Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Trump on autism

694 replies

BeHappySloth · 22/09/2025 21:59

Sorry if there is another thread - I did look.

I mean, wtf??!!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
29
Happyher · 23/09/2025 20:49

Ablondiebutagoody · 22/09/2025 22:17

Because the Democrats put up a senile old man and then tried to gaslight the American people that everything was fine.

But the Republicans also put up a senile old man!

Happyher · 23/09/2025 20:51

Honish · 23/09/2025 19:19

Perhaps its not about you, perhaps it's about trying to help children and future generations. Should this research not be done just in case some women feel 'shamed'?
You seriously think they've done all that research for the sole purpose of shaming women??

Exactly what research have they done to come to this conclusion??

Dymaxion · 23/09/2025 20:52

I am not going to take any type of health advice from someone who cannot remember what the R in MMR stands for !

And what was all the 'toughing it out' shite about ?

MySweetMaggie · 23/09/2025 20:53

lessee167 · 23/09/2025 17:24

Would you be happy for your child to die from measles in the name of medical research!

I don't think anyone, ever, would be happy their child died unless they are a psychopath! So no. Not sure how the studies will be conducted, as it's out of my hands. Let's wait until we get more information before getting wild and saying people will be killing children.

MySweetMaggie · 23/09/2025 20:54

ThatDreamyLemonBiscuit · 23/09/2025 17:50

Call me crazy, but I'd rather have any scientific studies conducted by scientists, rather than some ideologically/financially motivated fuckwit who fired scientists because they wont repeat his lies.

If you like killing women and kids, you've backed the right horse.

Edited

The scientists at the Dept of Human Health and Science will be conducting the studies I guess. Not sure that RFK Jr will be doing them himself.

AndThenIsawhisface · 23/09/2025 20:56

SleeplessInWherever · 23/09/2025 18:50

@Livelovebehappy

The thing is, I don’t want a cure. We love our son, needs and all, and if he wasn’t autistic he wouldn’t be himself. Autism isn’t all he is, but his many quirks and habits at least partly come from it and I wouldn’t change any of them.

Living with a child with autism is obviously not without its challenges. But I wouldn’t describe our family as living in “misery.”

I think that's fair as I responded to another poster. You don't want a cure so even if one came out, you shouldn't be made to get your child to take it. Spare a moment to think about the autistic children who have recently drowned in the US. Some children are more impacted than others. Some parents would like a cure. I think it's fair a cure is found and people can take it if they wish

ohime · 23/09/2025 20:56

BeHappySloth · 22/09/2025 22:33

Eh?

So it didn't matter if they put up a dangerous nutter as long as they knew he could win?

That was precisely their strategy, actually. (See, for a historical parallel, a guy called Adolf.)

AndThenIsawhisface · 23/09/2025 21:00

babybythesea · 23/09/2025 19:36

When you say autism, what exactly do you mean?
Do you mean kids like dd, who is sparky and loving and a great athlete but struggles with organisation and a sudden change in routine? She doesn’t need PIP or benefits- she just needs a bit of recognition that if something is going to change she needs time to process that, and a bit of support with sorting herself out (in terms of having the right kit etc.) Hence getting a diagnosis, so she can thrive and be herself because people understand her a bit better.
As I said earlier, mum is almost certainly autistic but has had a great career and has many friends and an active social life.
Are these the people you want to cure? Why???
Or are you assuming everyone is on the more extreme end of the spectrum?

One reason for the rise in diagnosis is that traits that were labelled ‘quirky’ in my mum are autism in dd. It doesn’t mean there’s a problem.

Repeating this message because the children on the severe end of the spectrum aren't having their voices heard enough. Your child doesn't need adaptations a d she doesn't need a cure. What if your child had non verbal autism with self harm? Unable to engage with the world , restricted diet and pica? Smearing and unable to live independently? Would you want a cure then? This is why it's unreasonable for the same condition to have this much variation. People like you will, probably understandably, see it as a slight that your child might be considered to have an illness. But for some, it is an illness and those children and parents deserve anything that would bring them even the tiniest amount of relief

Sparrow7 · 23/09/2025 21:01

When was paracetamol available in the UK? My mum was autistic and she was born in 1943.

oneoneone · 23/09/2025 21:04

Jumpingthruhoops · 23/09/2025 20:38

Well, yes, but they haven't arrived at a conclusion have they? So clearly more needs to be done...

Right, but why would you think no more is being done? A quick google will show there's loads of ongoing research all over the world.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9498424/#:~:text=Autism%20Database%20(AutDB),candidates%20biologically%20relevant%20to%20ASD).

And this is a quick read on the fact that Trump and RFK have defunded autism research (along with cancer research).
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/trump-administration-cut-autism-related-research-by-26-so-far-2025-2025-05-16/

oneoneone · 23/09/2025 21:05

Sparrow7 · 23/09/2025 21:01

When was paracetamol available in the UK? My mum was autistic and she was born in 1943.

1956

SleeplessInWherever · 23/09/2025 21:05

AndThenIsawhisface · 23/09/2025 20:56

I think that's fair as I responded to another poster. You don't want a cure so even if one came out, you shouldn't be made to get your child to take it. Spare a moment to think about the autistic children who have recently drowned in the US. Some children are more impacted than others. Some parents would like a cure. I think it's fair a cure is found and people can take it if they wish

Edited

Our son is 9, and cognitively 2.5 years old. He still isn’t toilet trained, has very limited vocabulary and even less understanding.

He sleeps for around 3-4hrs a night, and has huge emotional difficulties that can regularly lead to meltdowns that involve biting, kicking and hitting out at us.

He’s also hilarious, and very caring, and has the biggest smile that he reserves for his most special people. He tries really hard to play with other kids, even if he can’t speak to them, and finds absolute joy in everyday things like spoons.

He is complex, his needs are high, but he is who he is and we love him for it all. Warts and all.

He has exactly the kind of needs people on this thread would say cost a fortune in funding, and would require a cure because of the level of demand on caregivers and probably society.

I still cannot understand anyone who would change their children, or condone someone trying to make sure people like him don’t exist in whatever form they exist in.

AndThenIsawhisface · 23/09/2025 21:07

oneoneone · 23/09/2025 21:05

1956

I read reports on Trumps speech though I didn't watch it. Did he say paracetamol/Tylenol is the only cause of autism? Lots of responses on the thread seem to imply that. I had thought he said might be a cause rather then the only cause.

MrsSkylerWhite · 23/09/2025 21:08

AndThenIsawhisface · 23/09/2025 21:07

I read reports on Trumps speech though I didn't watch it. Did he say paracetamol/Tylenol is the only cause of autism? Lots of responses on the thread seem to imply that. I had thought he said might be a cause rather then the only cause.

Sure you did.

AndThenIsawhisface · 23/09/2025 21:09

SleeplessInWherever · 23/09/2025 21:05

Our son is 9, and cognitively 2.5 years old. He still isn’t toilet trained, has very limited vocabulary and even less understanding.

He sleeps for around 3-4hrs a night, and has huge emotional difficulties that can regularly lead to meltdowns that involve biting, kicking and hitting out at us.

He’s also hilarious, and very caring, and has the biggest smile that he reserves for his most special people. He tries really hard to play with other kids, even if he can’t speak to them, and finds absolute joy in everyday things like spoons.

He is complex, his needs are high, but he is who he is and we love him for it all. Warts and all.

He has exactly the kind of needs people on this thread would say cost a fortune in funding, and would require a cure because of the level of demand on caregivers and probably society.

I still cannot understand anyone who would change their children, or condone someone trying to make sure people like him don’t exist in whatever form they exist in.

I would 💯 % change my child if he has any illness that would reduce his likelihood of living a safe and fulfilling life. I would reduce his drowning risk, reduce the risk of illnesses from pica just to mention a few. I would change and remove any condition to make my child safe and well. I would also want to ensure any future children have the ability to live as full a life as they want and deserve. I don't know if anyone is saying any children/people shouldn't exist/be eliminated, or at least I hope no one is talking about mass elimination of any sub group

NettleandBramble · 23/09/2025 21:12

AndThenIsawhisface · 23/09/2025 20:46

Autism is a problem for me and for my child. This is why there are lots of opinions about reclassifying autism into separate conditions depending on severity. It's really great it's not a problem from your perspective, it is to many many others though

I would really love for my son to not have the OCD and the distressing rumination. In time he might become more comfortable with the situational mutism.
If he didn't have this, he would still be him, but he would be having a much happier time of being a teenager.

yoursecretcrush · 23/09/2025 21:12

Pot kettle.

SleeplessInWherever · 23/09/2025 21:13

AndThenIsawhisface · 23/09/2025 21:09

I would 💯 % change my child if he has any illness that would reduce his likelihood of living a safe and fulfilling life. I would reduce his drowning risk, reduce the risk of illnesses from pica just to mention a few. I would change and remove any condition to make my child safe and well. I would also want to ensure any future children have the ability to live as full a life as they want and deserve. I don't know if anyone is saying any children/people shouldn't exist/be eliminated, or at least I hope no one is talking about mass elimination of any sub group

Edited

I’m assuming any children you do have don’t have complex needs?

I’d imagine looking at them and wishing they were an entirely different child is quite rare, that’s all.

AndThenIsawhisface · 23/09/2025 21:16

SleeplessInWherever · 23/09/2025 21:13

I’m assuming any children you do have don’t have complex needs?

I’d imagine looking at them and wishing they were an entirely different child is quite rare, that’s all.

They do have complex needs and that's why I'd change them...in that I would remove those needs so they can be safe and happy. I think some parents would and some wouldn't but also some parents wouldn't say it as it would be thought of as taboo. I don't see if that way. I would remove any and all hindrances to my child's happiness, whatever it may be called :)

Notonthestairs · 23/09/2025 21:19

“The complainants in the case engaged five experts, including Baccarelli, to testify in their case. But in December 2023 their testimonies were dismissed by a federal judge, Denise Cote, who found their views to be “unreliable”.

Of Baccarelli’s testimony, Cote said: “The discussion in his reports is incomplete, unbalanced and at times misleading. In general, Dr Baccarelli downplays those studies that undercut his causation thesis and emphasises those that align with his thesis.”

Scientist behind Trump’s Tylenol claims was paid $150K to give evidence against drug maker

https://www.thetimes.com/article/aa7fff5a-d267-440f-a544-a3cd75c33416?shareToken=53171527772e2c378f669a732a7149be

Scientist behind Trump’s Tylenol claims was paid $150K to give evidence against drug maker

The Harvard academic Andrea Baccarelli gave an ‘unreliable’ testimony on the links between autism and paracetamol, and produced research that raises ‘serious concerns about bias’

https://www.thetimes.com/article/aa7fff5a-d267-440f-a544-a3cd75c33416?shareToken=53171527772e2c378f669a732a7149be

babybythesea · 23/09/2025 21:35

AndThenIsawhisface · 23/09/2025 21:00

Repeating this message because the children on the severe end of the spectrum aren't having their voices heard enough. Your child doesn't need adaptations a d she doesn't need a cure. What if your child had non verbal autism with self harm? Unable to engage with the world , restricted diet and pica? Smearing and unable to live independently? Would you want a cure then? This is why it's unreasonable for the same condition to have this much variation. People like you will, probably understandably, see it as a slight that your child might be considered to have an illness. But for some, it is an illness and those children and parents deserve anything that would bring them even the tiniest amount of relief

I actually agree. What I’m trying to say though is that part of the rise in autism isn’t because we’ve suddenly got vastly increased numbers of children developing severe symptoms but because children like dd who can actually function perfectly well with a few minor adjustments are being diagnosed.
So saying we need a cure because autism is rampant is too broad. Autism might be ‘rampant’ but not everyone who receives an autism diagnosis is actually in need of a cure. It’s way more complex and subtle than that.

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 23/09/2025 21:38

babybythesea · 23/09/2025 21:35

I actually agree. What I’m trying to say though is that part of the rise in autism isn’t because we’ve suddenly got vastly increased numbers of children developing severe symptoms but because children like dd who can actually function perfectly well with a few minor adjustments are being diagnosed.
So saying we need a cure because autism is rampant is too broad. Autism might be ‘rampant’ but not everyone who receives an autism diagnosis is actually in need of a cure. It’s way more complex and subtle than that.

I thought my dd could function well until she hit adolescence. 5 years later she’s still not functioning well.

Appeared to function so well during primary no one suspected anything. Then burnout hit at 14……

Ihatetomatoes · 23/09/2025 21:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Do you actually think non scientist Trump and anti vax Kennedy Jr are 'finally looking into it'. Don't fall for their bullshit with the 'nasty things' they 'put into the beautiful children ' bollocks that they spout. Real scientists and medical experts have been researching for many years; no proof to link to vaccines or other medication. There is a known link to genetics though.

Trump has probably heard of some snake oil that someone wants to push as an alternative medicine. He's an idiot but many people sadly fall for his ramblings.

babybythesea · 23/09/2025 22:02

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 23/09/2025 21:38

I thought my dd could function well until she hit adolescence. 5 years later she’s still not functioning well.

Appeared to function so well during primary no one suspected anything. Then burnout hit at 14……

I’m not trying to negate anyone’s experience- it sounds incredibly tough.
But there are people who did/do manage. And not just manage but live full and happy and meaningful lives. With a few quirks. Like my mum.
Again, I was replying originally to someone who said there had to be a reason that autism is now rampant and a cure is needed. I simply started by pointing out that one reason autism rates have shot up os because it encompasses people who enever would have been diagnosed a decade or more ago, like dd, and not everyone would need or want a cure. It isn’t rampant because suddenly thousands more children are nonverbal or engage in smearing. It’s not to say that doesn’t happen because it does, but it’s a vastly more complex picture than simply shouting ‘cure autism’ allows
for.

sunshine244 · 23/09/2025 22:03

I've got two ND children and don't recall taking paracetamol during pregnancy.

Correlation also doesn't equal causation as has been mentioned. Autism is highly genetic. So autistic children often have autistic mums. Connective tissue disorders are more common in autistic people. Pain thresholds can also be affected. So perhaps paracetamol use might be higher in parents of autistic kids. That doesn't mean it is causing autism.

Swipe left for the next trending thread