Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Labour are lifting the 2 child benefit cap

1000 replies

PuppyKeep · 30/09/2025 18:43

AIBU that this is a terrible decision?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
FlyMeSomewhere · 01/10/2025 10:06

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 09:59

I know so many people do seem to be able to imagine a world where you don't push out the sprogs and hand them over to Nanny Starmer to feed, house and keep warm.

I don't think people realise that council housing was never built to allow people to sit and not work, it used all occupied by workers on a lower income and the people on these estates had pride for them and built a decent community.

BIossomtoes · 01/10/2025 10:07

PraisebetoGod · 01/10/2025 10:04

You're assuming the vast majority of people on UC are hardworking people who aren't playing the system though. Where's your evidence to prove that you are in fact correct?
I am absolutely sure there are people who aren't playing the system and I have no objection to these people receiving financial help. However it is grossly naive to think these people are in the main. My entire life experience tells me different.

37% of universal credit claimants are in work.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/universal-credit-statistics-29-april-2013-to-9-january-2025/universal-credit-statistics-29-april-2013-to-9-january-2025

Universal Credit statistics, 29 April 2013 to 9 January 2025

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/universal-credit-statistics-29-april-2013-to-9-january-2025/universal-credit-statistics-29-april-2013-to-9-january-2025

FlyMeSomewhere · 01/10/2025 10:08

LidlAmaretto · 01/10/2025 09:44

I don't think that's true. We have families where there is generational worklessness, people were routinely kicked out of home so they could go on the council list etc. That goes back to the 80's.

But a lot of people in council housing back then did work, not like it is now where if you went on a council estate most people wouldn't be working and their would be feral kids hanging around.

MrsSkylerWhite · 01/10/2025 10:09

Horsehow · 01/10/2025 09:52

About 10 years ago a guy was infront of me in the queue at the post office. He was picking up his benefits. He commented loudly that it was Thatchers fault he couldn’t get a job. Hadn’t had one since she shut the mines. The mines had shut 20 years previously and lots of other industries had popped up in their place. I was so surprised people were allowed to live off benefits for that long without having to retrain and get a job.

Indeed. I was responding specifically to a poster who was suggesting that there was little unemployment in the 80s, which is simply not true.

PraisebetoGod · 01/10/2025 10:11

So the minority then. The rest aren't in work so that's 63% percent.

How many of the 37% don't do overtime and don't apply for higher paid jobs because it would affect they universal credits? How many of these families has only one working parent and the other out of work?

Not the gotcha you think it is.

FlyMeSomewhere · 01/10/2025 10:12

Differentforgirls · 01/10/2025 10:06

What happened to the men and the boys in this scenario?

Edited

You tell me! Why have we got all these single mothers with huge families that never ever mention a dad! They'll get knocked up every couple of years yet there's never a dad! The taxpayer's pay for everything! The lads obviously grow up start knocking someone up in their teens and then hide in the shadows to let mum get full benefits!

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:13

FlyMeSomewhere · 01/10/2025 09:54

You really are pretending to be blind aren't you! I am not going to keep repeating about the benefit culture has changed! Not only because of the boom of large benefit families that never work a day in their lives and the fact that we now see multi generations following the same path but we now have an issue of people wanting to call kids disabled and get benefits for such as ADHD? I literally had someone online telling me that their school child has ADHD and she gets benefits for it! My brother is in an 8 year waiting list for assessment for ADHD and he's had it all his 51 years of life not he's not disabled! He has mates with it that aren't disabled but some of these parents are writing their kids off! They are teaching these kids to think they are disabled and can't work when they grow up! The benefit culture has got out of hand and any one with sense sees it! A lot of the benefit stupidity that's around now wasn't around years ago I assure you!

Those families existed in the 70s and 80s too - my extended family was one of them! I do know exactly the world you're talking about - I haven't lived it, but I've lived in parallel with it. But I also see another section of society where the wealth sloshing around is UNREAL. I have a foot in each and I can see that wealth is not distributed fairly in this country. It is sick that we are bickering about a bit of extra money for families to turn the heating on (or possibly - you never know - perhaps some of them will buy an extra vape...) when there is so much inadequately taxed wealth in this economy.

WE ARE LOOKING AT THE WRONG PEOPLE.

The threshold to get disability benefit is extremely high. I have a child with fairly mild neurodivergence and it is tough. I cannot imagine how difficult it is for families where one or more child has severe ADHD. There are different levels of these things, and it sounds like the people you know are lucky to not be too severely impacted. Again - I'm sure if we looked we could find multiple examples of people "using" things like ADHD as excuses. But the fact those examples exist does not negate the fact that most people in receipt of disability benefits desperately need them.

There is such moral outrage when someone scams a few hundred in benefits. I don't understand why there isn't the same degree of outrage when the wealthy sidestep hundreds of thousands in tax they should be paying. In both cases, you're taking money from the system that you're not entitled to. Why is one vilified and the other given a free pass?

PraisebetoGod · 01/10/2025 10:15

Oh I'm pissed off with the wealthy who are taking the piss just as much as the scroungers.

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 10:18

PraisebetoGod · 01/10/2025 10:15

Oh I'm pissed off with the wealthy who are taking the piss just as much as the scroungers.

Edited

You've really got to be pissed off the with the 1% paying for 30% of the country's needs.

FlyMeSomewhere · 01/10/2025 10:18

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:13

Those families existed in the 70s and 80s too - my extended family was one of them! I do know exactly the world you're talking about - I haven't lived it, but I've lived in parallel with it. But I also see another section of society where the wealth sloshing around is UNREAL. I have a foot in each and I can see that wealth is not distributed fairly in this country. It is sick that we are bickering about a bit of extra money for families to turn the heating on (or possibly - you never know - perhaps some of them will buy an extra vape...) when there is so much inadequately taxed wealth in this economy.

WE ARE LOOKING AT THE WRONG PEOPLE.

The threshold to get disability benefit is extremely high. I have a child with fairly mild neurodivergence and it is tough. I cannot imagine how difficult it is for families where one or more child has severe ADHD. There are different levels of these things, and it sounds like the people you know are lucky to not be too severely impacted. Again - I'm sure if we looked we could find multiple examples of people "using" things like ADHD as excuses. But the fact those examples exist does not negate the fact that most people in receipt of disability benefits desperately need them.

There is such moral outrage when someone scams a few hundred in benefits. I don't understand why there isn't the same degree of outrage when the wealthy sidestep hundreds of thousands in tax they should be paying. In both cases, you're taking money from the system that you're not entitled to. Why is one vilified and the other given a free pass?

You can't just deal with one and not the other, tax payers who are stuck in the middle deserve both elements to be dealt with - not only but I dread to think what society will be like in ten years from now because it's degenerating so badly because of people being raised with no discipline or morals, the public facing sectors in such as like retail and banking are struggling to cope with the levels of abuse they get now.

Nestingbirds · 01/10/2025 10:19

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 10:18

You've really got to be pissed off the with the 1% paying for 30% of the country's needs.

Quote and most of them don’t even use any of the services

PraisebetoGod · 01/10/2025 10:23

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 10:18

You've really got to be pissed off the with the 1% paying for 30% of the country's needs.

Erm, I am pissed off!

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:24

PraisebetoGod · 01/10/2025 10:15

Oh I'm pissed off with the wealthy who are taking the piss just as much as the scroungers.

Edited

You're pissd off with the people who pay majority of tax in the country in order to fund benefits etc?
The top 10% pay 60% of all tax receipts.

  • In 2024-25, the top one per cent of income tax payers earned 13.3 per cent of total income and paid 28.2 per cent of income tax. This is up from 22.7 per cent in 2005-06, a full 20 financial years ago.
  • This means the top one per cent of income tax earners paid 2.1 times their share of income taxes in 2024-25, up from 1.9 times two decades ago.
  • The top ten per cent of income tax payers earned 35.1 per cent of total income in 2024-25 and paid 60.2 per cent of income tax, up from 52.9 per cent in 2005-06.
  • 35.6 per cent of the adult population paid no income tax at all in 2023-24
EasternStandard · 01/10/2025 10:24

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 10:18

You've really got to be pissed off the with the 1% paying for 30% of the country's needs.

Get them out and all that. Whoops.

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:24

Nestingbirds · 01/10/2025 10:19

Quote and most of them don’t even use any of the services

I'm in the top half of the 1%, don't use many of the services my taxes fund, but I would happily pay more to help those who do.

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:26

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:24

You're pissd off with the people who pay majority of tax in the country in order to fund benefits etc?
The top 10% pay 60% of all tax receipts.

  • In 2024-25, the top one per cent of income tax payers earned 13.3 per cent of total income and paid 28.2 per cent of income tax. This is up from 22.7 per cent in 2005-06, a full 20 financial years ago.
  • This means the top one per cent of income tax earners paid 2.1 times their share of income taxes in 2024-25, up from 1.9 times two decades ago.
  • The top ten per cent of income tax payers earned 35.1 per cent of total income in 2024-25 and paid 60.2 per cent of income tax, up from 52.9 per cent in 2005-06.
  • 35.6 per cent of the adult population paid no income tax at all in 2023-24

You say that like it's a bad thing?! Yes, those earning the top 1% should pay a higher proportion.

EasternStandard · 01/10/2025 10:26

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:24

I'm in the top half of the 1%, don't use many of the services my taxes fund, but I would happily pay more to help those who do.

If only people would pay more voluntarily for each post along these lines.

cadburyegg · 01/10/2025 10:26

PraisebetoGod · 01/10/2025 10:11

So the minority then. The rest aren't in work so that's 63% percent.

How many of the 37% don't do overtime and don't apply for higher paid jobs because it would affect they universal credits? How many of these families has only one working parent and the other out of work?

Not the gotcha you think it is.

I’m in the 37%. I am significantly better off working full time than I was part time. The UC system is designed to make sure that people are always better off working and working more.

I wish people wouldn’t make ignorant comments about a system they know nothing about

MrsSkylerWhite · 01/10/2025 10:28

EasternStandard · 01/10/2025 10:26

If only people would pay more voluntarily for each post along these lines.

Is there a mechanism in place for doing so?

Bumblebee72 · 01/10/2025 10:28

PraisebetoGod · 01/10/2025 10:23

Erm, I am pissed off!

How selfish of them. Maybe you want them to stop working and live on benefits?

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:28

MrsSkylerWhite · 01/10/2025 10:28

Is there a mechanism in place for doing so?

Of course there is. HMRC voluntary contributions scheme.

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:28

EasternStandard · 01/10/2025 10:26

If only people would pay more voluntarily for each post along these lines.

Spurious argument - that's not how taxation works. In the US, there's a culture of voluntary philanthropy rather than enforced taxation, and look how that's going...

EasternStandard · 01/10/2025 10:29

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:28

Spurious argument - that's not how taxation works. In the US, there's a culture of voluntary philanthropy rather than enforced taxation, and look how that's going...

There’s quite a few of you on mn who post they want to pay more. Feel free.

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:29

ProcrastinatorsAnonymous · 01/10/2025 10:28

Spurious argument - that's not how taxation works. In the US, there's a culture of voluntary philanthropy rather than enforced taxation, and look how that's going...

It's not spurious. You claim you would happily pay more tax, well then do it otherwise it's just virtue signalling. You want to pay more tax, then do it.

MrsSkylerWhite · 01/10/2025 10:30

twistyizzy · 01/10/2025 10:28

Of course there is. HMRC voluntary contributions scheme.

Thanks. Honestly didn’t know that.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread