Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Farage promises to deport people with ILR

1000 replies

Acidburn · 22/09/2025 12:21

Posting in AIBU for traffic.
Nigel Farage stated he would deport anyone with existing indefinite leave to remain. We are talking about millions of people.
This terrifying. If people live here, work here, have kids and mortgages - where are they supposed to go?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
YouHaveAnArse · 22/09/2025 13:38

If Reform start framing pensioners as benefit claimants/not economically active, as opposed to a special class of citizens who are dependent on state money without any of the moral judgement that seems to come with other benefits, that will get interesting fast.

ruethewhirl · 22/09/2025 13:38

IWasScaredToBeHeld · 22/09/2025 13:34

Not sure why so many people are saying to not worry about it.

Farage is Trump in less orange clothing. He does not care about the legal process.

Couldn't agree more. And I think there is a real danger he will get in if the electorate doesn't wake up.

SatsumaDog · 22/09/2025 13:39

I think he’s shooting himself in the foot making outlandish claims like this. Most people will think it’s over the top snd not possible to implement. Those who may have been swayed towards voting for him now won’t because he’s exposing himself as the lunatic he is.

See this as a good thing. He’s showing his true colours and eroding his support.

HJBeans · 22/09/2025 13:39

ladybirdsanchez · 22/09/2025 12:31

I wouldn't worry too much - it's just Farage rabble-rousing and he'd be tied up in legal red-tape for ages if he tried to do this.

If have agreed with this a few years ago. But having seen the speed with which Trump has dismantled legal checks and balances in the US, I don’t think we can afford to be complacent.

Bipitybopitybo · 22/09/2025 13:39

Dontasksillyquestions · 22/09/2025 13:31

I believe they said that ILR would be abolished and people would have to apply for visas instead under more stringent rules. Fair enough if it’s for new applicants. Immigration law can change at any time, it is what it is.

But if they’re thinking of revoking existing ILR and having people reapply for visas instead, I’m out of here. I’m a net contributor, never taken benefits, and have built a good life in the UK, but I won’t be jumping through hoops to stay. The world is big, I can take my money and pay my taxes elsewhere.

This is what I have read. OP needs to quote the source for this. Too much misinformation gets spread

MaidOfSteel · 22/09/2025 13:39

Eviebeans · 22/09/2025 12:40

I was listening and that is not what I heard him say. He said that if you have been granted indefinite leave to remain by a previous government they will not try to change that.
My understanding however is that going forward there will be no granting of indefinite leave to remain. Also that rules to come here to work will be stricter and will not for example allow accompanying families

This was the impression I got. The proposed new rules would only apply to arrivals after said law came into effect. Making it less attractive to come here being the aim, and to ease the massive pressure on our public services.

I love that we are a safe and ordinarily a welcoming country but we are flat broke and there seems no way out of it. We need to prioritise those who are here already. We can re-consider when/if our economy improves.

pikkumyy77 · 22/09/2025 13:40

IsawwhatIsaw · 22/09/2025 12:27

I doubt this could/ would ever happen.
It’s another dishonest headline grabber

Look at what is happening in the US if you think it “can’t happen” in the UK. Trump promised to deport millions of “criminals and illegals” and when he couldn’t find them he and his storm troopers have resorted to grabbing green card holders and elderly grandmothers and Korean visitors with visas off the streets and out if their homes to make up the numbers. He has imprisoned people without trial and is shipping them to African countries or South American prisons. This is explicitly Farage’s model. Don’t be complacent.

Dontasksillyquestions · 22/09/2025 13:40

usernamealreadytaken · 22/09/2025 13:29

So they’ll probably be able to manage to fill in a form every five years then. If they can’t, I’m not sure I’d want them treating me, tbh.

But why deal with the uncertainty and expense when they can use their skills and pay taxes almost anywhere in the world?

usernamealreadytaken · 22/09/2025 13:40

squidsin · 22/09/2025 13:15

Farage doesn't have presidential powers, and never will, even if the ghastly possibility of him becoming PM actually does happen. So he's over-promising on a huge scale and it can and will come back to bite him.

'Benefits tourism' is such a minor problem in the scheme of things - our benefits system isn't that generous, despite all the hype about flatscreen TVs etc, and you can't just move here and get full benefits now - that it's pretty pathetic that this is being put front and centre of Reform strategy.

One in six UC claimants is foreign born. 15% of our UC bill potentially saved in one fell swoop. Do you think these claimants came here entirely altruistically, just for the nice weather?

EasternStandard · 22/09/2025 13:40

SatsumaDog · 22/09/2025 13:39

I think he’s shooting himself in the foot making outlandish claims like this. Most people will think it’s over the top snd not possible to implement. Those who may have been swayed towards voting for him now won’t because he’s exposing himself as the lunatic he is.

See this as a good thing. He’s showing his true colours and eroding his support.

I’m not sure about this but I guess we’ll see with polling.

MaggieBsBoat · 22/09/2025 13:41

LivingDeadGirlUK · 22/09/2025 13:37

Don't they also want to abolish the house of lords and remove us from the ECHR though?

Probably. But I do not think for a moment that they will succeed.

GoodTimesNoodleSalad · 22/09/2025 13:41

BeHappySloth · 22/09/2025 13:38

Do you think it would be sound to rescind the ILR status of someone who may have contributed a lot over many years and then fallen on hard times, e.g. because of serious illness or disability? People who have built their lives here suddenly finding that their rights may be removed?

We already have measures in place to stop new immigrants from having recourse to public funds. Why shouldn't there be a level of protection for those who have worked and paid into the system?

I disagree. Benefits for immigrants should be tied to their employment and provided by their employers, rather than being a general entitlement from the government.

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 13:41

Another source

https://www.ft.com/content/4e1641eb-89f6-4c26-b190-cc9151e520dc

BeHappySloth · 22/09/2025 13:41

EasternStandard · 22/09/2025 13:35

That is true but did he talk about earnings? I missed the speech. From what I can pick up online there is a distinguishing commentary on lower and higher earners.

Doctors can also fall ill or become disabled.

I wonder how many of them will choose to remain here without any safety net, and how many will choose to take their skills and tax contributions elsewhere.

Angryhag · 22/09/2025 13:42

OP refers to people who live and work here with kids and mortgages. Farage has no problem with that kind of person. He does specifically say that he wants people working (or at least not claiming benefits) and speaking a reasonable level of English. I think that is a reasonable expectation of an immigrant.

I bet nobody on this thread would plan to emigrate to another country to claim benefits from their government and not bother learning any of the local language.

GoodTimesNoodleSalad · 22/09/2025 13:43

Dontasksillyquestions · 22/09/2025 13:40

But why deal with the uncertainty and expense when they can use their skills and pay taxes almost anywhere in the world?

If they want to stay, they will. That’s up to them.

usernamealreadytaken · 22/09/2025 13:44

saraclara · 22/09/2025 13:19

As if we didn't lose enough of the vital workforce after Brexit...

So were all the EU citizens who stayed after Brexit NOT part of the vital workforce? Far more applications were submitted for settled status after Brexit, than EU citizens we were told were here before Brexit… or are you confirming we really just didn't know how many were here in the first place?

Parry5timesbeforedeath · 22/09/2025 13:44

GoodTimesNoodleSalad · 22/09/2025 13:41

I disagree. Benefits for immigrants should be tied to their employment and provided by their employers, rather than being a general entitlement from the government.

Should that be the case for all then? No NHS unless it's provided for via your employment? What about a state pension? Would YOU be happy paying NI for decades if it meant you never saw a penny when you are state pension age? That's what the situation would be. How is that fair?

HJBeans · 22/09/2025 13:44

MaidOfSteel · 22/09/2025 13:39

This was the impression I got. The proposed new rules would only apply to arrivals after said law came into effect. Making it less attractive to come here being the aim, and to ease the massive pressure on our public services.

I love that we are a safe and ordinarily a welcoming country but we are flat broke and there seems no way out of it. We need to prioritise those who are here already. We can re-consider when/if our economy improves.

That’s not how it was presented in the article I read. They were saying he is proposing retrospective cancellation of ILR.

On your second paragraph, I am interested in your view of areas of society where we are currently dependent on foreign workers - ie social care, nursing, etc. And also if you have thought deeply about or researched what the actual cost of providing public services to certain types of immigrants is compared to the services they bring to the country?

I’m not being argumentative - just genuinely interested in your views as mine are different.

MalinandGo · 22/09/2025 13:44

usernamealreadytaken · 22/09/2025 13:40

One in six UC claimants is foreign born. 15% of our UC bill potentially saved in one fell swoop. Do you think these claimants came here entirely altruistically, just for the nice weather?

UC is paid to working people, including an awful lot of people working in essential roles.

BeHappySloth · 22/09/2025 13:44

GoodTimesNoodleSalad · 22/09/2025 13:41

I disagree. Benefits for immigrants should be tied to their employment and provided by their employers, rather than being a general entitlement from the government.

Why shouldn't people who may have contributed far more in tax in many cases than many British citizens have access to the welfare benefits that they have been helping to pay for?

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 13:44

Angryhag · 22/09/2025 13:42

OP refers to people who live and work here with kids and mortgages. Farage has no problem with that kind of person. He does specifically say that he wants people working (or at least not claiming benefits) and speaking a reasonable level of English. I think that is a reasonable expectation of an immigrant.

I bet nobody on this thread would plan to emigrate to another country to claim benefits from their government and not bother learning any of the local language.

What about expats in the UAE? Do they integrate and learn the local language do you think?

BeHappySloth · 22/09/2025 13:46

Parry5timesbeforedeath · 22/09/2025 13:44

Should that be the case for all then? No NHS unless it's provided for via your employment? What about a state pension? Would YOU be happy paying NI for decades if it meant you never saw a penny when you are state pension age? That's what the situation would be. How is that fair?

To be fair, Farage would probably love that.

However, a lot of people who vote for Reform would not.

childofthe607080s · 22/09/2025 13:46

Depends on what is set as the salary threshold doesn’t it?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.