by doing more than pressing intercom buttons, and b) she is probably bloody worn down and unsupported by it all.

I understand you are angry, but it is an issue for the school. You can get some sort of SEN funding without an EHCP in the interim, but they probably aren't using this on the boy if they are and your child is getting hurt as a result of this. He needs a 1 to 1, so maybe ask if this is in place.

The school won't be able to discuss what is or isn't in place for the other child with OP. They will only be able to discuss how they are safeguarding OP's daughter.

Pezdeoro41 · 02/10/2025 19:23

I would be speaking to them about the possibility she or another child ends up with a serious injury and their liability in such a scenario tbh.

CoffeeCakeAndALattePlease · 02/10/2025 19:24

smilingfanatic · 02/10/2025 19:06

I wondered how long it would take for ableist chorus to enter the chat and tell everyone to put up with little Tarquin battering their daughters and smashing up the classroom.

The level of entitlement is off the scale. The state must do this. The school must do that. We have ended up in the most peculiar position in education now, and I don't see a way out of it with the current level of funding vs the attitude of parents.

well it is an entitlement! It is literally a legal entitlement protected by law.

it may be a nightmare to implement and fund, and others may not agree with it.

but it is the law nonetheless.

Balloonhearts · 02/10/2025 19:24

frozendaisy · 02/10/2025 16:41

If the school are rubbish I would tell her to hit him back next time as hard as she can

That’s what I told our I had advised my children when in primary school after about incident 3 with the “we don’t retaliate” nonsense. I emailed the school informing them I had advised our child to do this seeing as they were struggling to keep them safe.

What else can you do?
And it worked.

Children are not punchbags for other people’s children. What they can hit yours but yours can’t hit back.

And I pointed this out to school, they hit them back, back, not first, they were attempting to avoid them after taking it 3 times, how many more times until it stops?

It doesn’t always work but it can do. And did with ours, kids learn not to hit someone if they are going to get a smack back.

This! Tell her to hit back as hard as she can. If the school won't protect her, she has every right to defend herself. If a grown man came up to me in the street and hit me, I wouldn't care if he had autism, someone attacks you, you bloody fight back! He isn't her responsibility nor should he be her priority. Her own safety is.

BrightSpark10 · 02/10/2025 19:24

So sorry to hear that this happened to you. We had similar incident TWICE, boy who also had SEN “attacked” DD, he hit her on a face with a ruler, she had red mark right across her face. We complained to the school, they investigated blah blah nothing came out of it… the other child was made to write sorry note. It was pretty bad one - paper all crumbled up with a sorry written in the middle 🙄🙄

Baital · 02/10/2025 19:25

smilingfanatic · 02/10/2025 19:19

@NCJD - I don't follow your point. Because it's hard for the parents.....other children have to put up with violence?

The theme of this thread seems to be simultaneously that the school should be doing this that and other, while acknowledging that it takes months/years to get there.

The boy may need a special school. Places take years.

In the meantime the school needs to protect other children. Even with an EHCP the school is supposed to provide the first £6,000 per year of funding for additional support out of their own budget. An EHCP adds funding on top of that.

No one has said that the OP's DD (or anyone else) should accept being the victim of violence

Blessthismess2 · 02/10/2025 19:25

Bumdrops · 02/10/2025 19:21

I think an immediate safeguarding action should be remove the perpetrator of violence from the classroom / playground and any situation where other children are likely to be harmed

if that can’t be addressed then the perpetrator should be removed from school for immediate risk management

then educators / parents / child require assessment of needs / plan in order for child to access education

it is not appropriate to allow children to be harmed because he is entitled to an education

for example - a person is legally entitled to travel by bus, but if they are assaulting people on the bus, they have forfeited their rights and that requires addressing.

with a child entitled to an education, that does not trump the rights of others - all rights are clearly needed to be seen in the round -

if that can’t be addressed then the perpetrator should be removed from school for immediate risk management

yes but it may very well be the case that there are lots of other ways of addressing it. Why are people assuming there aren't?

Nobody is disputing that violence shouldn't be tolerated, they are just pointing out that there may well be lots of ways of managing the situation that do not involve immediate permanent exclusion of a disabled four year old.

Im baffled as to why this message is not translating.

smilingfanatic · 02/10/2025 19:25

Bumblebee72 · 02/10/2025 19:23

And if your child develops SEN you want them kicked to home educate too?

And this comment here is the issue. If my child was attacking children at school (which of course many SEN children do not do) I would remove them myself.

Bumdrops · 02/10/2025 19:25

DoubtfulCat · 02/10/2025 19:17

I started teaching around the time that specialist provision settings were being closed in the name of inclusion. I now work in a specialist provision. Our learners are nearly all autistic and suffering the effects of trauma, burnout, and anxiety.

The thing is, inclusion can work and should be the first choice for children who are deaf, blind, have physical differences and disabilities- as well as some children who are neurodivergent.

But for other neurodivergent children, mainstream school can inflict real and lasting harm by not meeting their needs.

furthermore, as we see in this case, and as I have seen in previous workplaces, some children’s behaviours have led to other children within the setting being assaulted and in some cases quite badly injured. Now, while we can explain the behaviour we cannot excuse it and it does nobody any favours if we pretend that such violent behaviour, away from an educational setting, would be treated with anything other than aggression and retaliatory violence. Those kids who lash out at their peers in school may lash out at someone in a pub or a shop and they’re either going to get a kicking from a member of the public, or be restrained and arrested by the police. Both outcomes would be horrific for that young person.

Children who use violence as a means of communication have to learn as soon as they start that they just can’t respond like that. Even if they’re four, they have to be withdrawn and separated from the peer group, because as they grow the injuries they inflict can get worse and worse. I saw a girl punched in the face and another girl attacked full-body, scratched and kicked, by a boy the same age and in both cases the violence came from nowhere, no warning signs that they could have seen. The same boy also threw electronic equipment around with force enough to break it (these were all separate incidents)- staff were right there in every incident but because it was so sudden and so violent could do nothing until the assault had happened. This boy was 13 at the time and I don’t know what happened to him because I stopped working there soon after. All I know is that the lack of adequate response and consequence by the setting meant that he escalated from breaking equipment to breaking a girl’s nose because someone had done something he didn’t like.

OP I would be the same as you in your situation. Don’t speak to the mum, but do go all out to the school. Your daughter is entitled to be safe at school and it can be an Ofsted fail if children don’t feel, or are not, safe at school.

Fantastic, insightful, thoughtful post

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.