Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reform voters may not be racist but they are at least dangerously naive

1000 replies

ChocolateMagnum · 29/09/2025 08:00

AIBU to accept that some Reform voters may not actually be racist, but to be pretty certain that, if they're not, they are at the very least dangerously naive?

I thought we all got taught at school about how fascism took over in 1939s Germany? And there's so much out there at the moment showing why we are at a dangerous turning point in history again.

Why is it that the so-called non-racist Reform voters not see that they are aligning themselves with a covertly racist and fascist-leaning party and that their support risks tipping the balance towards a fascist dictatorship in the UK?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
PandoraSocks · 29/09/2025 15:48

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 29/09/2025 15:43

I think Starmer might be a psychopath. I'm not a psychologist and I have no medical credentials, however, he said before how he doesn't dream, doesn't have thoughts and there was an implication that he doesn't even have an inner monologue, like an internal voice. These are all hallmarks of a psychopath. Like when you read, there's always a voice in your head you read in (at least that is the case with me, I find it hard to get peace and quiet in my head most times). It's creepy. The man creeps me out.

When did he say he doesn't dream or have thoughts? Genuine question as I didn't know that he had stated this. How do you get to be a KC if you can't think?!

DIYagainstMould · 29/09/2025 15:50

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 08:33

I wonder whether any Reform voters ever ask themselves why leaving the EU didn't actually fix anything.

Not only this, it actually directly opened the door loophole for the boats....Farage is ruining this country with his hysteria and people still want to believe him

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 29/09/2025 15:50

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 15:45

😂

You could have stopped after the first 17 words of that post.

Indeed. But I didn't because I know people are capable of not reading past the first 17 words if they don't want to read further.

Marshmallow4545 · 29/09/2025 15:52

Unrulyscrumptious · 29/09/2025 15:35

I'm not writing them off because I'm not sitting here being naive that everyone out of work is sitting on their arse. Many are already engaged in caring for the children or family members, they do not have the time to work. Others have disabilities that prevent them from being able to do a lot of jobs. Others can afford not to work so good luck forcing them to do work they don't need to do. Are there a minority of able bodied people with no responsibilities sitting on their arse? Probably, but they aren't actually entitled to many benefits if that's the case. Who's going to pay for them to be trained and upskilled? I'm sure you're also aware that care wages are so low that many working in the care industries and the NHS have to claim benefits on top of their wages. I'm all for people being encouraged towards employment but into positions caring for vulnerable people? No

Lots of mothers work and raise children. The childcare argument is normally only relevant for the first 5 years of a child's life, even less if you're eligible for free hours

My mind is boggling at you typing this. You know working mothers pay for childcare right...? What exactly do you think a 5 year old does when school is finished at 3.30 and their parents are at work? They go into childcare, silly. Otherwise a parent needs a flexible school hours job, of which care work doesn't provide much of!

I am a working mother, of course I know mother's pay for wraparound care. This is rarely as prohibitively as expensive as FT childcare can be during the preschool/nursery years. I have friends that work in care roles and have kids at school. They pay for the very affordable after-school clubs and breakfast clubs and crack on.

I never said everyone that economically inactive is sat on their arse doing nothing. The reality is that many of them could be a hell of a lot more economically productive than they are now. Even some of those with disabilities or with caring responsibilities. It will require training, flexibility and investment but this will be cheaper in the long term than paying for their benefits, importing in Labour and then paying for these migrants benefits, pensions etc too.

Why do you think migrants are automatically more qualified or better suited to caring roles than British people? Don't you see how many completely unsuitable people will apply for these roles seeing it as an easy way to access Britain? You are naive if you don't realise this. Caring is a difficult job with crap pay. This is true for migrants as well as UK citizens. The idea that there are loads of passionate, conscientious carers living abroad just desperate to wipe the arses of old UK citizens is just ridiculous.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 15:53

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 29/09/2025 15:50

Indeed. But I didn't because I know people are capable of not reading past the first 17 words if they don't want to read further.

I did read further but the other words really weren't necessary.

DIYagainstMould · 29/09/2025 15:54

MissyB1 · 29/09/2025 08:33

I agree OP, the trouble is the lessons of the past seem to have been well and truly forgotten. I believe politics needs to be a compulsory part of the school curriculum, because many people have trouble applying any critical thinking skills when it comes to what politicians promise them.

Not only. It's a really hard subject and not many people get it despite the fact some politics is in the news everyday. Reading political news still doesn't equal understanding it

EasternStandard · 29/09/2025 15:54

DIYagainstMould · 29/09/2025 15:50

Not only this, it actually directly opened the door loophole for the boats....Farage is ruining this country with his hysteria and people still want to believe him

There’s no ‘loophole for boats’ in the same way every other EU country has the same problems.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 15:54

Marshmallow4545 · 29/09/2025 15:52

I am a working mother, of course I know mother's pay for wraparound care. This is rarely as prohibitively as expensive as FT childcare can be during the preschool/nursery years. I have friends that work in care roles and have kids at school. They pay for the very affordable after-school clubs and breakfast clubs and crack on.

I never said everyone that economically inactive is sat on their arse doing nothing. The reality is that many of them could be a hell of a lot more economically productive than they are now. Even some of those with disabilities or with caring responsibilities. It will require training, flexibility and investment but this will be cheaper in the long term than paying for their benefits, importing in Labour and then paying for these migrants benefits, pensions etc too.

Why do you think migrants are automatically more qualified or better suited to caring roles than British people? Don't you see how many completely unsuitable people will apply for these roles seeing it as an easy way to access Britain? You are naive if you don't realise this. Caring is a difficult job with crap pay. This is true for migrants as well as UK citizens. The idea that there are loads of passionate, conscientious carers living abroad just desperate to wipe the arses of old UK citizens is just ridiculous.

Well would you agree that a foreign nurse is more qualified for a nursing job than a British layabout with no qualifications?

EasternStandard · 29/09/2025 15:57

Gruffporcupine · 29/09/2025 15:08

It's not so hard to review policies on their own merit and detatch them from spats grounded in nothing but left/right purity politics. Not on anyone's team.

Labour have literally announced an almost identical set of policies about ILTR. Are they proto-fascist too now? It's just hysterical

Yep. Labour gets oh they’re ‘doing something on immigration’. Whatever it’s bollocks. People are tuning out. Outside mn that’s obvious.

Coconutter24 · 29/09/2025 15:57

Goldenbear · 29/09/2025 14:40

Aren't we discussing Reform and UK politics?

Did fascism and Germany not get mentioned in the post?

hamstersarse · 29/09/2025 15:59

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 29/09/2025 15:43

I think Starmer might be a psychopath. I'm not a psychologist and I have no medical credentials, however, he said before how he doesn't dream, doesn't have thoughts and there was an implication that he doesn't even have an inner monologue, like an internal voice. These are all hallmarks of a psychopath. Like when you read, there's always a voice in your head you read in (at least that is the case with me, I find it hard to get peace and quiet in my head most times). It's creepy. The man creeps me out.

Add to that, total lack of emotion, lack of remorse and a callousness.......

I've never heard him say anything that I think he actually means.

hamstersarse · 29/09/2025 15:59

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 29/09/2025 15:43

I think Starmer might be a psychopath. I'm not a psychologist and I have no medical credentials, however, he said before how he doesn't dream, doesn't have thoughts and there was an implication that he doesn't even have an inner monologue, like an internal voice. These are all hallmarks of a psychopath. Like when you read, there's always a voice in your head you read in (at least that is the case with me, I find it hard to get peace and quiet in my head most times). It's creepy. The man creeps me out.

Add to that, total lack of emotion, lack of remorse and a callousness.......

I've never heard him say anything that I think he actually means.

DIYagainstMould · 29/09/2025 16:00

StandFirm · 29/09/2025 08:40

I worry that the measures regarding eligibility for Indefinite Leave to Remain- both those proposed by Reform and those now parroted by Labour- will leave women disproportionately vulnerable. Those trailing spouses who come here and raise kids contribute a lot to society but not always in a quantifiable way. With the constant rise of childcare fees, it will really fuck with stay at home mums from other countries, with potentially horrifying consequences. What if they're trapped in a marriage they want to leave but can't because they might lose their residence status and not be able to take their children with them? (which can already be an issue btw) Has anyone even given that half a second's thought? Labour is being weak and disgusting by constantly trying to out Reform Reform. I want a truly socially minded government with a pragmatic approach to business which will boost our economy. Seems too much to ask...

There are millions of mums like that here, we are raising British children. Seems we are very hated also because foreign, stay at home, nice man, house .....these aren't benefits, it's just life

hamstersarse · 29/09/2025 16:01

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 15:54

Well would you agree that a foreign nurse is more qualified for a nursing job than a British layabout with no qualifications?

British layabout?

I bet in the next breath you argue for better education, lower student fees, and better benefits for 'the poor people'

Please try and make the circle one day will you?

Goldenbear · 29/09/2025 16:02

hamstersarse · 29/09/2025 15:31

Like I said, so dramatic

Why do you feel the need to dramatise everything?

If you think Nigel Farage is the same as Hitler, I can't help you

Do you actually write that with a straight face when posting this about Starmer, "It was extreme naivity to think that just because he looks like a geek, he was one. He is monstrous, much worse than Farage will ever be."👀

L

hamstersarse · 29/09/2025 16:04

Goldenbear · 29/09/2025 16:02

Do you actually write that with a straight face when posting this about Starmer, "It was extreme naivity to think that just because he looks like a geek, he was one. He is monstrous, much worse than Farage will ever be."👀

L

As has been pointed out, Starmer has just out of the blue adopted almost the exact same policies as Farage on immigration.

We should fear weak men.

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 29/09/2025 16:11

PandoraSocks · 29/09/2025 14:39

If you think about democracy, when another culture becomes the majority then it is possible that they vote in leaders that impose rules that represent their culture and not the native culture

Yes, but there is no prospect of that happening in the UK. I know there are some people who believe in the anti-semetic Great Replacement conspiracy theory, but conspiracy theories are just that.

Now you are being naive.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 16:11

hamstersarse · 29/09/2025 16:01

British layabout?

I bet in the next breath you argue for better education, lower student fees, and better benefits for 'the poor people'

Please try and make the circle one day will you?

The point I am trying to make is that a lot of the jobs we need to fill require a specific skillset, and putting someone who does not have that specific skillset into a job like that is a recipe for disaster.

You have to go to university and study to become a nurse. There are entrance criteria you have to meet, followed by three years of study. The existence of British people who do not have the relevant skillset does not help us fill these roles, and neither does restricting immigration to people earning over £60k.

Care work requires fewer qualifications than nursing, but you still need people with suitable experience and the right kind of interpersonal skills to do the job. I'd much rather my elderly parents were cared for by a lovely, kind, trustworthy immigrant carer than someone plucked out of the dole queue, wouldn't you?

Why don't you try and "make that circle"?

Perhaps we could have a system where Reform voters agree to be cared for, and for their children to be taught by, unqualified Brits. And people who didn't vote Reform can have whoever is the best person for the job.

1dayatatime · 29/09/2025 16:13

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 15:43

Ah, I see what has happened. At some point during the conversation the goalposts were moved from "unemployed" to "economically inactive".

The relevant figure here is "unemployed", and the number is 1.67 million, or around 4%.

It is a low figure compared to most other countries.

Although I'm sure many of those people are actively looking for work and suitably qualified to do something, that doesn't mean they are suitably qualified to fill the posts that are actually available.

The problem with setting an income threshold for immigrants is that most of the vacancies we actually need to fill do not pay £60k but do require people with specific skills.

If you want to pluck some useless twit off his mum's sofa, take away his PlayStation and force him to become a teacher or to take care of vulnerable adults, that's a bit concerning.

Edited

Your original quote was that "a lot of these are stay at home mothers ".

Now we can debate whether when referring to "these people " you meant the unemployed and in which case your point doesn't make sense as the unemployed figures do NOT include SAHM.

Or you can claim that by "these people " you meant the "economically inactive " in which case I disproved your point with data from the ONS.

Honestly you are not going to win this debate based on facts, figures or reality so it would be a lot easier for you to follow the left wing fall back option of branding me a racist or a fascist or alternatively bring up a completely unrelated "well what about ".

hamstersarse · 29/09/2025 16:13

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 16:11

The point I am trying to make is that a lot of the jobs we need to fill require a specific skillset, and putting someone who does not have that specific skillset into a job like that is a recipe for disaster.

You have to go to university and study to become a nurse. There are entrance criteria you have to meet, followed by three years of study. The existence of British people who do not have the relevant skillset does not help us fill these roles, and neither does restricting immigration to people earning over £60k.

Care work requires fewer qualifications than nursing, but you still need people with suitable experience and the right kind of interpersonal skills to do the job. I'd much rather my elderly parents were cared for by a lovely, kind, trustworthy immigrant carer than someone plucked out of the dole queue, wouldn't you?

Why don't you try and "make that circle"?

Perhaps we could have a system where Reform voters agree to be cared for, and for their children to be taught by, unqualified Brits. And people who didn't vote Reform can have whoever is the best person for the job.

It is quite naive to say that it is a skills thing. It is mostly for lower costs that we use immigrant labour.

Which keeps our wages down.....

moderate · 29/09/2025 16:14

ChocolateMagnum · 29/09/2025 08:00

AIBU to accept that some Reform voters may not actually be racist, but to be pretty certain that, if they're not, they are at the very least dangerously naive?

I thought we all got taught at school about how fascism took over in 1939s Germany? And there's so much out there at the moment showing why we are at a dangerous turning point in history again.

Why is it that the so-called non-racist Reform voters not see that they are aligning themselves with a covertly racist and fascist-leaning party and that their support risks tipping the balance towards a fascist dictatorship in the UK?

You are being unreasonable to imagine that Reform voters all fall into at least one of two categories: "racist" or "dangerously naive".

Quite apart from anything else, the arrogance of this is electoral suicide.

PandoraSocks · 29/09/2025 16:15

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 29/09/2025 16:11

Now you are being naive.

In what way, could you explain please?

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 16:15

hamstersarse · 29/09/2025 16:13

It is quite naive to say that it is a skills thing. It is mostly for lower costs that we use immigrant labour.

Which keeps our wages down.....

Fine, pluck someone out of the dole queue and pay them £20/hour to care for your elderly parents then.

As long as it's your parents and not mine, I don't really care.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.