Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Labour are lifting the 2 child benefit cap

1000 replies

PuppyKeep · 30/09/2025 18:43

AIBU that this is a terrible decision?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:31

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:26

You say that like it's a bad thing?! Yes, those earning the top 1% should pay a higher proportion.

But you're pissed off with them? Why when they pay the most tax? If it wasn't for them there would be no benefits because not enough other people pay enough tax!

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 10:31

Yes - this link includes the instructions. Thank you in advance for your extra contributions!

Want to pay more tax?

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:32

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:29

It's not spurious. You claim you would happily pay more tax, well then do it otherwise it's just virtue signalling. You want to pay more tax, then do it.

It's spurious because you know perfectly well that one person donating £200k to the treasury would make f all difference. It needs to be mandatory. And WEALTH needs to be taxed at the same rate as earned income.

I imagine most people prefer gift aided charitable giving so it's targeted to something you care about and you know it's not going to fund government contracts to billionaires.

EasternStandard · 01/10/2025 10:32

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 10:31

Yes - this link includes the instructions. Thank you in advance for your extra contributions!

Want to pay more tax?

Ha love the directness of that link. Yes they do. Much appreciated.

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 10:32

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:31

But you're pissed off with them? Why when they pay the most tax? If it wasn't for them there would be no benefits because not enough other people pay enough tax!

Some people would bite the hand that literally feeds them.

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:33

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 10:31

Yes - this link includes the instructions. Thank you in advance for your extra contributions!

Want to pay more tax?

You do understand why tax is mandatory, don't you?!

BIossomtoes · 01/10/2025 10:34

PraisebetoGod · 01/10/2025 10:11

So the minority then. The rest aren't in work so that's 63% percent.

How many of the 37% don't do overtime and don't apply for higher paid jobs because it would affect they universal credits? How many of these families has only one working parent and the other out of work?

Not the gotcha you think it is.

It wasn’t intended as a gotcha. I merely answered your question. How many people restrict their hours/don’t apply for promotion, etc to reduce their tax liability? It’s the other side of the same coin, isn’t it?

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:34

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:32

It's spurious because you know perfectly well that one person donating £200k to the treasury would make f all difference. It needs to be mandatory. And WEALTH needs to be taxed at the same rate as earned income.

I imagine most people prefer gift aided charitable giving so it's targeted to something you care about and you know it's not going to fund government contracts to billionaires.

If everyone who claimed to be happy to pay more tax did it though then, just based on MN sample, that would raise ££.

Of course that's only if they aren't virtue signalling about being willing to pay more. Everyone who says they want to pay more tax should put their money where their mouths are otherwise it's just performative bullshit and should be treated as such.

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 10:36

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:33

You do understand why tax is mandatory, don't you?!

What on earth has that got to do with anything. Lots of posters have said they want to pay more tax. Someone asked if there was a mechanism for it, so I posted the mechanism.

Obviously I understand that tax has to be mandatory because no matter how many people say they would be happy to pay on thread, when it comes to getting their chequebook out none of them actually do.

EasternStandard · 01/10/2025 10:36

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 10:36

What on earth has that got to do with anything. Lots of posters have said they want to pay more tax. Someone asked if there was a mechanism for it, so I posted the mechanism.

Obviously I understand that tax has to be mandatory because no matter how many people say they would be happy to pay on thread, when it comes to getting their chequebook out none of them actually do.

Yes for mn posts only.

Mushypeasandchipstogo · 01/10/2025 10:36

An absolutely idiotic decision. As others have said, it will have to paid for by increasing the taxes of working people. Why should we have to pay for feckless idiots who insist on having more and more children with no way of supporting them ?

BIossomtoes · 01/10/2025 10:39

Mushypeasandchipstogo · 01/10/2025 10:36

An absolutely idiotic decision. As others have said, it will have to paid for by increasing the taxes of working people. Why should we have to pay for feckless idiots who insist on having more and more children with no way of supporting them ?

The most favoured way of funding it is an increase in gambling tax. I imagine most people would be happy with that. I know I would.

1apenny2apenny · 01/10/2025 10:41

I don’t agree with using a gambling tax to pay for people to get benefits for more than 2 children. I want a gambling tax to pay for all the other things that need paying for. How about paying down the debt, a debt that had increased ridiculously since Labour got into power.

The message should be - any more than 2 you pay for your own children.

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:41

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:34

If everyone who claimed to be happy to pay more tax did it though then, just based on MN sample, that would raise ££.

Of course that's only if they aren't virtue signalling about being willing to pay more. Everyone who says they want to pay more tax should put their money where their mouths are otherwise it's just performative bullshit and should be treated as such.

I would always give to a charity supporting something I believe in over a voluntary tax contribution because I don't agree with the way all taxes are spent (Michelle Mone, anyone?!). So I don't think there's ever going to be a huge appetite for HMRC overpayment. But we can't always agree 100% with everything whichever government is in power is doing but do need a functioning society somehow... so that's why tax must be mandatory for people to pay it - at all wage brackets. That's how tax works. People in the 1% should be forced to pay more. Wealth should be taxed. Loopholes should be closed. The crown estate should pay corporation tax. Let's do all of that and then look at whether or not it's really necessary to squeeze people in the middle in order to support those at the bottom.

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:43

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:41

I would always give to a charity supporting something I believe in over a voluntary tax contribution because I don't agree with the way all taxes are spent (Michelle Mone, anyone?!). So I don't think there's ever going to be a huge appetite for HMRC overpayment. But we can't always agree 100% with everything whichever government is in power is doing but do need a functioning society somehow... so that's why tax must be mandatory for people to pay it - at all wage brackets. That's how tax works. People in the 1% should be forced to pay more. Wealth should be taxed. Loopholes should be closed. The crown estate should pay corporation tax. Let's do all of that and then look at whether or not it's really necessary to squeeze people in the middle in order to support those at the bottom.

The 1% can afford to move abroad if you come after them, and are doing. So then what do you do?

TigerRag · 01/10/2025 10:44

PraisebetoGod · 01/10/2025 10:11

So the minority then. The rest aren't in work so that's 63% percent.

How many of the 37% don't do overtime and don't apply for higher paid jobs because it would affect they universal credits? How many of these families has only one working parent and the other out of work?

Not the gotcha you think it is.

You see it on the Facebook groups. People are working the minimum in order to not be called into the job centre to look for more work

angelos02 · 01/10/2025 10:44

If they scrap the cap and then up income tax, they are done for. It is madness. Why should people that have worked out how many children they can afford pay for someone else's bad choices? Madness. I'd scrap it altogether. If you want a holiday or a car or a child, you pay for it.

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:44

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:43

The 1% can afford to move abroad if you come after them, and are doing. So then what do you do?

There's very little evidence that the 1% relocate when hit with a higher tax burden - they have social ties, family ties etc keeping them where they are, just like everyone else. Getting pushed out of an area for financial reasons is something that happens to poor people, not rich people.

Whyjustwhy83 · 01/10/2025 10:45

Is it going to for a unlimited amount of children though? As I think it still should be capped as I don't think funding people having 4+ kids is fair.

ERthree · 01/10/2025 10:47

Athreedoorwardrobe · 30/09/2025 18:46

The cap was always horrific. As someone who has fallen pregnant twice whilst on contraception absolutely no one should feel pressured to abortion because they'll be unable to feed the child. In this modern era in a wealthy western country, it's disgusting.
And the cap just entrenches poverty. As higher birthrate are linked to poverty. It makes the issues worse. Because those kids don't even stand a chance.

I had contraception fail with my last child but i took responsibility and booked sterilisation. It is not the country's job to fund your choices.

angelos02 · 01/10/2025 10:48

I'm sick of successive governments happily throwing other people's money at the feckless.

ShoeChocolate · 01/10/2025 10:53

The previous labour government only did well because they continued the fiscal discipline of the Major government

TopPocketFind · 01/10/2025 10:54

The feckless Hmm

Is that like the deserving v undeserving poor?

Where does that leave the children?

EasternStandard · 01/10/2025 10:55

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:34

If everyone who claimed to be happy to pay more tax did it though then, just based on MN sample, that would raise ££.

Of course that's only if they aren't virtue signalling about being willing to pay more. Everyone who says they want to pay more tax should put their money where their mouths are otherwise it's just performative bullshit and should be treated as such.

That’d be good. There’s a clear link below.

BananaPeels · 01/10/2025 10:55

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:44

There's very little evidence that the 1% relocate when hit with a higher tax burden - they have social ties, family ties etc keeping them where they are, just like everyone else. Getting pushed out of an area for financial reasons is something that happens to poor people, not rich people.

You say that, in my job I occasionally come across some of those 1%, certainly some of the 5%. They were all relocating either back home or Dubai for instance.

i’m stuck in the Uk until my children finish school in the next few years but although we are certainly not in the 1% my DH and I do sometimes get foreign opportunities and have always turned them down but have said we’d move once children have left home for a few years at least.

several of my work colleagues have moved to Dubai recently

so it is happening more than you think .

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.